Hunter S. Thompson Writes a Blistering, Over-the-Top Letter to Anthony Burgess (1973)

Thompson Burgess Letter

We know Anthony Burgess for having written A Clockwork Orange, but in total, according to Shaun Usher’s More Letters of Note: Correspondence Deserving of a Wider Audience (a book based on the well-known blog), he “published 33 novels, 25 nonfiction titles, produced poetry, short stories and screenplays, composed three symphonies, wrote hundreds of musical pieces, and spoke nine languages fluently.” Yet even such a “prolific, versatile, and highly intelligent” man of letters faces writer’s block now and again.

Take the Rolling Stone thinkpiece Burgess couldn’t manage to write in 1973. Conceding defeat — “things are hell here,” he wrote of his life in Rome at the time — he offered the magazine “a 50,000-word novella I’ve just finished, all about the condition humaine, etc.” in its place. Surely his editor would understand? Alas, unluckily for Burgess, his editor turned out to be one Hunter S. Thompson, who fired back the characteristically blunt but eloquently vitriolic reply you see here:

Dear Mr. Burgess,

Herr Wenner has forwarded your useless letter from Rome to the National Affairs Desk for my examination and/or reply.

Unfortunately, we have no International Gibberish Desk, or it would have ended up there.

What kind of lame, half-mad bullshit are you trying to sneak over on us? When Rolling Stone asks for “a thinkpiece”, goddamnit, we want a fucking Thinkpiece… and don’t try to weasel out with any of your limey bullshit about a “50,000 word novella about the condition humaine, etc…”

Do you take us for a gang of brainless lizards? Rich hoodlums? Dilettante thugs?

You lazy cocksucker. I want that Thinkpiece on my desk by Labor Day. And I want it ready for press. The time has come & gone when cheapjack scum like you can get away with the kind of scams you got rich from in the past.

Get your worthless ass out of the piazza and back to the typewriter. Your type is a dime a dozen around here, Burgess, and I’m fucked if I’m going to stand for it any longer.


Hunter S Thompson

“The desired thinkpiece never appeared in the pages of Rolling Stone,” writes the International Anthony Burgess Foundation’s Graham Foster, “but the essay referred to in these letters, ‘The Clockwork Condition’, was eventually published in the New Yorker in 2012.” In it, Burgess recalls the origins of his best-known novel and considers the causes of the societal conformity he took as one of his themes, arriving at the Orwellian notion that “the burden of making one’s own choices is, for many people, intolerable. To be tied to the necessity of deciding for oneself is to be a slave to one’s will.”

That goes for “where to eat, whom to vote for, what to wear” — and, of course, for what to write a thinkpiece about as well as how to write it. “It is easier to be told,” Burgess writes. “Smoke Hale — ninety per cent less tar; read this novel, seventy-five weeks on the best-seller list; don’t see that movie, it’s artsy-shmartsy.” He even remembers, with a certain fondness, his time in the army: “At first I resented the discipline, the removal of even minimal liberty,” but “soon my reduction to a piece of clockwork began to please me, soothe me.” Fair to say, though, that no matter how demanding the officers above him, the experience didn’t prepare Burgess for a superior like Thompson.

via More Letters of Note and Esquire

Related Content:

Read 10 Free Articles by Hunter S. Thompson That Span His Gonzo Journalist Career (1965-2005)

Read 18 Lost Stories From Hunter S. Thompson’s Forgotten Stint As a Foreign Correspondent

Hunter S. Thompson, Existentialist Life Coach, Gives Tips for Finding Meaning in Life

Hunter S. Thompson’s Ballsy & Hilarious Job Application Letter (1958)

Johnny Depp Reads Letters from Hunter S. Thompson

Based in Seoul, Colin Marshall writes and broadcasts on cities, language, and style. He’s at work on a book about Los Angeles, A Los Angeles Primer, the video series The City in Cinema, the crowdfunded journalism project Where Is the City of the Future?, and the Los Angeles Review of Books’ Korea Blog. Follow him on Twitter at @colinmarshall or on Facebook.

by | Permalink | Comments (9) |

Support Open Culture

We’re hoping to rely on our loyal readers rather than erratic ads. To support Open Culture’s educational mission, please consider making a donation. We accept PayPal, Venmo (@openculture), Patreon and Crypto! Please find all options here. We thank you!

Comments (9)
You can skip to the end and leave a response. Pinging is currently not allowed.
  • FTB says:

    As funny and cathartic as that was for him truth be told Burgess was ten times the writer Thompson ever was.

  • baktash says:

    awsom letter.this was almost too funny.thanks for posting it.

  • Chris says:

    Hunter Thompson lacks wit and is hugely overrated.

  • Marco says:

    Well, all the world knows, reads and appreciates Anthony Burgess. Who is Hunter S Thompson? This says all.
    Not to mention we’re talking about Rolling Stone…

  • Joe says:

    Chris lacks balls and is probably a hack.

  • allhailgonzo says:

    What a bunch of disrespectful, slanderous filth in these comments. If his writing is anything like clockwork orange, he is in no literary sense close to hunter s Thompson. You can’t compare real life experience to rubbish fantasy. Clockwork Orange was a shitty movie. I saw it a couple times and I didn’t enjoy it. It made me think of how delusional and messed up someone would have to be to write something like that.

    Hunter S Thompson provided a perspective that no one else on this earth has or ever will. That is worthy of respect in my books.

    I’d like to see these keyboard warriors run with the Hell’s Angels like Hunter did.

    Real life>Fantasy

  • FTB says:

    Let’s see, you can’t figure out the difference between a book and a movie director’s vision of that book, you haven’t read anything by Burgess, you think riding with the Hell’s Angels is some sort of literary achievement and you’re angry those who have read both authors don’t agree with your views.

    It’s OK to be stupid, often it’s not your fault–genetics, environment, etc all play a role–but the secret is not to show your stupidity off to everyone. Give mommy her laptop back, you’ll thank me when you grow up.

  • Rathbone says:

    All kidding aside, can someone please explain why “To be tied to the necessity of deciding for oneself is to be a slave to one’s will.” isn’t complete drivel?

  • Ataxias says:

    It’s because taking decisions requires mental effort, and entails responsibility. You are fully responsible for your decisions, and you have to accept the consequences, including remorse and wondering about what could have been different should you have opted for something else. By contrast, being told what to do is liberating – you don’t have to ponder over possible advantages and disadvantages, losses, gains, morality. And best of all? No matter the outcome, it’s not your fault. You were simply doing what you had been told.

Leave a Reply

Open Culture was founded by Dan Colman.