<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Jon Stewart v. CNBC, or The Failure of the Financial Media</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.openculture.com/2009/03/jon_stewart_v_cnbc_or_the_failure_of_the_financial_media.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.openculture.com/2009/03/jon_stewart_v_cnbc_or_the_failure_of_the_financial_media.html</link>
	<description>The best free cultural &#38; educational media on the web</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 21:01:48 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ron</title>
		<link>http://www.openculture.com/2009/03/jon_stewart_v_cnbc_or_the_failure_of_the_financial_media.html#comment-3492</link>
		<dc:creator>Ron</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Mar 2009 18:27:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oculture.com/?p=2882#comment-3492</guid>
		<description>While I enjoy watching Cramer every night, one must remember the show is primarily entertainment. The financial networks exist to promote their advertisers financial and investment products. Who would expect them to warn about the credit bubble or coming Washington national debt collapse which will destroy much of the remaining private wealth in America today or what this will do to the dollar, the stock market, bonds, gold or the real estate market?


China is now worried about their dangerous over investment in US Treasury obligations. Washington ’s long-term choice is either repudiation or monetization. For monetization to be effective, the depreciation in the dollar would have to be substantial and this in turn would dramatically raise prices of imports for American consumers which would mean a tremendous drop in foreign imports. Debt monetization would cause more disruption to exporting nations than selective repudiation of Treasury debt.

The Campaign to Cancel the Washington National Debt By 12/22/2013 Constitutional Amendment is starting now in the U.S. See:  http://www.facebook.com/group.php?gid=67594690498&amp;ref=ts

Thanks,

Ron with 30 plus years in the investment business and banking industry.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>While I enjoy watching Cramer every night, one must remember the show is primarily entertainment. The financial networks exist to promote their advertisers financial and investment products. Who would expect them to warn about the credit bubble or coming Washington national debt collapse which will destroy much of the remaining private wealth in America today or what this will do to the dollar, the stock market, bonds, gold or the real estate market?</p>
<p>China is now worried about their dangerous over investment in US Treasury obligations. Washington ’s long-term choice is either repudiation or monetization. For monetization to be effective, the depreciation in the dollar would have to be substantial and this in turn would dramatically raise prices of imports for American consumers which would mean a tremendous drop in foreign imports. Debt monetization would cause more disruption to exporting nations than selective repudiation of Treasury debt.</p>
<p>The Campaign to Cancel the Washington National Debt By 12/22/2013 Constitutional Amendment is starting now in the U.S. See:  <a href="http://www.facebook.com/group.php?gid=67594690498&#038;ref=ts" rel="nofollow">http://www.facebook.com/group.php?gid=67594690498&#038;ref=ts</a></p>
<p>Thanks,</p>
<p>Ron with 30 plus years in the investment business and banking industry.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: connor t.</title>
		<link>http://www.openculture.com/2009/03/jon_stewart_v_cnbc_or_the_failure_of_the_financial_media.html#comment-3495</link>
		<dc:creator>connor t.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Mar 2009 08:26:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oculture.com/?p=2882#comment-3495</guid>
		<description>videos work in Czech Republic. one of the best interviews of recent memory</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>videos work in Czech Republic. one of the best interviews of recent memory</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan Colman</title>
		<link>http://www.openculture.com/2009/03/jon_stewart_v_cnbc_or_the_failure_of_the_financial_media.html#comment-3491</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan Colman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Mar 2009 02:43:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oculture.com/?p=2882#comment-3491</guid>
		<description>Voltaire? I like the comparison. Perhaps that&#039;s why I got all 18th century with the title of the post -- without thinking about it, of course.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Voltaire? I like the comparison. Perhaps that&#8217;s why I got all 18th century with the title of the post &#8212; without thinking about it, of course.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert H</title>
		<link>http://www.openculture.com/2009/03/jon_stewart_v_cnbc_or_the_failure_of_the_financial_media.html#comment-3493</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert H</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Mar 2009 21:48:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oculture.com/?p=2882#comment-3493</guid>
		<description>Stewart is most definitely not a comedian. Frankly, he&#039;s the most brilliant satirist this country has had in a long time. The only person I know to compare him to is Voltaire.

But when he needs to get serious, he does, as he did in the interview with Cramer. This is why I watch The Daily Show without fail, and almost never watch the network evening news.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Stewart is most definitely not a comedian. Frankly, he&#8217;s the most brilliant satirist this country has had in a long time. The only person I know to compare him to is Voltaire.</p>
<p>But when he needs to get serious, he does, as he did in the interview with Cramer. This is why I watch The Daily Show without fail, and almost never watch the network evening news.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bob</title>
		<link>http://www.openculture.com/2009/03/jon_stewart_v_cnbc_or_the_failure_of_the_financial_media.html#comment-3494</link>
		<dc:creator>Bob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Mar 2009 20:19:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oculture.com/?p=2882#comment-3494</guid>
		<description>Much of the financial minutia they were talking about eluded me. But what couldn&#039;t be missed was Cramer&#039;s muted, stuttering defense against Stewart&#039;s rather pointed charges against him and his network.

He&#039;s was obviously guilty of something and clearly knew it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Much of the financial minutia they were talking about eluded me. But what couldn&#8217;t be missed was Cramer&#8217;s muted, stuttering defense against Stewart&#8217;s rather pointed charges against him and his network.</p>
<p>He&#8217;s was obviously guilty of something and clearly knew it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

