Comments on: Philosophy for Beginners http://www.openculture.com/2009/07/philosophy_for_beginners.html The best free cultural & educational media on the web Mon, 13 Feb 2012 10:44:03 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1 By: Robert Heredia http://www.openculture.com/2009/07/philosophy_for_beginners.html#comment-15132 Robert Heredia Sat, 02 Oct 2010 11:59:57 +0000 http://www.openculture.com/?p=4172#comment-15132 I've never had a formal education because I had cheated myself during my childhood.The knowledge I have hungered for is now reality because of "OPEN CULTURE" At 51 years old, I'm finally going to a community college and learning basics again. Sometimes I get overwhelm about the next coarse but I feel better when I will get help from "OPEN CULTURE". I’ve never had a formal education because I had cheated myself during my childhood.The knowledge I have hungered for is now reality because of “OPEN CULTURE” At 51 years old, I’m finally going to a community college and learning basics again. Sometimes I get overwhelm about the next coarse but I feel better when I will get help from “OPEN CULTURE”.

]]> By: yvonne http://www.openculture.com/2009/07/philosophy_for_beginners.html#comment-11751 yvonne Tue, 26 Jan 2010 20:56:20 +0000 http://www.openculture.com/?p=4172#comment-11751 What knowledge do we have if we base our knowledge on sterility? Why read, why live for that matter and proclaim knowledge if it is based on 'just words'? So in other words to know is also very much more to NOT KNOW* which is why quite possible we have a brain that thinks objectively. That quite possibly needs to be questioned generically if you will? Why submit to that which is already subject to? Here is if you like a paradox of either so called knowledge or actual knowledge which may or may not be connected to 'words' or proof of knowledge. Thanks Yvonne What knowledge do we have if we base our knowledge on sterility? Why read, why live for that matter and proclaim knowledge if it is based on ‘just words’? So in other words to know is also very much more to NOT KNOW* which is why quite possible we have a brain that thinks objectively.
That quite possibly needs to be questioned generically if you will? Why submit to that which is already subject to? Here is if you like a paradox of either so called knowledge or actual knowledge which may or may not be connected to ‘words’ or proof of knowledge. Thanks Yvonne

]]>