<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Decline and Fall of the Roman (and American?) Empire: A Free Audiobook</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.openculture.com/2007/07/the_rise_and_fall_of_the_roman_and_american_empire_a_free_audiobook.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.openculture.com/2007/07/the_rise_and_fall_of_the_roman_and_american_empire_a_free_audiobook.html</link>
	<description>The best free cultural &#38; educational media on the web</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 20 Mar 2010 19:55:53 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: ratanlaxmi</title>
		<link>http://www.openculture.com/2007/07/the_rise_and_fall_of_the_roman_and_american_empire_a_free_audiobook.html/comment-page-1#comment-2490</link>
		<dc:creator>ratanlaxmi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Oct 2008 05:51:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oculture.com/2007/07/the_rise_and_fall_of_the_roman_and_american_empire_a_free_audiobook.html#comment-2490</guid>
		<description>i would love to have the preface ofall the seven books of edward gibbon,s.
it would be heaven,s edweils shower on me.
                 ratanlaxmi
                  9.10.2008</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i would love to have the preface ofall the seven books of edward gibbon,s.<br />
it would be heaven,s edweils shower on me.<br />
                 ratanlaxmi<br />
                  9.10.2008</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ratanlaxmi</title>
		<link>http://www.openculture.com/2007/07/the_rise_and_fall_of_the_roman_and_american_empire_a_free_audiobook.html/comment-page-1#comment-2489</link>
		<dc:creator>ratanlaxmi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Oct 2008 05:46:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oculture.com/2007/07/the_rise_and_fall_of_the_roman_and_american_empire_a_free_audiobook.html#comment-2489</guid>
		<description>ed gibbon was very gifted, i would love to have all his introduction in the seven books that got printed. it will be heaven,s edelweis shower on me.
                              ratanlaxmi
                                9.10.2008</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ed gibbon was very gifted, i would love to have all his introduction in the seven books that got printed. it will be heaven,s edelweis shower on me.<br />
                              ratanlaxmi<br />
                                9.10.2008</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Len</title>
		<link>http://www.openculture.com/2007/07/the_rise_and_fall_of_the_roman_and_american_empire_a_free_audiobook.html/comment-page-1#comment-2488</link>
		<dc:creator>Len</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 May 2008 17:12:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oculture.com/2007/07/the_rise_and_fall_of_the_roman_and_american_empire_a_free_audiobook.html#comment-2488</guid>
		<description>Gibbon did not ignore the length of the Roman Empire. Moreover, his book  deals with the empire&#039;s decline --not its rise!

His work is a major literary achievement of the 18th century --still cited by scholars. Gibbon, consulted more original and ancient sources than any other &#039;Rome&#039; scholar then or now. He &#039;pioneered&#039; the use of &#039;footnotes&#039;. Therefore, we know what Gibbon read and the conclusions derived thereof. To assert that Gibbon ignored the length of the Roman Empire is like saying Einstein ignored the speed of light!

Gibbon&#039;s history was published in six extensive volumes in 1776. It went through six printings. The original volumes were published as quartos, a common publishing practice of the time.

Even the period covered by Gibbon is not &#039;short&#039; --the period after Marcus Aurelius (from just before 180) to 1453. Gibbon most certainly knew a thing or two, as well, about the Eastern Empire. He is consulted by everyone writing about it today.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Gibbon did not ignore the length of the Roman Empire. Moreover, his book  deals with the empire&#8217;s decline &#8211;not its rise!</p>
<p>His work is a major literary achievement of the 18th century &#8211;still cited by scholars. Gibbon, consulted more original and ancient sources than any other &#8216;Rome&#8217; scholar then or now. He &#8216;pioneered&#8217; the use of &#8216;footnotes&#8217;. Therefore, we know what Gibbon read and the conclusions derived thereof. To assert that Gibbon ignored the length of the Roman Empire is like saying Einstein ignored the speed of light!</p>
<p>Gibbon&#8217;s history was published in six extensive volumes in 1776. It went through six printings. The original volumes were published as quartos, a common publishing practice of the time.</p>
<p>Even the period covered by Gibbon is not &#8217;short&#8217; &#8211;the period after Marcus Aurelius (from just before 180) to 1453. Gibbon most certainly knew a thing or two, as well, about the Eastern Empire. He is consulted by everyone writing about it today.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Carol Jurd</title>
		<link>http://www.openculture.com/2007/07/the_rise_and_fall_of_the_roman_and_american_empire_a_free_audiobook.html/comment-page-1#comment-2487</link>
		<dc:creator>Carol Jurd</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jul 2007 22:56:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oculture.com/2007/07/the_rise_and_fall_of_the_roman_and_american_empire_a_free_audiobook.html#comment-2487</guid>
		<description>I haven&#039;t read (or listened to) all of Gibbon&#039;s book/s, but he does seem to ignore the fact that (a) the Roman empire lasted for a very long time, (b) the eastern Roman empire (which he rather dismisses) lasted even longer.  Does he perhaps attribute this to moral reasons, where perhaps there were other underlying causes: the rise of other powerful nations, economic fluctuations. It&#039;s easy to oversimplify and draw similes from a very unsimilar situation.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I haven&#8217;t read (or listened to) all of Gibbon&#8217;s book/s, but he does seem to ignore the fact that (a) the Roman empire lasted for a very long time, (b) the eastern Roman empire (which he rather dismisses) lasted even longer.  Does he perhaps attribute this to moral reasons, where perhaps there were other underlying causes: the rise of other powerful nations, economic fluctuations. It&#8217;s easy to oversimplify and draw similes from a very unsimilar situation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stephen Downes</title>
		<link>http://www.openculture.com/2007/07/the_rise_and_fall_of_the_roman_and_american_empire_a_free_audiobook.html/comment-page-1#comment-2486</link>
		<dc:creator>Stephen Downes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jul 2007 14:19:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oculture.com/2007/07/the_rise_and_fall_of_the_roman_and_american_empire_a_free_audiobook.html#comment-2486</guid>
		<description>Gibbon&#039;s book is named (and about) the decline and fall, not the rise and fall.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Gibbon&#8217;s book is named (and about) the decline and fall, not the rise and fall.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
