<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Open Culture &#187; Technology</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.openculture.com/category/technology/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.openculture.com</link>
	<description>The best free cultural &#38; educational media on the web</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 21:38:16 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>The Internet Imagined in 1969</title>
		<link>http://www.openculture.com/2012/02/the_internet_imagined_in_1969.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.openculture.com/2012/02/the_internet_imagined_in_1969.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 13:00:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dan Colman</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.openculture.com/?p=26758</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The gender stereotypes might be backward-looking (we&#8217;ll make up for it later in the day), but the technological vision is on the mark, right down to email, e-commerce and online banking. Of course, these weren&#8217;t the only people imagining an electronic, connected world during the 1960s. In 1964, the futurist Arthur C. Clarke peered into [...]<p><a href="http://www.openculture.com/2012/02/the_internet_imagined_in_1969.html">The Internet Imagined in 1969</a> is a post from: <a href="http://www.openculture.com">Open Culture</a></p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><object width="480" height="360"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/Y0pPfyYtiBc?version=3&amp;hl=en_US" /><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true" /><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always" /><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/Y0pPfyYtiBc?version=3&amp;hl=en_US" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="480" height="360" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true"></embed></object></p>
<p>The gender stereotypes might be backward-looking (we&#8217;ll make up for it later in the day), but the technological vision is on the mark, right down to email, e-commerce and online banking. Of course, these weren&#8217;t the only people imagining an electronic, connected world during the 1960s.</p>
<p>In 1964, the futurist <a href="http://www.openculture.com/2011/09/arthur_c_clarke_looks_into_the_future_1964.html">Arthur C. Clarke peered into the future</a> and saw our connectedness coming. By 2000, he predicted, &#8220;We could be in instant contact with each other, wherever we may be,&#8221; and &#8220;it will be possible in that age &#8230; for a man to conduct his business from Tahiti or Bali just as well as he could from London.&#8221;</p>
<p>And then Marshall McLuhan understood the trend too. He saw electronic media turning our world into a social one, a world where services like Facebook and Twitter would make complete sense. You can <a href="http://www.openculture.com/2010/04/marshall_mcluhan_the_world_is_a_global_village_.html">watch the prescient Marshall McLuhan right here</a>.  H/T Sasa</p>
<p><strong>Related Content:</strong></p>
<p><a href="http://www.openculture.com/2011/09/1930s_fashion_designers_imagine_year_2000.html">1930s Fashion Designers Imagine Year 2000</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.openculture.com/2012/02/the_internet_imagined_in_1969.html">The Internet Imagined in 1969</a> is a post from: <a href="http://www.openculture.com">Open Culture</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.openculture.com/2012/02/the_internet_imagined_in_1969.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Neil Young on the Travesty of MP3s</title>
		<link>http://www.openculture.com/2012/02/neil_young_on_the_travesty_of_mp3s.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.openculture.com/2012/02/neil_young_on_the_travesty_of_mp3s.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 16:02:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mike Springer</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Music]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.openculture.com/?p=26719</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Neil Young made headlines last week when he appeared at the Wall Street Journal’s &#8220;D: Dive Into Media&#8221; conference and voiced his disapproval of the way music is being heard these days. &#8220;We live in a digital age,&#8221; Young said, &#8220;and unfortunately it&#8217;s degrading our music, not improving it.&#8221; Young is deeply dissatisfied with the [...]<p><a href="http://www.openculture.com/2012/02/neil_young_on_the_travesty_of_mp3s.html">Neil Young on the Travesty of MP3s</a> is a post from: <a href="http://www.openculture.com">Open Culture</a></p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><object id="wsj_fp" width="480" height="360"><param name="movie" value="http://s.wsj.net/media/swf/microPlayer.swf" /><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true" /><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always" /><param name="flashvars" value="videoGUID={1598C8DC-7B17-4E42-A95A-DE703ACC12A9}&amp;playerid=4001&amp;plyMediaEnabled=1&amp;configURL=http://wsj.vo.llnwd.net/o28/players/&amp;autoStart=false" /><embed pluginspage="http://www.macromedia.com/shockwave/download/index.cgi?P1_Prod_Version=ShockwaveFlash" swliveconnect="true" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" seamlesstabbing="false" height="360" width="480" name="microflashPlayer" base="rtmpt://wsj.fcod.llnwd.net/a1318/o28/video" flashvars="videoGUID={1598C8DC-7B17-4E42-A95A-DE703ACC12A9}&amp;playerid=4001&amp;plyMediaEnabled=1&amp;configURL=http://wsj.vo.llnwd.net/o28/players/&amp;autoStart=false" bgcolor="#FFFFFF" src="http://s.wsj.net/media/swf/microPlayer.swf"></embed></object></p>
<p>Neil Young made headlines last week when he appeared at the <em>Wall Street Journal</em>’s <a href="http://allthingsd.com/category/dive-into-media/">&#8220;D: Dive Into Media&#8221; conference</a> and voiced his disapproval of the way music is being heard these days. &#8220;We live in a digital age,&#8221; Young said, &#8220;and unfortunately it&#8217;s degrading our music, not improving it.&#8221;</p>
<p>Young is deeply dissatisfied with the sound quality of compressed <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mp3">MP3</a> digital files, which he said carry only five percent of the data from the original vinyl or master recordings. &#8220;It&#8217;s not that digital is bad or inferior,&#8221; he told the <em>Journal</em>&#8216;s Walt Mossberg and Peter Kafka. &#8220;It&#8217;s that the way it&#8217;s being used is not sufficient to transfer the depth of the art.&#8221;</p>
<p>The full 32-minute interview is now available online, and can be seen above. Throughout the discussion, Young&#8217;s commitment to his cause is clear. &#8220;My goal,&#8221; he said, &#8220;is to try and rescue the art form that I&#8217;ve been practicing for the past 50 years.&#8221;</p>
<p><a href="http://www.openculture.com/2012/02/neil_young_on_the_travesty_of_mp3s.html">Neil Young on the Travesty of MP3s</a> is a post from: <a href="http://www.openculture.com">Open Culture</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.openculture.com/2012/02/neil_young_on_the_travesty_of_mp3s.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>12</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Solve For X: Google Presents Moonshot Thinking in Short, TED-Style Talks</title>
		<link>http://www.openculture.com/2012/02/solve_for_x_google_presents_moonshot_thinking_in_short_ted-style_talks.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.openculture.com/2012/02/solve_for_x_google_presents_moonshot_thinking_in_short_ted-style_talks.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 13:00:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dan Colman</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.openculture.com/?p=26716</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Last week, Google hosted a gathering called “Solve for X,” which brought together entrepreneurs, innovators and scientists interested in finding technological solutions to the world’s greatest problems. These solutions weren&#8217;t small in scope. No, they were all &#8220;moonshots,&#8221; ideas that live in the &#8220;gray area between audacious projects and pure science fiction; they are 10x [...]<p><a href="http://www.openculture.com/2012/02/solve_for_x_google_presents_moonshot_thinking_in_short_ted-style_talks.html">Solve For X: Google Presents Moonshot Thinking in Short, TED-Style Talks</a> is a post from: <a href="http://www.openculture.com">Open Culture</a></p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><object width="480" height="274"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/CNRaM2GgQuA?version=3&amp;hl=en_US" /><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true" /><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always" /><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/CNRaM2GgQuA?version=3&amp;hl=en_US" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="480" height="274" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true"></embed></object></p>
<p>Last week, Google hosted a gathering called “Solve for X,” which brought together entrepreneurs, innovators and scientists interested in finding technological solutions to the world’s greatest problems. These solutions weren&#8217;t small in scope. No, they were all &#8220;moonshots,&#8221; ideas that live in the &#8220;gray area between audacious projects and pure science fiction; they are 10x improvement, not 10%.&#8221; And these moonshot ideas were all presented in TED-style talks that now live on the <a href="http://www.wesolveforx.com/">WeSolveForX</a> website and the <a href="http://www.youtube.com/user/wesolveforx">WeSolveforX YouTube Channel</a>.</p>
<p>Eric Schmidt and Sergey Brin <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=t4-JswHBIbU&amp;feature=related">kicked off the event and framed the project</a>, paving the way for <a href="http://web.media.mit.edu/~nicholas/">Nicholas Negroponte</a>, founder of the MIT Media Lab and One Laptop Per Child, to dream big and ask: Can emerging technologies empower children to learn to read on their own? Imagine how that would change the educational problems besetting the developing world? (Watch above.) Or how about this big thought from <a href="http://www.cs.cmu.edu/~treuille/">Adrien Treuille</a>, assistant professor at Carnegie Mellon, who imagines a day when knowledge creation won&#8217;t be driven by universities and corporations, but rather by loose groups of individuals taking advantage of the internet and big data. That talk appears right below.</p>
<p><object width="480" height="274"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/A-CCEy3u2WM?version=3&amp;hl=en_US" /><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true" /><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always" /><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/A-CCEy3u2WM?version=3&amp;hl=en_US" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="480" height="274" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true"></embed></object></p>
<p><a href="http://www.openculture.com/2012/02/solve_for_x_google_presents_moonshot_thinking_in_short_ted-style_talks.html">Solve For X: Google Presents Moonshot Thinking in Short, TED-Style Talks</a> is a post from: <a href="http://www.openculture.com">Open Culture</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.openculture.com/2012/02/solve_for_x_google_presents_moonshot_thinking_in_short_ted-style_talks.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Koyaanisqatsi at 1552% Speed</title>
		<link>http://www.openculture.com/2012/02/koyaanisqatsi_at_1552_speed.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.openculture.com/2012/02/koyaanisqatsi_at_1552_speed.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 12:00:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dan Colman</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Film]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.openculture.com/?p=26656</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Koyaanisqatsi: Life Out of Balance &#8212; Godfrey Reggio directed the 1982 film, and Philip Glass composed the music. Later, Reggio said that the film is wide open to interpretation, that &#8220;the viewer can take for herself what the film means.&#8221; &#8220;For some people it&#8217;s an environmental film, for some people it&#8217;s an ode to technology, [...]<p><a href="http://www.openculture.com/2012/02/koyaanisqatsi_at_1552_speed.html">Koyaanisqatsi at 1552% Speed</a> is a post from: <a href="http://www.openculture.com">Open Culture</a></p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><iframe src="http://player.vimeo.com/video/36205162?title=0&amp;byline=0&amp;portrait=0" width="480" height="270" frameborder="0" webkitAllowFullScreen mozallowfullscreen allowFullScreen></iframe></p>
<p><em>Koyaanisqatsi: Life Out of Balance</em> &#8212; Godfrey Reggio directed the 1982 film, and Philip Glass composed the music. Later, <a href="http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-6035911215317334768">Reggio said</a> that the film is wide open to interpretation, that &#8220;the viewer can take for herself what the film means.&#8221; &#8220;For some people it&#8217;s an environmental film, for some people it&#8217;s an ode to technology, for some people it&#8217;s a piece of shit, for other people it moves them deeply.&#8221; And for Wyatt Hodgson, it&#8217;s a film worth watching in a compressed, five-minute format, maybe because (as one viewer suggested) it highlights &#8220;one of the main dimensions of the film: the breakneck speed of our (crazy) world.&#8221;</p>
<p>Hodgson&#8217;s version strips out Glass&#8217; original soundtrack, replacing it with music by the Art of Noise. But some crafty individual found a way to reproduce Glass&#8217; composition at 1552% speed. You can listen below.</p>
<p>h/t <a href="http://kottke.org/12/02/koyaanisqatsi-in-five-minutes">Kottke</a></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p><a href="http://www.openculture.com/2012/02/koyaanisqatsi_at_1552_speed.html">Koyaanisqatsi at 1552% Speed</a> is a post from: <a href="http://www.openculture.com">Open Culture</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.openculture.com/2012/02/koyaanisqatsi_at_1552_speed.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>An Animated History Of Aviation: From da Vinci&#8217;s Sketches to Apollo 11</title>
		<link>http://www.openculture.com/2012/02/an_animated_history_of_aviation_from_da_vincis_sketches_to_apollo_11.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.openculture.com/2012/02/an_animated_history_of_aviation_from_da_vincis_sketches_to_apollo_11.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2012 13:00:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dan Colman</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Animation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.openculture.com/?p=26555</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It starts with Leonardo da Vinci&#8217;s famous sketches of flying machines, then moves to the first hot air balloon launched by the Montgolfier brothers in 1783, the gliders created by Sir George Cayley (1804), and the Wright brothers&#8217; first flight at Kitty Hawk in 1903. These great moments and others all get covered in this Animated [...]<p><a href="http://www.openculture.com/2012/02/an_animated_history_of_aviation_from_da_vincis_sketches_to_apollo_11.html">An Animated History Of Aviation: From da Vinci&#8217;s Sketches to Apollo 11</a> is a post from: <a href="http://www.openculture.com">Open Culture</a></p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><object width="480" height="274"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/GLAreFQ3G5k?version=3&amp;hl=en_US" /><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true" /><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always" /><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/GLAreFQ3G5k?version=3&amp;hl=en_US" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="480" height="274" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true"></embed></object></p>
<p>It starts with Leonardo da Vinci&#8217;s famous sketches of flying machines, then moves to the first hot air balloon launched by the Montgolfier brothers in 1783, the gliders created by Sir George Cayley (1804), and the Wright brothers&#8217; first flight at Kitty Hawk in 1903. These great moments and others all get covered in this <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GLAreFQ3G5k&amp;feature=player_embedded">Animated History of Aviation</a>, an elegant little film produced by <a href="http://www.uvu.edu/aviation/">Utah Valley University</a>, a college with a large aviation program of its own. We&#8217;ll add it to our collection of <a href="http://www.openculture.com/science_videos">Great Science Videos</a>.</p>
<p><strong>Related Content:</strong></p>
<p><a href="http://www.openculture.com/2012/01/a_robot_that_flies_with_the_grace_of_a_bird.html">A Robot That Flies with the Grace of a Bird: A Great TED Flight</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.openculture.com/2012/02/an_animated_history_of_aviation_from_da_vincis_sketches_to_apollo_11.html">An Animated History Of Aviation: From da Vinci&#8217;s Sketches to Apollo 11</a> is a post from: <a href="http://www.openculture.com">Open Culture</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.openculture.com/2012/02/an_animated_history_of_aviation_from_da_vincis_sketches_to_apollo_11.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Last (Faxed) Poem of Charles Bukowski</title>
		<link>http://www.openculture.com/2012/01/the_last_faxed_poem_of_charles_bukowski.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.openculture.com/2012/01/the_last_faxed_poem_of_charles_bukowski.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Jan 2012 12:30:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dan Colman</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Literature]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.openculture.com/?p=26168</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On February 18, 1994, Charles Bukowski had a fax machine installed in his home and immediately sent his first Fax poem to his publisher: oh, forgive me For Whom the Bell Tolls, oh, forgive me Man who walked on water, oh, forgive me little old woman who lived in a shoe, oh, forgive me the [...]<p><a href="http://www.openculture.com/2012/01/the_last_faxed_poem_of_charles_bukowski.html">The Last (Faxed) Poem of Charles Bukowski</a> is a post from: <a href="http://www.openculture.com">Open Culture</a></p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><center><a href="http://www.booktryst.com/2011/03/charles-bukowskis-last-unpublished-poem.html"><img class="alignleft size-full wp-image-26171" title="BukowskiLast2" src="http://www.openculture.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/BukowskiLast2.png" alt="" width="419" height="326" /></a></center></p>
<p>On February 18, 1994, <a href="http://www.poetryfoundation.org/bio/charles-bukowski">Charles Bukowski</a> had a fax machine installed in his home and immediately sent his first Fax poem to his publisher:</p>
<blockquote><p>oh, forgive me For Whom the Bell Tolls,<br />
oh, forgive me Man who walked on water,<br />
oh, forgive me little old woman who lived in a shoe,<br />
oh, forgive me the mountain that roared at midnight,<br />
oh, forgive me the dumb sounds of night and day and death,<br />
oh, forgive me the death of the last beautiful panther,<br />
oh, forgive me all the sunken ships and defeated armies,<br />
this is my first FAX POEM.<br />
It&#8217;s too late:<br />
I have been<br />
smitten.</p></blockquote>
<p>Alas this was also Bukowski&#8217;s last poem. Just 18 days after Bukowski embraced technology, the poet (once famously called the &#8220;laureate of American lowlife&#8221; by Pico Iyer) died of leukemia in California. He was 73 years old. According to John Martin at Black Sparrow Press, the Fax poem has never been published or collected in a book. <a href="http://www.booktryst.com/2011/03/charles-bukowskis-last-unpublished-poem.html">Booktryst has a whole lot more on the story</a>, and we have the singer/songwriter <a href="http://www.openculture.com/2010/05/tom_waits_reads_charles_bukowski.html">Tom Waits reading Charles Bukowski’s poem, The Laughing Heart</a>. You can also listen to three other Bukowski poems (in audio) here on YouTube:</p>
<ul>
<li><a href="http://www.openculture.com/2009/12/charles_bukowski_bluebird.html">Bluebird</a></li>
<li><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NZMs5775Z4s&amp;feature=player_embedded">Something For The Touts, The Nuns, The Grocery Clerks, And You</a></li>
<li><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iCrn1LDDoRc">The Secret to My Endurance</a> (read by Bukowski himself)</li>
</ul>
<p>Find more great reads in our collection of <a href="http://www.openculture.com/freeaudiobooks">Free Audio Books</a>.</p>
<p>via <a href="http://www.poetryfoundation.org/harriet/2012/01/the-final-fax-of-chuck-bukowski/">Poetry Foundation</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.openculture.com/2012/01/the_last_faxed_poem_of_charles_bukowski.html">The Last (Faxed) Poem of Charles Bukowski</a> is a post from: <a href="http://www.openculture.com">Open Culture</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.openculture.com/2012/01/the_last_faxed_poem_of_charles_bukowski.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Jim Henson&#8217;s Zany 1963 Robot Film Uncovered by AT&amp;T: Watch Online</title>
		<link>http://www.openculture.com/2012/01/jim_hensons_1963_robot_film.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.openculture.com/2012/01/jim_hensons_1963_robot_film.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jan 2012 13:00:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dan Colman</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Film]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.openculture.com/?p=26062</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Before Jim Henson joined Sesame Street in 1969, the great puppeteer took on various projects during the 60s, sometimes creating experimental films (for example, the Oscar-nominated short Time Piece), other times producing primers on puppet making, and then pursuing the occasional commercial project &#8212; like the one just uncovered by AT&#38;T. Back in 1963, Henson was [...]<p><a href="http://www.openculture.com/2012/01/jim_hensons_1963_robot_film.html">Jim Henson&#8217;s Zany 1963 Robot Film Uncovered by AT&#038;T: Watch Online</a> is a post from: <a href="http://www.openculture.com">Open Culture</a></p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><object width="480" height="360"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/ivJNNwTGDcw?version=3&amp;hl=en_US" /><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true" /><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always" /><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/ivJNNwTGDcw?version=3&amp;hl=en_US" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="480" height="360" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true"></embed></object></p>
<p>Before Jim Henson joined Sesame Street in 1969, the great puppeteer took on various projects during the 60s, sometimes creating experimental films (for example, the Oscar-nominated short <em><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oDwCwMIRJlI">Time Piece</a></em>), other times producing <a href="http://www.openculture.com/2010/09/puppet_making_with_jim_henson_a_primer.html">primers on puppet making</a>, and then pursuing the occasional commercial project &#8212; like the one just uncovered by AT&amp;T.</p>
<p>Back in 1963, Henson was asked to create a short film for a Bell Data Communications Seminar held in Chicago. The conference organizers sent a three-page memo to Henson outlining the main themes of the conference &#8212; one being the strange and sometimes fraught relationship between man and machine. Henson&#8217;s film only runs three minutes, but it gets the message across &#8230; and then some.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.openculture.com/2012/01/jim_hensons_1963_robot_film.html">Jim Henson&#8217;s Zany 1963 Robot Film Uncovered by AT&#038;T: Watch Online</a> is a post from: <a href="http://www.openculture.com">Open Culture</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.openculture.com/2012/01/jim_hensons_1963_robot_film.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>What is Wrong with SOPA?</title>
		<link>http://www.openculture.com/2012/01/what-is-wrong-with-sopa.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.openculture.com/2012/01/what-is-wrong-with-sopa.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Jan 2012 07:38:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dan Colman</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Current Affairs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.openculture.com/?p=25783</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Some of the big websites are going black today to protest SOPA, the Stop Online Piracy Act, that has been winding its way through Congress. We&#8217;re going to handle things in our own way &#8212; by illuminating the matter with a little intelligent media. Backed by the Motion Picture Association of America, SOPA is designed [...]<p><a href="http://www.openculture.com/2012/01/what-is-wrong-with-sopa.html">What is Wrong with SOPA?</a> is a post from: <a href="http://www.openculture.com">Open Culture</a></p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><object classid="clsid:d27cdb6e-ae6d-11cf-96b8-444553540000" width="480" height="360" codebase="http://download.macromedia.com/pub/shockwave/cabs/flash/swflash.cab#version=6,0,40,0"><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true" /><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always" /><param name="src" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/S2vFB3qKqoY?version=3&amp;hl=en_US" /><param name="allowfullscreen" value="true" /><embed allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" src="http://www.youtube.com/v/S2vFB3qKqoY?version=3&amp;hl=en_US" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" height="360" width="480"></embed></object></p>
<p>Some of the big websites are going black today to protest SOPA, <a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052970203735304577167261853938938.html?mod=googlenews_wsj">the Stop Online Piracy Act</a>, that has been winding its way through Congress. We&#8217;re going to handle things in our own way &#8212; by illuminating the matter with a little intelligent media.</p>
<p>Backed by the Motion Picture Association of America, SOPA is designed to debilitate and effectively shut down foreign-based websites that sell pirated movies, music and other goods. That all sounds fine on the face of things. But the legislation, if enacted, would carry with it a series of unexpected consequences that could change the internet as we know it. Among other things, the law could be used to shut down American sites that unwittingly host or link to illegal content &#8212; and without giving the <a href="http://www.scribd.com/carl_franzen/d/72807693-Law-Profs-Letter-Against-SOPA-PROTECT-IP">sites due process, a real day in court</a>. Big sites like YouTube and Twitter could fall under pressure, and so could countless small sites. Needless to say, that could have a serious chilling effect on the openness of the web and free speech.</p>
<p>To give a quick example: It could conceivably be the case that Stanford might object to my featuring their video above, file a claim, and shut the site down without giving me notice and an opportunity to remove the material (as exists under current law). It&#8217;s not likely. But it is possible, and the risk increases with every post we write. If this law passes, the amount of material we could truly safely cover would become ludicrously small, so much so that it wouldn&#8217;t be worth running the site and using the web as an educational medium.</p>
<p>The <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2012/01/15/us/white-house-says-it-opposes-parts-of-2-antipiracy-bills.html">Obama administration has come out against SOPA</a> and <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/PROTECT_IP_Act">PIPA</a>, sidelining the legislation for now. But you can almost guarantee that revisions will be made, and the bills will return soon. So, while other sites go black, we&#8217;re going to do what we do best. We&#8217;re featuring video of an event held in December by the <a href="http://cyberlaw.stanford.edu/">Stanford Center for Internet and Society (SCIS)</a>. What&#8217;s Wrong with SOPA brings together a series of informed opponents to SOPA, including Stanford law professors and business leaders within Silicon Valley. (Find their bios below the jump.) Some of the most incisive comments are made by Fred von Lohmann, a Google lawyer, starting at the 19:10 mark.</p>
<p>Note: If you&#8217;re looking to understand the debate from the perspective of copyright holders, then we&#8217;d recommend you spend time watching, <a href="http://vimeo.com/22541902">Follow the Money: Who Profits from Piracy?</a>, a video that tracks the theft of one movie, making it a microcosm of a larger problem.</p>
<p><span><span style="line-height: 18px;"> </span></span></p>
<p><a href="http://www.openculture.com/2012/01/what-is-wrong-with-sopa.html">What is Wrong with SOPA?</a> is a post from: <a href="http://www.openculture.com">Open Culture</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.openculture.com/2012/01/what-is-wrong-with-sopa.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>M.I.T. Camera Captures Speed of Light: A Trillion-Frames-Per-Second</title>
		<link>http://www.openculture.com/2011/12/mit_camera_captures_speed_of_light.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.openculture.com/2011/12/mit_camera_captures_speed_of_light.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Dec 2011 19:50:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mike Springer</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[MIT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Physics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.openculture.com/?p=24232</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Think of it as the ultimate slow-motion movie camera. Researchers at M.I.T. have developed an imaging system so fast it can trace the motion of pulses of light as they travel through liquids and solids. To put it into perspective, writes John Markoff in The New York Times, &#8220;If a bullet were tracked in the same fashion [...]<p><a href="http://www.openculture.com/2011/12/mit_camera_captures_speed_of_light.html">M.I.T. Camera Captures Speed of Light: A Trillion-Frames-Per-Second</a> is a post from: <a href="http://www.openculture.com">Open Culture</a></p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><object width="480" height="274"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/EtsXgODHMWk?version=3&amp;hl=en_US&amp;hd=1" /><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true" /><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always" /><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/EtsXgODHMWk?version=3&amp;hl=en_US&amp;hd=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="480" height="274" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true"></embed></object></p>
<p>Think of it as the ultimate slow-motion movie camera. Researchers at M.I.T. have developed an imaging system so fast it can trace the motion of pulses of light as they travel through liquids and solids. To put it into perspective, <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2011/12/13/science/speed-of-light-lingers-in-face-of-mit-media-lab-camera.html">writes John Markoff </a>in <em>The New York Times</em>, &#8220;If a bullet were tracked in the same fashion moving through the same fluid, the resulting movie would last three years.&#8221;</p>
<p>The research was directed by <a href="http://web.media.mit.edu/~raskar/">Ramesh Raskar</a> of the <a href="http://cameraculture.media.mit.edu/">Camera Culture</a> group at the M.I.T. Media Lab. In an <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EtsXgODHMWk&amp;feature=player_embedded">abstract</a>, the research team writes:</p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;"><em>We have built an imaging solution that allows us to visualize the propagation of light. The effective exposure time of each frame is two trillionths of a second and the resultant visualization depicts the movement of light at roughly half a trillion frames per second. Direct recording of reflected or scattered light at such a frame rate with sufficient brightness is nearly impossible. We use an indirect &#8216;stroboscopic&#8217; method that records millions of repeated measurements by careful scanning in time and viewpoints. Then we rearrange the data to create a &#8216;movie&#8217; of a nanosecond long event.</em></p>
<p>You can learn more by watching the <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EtsXgODHMWk&amp;feature=player_embedded">video</a> above by Melanie Gonick of the M.I.T. News Office, or by visiting the <a href="http://web.media.mit.edu/~raskar/trillionfps/">project website</a>.</p>
<p>via <a href="http://kottke.org/11/12/camera-shooting-at-a-trillion-framessec-can-see-photons-move">Kottke</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.openculture.com/2011/12/mit_camera_captures_speed_of_light.html">M.I.T. Camera Captures Speed of Light: A Trillion-Frames-Per-Second</a> is a post from: <a href="http://www.openculture.com">Open Culture</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.openculture.com/2011/12/mit_camera_captures_speed_of_light.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>HDR Skies: Beautiful Time-Lapse Film of the French Countryside</title>
		<link>http://www.openculture.com/2011/12/ihdr_skiesi_beautiful_time-lapse_film_of_the_french_countryside.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.openculture.com/2011/12/ihdr_skiesi_beautiful_time-lapse_film_of_the_french_countryside.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Dec 2011 20:01:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mike Springer</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Art]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.openculture.com/?p=23977</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[French photographer Tanguy Louvigny created this time-lapse film of bucolic Normandy and Brittany using High Dynamic Range (HDR) imaging techniques. From forest floor to setting sun, Louvigny&#8217;s shots render fine detail across an extremely wide range of luminosity. To achieve this he used the auto-bracketing feature of his Canon EOS 400D and 60D cameras to create three [...]<p><a href="http://www.openculture.com/2011/12/ihdr_skiesi_beautiful_time-lapse_film_of_the_french_countryside.html"><i>HDR Skies</i>: Beautiful Time-Lapse Film of the French Countryside</a> is a post from: <a href="http://www.openculture.com">Open Culture</a></p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><iframe src="http://player.vimeo.com/video/32238183?title=0&amp;byline=0&amp;portrait=0" width="480" height="270" frameborder="0" webkitAllowFullScreen mozallowfullscreen allowFullScreen></iframe></p>
<p>French photographer Tanguy Louvigny created this time-lapse film of bucolic Normandy and Brittany using High Dynamic Range (HDR) imaging techniques.</p>
<p>From forest floor to setting sun, Louvigny&#8217;s shots render fine detail across an extremely wide range of luminosity. To achieve this he used the auto-bracketing feature of his Canon EOS <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Canon_EOS_400D">400D</a> and <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Canon_Eos_60d">60D</a> cameras to create three different exposures for each frame in the film. (At 30 frames per second, that&#8217;s 90 exposures for each second of screen time.) Louvigny then merged each set of three exposures into one image using <a href="http://www.hdrsoft.com/">Photomatrix</a> Pro 4.0 software, selectively <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tone_mapping">tone mapping</a> each sequence to hold detail in some areas while allowing others to go dark.</p>
<p>To create the moving-camera effects, Louvigny designed and built his own <a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/hdrskies/6360348743/in/photostream/">robotic three-axis motion system</a> using <a href="http://www.tetrixrobotics.com/">Tetrix</a> motors and a <a href="http://mindstorms.lego.com/en-us/Default.aspx">LEGO Mindstorms</a> control system, which he programmed in <a href="http://www.robotc.net/">ROBOTC</a> language. This allowed him to automate the tortoise-like dolly, pan and tilt movements. Louvigny edited the digital film in Adobe <a href="http://www.adobe.com/products/premiere.html">Premiere</a> and <a href="http://www.adobe.com/products/aftereffects.html">After Effects</a> software. To top it off he composed his own music on a <a href="http://www.adobe.com/products/aftereffects.html">Roland MC-808</a> groovebox. For more information, go to the photographer&#8217;s <a href="http://www.hdrskies.com/">website</a> and <em><a href="http://vimeo.com/user5601943">Vimeo</a></em><a href="http://vimeo.com/user5601943"> page</a>.</p>
<p><strong>Related Content:</strong></p>
<p><a href="http://www.openculture.com/2011/04/inventing_the_digital_camera_a_short_portrait_of_steven_sasson.html">Inventing the Digital Camera: A Short Portrait of Steven Sasson</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.openculture.com/2011/05/darrens_big_diy_camera.html">Darren’s Big DIY Camera</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.openculture.com/2011/06/walt_disney_presents_the_super_cartoon_camera.html">Walt Disney Presents the Super Cartoon Camera</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.openculture.com/2011/12/ihdr_skiesi_beautiful_time-lapse_film_of_the_french_countryside.html"><i>HDR Skies</i>: Beautiful Time-Lapse Film of the French Countryside</a> is a post from: <a href="http://www.openculture.com">Open Culture</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.openculture.com/2011/12/ihdr_skiesi_beautiful_time-lapse_film_of_the_french_countryside.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

