<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: John Updike on How Rabbit Angstrom Would Have Voted?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.openculture.com/2008/11/how_would_rabbit_angstrom_have_voted.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.openculture.com/2008/11/how_would_rabbit_angstrom_have_voted.html</link>
	<description>The best free cultural &#38; educational media on the web</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 21:01:48 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan Colman</title>
		<link>http://www.openculture.com/2008/11/how_would_rabbit_angstrom_have_voted.html#comment-3257</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan Colman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Nov 2008 21:22:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oculture.com/?p=1577#comment-3257</guid>
		<description>Hanoch, I have to basically agree with you here. Those weren&#039;t particularly well chosen words. Boy, I am feeling quite post-partisan these days.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hanoch, I have to basically agree with you here. Those weren&#8217;t particularly well chosen words. Boy, I am feeling quite post-partisan these days.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hanoch</title>
		<link>http://www.openculture.com/2008/11/how_would_rabbit_angstrom_have_voted.html#comment-3258</link>
		<dc:creator>Hanoch</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 Nov 2008 15:35:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oculture.com/?p=1577#comment-3258</guid>
		<description>In describing the citizens of Pennsylvania, he says they &quot;tend to want to ban abortion and all manner of redneck ideas&quot;.  Unbelievable.  It should not be that difficult--particularly for an intelligent person like Updike--to recognize the profound moral implications of taking the life of a developing human being in its mother&#039;s womb, irrespective of where one ultimately comes out on the issue.  In reducing the other side of this this profound debate to nothing more than a &quot;redneck idea&quot;, Mr. Updike shows a deplorable tendency towards elitism, and demonstrates there is not necessarily a connection between intelligence and wisdom.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In describing the citizens of Pennsylvania, he says they &#8220;tend to want to ban abortion and all manner of redneck ideas&#8221;.  Unbelievable.  It should not be that difficult&#8211;particularly for an intelligent person like Updike&#8211;to recognize the profound moral implications of taking the life of a developing human being in its mother&#8217;s womb, irrespective of where one ultimately comes out on the issue.  In reducing the other side of this this profound debate to nothing more than a &#8220;redneck idea&#8221;, Mr. Updike shows a deplorable tendency towards elitism, and demonstrates there is not necessarily a connection between intelligence and wisdom.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

