<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Dalai Lama&#8217;s Introduction to Buddhism</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.openculture.com/2009/06/_the_dalai_lamas_introduction_to_buddhism.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.openculture.com/2009/06/_the_dalai_lamas_introduction_to_buddhism.html</link>
	<description>The best free cultural &#38; educational media on the web</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 21:01:48 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: socratus</title>
		<link>http://www.openculture.com/2009/06/_the_dalai_lamas_introduction_to_buddhism.html#comment-13733</link>
		<dc:creator>socratus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Apr 2010 05:13:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.openculture.com/?p=3777#comment-13733</guid>
		<description>Meditation.
Meditation has nothing to do with pleasure or cultural frills.
Meditation is work, hard work, like paving a road, 
or farming land, or building a house.
#
Meditation.
Listen to the waves becoming particles and the particles becoming waves.
Perceive the energy of the Electron / Quantum of Light.
Can we agree with this way to understand the truth?
===========.
Socratus.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Meditation.<br />
Meditation has nothing to do with pleasure or cultural frills.<br />
Meditation is work, hard work, like paving a road,<br />
or farming land, or building a house.<br />
#<br />
Meditation.<br />
Listen to the waves becoming particles and the particles becoming waves.<br />
Perceive the energy of the Electron / Quantum of Light.<br />
Can we agree with this way to understand the truth?<br />
===========.<br />
Socratus.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: socratus</title>
		<link>http://www.openculture.com/2009/06/_the_dalai_lamas_introduction_to_buddhism.html#comment-9832</link>
		<dc:creator>socratus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Jan 2010 06:29:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.openculture.com/?p=3777#comment-9832</guid>
		<description>The process of conscious and unconscious. 
 My layman’s opinion.
===============================

 There is a possibility  of the brain activity to have 
the ability to switch between  conscious and unconscious. 
But  this process is suppressed by contact with the
cerebral cortex neurons (! ) which work in Maxwell’s regime. ( !) 
( Electroencephalography shows us the Maxwell’s electrical 
activity of the brain)
#
To create &#039;awareness&#039; having senses and thoughts is impossible.
The senses and thoughts increase the cerebral cortex neurons 
impulses  ( Maxwell’s EM energy ) and doesn’t give the ability
 ( of something ) to switch between conscious and unconscious.
#
Maxwell’s electrical activity of the brain shows the
 ‘normal – not normal logical ‘ process in the brain.
To create &#039;awareness/ unconscious &#039; needs another 
process – Quantum (!). &#039;Awareness&#039; is Quantum process.
Very often it is only Quantum moment (!) but at this moment,
at this second  the structure of cerebral cortex neurons is changes
 and it means that the thought and behaviour  of person changes too. 
And then again the Maxwell’s electrical activity of the brain takes place.
#
&quot; . . . the discovery is not the matter of logical thought, 
even if the final product is connected with the logical form&quot;. 
       / Einstein /
===========================.
P.S.
Is  an &#039;awareness/ unconscious &#039; equal to a ‘discovery / enlightenment ‘?
============.
Best wishes.
Israel Sadovnik  Socratus.
============================================.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The process of conscious and unconscious.<br />
 My layman’s opinion.<br />
===============================</p>
<p> There is a possibility  of the brain activity to have<br />
the ability to switch between  conscious and unconscious.<br />
But  this process is suppressed by contact with the<br />
cerebral cortex neurons (! ) which work in Maxwell’s regime. ( !)<br />
( Electroencephalography shows us the Maxwell’s electrical<br />
activity of the brain)<br />
#<br />
To create &#8216;awareness&#8217; having senses and thoughts is impossible.<br />
The senses and thoughts increase the cerebral cortex neurons<br />
impulses  ( Maxwell’s EM energy ) and doesn’t give the ability<br />
 ( of something ) to switch between conscious and unconscious.<br />
#<br />
Maxwell’s electrical activity of the brain shows the<br />
 ‘normal – not normal logical ‘ process in the brain.<br />
To create &#8216;awareness/ unconscious &#8216; needs another<br />
process – Quantum (!). &#8216;Awareness&#8217; is Quantum process.<br />
Very often it is only Quantum moment (!) but at this moment,<br />
at this second  the structure of cerebral cortex neurons is changes<br />
 and it means that the thought and behaviour  of person changes too.<br />
And then again the Maxwell’s electrical activity of the brain takes place.<br />
#<br />
&#8221; . . . the discovery is not the matter of logical thought,<br />
even if the final product is connected with the logical form&#8221;.<br />
       / Einstein /<br />
===========================.<br />
P.S.<br />
Is  an &#8216;awareness/ unconscious &#8216; equal to a ‘discovery / enlightenment ‘?<br />
============.<br />
Best wishes.<br />
Israel Sadovnik  Socratus.<br />
============================================.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: socratus</title>
		<link>http://www.openculture.com/2009/06/_the_dalai_lamas_introduction_to_buddhism.html#comment-8914</link>
		<dc:creator>socratus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Dec 2009 06:41:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.openculture.com/?p=3777#comment-8914</guid>
		<description>What is the material basis of Quantum Consciousness ?

Will Physics explain Consciousness?
     ===.
Our brain works on dualistic basis:
 usually consciousness (logically)  and rarely unconsciousness
 ( at first it seems  illogically but at last it shows as very wise act) 
 In his last autobiographic article, Einstein wrote:
 &quot; . . . the discovery is not the matter of logical thought, 
even if the final product is connected with the logical form&quot;. 
In  book ‘ The Holographic Universe’  Michael Talbot
 on  page 160 explained this situation in such way:	
‘ Contrary to what everyone knows it is so, it may not be
 the brain that produce consciousness, but rather consciousness
 that creates the appearance of the brain ’
# 
In our terrestrial world the Information ( some basis of Consciousness)
 can be transfer to you only by Electromagnetic waves. 
Lorentz proved: there aren’t Electromagnetic waves without Electron.
Therefore I say, 
only Electron can be the Quantum of Information/ Consciousness.
We don’t have any other theory of Information’s transfers.
#
We know the Electron is very important particle in our live.
It acts in Maxwell’s electrodynamics. 
It acts in the atom.
But how Electron acts in cell and in Outer space we don’t know.
We need time to understand this fact.
And when we understand  the Vacuum and Electron 
we will know the Ultimate Nature of Reality, it means we
 will know the material basis of Quantum Consciousness too.
==========.
Planck and Einstein found the energy of electron: E=h*f.
Sommerfeld found the formula of electron : e^2=ah*c,
 it means:  e= +ah*c  and  e= -ah*c.
Dirac found two more formulas of electron’s energy: 
 +E=Mc^2  and  -E=Mc^2.
Question.
Why does electron heed five ( 5 ) formulas?
====.
#
Now nobody knows what the Vacuum and Electron are.
 1
&quot; The problem of the exact description of vacuum, in my opinion,  
 is the basic problem now before physics. Really, if you can’t correctly 
describe the vacuum, how it is possible to expect a correct description 
of something more complex? &quot;
       / Paul Dirac /
2
 You know, it would be sufficient to really understand the electron. 
      / Albert Einstein  /
3
Tell me what an electron is and I&#039;ll then tell you everything.
     / Somebody /
=====================.
More details. 

&quot;... indeed an understanding of psi phenomena and of 
consciousness must provide the basis of an improved 
understanding of quantum mechanics.&quot; 
         /Evan Walker / 
In my opinion it means that to answer to the question 
‘ where the  consciousness come from?’ 
 we must understand not only the brain but electron too.
Once again.
Human brain works on two levels: 
consciousness and subconsciousness. The neurons of brain
create these two levels. So, that it means consciousness and
 subconsciousness  from physical point of view ( interaction 
between billions and billions neurons ). It can only mean 
that the state of neurons  in these two situations is different.
How can we understand these different states of neurons?
How does the brain generate consciousness?
We can understand this situation only on the quantum level, 
only using Quantum theory. But there isn’t QT without 
Quantum of Light and Electron. So, what is interaction between
 Quantum of Light, Electron and brain ? 
Therefore I say: we must understand not only the brain but electron too.
=================.
According to Pauli Exclusion Principle  
only one single electron can be in the atom.
If the atom contains more than one electron 
(for example - two), this atom represents &quot; Siamese twins&quot;.
Save us, the Great God, of having such atoms, such cells.
And therefore the human brain has only one Electron.
Each of us has an Electron, but we do not know it.
As the ‘Bhagavad Gita’ says:
Fools deride Me when I descend in the human form. 
They do not know My transcendental nature and
 My supreme dominion over all that be.
 / Chapter  9. Text 11./
================== .
Best wishes 
Israel  Sadovnik  Socratus
================== .</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What is the material basis of Quantum Consciousness ?</p>
<p>Will Physics explain Consciousness?<br />
     ===.<br />
Our brain works on dualistic basis:<br />
 usually consciousness (logically)  and rarely unconsciousness<br />
 ( at first it seems  illogically but at last it shows as very wise act)<br />
 In his last autobiographic article, Einstein wrote:<br />
 &#8221; . . . the discovery is not the matter of logical thought,<br />
even if the final product is connected with the logical form&#8221;.<br />
In  book ‘ The Holographic Universe’  Michael Talbot<br />
 on  page 160 explained this situation in such way:<br />
‘ Contrary to what everyone knows it is so, it may not be<br />
 the brain that produce consciousness, but rather consciousness<br />
 that creates the appearance of the brain ’<br />
#<br />
In our terrestrial world the Information ( some basis of Consciousness)<br />
 can be transfer to you only by Electromagnetic waves.<br />
Lorentz proved: there aren’t Electromagnetic waves without Electron.<br />
Therefore I say,<br />
only Electron can be the Quantum of Information/ Consciousness.<br />
We don’t have any other theory of Information’s transfers.<br />
#<br />
We know the Electron is very important particle in our live.<br />
It acts in Maxwell’s electrodynamics.<br />
It acts in the atom.<br />
But how Electron acts in cell and in Outer space we don’t know.<br />
We need time to understand this fact.<br />
And when we understand  the Vacuum and Electron<br />
we will know the Ultimate Nature of Reality, it means we<br />
 will know the material basis of Quantum Consciousness too.<br />
==========.<br />
Planck and Einstein found the energy of electron: E=h*f.<br />
Sommerfeld found the formula of electron : e^2=ah*c,<br />
 it means:  e= +ah*c  and  e= -ah*c.<br />
Dirac found two more formulas of electron’s energy:<br />
 +E=Mc^2  and  -E=Mc^2.<br />
Question.<br />
Why does electron heed five ( 5 ) formulas?<br />
====.<br />
#<br />
Now nobody knows what the Vacuum and Electron are.<br />
 1<br />
&#8221; The problem of the exact description of vacuum, in my opinion,<br />
 is the basic problem now before physics. Really, if you can’t correctly<br />
describe the vacuum, how it is possible to expect a correct description<br />
of something more complex? &#8221;<br />
       / Paul Dirac /<br />
2<br />
 You know, it would be sufficient to really understand the electron.<br />
      / Albert Einstein  /<br />
3<br />
Tell me what an electron is and I&#8217;ll then tell you everything.<br />
     / Somebody /<br />
=====================.<br />
More details. </p>
<p>&#8220;&#8230; indeed an understanding of psi phenomena and of<br />
consciousness must provide the basis of an improved<br />
understanding of quantum mechanics.&#8221;<br />
         /Evan Walker /<br />
In my opinion it means that to answer to the question<br />
‘ where the  consciousness come from?’<br />
 we must understand not only the brain but electron too.<br />
Once again.<br />
Human brain works on two levels:<br />
consciousness and subconsciousness. The neurons of brain<br />
create these two levels. So, that it means consciousness and<br />
 subconsciousness  from physical point of view ( interaction<br />
between billions and billions neurons ). It can only mean<br />
that the state of neurons  in these two situations is different.<br />
How can we understand these different states of neurons?<br />
How does the brain generate consciousness?<br />
We can understand this situation only on the quantum level,<br />
only using Quantum theory. But there isn’t QT without<br />
Quantum of Light and Electron. So, what is interaction between<br />
 Quantum of Light, Electron and brain ?<br />
Therefore I say: we must understand not only the brain but electron too.<br />
=================.<br />
According to Pauli Exclusion Principle<br />
only one single electron can be in the atom.<br />
If the atom contains more than one electron<br />
(for example &#8211; two), this atom represents &#8221; Siamese twins&#8221;.<br />
Save us, the Great God, of having such atoms, such cells.<br />
And therefore the human brain has only one Electron.<br />
Each of us has an Electron, but we do not know it.<br />
As the ‘Bhagavad Gita’ says:<br />
Fools deride Me when I descend in the human form.<br />
They do not know My transcendental nature and<br />
 My supreme dominion over all that be.<br />
 / Chapter  9. Text 11./<br />
================== .<br />
Best wishes<br />
Israel  Sadovnik  Socratus<br />
================== .</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: socratus</title>
		<link>http://www.openculture.com/2009/06/_the_dalai_lamas_introduction_to_buddhism.html#comment-8154</link>
		<dc:creator>socratus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2009 18:44:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.openculture.com/?p=3777#comment-8154</guid>
		<description>Albert Einstein Quotes on Philosophy of Religion, Theology, God.
#
The religion of the future will be a cosmic religion. 
It should transcend personal God and avoid dogma and theology. 
Covering both the natural and the spiritual, it should be based on a religious
 sense arising from the experience of all things natural and spiritual as a
 meaningful unity. Buddhism answers this description. If there is any religion
 that could cope with modern scientific needs it would be Buddhism.
 (Albert Einstein)
http://www.spaceandmotion.com/albert-einstein-god-religion-theology.htm</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Albert Einstein Quotes on Philosophy of Religion, Theology, God.<br />
#<br />
The religion of the future will be a cosmic religion.<br />
It should transcend personal God and avoid dogma and theology.<br />
Covering both the natural and the spiritual, it should be based on a religious<br />
 sense arising from the experience of all things natural and spiritual as a<br />
 meaningful unity. Buddhism answers this description. If there is any religion<br />
 that could cope with modern scientific needs it would be Buddhism.<br />
 (Albert Einstein)<br />
<a href="http://www.spaceandmotion.com/albert-einstein-god-religion-theology.htm" rel="nofollow">http://www.spaceandmotion.com/albert-einstein-god-religion-theology.htm</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: socratus </title>
		<link>http://www.openculture.com/2009/06/_the_dalai_lamas_introduction_to_buddhism.html#comment-7930</link>
		<dc:creator>socratus </dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 02:51:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.openculture.com/?p=3777#comment-7930</guid>
		<description>Has God known the formula: E=Mc^2 ?&lt;br&gt;If God has known the formula why HE / SHE /IT &lt;br&gt;didn&#039;t write it in His Bible?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;If I were God, I would give chance to Human &lt;br&gt; to understand who I am by analyzing the Physical&lt;br&gt; formulas, equations and laws. Because I need them &lt;br&gt;to create Everything. So, logically (!) , catching the thread &lt;br&gt;of the physics Human can understand Me and My Work &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Where is here the place for Buddhism teaching ?&lt;br&gt;The Buddha teach us the Practical (!) way  to God,&lt;br&gt;the Practical path of salvation through Meditation, &lt;br&gt;through understanding the Ultimate Nature of Reality    &lt;br&gt;============== .&lt;br&gt;#&lt;br&gt;“ To be sure, the doctrine of a personal God interfering with &lt;br&gt;natural events could never be refuted, in the real sense, by science, &lt;br&gt;for this doctrine can always take refuge in those domains in which &lt;br&gt;scientific knowledge has not yet been able to set foot.”&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;/ Albert Einstein. The man and his theory.&lt;br&gt;A profile in science.&lt;br&gt;By Hilaire Cuny.&lt;br&gt;Part: A few of Albert Einstein’s opinions. Page 162./&lt;br&gt;===========================..&lt;br&gt;=========.&lt;br&gt;Best wishes. &lt;br&gt;Israel Sadovnik. / Socratus.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.worldnpa.org/php2/index.php?tab0=Scientists&amp;tab1=Display&amp;id=1372&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://www.worldnpa.org/php2/index.php?tab0=Sci...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;================== . .</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Has God known the formula: E=Mc^2 ?<br />If God has known the formula why HE / SHE /IT <br />didn&#39;t write it in His Bible?</p>
<p>If I were God, I would give chance to Human <br /> to understand who I am by analyzing the Physical<br /> formulas, equations and laws. Because I need them <br />to create Everything. So, logically (!) , catching the thread <br />of the physics Human can understand Me and My Work </p>
<p>Where is here the place for Buddhism teaching ?<br />The Buddha teach us the Practical (!) way  to God,<br />the Practical path of salvation through Meditation, <br />through understanding the Ultimate Nature of Reality    <br />============== .<br />#<br />“ To be sure, the doctrine of a personal God interfering with <br />natural events could never be refuted, in the real sense, by science, <br />for this doctrine can always take refuge in those domains in which <br />scientific knowledge has not yet been able to set foot.”</p>
<p>/ Albert Einstein. The man and his theory.<br />A profile in science.<br />By Hilaire Cuny.<br />Part: A few of Albert Einstein’s opinions. Page 162./<br />===========================..<br />=========.<br />Best wishes. <br />Israel Sadovnik. / Socratus.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.worldnpa.org/php2/index.php?tab0=Scientists&#038;tab1=Display&#038;id=1372" rel="nofollow">http://www.worldnpa.org/php2/index.php?tab0=Sci&#8230;</a><br />================== . .</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

