‘The Right of the People to Rule’: Listen to Theodore Roosevelt Speaking 100 Years Ago Today

On this day 100 years ago, Theodore Roo­sevelt record­ed his great speech, “The Right of the Peo­ple to Rule.” The polit­i­cal cir­cum­stances sur­round­ing the speech bear some resem­blance to those of today: 1912 was a pres­i­den­tial elec­tion year, and the coun­try was divid­ed.

The Repub­li­can Par­ty, though, was espe­cial­ly divid­ed. Roo­sevelt had already served two terms as pres­i­dent under the Repub­li­can ban­ner, but by 1912 he had become deeply dis­ap­point­ed in what he saw as the reac­tionary drift of his suc­ces­sor and one-time friend, William Howard Taft. He decid­ed to chal­lenge Taft for the Repub­li­can nom­i­na­tion. When Roo­sevelt lost at the con­ven­tion he pressed ahead any­way, form­ing the Pro­gres­sive (“Bull Moose”) Par­ty.

Taft knew he was no match for the charis­mat­ic Roo­sevelt in a pop­u­lar elec­tion, but he saw his role in the sit­u­a­tion as being the guardian of the con­ser­v­a­tive char­ac­ter of the Repub­li­can Par­ty. With only 24% of the vote, Taft came in third place in the Novem­ber elec­tion, behind the Demo­c­rat Woodrow Wil­son (41%) and Roo­sevelt (27%). It was an embar­rass­ing out­come for a sit­ting pres­i­dent, but in one sense Taft won: The Repub­li­can par­ty took a con­ser­v­a­tive turn, and stayed on that course.

Roo­sevelt’s speech was record­ed on an Edi­son cylin­der at his Sag­amore Hill Estate in Oys­ter Bay, New York on August 16, 1912, dur­ing a brief lull in the cam­paign fol­low­ing the Pro­gres­sive Par­ty Con­ven­tion. It was one of sev­er­al cam­paign speech­es that were record­ed and then dis­trib­uted around the coun­try before the gen­er­al elec­tion. It’s based part­ly on a speech he gave on March 20, 1912 at Carnegie Hall.

In the record­ed ver­sion, Roo­sevelt speaks for the need to find a polit­i­cal mid­dle ground, warn­ing against the dan­ger of ultra-con­ser­vatism. “It would be well,” he says, “if our peo­ple would study the his­to­ry of a sis­ter repub­lic. All the woes of France for a cen­tu­ry and a quar­ter have been due to the fol­ly of her peo­ple in split­ting into the two camps of unrea­son­able con­ser­vatism and unrea­son­able rad­i­cal­ism. Had pre-Rev­o­lu­tion­ary France lis­tened to men like Tur­got, and backed them up, all would have gone well. But the ben­e­fi­cia­ries of priv­i­lege, the Bour­bon reac­tionar­ies, the short­sight­ed ultra-con­ser­v­a­tives, turned down Tur­got; and found that instead of him they had obtained Robe­spierre.”

Near the end, Roo­sevelt sounds an impas­sioned call:

Friends, our task as Amer­i­cans is to strive for social and indus­tri­al jus­tice, achieved through the gen­uine rule of the peo­ple. This is our end, our pur­pose. The meth­ods for achiev­ing the end are mere­ly expe­di­ents, to be final­ly accept­ed or reject­ed accord­ing as actu­al expe­ri­ence shows that they work well or ill. But in our hearts we must have this lofty pur­pose, and we must strive for it in all earnest­ness and sin­cer­i­ty, or our work will come to noth­ing. In order to suc­ceed we need lead­ers of inspired ide­al­ism, lead­ers to whom are grant­ed great visions, who dream great­ly and strive to make their dreams come true; who can kin­dle the peo­ple with the fire from their own burn­ing souls.

If you would like to read along as you lis­ten to Roo­sevelt’s voice, click here to open the full text in a new win­dow.

 


by | Permalink | Comments (3) |

Sup­port Open Cul­ture

We’re hop­ing to rely on our loy­al read­ers rather than errat­ic ads. To sup­port Open Cul­ture’s edu­ca­tion­al mis­sion, please con­sid­er mak­ing a dona­tion. We accept Pay­Pal, Ven­mo (@openculture), Patre­on and Cryp­to! Please find all options here. We thank you!


Comments (3)
You can skip to the end and leave a response. Pinging is currently not allowed.
  • Michael says:

    I’d dis­agree with the con­clu­sion here and throw out one of my own.
    Roo­sevelt was the first to prove that by going third par­ty you end up with exact­ly what you were try­ing to fight against. Wil­son was one of the great­est left­ist pro­gres­sives in Amer­i­can his­to­ry. Giv­ing us the fer­eral reserve bank and the leau­gue of nations the fore­run­ner to the UN. Per­ot gave us Clin­ton. Nad­er gave us Bush. Ron Paul may give us 4 more years of Oba­ma. In my mind the his­to­ry is clear that third par­ty run’s only dam­age the side you claim to sup­port.

    • Thomas Alva Lindbergh says:

      Wil­son did­n’t “give us” the “fer­eral reserve bank”.
      That bank is NOT part of the Fed­er­al gov­ern­ment.
      It is a cor­po­rate enti­ty grant­ed a bank­ing monop­oly.
      In my opin­ion, it is mon­u­men­tal­ly trag­ic that Wil­son
      rail­road­ed the U.S.A. into war against Ger­many.
      Had The Great War” end­ed in a stale­mate, (and the ‘TREATY” BEING ONE THAT WAS TRULY NEGOTIATED, then the vitu­per­a­tive Ger­man resent­ment of the Ver­sailles Treaty would not have metas­ta­sized into the Third Reich.

      And, if you any pity for what was done TO Bel­gium
      by the Triple Entente, then research what Bel­gium
      did to their VICTIMS in their “COLONY” known as
      The Con­go.

  • Thomas Alva Lindbergh says:

    TR DID NOT SERVE TWO TERMS AS PRESIDENT. HE WAS ONLY ELECTED ONCE: IN 1908. HIS PREVIOUS TIME IN OFFICE WAS DUE TO HIS ASCENSION DUE TO THE ASSASSINATION OF PRESIDENT McKIN­LEY. ALSO, TR MADE FIVE DISK RECORDINGS
    FOR VICTOR. ALL NINE WERE SOLD COMMERCIALLY.

Leave a Reply

Quantcast
Open Culture was founded by Dan Colman.