If you want to see the Mona Lisa in real life, your first thought may not be to head to the PraÂdo. But accordÂing to a school of thought that has emerged in recent years, the Mona Lisa in Madrid has a greater claim to artisÂtic faithÂfulÂness than the one in Paris. That’s because researchers have disÂcovÂered comÂpelling eviÂdence sugÂgestÂing that what was long conÂsidÂered just anothÂer copy of the most famous paintÂing in the world wasÂn’t made after LeonarÂdo had comÂpletÂed the origÂiÂnal, but conÂcurÂrentÂly with the origÂiÂnal, probÂaÂbly by one of his stuÂdents. Over half a milÂlenÂniÂum, in this view, the Prado’s Mona Lisa has retained the colÂors and details the LouÂvre’s has lost, resultÂing in its preserÂvaÂtion of LeonarÂdo’s intenÂtions today.
Infrared phoÂtogÂraÂphy has even revealed, says the narÂraÂtor of the new InspiÂragÂgio video above, that both paintÂings “share the same changes in the origÂiÂnal sketch. For years, it has been known that LeonarÂdo made small corÂrecÂtions to the shape of the Mona Lisa’s hands, adjustÂments to the line of the eyes, and subÂtle modÂiÂfiÂcaÂtions to the curve of the face,” the very same corÂrecÂtions that were found in the newÂly examÂined copy.
Unlike othÂer copies, the Prado’s verÂsion uses “incredÂiÂbly expenÂsive pigÂments” such as lapis lazuli—imported from Afghanistan—for the sky. This only became eviÂdent durÂing the 2012 restoraÂtion, when the backÂground, long hidÂden under a thick layÂer of black, was finalÂly uncovÂered.

ThereÂafter, the PraÂdo Mona Lisa was exhibÂitÂed alongÂside the Mona Lisa at the LouÂvre in a temÂpoÂrary exhiÂbiÂtion. This gave the pubÂlic the chance to see both how simÂiÂlar they look, and how difÂferÂent. Though undeÂniÂably La GioÂconÂda, the copy doesÂn’t seem quite “right,” in large part because it hasÂn’t deteÂriÂoÂratÂed in the manÂner or to the degree of the origÂiÂnal. LeonarÂdo paintÂed it on a poplar wood panÂel that has givÂen way to countÂless small cracks, and the layÂers of yelÂlow varÂnish added over the cenÂturies have darkÂened to give the whole image a sepia tone. The result, of course, is the texÂture and colÂorÂing we’ve come to assoÂciate with the Mona Lisa by ceaseÂless expoÂsure to her in popÂuÂlar culÂture, even if we’ve nevÂer seen any verÂsion hangÂing in any museÂum. If the Prado’s copy realÂly does reflect LeonarÂdo’s origÂiÂnal artisÂtic choicÂes, we can put at least one hotÂly debatÂed matÂter to rest: the lady realÂly did have eyeÂbrows.
RelatÂed conÂtent:
What Makes Leonardo’s Mona Lisa a Great PaintÂing?: An ExplaÂnaÂtion in 15 MinÂutes
Did LeonarÂdo da VinÂci Paint a First Mona Lisa Before the Mona Lisa?
How Did the Mona Lisa Become the World’s Most Famous PaintÂing?: It’s Not What You Think
Based in Seoul, ColÂin Marshall writes and broadÂcasts on cities, lanÂguage, and culÂture. His projects include the SubÂstack newsletÂter Books on Cities and the book The StateÂless City: a Walk through 21st-CenÂtuÂry Los AngeÂles. FolÂlow him on the social netÂwork forÂmerÂly known as TwitÂter at @colinmarshall.






