America at War: Infographic Reveals How the U.S. Military Is Operating in 40% of the World’s Nations

Earlier this month, NBC reporter and analyst William Arkin ended a 30-year career as a journalist, announcing in a “scathing letter,” Democracy Now! reports, that “he would be leaving the network. Arkin accuses “the media of warmongering while ignoring the, quote, ‘creeping fascism of homeland security.’” He does not equivocate in a follow-up interview with Amy Goodman. “The generals and the national security leadership" are also now, he says, “the commentators and the analysts who populate the news media” (Arkin himself is a former Army intelligence officer).

The problem isn’t only NBC, in his estimation, and it isn’t only supposed journalists cheerleading for war. Most of the conflicts the country is currently engaged in are un- or under-reported in major sources. His letter “applies to all of the mainstream networks, applies to CNN and Fox, as well…. We’ve just become so shallow that we’re not really able even to see the truth, which is that we’re at war right now in nine countries around the world where we’re bombing, and we hardly report any of it on a day-to-day basis.”

This isn’t the case with independent media organizations like Democracy Now!, The Intercept, or Airwars. Secular and religious refugee relief organizations like the International Rescue Committee, World Relief, or Muslim Global Relief are paying attention. Many of these organizations are non-U.S.-based or connected to the “civilian experts” Arkin says once appeared regularly in the national media and represented opposing views, “people who might be university professors or activists… or experts who were associated with think tanks.”

Airwars, affiliated with the Department of Media and Communications at Goldsmiths, University of London, has monitored conflicts around the world since 2014, with extensive coverage and records of alleged civilian deaths, military reports, and the names of victims. For a comparable U.S.-focused deep dive, see the Costs of War Project at Brown University’s Watson Institute of International & Public Affairs. The project’s website not only tracks the enormous economic costs of wars in the Middle East and Africa since 9/11; it also tracks “the human toll,” as you can see in the video below.

At the top of the post, see a map (view in a larger format here) from the Cost of War Project’s Stephanie Savell, 5W Infographics, and the Smithsonian of all the regions where the U.S. is “combatting terrorism.” While most of the media orgs and non-profits mentioned above would probably dispute the use of that term in some or all of the conflict zones, Savell sticks with the official language to describe the situation—one in which the nation “is now operating in 40 percent of the world’s nations," as she writes at Smithsonian.com.

Maybe no one needs an editorial to imagine the enormous toll this level of military engagement has taken over the course of 17 years since the inception of the “Global War on Terror.” The map covers the past two, illustrating “80 countries, engaged through 40 U.S. military bases,” and conducting training, exercises, active combat, and air and drone strikes on six continents. The selections, writes Savell, are “conservative,” and sourced from both independent and mainstream media outlets and international government and military sources.

“The most comprehensive depiction in civilian circles of U.S. military and government antiterrorist actions overseas,” the America at War map provides information we don't often get in our daily—or hourly, or by-the-minute—diet of news. "Contrary to what most Americans believe, the war on terror is not winding down.” It is expanding. Given the country’s history of sustained mass movements against legally suspect, grossly expensive wars with high civilian casualties, disease epidemics, starvation, and refugee crises, one would think that a sizable segment of the population would want to know what their country's military and civilian defense contractors are doing around the world.

via Smithsonian.com

Related Content:

The History of the U.S. Civil War Visualized Month by Month and State by State, in an Infographic from 1897

An Archive of 800+ Imaginative Propaganda Maps Designed to Shape Opinions & Beliefs: Enter Cornell’s Persuasive Maps Collection

It’s the End of the World as We Know It: The Apocalypse Gets Visualized in an Inventive Map from 1486

Josh Jones is a writer and musician based in Durham, NC. Follow him at @jdmagness


by | Permalink | Comments (4) |

Support Open Culture

We're hoping to rely on our loyal readers rather than erratic ads. To support Open Culture's continued operation, please consider making a donation. We thank you!


Comments (4)
You can skip to the end and leave a response. Pinging is currently not allowed.
  • Bill W. says:

    Strangely, the people upset by the subject-matter of this article are the same people who remained completely silent when our longest-serving wartime-President, Obama, bombed seven nations, and are UPSET Trump is pulling us out of Syria and Afghanistan. Who are the real “doves,” again?

  • Mark says:

    Bill W:
    Many are upset about Trump pulling out of Syria, not because we want to continue fighting there, but for the reason he is doing so. The motive appears to be linked to Trump’s support of Putin’s goals in the region, and a reduction of the USA’s influence there. Abandoning the Kurds should not be part of our foreign policy. Allowing Assad to do what he pleases against civilians is a mistake. Unfortunately, previous administrations got us into Syria but now we have to find a way to get out without causing even greater harm.
    Also- yes many were silent about Obama’s militaristic moves but many were not.

  • Ray Riley says:

    Exactly. Barack Obama is the only president in the history of the U. S. to be at war, every single day, for eight entire years. Bravo, Mr. Warmonger, dropper of tens of thousands of bombs! Strangely, OC and other statists were dead silent (no pun intended).

  • Dagwood says:

    This is absolutely false. There seems to be an assumption or accusation that if someone voted for, or generally approved of, Obama, s/he didn’t and wouldn’t criticize him. False! Many, many of us strongly opposed Obama policies, including the ones you mention. I am weary of these kinds of false accusations made, at least in part, to smear “liberals”. Similarly, many or most of us who are distressed at Trump’s Syria withdrawal announcement oppose the how of it. A sudden, impulsive, lie-based, ignorant, betrayal of allies and advisors alike, hawk and dove alike. Please, try to be accurate and not a Trump pawn.

Leave a Reply

Quantcast