<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Philosophy for Beginners</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.openculture.com/2009/07/philosophy_for_beginners.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.openculture.com/2009/07/philosophy_for_beginners.html</link>
	<description>The best free cultural &#38; educational media on the web</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 20 Mar 2010 01:28:37 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: yvonne</title>
		<link>http://www.openculture.com/2009/07/philosophy_for_beginners.html/comment-page-1#comment-11751</link>
		<dc:creator>yvonne</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Jan 2010 20:56:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.openculture.com/?p=4172#comment-11751</guid>
		<description>What knowledge do we have if we base our knowledge on sterility? Why read, why live for that matter and proclaim knowledge if it is based on &#039;just words&#039;? So in other words to know is also very much more to NOT KNOW* which is why quite possible we have a brain that thinks objectively. 
That quite possibly needs to be questioned generically if you will? Why submit to that which is already subject to? Here is if you like a paradox of either so called knowledge or actual knowledge which may or may not be connected to &#039;words&#039; or proof of knowledge.   Thanks  Yvonne</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What knowledge do we have if we base our knowledge on sterility? Why read, why live for that matter and proclaim knowledge if it is based on &#8216;just words&#8217;? So in other words to know is also very much more to NOT KNOW* which is why quite possible we have a brain that thinks objectively.<br />
That quite possibly needs to be questioned generically if you will? Why submit to that which is already subject to? Here is if you like a paradox of either so called knowledge or actual knowledge which may or may not be connected to &#8216;words&#8217; or proof of knowledge.   Thanks  Yvonne</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
