<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Google Book Search: A Disaster for Scholars?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.openculture.com/2009/09/google_book_search_a_disaster_for_scholars.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.openculture.com/2009/09/google_book_search_a_disaster_for_scholars.html</link>
	<description>The best free cultural &#38; educational media on the web</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 21:01:48 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: jonm</title>
		<link>http://www.openculture.com/2009/09/google_book_search_a_disaster_for_scholars.html#comment-7271</link>
		<dc:creator>jonm</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Sep 2009 19:05:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.openculture.com/?p=4737#comment-7271</guid>
		<description>The professional critics are talking tosh - their basic complaint is that the first version of Google&#039;s archive is not absolutely, in every way, perfect.  This is ridiculous, especially given the problems with existing archives, for which see http://idlethink.wordpress.com/2009/09/17/archive-iniquities/ .</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The professional critics are talking tosh &#8211; their basic complaint is that the first version of Google&#8217;s archive is not absolutely, in every way, perfect.  This is ridiculous, especially given the problems with existing archives, for which see <a href="http://idlethink.wordpress.com/2009/09/17/archive-iniquities/" rel="nofollow">http://idlethink.wordpress.com/2009/09/17/archive-iniquities/</a> .</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

