<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Future of Content Delivery</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.openculture.com/2009/08/the_future_of_content_delivery.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.openculture.com/2009/08/the_future_of_content_delivery.html</link>
	<description>The best free cultural &#38; educational media on the web</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 14 Mar 2010 16:36:53 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Seth Harwood</title>
		<link>http://www.openculture.com/2009/08/the_future_of_content_delivery.html/comment-page-1#comment-6801</link>
		<dc:creator>Seth Harwood</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Aug 2009 16:56:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.openculture.com/?p=4566#comment-6801</guid>
		<description>Blake- Good point! But if we look at the landscape of publishing today, we largely see two models. The standard is to put up a big investment (risk) to print a large number of copies you&#039;re hoping to sell, and Print On Demand, which reduces your risk, but raises your cost per book. 
So compared to these, the solicitation of subscribers looks like a great new movement!
On the other hand, you&#039;re totally right about nothing new under the sun. 
To put it in a less French way than Dan did, I guess we&#039;re going &quot;Back to the Future!&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Blake- Good point! But if we look at the landscape of publishing today, we largely see two models. The standard is to put up a big investment (risk) to print a large number of copies you&#8217;re hoping to sell, and Print On Demand, which reduces your risk, but raises your cost per book.<br />
So compared to these, the solicitation of subscribers looks like a great new movement!<br />
On the other hand, you&#8217;re totally right about nothing new under the sun.<br />
To put it in a less French way than Dan did, I guess we&#8217;re going &#8220;Back to the Future!&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan Colman</title>
		<link>http://www.openculture.com/2009/08/the_future_of_content_delivery.html/comment-page-1#comment-6792</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan Colman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Aug 2009 07:45:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.openculture.com/?p=4566#comment-6792</guid>
		<description>Or as they said during those days: Plus ça change, plus c&#039;est la même chose, kind of, sort of...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Or as they said during those days: Plus ça change, plus c&#8217;est la même chose, kind of, sort of&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Blake</title>
		<link>http://www.openculture.com/2009/08/the_future_of_content_delivery.html/comment-page-1#comment-6791</link>
		<dc:creator>Blake</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Aug 2009 06:56:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.openculture.com/?p=4566#comment-6791</guid>
		<description>Soliciting subscribers, or &quot;pre-selling&quot; as you call it, is hardly &quot;a model so far ahead of everyone else&quot;; it&#039;s the way the publication of many books were funded in the late 17th and 18th century. What has been will be again, what has been done will be done again; there is nothing new under the sun (Ecclesiastes 1:9).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Soliciting subscribers, or &#8220;pre-selling&#8221; as you call it, is hardly &#8220;a model so far ahead of everyone else&#8221;; it&#8217;s the way the publication of many books were funded in the late 17th and 18th century. What has been will be again, what has been done will be done again; there is nothing new under the sun (Ecclesiastes 1:9).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
