<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: E=mc²: Einstein Explains His Famous Formula</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.openculture.com/2008/07/emc_einstein_explains_his_famous_formula.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.openculture.com/2008/07/emc_einstein_explains_his_famous_formula.html</link>
	<description>The best free cultural &#38; educational media on the web</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 15 Mar 2010 18:46:33 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: socratus</title>
		<link>http://www.openculture.com/2008/07/emc_einstein_explains_his_famous_formula.html/comment-page-1#comment-7953</link>
		<dc:creator>socratus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 01:36:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oculture.com/?p=1142#comment-7953</guid>
		<description>Why physicists don’t say: ‘ potential mass/energy E=Mc^2’ ?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;According to SRT  rest mass and rest energy have equivalent&lt;br&gt;meaning: E= Mc^2 or M= Ec^2.  &lt;br&gt;Why SRT and Quantum theory use word:’ rest mass /energy E= Mc^2 ‘&lt;br&gt; and don’t say: ‘ potential mass/energy  E= Mc^2 ’ ? &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;When somebody says ‘ the particle in the rest . .  .’, then we&lt;br&gt;can image that particle was going maybe to sleep, maybe &lt;br&gt;to have a cup of coffee . .  . . etc.&lt;br&gt;That a strange terminology the physicists use.&lt;br&gt; ========  .&lt;br&gt;My opinion.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;In Classic physics there is ‘ potential energy’ and&lt;br&gt;  there is ‘ kinetic energy’.&lt;br&gt;And „The Law of Conservation and Transformation of &lt;br&gt;Energy/ Mass&quot; connects  them together.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;In Quantum physics the ’rest mass/enegy’ looks as a static factor.&lt;br&gt;I think that there is problem here.&lt;br&gt;Because in QT there is ’rest mass/enegy E=Mc^2’ and &lt;br&gt;there is active / kinetic energy E=hf. But how „The Law of &lt;br&gt;Conservation and Transformation of Energy/ Mass&quot;&lt;br&gt;can unite them together nobody explains.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;In other words:&lt;br&gt;Dont  know how to explain transforms the potenial &lt;br&gt;mass/enegy E=Mc^2 into the active / kinetic energy E=hf&lt;br&gt;the physicsts began to use new terminology and new words. &lt;br&gt;================== . .&lt;br&gt;Socratus.&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.worldnpa.org/php2/index.php?tab0=Scientists&amp;tab1=Display&amp;id=1372&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://www.worldnpa.org/php2/index.php?tab0=Sci...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;===================== . .</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why physicists don’t say: ‘ potential mass/energy E=Mc^2’ ?</p>
<p>According to SRT  rest mass and rest energy have equivalent<br />meaning: E= Mc^2 or M= Ec^2.  <br />Why SRT and Quantum theory use word:’ rest mass /energy E= Mc^2 ‘<br /> and don’t say: ‘ potential mass/energy  E= Mc^2 ’ ? </p>
<p>When somebody says ‘ the particle in the rest . .  .’, then we<br />can image that particle was going maybe to sleep, maybe <br />to have a cup of coffee . .  . . etc.<br />That a strange terminology the physicists use.<br /> ========  .<br />My opinion.</p>
<p>In Classic physics there is ‘ potential energy’ and<br />  there is ‘ kinetic energy’.<br />And „The Law of Conservation and Transformation of <br />Energy/ Mass&#8221; connects  them together.</p>
<p>In Quantum physics the ’rest mass/enegy’ looks as a static factor.<br />I think that there is problem here.<br />Because in QT there is ’rest mass/enegy E=Mc^2’ and <br />there is active / kinetic energy E=hf. But how „The Law of <br />Conservation and Transformation of Energy/ Mass&#8221;<br />can unite them together nobody explains.</p>
<p>In other words:<br />Dont  know how to explain transforms the potenial <br />mass/enegy E=Mc^2 into the active / kinetic energy E=hf<br />the physicsts began to use new terminology and new words. <br />================== . .<br />Socratus.<br /><a href="http://www.worldnpa.org/php2/index.php?tab0=Scientists&#038;tab1=Display&#038;id=1372" rel="nofollow"></a><a href="http://www.worldnpa.org/php2/index.php?tab0=Sci.." rel="nofollow">http://www.worldnpa.org/php2/index.php?tab0=Sci..</a>.<br />===================== . .</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: socratus</title>
		<link>http://www.openculture.com/2008/07/emc_einstein_explains_his_famous_formula.html/comment-page-1#comment-7952</link>
		<dc:creator>socratus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 01:32:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oculture.com/?p=1142#comment-7952</guid>
		<description>Why physicists don’t say: ‘ potential mass/energy E=Mc^2’ ?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;According to SRT  rest mass and rest energy have equivalent&lt;br&gt;meaning: E= Mc^2 or M= Ec^2.  &lt;br&gt;Why SRT and Quantum theory use word:’ rest mass /energy E= Mc^2 ‘&lt;br&gt; and don’t say: ‘ potential mass/energy  E= Mc^2 ’ ? &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;When somebody says ‘ the particle in the rest . .  .’, then we&lt;br&gt;can image that particle was going maybe to sleep, maybe &lt;br&gt;to have a cup of coffee . .  . . etc.&lt;br&gt;That a strange terminology the physicists use.&lt;br&gt; ========  .&lt;br&gt;My opinion.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;In Classic physics there is ‘ potential energy’ and&lt;br&gt;  there is ‘ kinetic energy’.&lt;br&gt;And „The Law of Conservation and Transformation of &lt;br&gt;Energy/ Mass&quot; connects  them together.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;In Quantum physics the ’rest mass/enegy’ looks as a static factor.&lt;br&gt;I think that there is problem here.&lt;br&gt;Because in QT there is ’rest mass/enegy E=Mc^2’ and &lt;br&gt;there is active / kinetic energy E=hf. But how „The Law of &lt;br&gt;Conservation and Transformation of Energy/ Mass&quot;&lt;br&gt;can unite them together nobody explains.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;In other words:&lt;br&gt;Dont  know how to explain transforms the potenial &lt;br&gt;mass/enegy E=Mc^2 into the active / kinetic energy E=hf&lt;br&gt;the physicsts began to use new terminology and new words. &lt;br&gt;================== . .&lt;br&gt;Socratus.&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.worldnpa.org/php2/index.php?tab0=Scientists&amp;tab1=Display&amp;id=1372&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://www.worldnpa.org/php2/index.php?tab0=Sci...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;===================== . .</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why physicists don’t say: ‘ potential mass/energy E=Mc^2’ ?</p>
<p>According to SRT  rest mass and rest energy have equivalent<br />meaning: E= Mc^2 or M= Ec^2.  <br />Why SRT and Quantum theory use word:’ rest mass /energy E= Mc^2 ‘<br /> and don’t say: ‘ potential mass/energy  E= Mc^2 ’ ? </p>
<p>When somebody says ‘ the particle in the rest . .  .’, then we<br />can image that particle was going maybe to sleep, maybe <br />to have a cup of coffee . .  . . etc.<br />That a strange terminology the physicists use.<br /> ========  .<br />My opinion.</p>
<p>In Classic physics there is ‘ potential energy’ and<br />  there is ‘ kinetic energy’.<br />And „The Law of Conservation and Transformation of <br />Energy/ Mass&#8221; connects  them together.</p>
<p>In Quantum physics the ’rest mass/enegy’ looks as a static factor.<br />I think that there is problem here.<br />Because in QT there is ’rest mass/enegy E=Mc^2’ and <br />there is active / kinetic energy E=hf. But how „The Law of <br />Conservation and Transformation of Energy/ Mass&#8221;<br />can unite them together nobody explains.</p>
<p>In other words:<br />Dont  know how to explain transforms the potenial <br />mass/enegy E=Mc^2 into the active / kinetic energy E=hf<br />the physicsts began to use new terminology and new words. <br />================== . .<br />Socratus.<br /><a href="http://www.worldnpa.org/php2/index.php?tab0=Scientists&#038;tab1=Display&#038;id=1372" rel="nofollow"></a><a href="http://www.worldnpa.org/php2/index.php?tab0=Sci.." rel="nofollow">http://www.worldnpa.org/php2/index.php?tab0=Sci..</a>.<br />===================== . .</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
