When Salvador Dali Met Sigmund Freud, and Changed Freud’s Mind About Surrealism (1938)

The close asso­ci­a­tions between Sur­re­al­ism and Freudi­an psy­cho­analy­sis were lib­er­al­ly encour­aged by the most famous pro­po­nent of the move­ment, Sal­vador Dalí, who con­sid­ered him­self a devot­ed fol­low­er of Freud. We don’t have to won­der what the founder of psy­cho­analy­sis would have thought of his self-appoint­ed pro­tégé.

We have them record­ing, in their own words, their impres­sions of their one and only meeting—which took place in July of 1938, at Freud’s home in Lon­don. Freud was 82, Dalí 34. We also have sketch­es Dalí made of Freud while the two sat togeth­er. Their mem­o­ries of events, shall we say, dif­fer con­sid­er­ably, or at least they seemed total­ly bewil­dered by each oth­er. (Freud pro­nounced Dalí a “fanat­ic.”)

In any case, there’s absolute­ly no way the encounter could have lived up to Dalí’s expec­ta­tions, as the Freud Muse­um Lon­don notes:

[Dalí] had already trav­elled to Vien­na sev­er­al times but failed to make an intro­duc­tion. Instead, he wrote in his auto­bi­og­ra­phy, he spent his time hav­ing “long and exhaus­tive imag­i­nary con­ver­sa­tions” with his hero, at one point fan­ta­siz­ing that he “came home with me and stayed all night cling­ing to the cur­tains of my room in the Hotel Sach­er.”

Freud was cer­tain­ly not going to indulge Dalí’s pecu­liar fan­tasies, but what the artist real­ly want­ed was val­i­da­tion of his work—and maybe his very being. “Dalí had spent his teens and ear­ly twen­ties read­ing Freud’s works on the uncon­scious,” writes Paul Gal­lagher at Dan­ger­ous Minds, “on sex­u­al­i­ty and The Inter­pre­ta­tion of Dreams.” He was obsessed. Final­ly meet­ing Freud in ’38, he must have felt “like a believ­er might feel when com­ing face-to-face with God.”

He brought with him his lat­est paint­ing The Meta­mor­pho­sis of Nar­cis­sus, and an arti­cle he had pub­lished on para­noia. This, espe­cial­ly, Dalí hoped would gain the respect of the elder­ly Freud.

Try­ing to inter­est him, I explained that it was not a sur­re­al­ist diver­sion, but was real­ly an ambi­tious­ly sci­en­tif­ic arti­cle, and I repeat­ed the title, point­ing to it at the same time with my fin­ger. Before his imper­turbable indif­fer­ence, my voice became invol­un­tar­i­ly sharp­er and more insis­tent.

On being shown the paint­ing, Freud sup­pos­ed­ly said, “in clas­sic paint­ings I look for the uncon­scious, but in your paint­ings I look for the con­scious.” The com­ment stung, though Dalí wasn’t entire­ly sure what it meant. But he took it as fur­ther evi­dence that the meet­ing was a bust. Sketch­ing Freud in the draw­ing below, he wrote, “Freud’s cra­ni­um is a snail! His brain is in the form of a spiral—to be extract­ed with a nee­dle!”

One might see why Freud was sus­pi­cious of Sur­re­al­ists, “who have appar­ent­ly cho­sen me as their patron saint,” he wrote to Ste­fan Zweig, the mutu­al friend who intro­duced him to Dalí. In 1921, poet and Sur­re­al­ist man­i­festo writer André Bre­ton “had shown up unin­vit­ed on [Freud’s] doorstep.” Unhap­py with his recep­tion, Bre­ton pub­lished a “bit­ter attack,” call­ing Freud an “old man with­out ele­gance” and lat­er accused Freud of pla­gia­riz­ing him.

Despite the mem­o­ry of this nas­ti­ness, and Freud’s gen­er­al dis­taste for mod­ern art, he could­n’t help but be impressed with Dalí. “Until then,” he wrote to Zweig, “I was inclined to look upon the sur­re­al­ists… as absolute (let us say 95 per­cent, like alco­hol), cranks. That young Spaniard, how­ev­er, with his can­did and fanat­i­cal eyes, and his unde­ni­able tech­ni­cal mas­tery, has made me recon­sid­er my opin­ion.”

Note: An ear­li­er ver­sion of this post appeared on our site in 2020.

Relat­ed Con­tent:

Sig­mund Freud Appears in Rare, Sur­viv­ing Video & Audio Record­ed Dur­ing the 1930s

When Sal­vador Dalí Gave a Sur­re­al­ist Lec­ture in a Div­ing Suit … and Almost Suf­fo­cat­ed (1936)

The Famous Break Up of Sig­mund Freud & Carl Jung Explained in a New Ani­mat­ed Video

How a Young Sig­mund Freud Researched & Got Addict­ed to Cocaine, the New “Mir­a­cle Drug,” in 1894

What Makes Sal­vador Dalí’s Icon­ic Sur­re­al­ist Paint­ing “The Per­sis­tence of Mem­o­ry” a Great Work of Art

Josh Jones is a writer and musi­cian based in Durham, NC. 

The Painting Nobody Wanted: How Matisse’s The Red Studio Went from a London Nightclub to a Masterpiece of Modern Art

A jour­nal­ist paid Hen­ri Matisse a vis­it not long after he’d paint­ed The Red Stu­dio in 1911. “I like it, but I don’t com­plete­ly under­stand it,” the artist is quot­ed as admit­ting of that lat­est work. “I like it, but I don’t know why I pre­cise­ly paint­ed it this way.” The paint­ing was a ren­di­tion of the very same Issy-les-Moulin­eaux stu­dio in which they were talk­ing, though you would­n’t nec­es­sar­i­ly rec­og­nize it at first glance. Deep red cov­ered two-thirds of its sur­face, an unortho­dox choice that prob­a­bly con­tributed to its rejec­tion by Matis­se’s loy­al patron Sergei Shchukin, who’d com­mis­sioned Dance and Music. This depar­ture from strict rep­re­sen­ta­tion fared no bet­ter when it was shown in Lon­don, and there­after at the ground­break­ing 1913 “Armory Show” in the Unit­ed States.

By 1926, when The Red Stu­dio final­ly made its Paris debut, pub­lic sen­si­bil­i­ties had begun to catch up with Matis­se’s instincts. The fol­low­ing year, it found a buy­er in the own­er of Lon­don’s Gar­goyle Club, a favorite haunt of the Bright Young Things, where the paint­ing would hang for more than a decade.

Even­tu­al­ly it end­ed up at the Muse­um of Mod­ern Art, whose video at the top of the post tells the sto­ry of the paint­ing’s jour­ney from endur­ing absolute rejec­tion to exert­ing great influ­ence on post­war New York artists like Mark Rothko, Bar­nett New­man, and Ellsworth Kel­ly. All of those younger painters were explor­ing the pos­si­bil­i­ties of what MoMA cura­tor Ann Temkin calls “a big expanse of col­or that does­n’t describe any­thing, that just is there for its own expres­sive pur­pos­es.”

Gal­lerist-YouTu­ber James Payne explores the paint­ing’s evo­lu­tion in greater detail  in his new Great Art Explained video above. But this image, which “seemed to break almost every estab­lished rule of West­ern paint­ing,” did­n’t come out of nowhere. Around the turn of the twen­ti­eth cen­tu­ry, sci­en­tif­ic and tech­no­log­i­cal devel­op­ments were chang­ing human­i­ty’s under­stand­ing of real­i­ty, while Paris was becom­ing espe­cial­ly fer­tile ground for new ideas about art, per­cep­tion, and rep­re­sen­ta­tion. Inspired by a vari­ety of oth­er Euro­pean artists and, increas­ing­ly, for­eign cul­tures as well, Matisse had already made his mark as one of the so-called Fau­vists, a group of painters who ont épaté la bour­geoisie with their bold, delib­er­ate­ly non-real­is­tic use of col­or. Fol­low­ing his instincts from there, Matisse cre­at­ed this scene awash in red and bereft of any human pres­ence — and in so doing, as Payne explains while exam­in­ing it object by object and art­work by art­work, cre­at­ed what may well be his great­est self-por­trait.

Relat­ed con­tent:

How Hen­ri Matisse Scan­dal­ized the Art Estab­lish­ment with His Dar­ing Use of Col­or

Hen­ri Matisse Illus­trates James Joyce’s Ulysses (1935)

When Hen­ri Matisse Was 83 Years Old, He Couldn’t Go to His Favorite Swim­ming Pool, So He Cre­at­ed a Swim­ming Pool as a Work of Art

Hen­ri Matisse Illus­trates Baudelaire’s Cen­sored Poet­ry Col­lec­tion Les Fleurs du Mal

Van Gogh’s Ugli­est Mas­ter­piece: A Break­down of His Late, Great Paint­ing, The Night Café (1888)

Watch Icon­ic Artists at Work: Rare Videos of Picas­so, Matisse, Kandin­sky, Renoir, Mon­et, Pol­lock & More

Based in Seoul, Col­in Marshall writes and broad­casts on cities, lan­guage, and cul­ture. He’s the author of the newslet­ter Books on Cities as well as the books 한국 요약 금지 (No Sum­ma­riz­ing Korea) and Kore­an Newtro. Fol­low him on the social net­work for­mer­ly known as Twit­ter at @colinmarshall.

A New Search Engine Lets You Explore 4 Million Works of Art & Historical Photographs from Museums and Libraries Around the World

We live in an age when you can describe prac­ti­cal­ly any­thing you want to see in words, then see it almost imme­di­ate­ly. Nobody will ever have laid eyes upon that par­tic­u­lar sight before — and quite pos­si­bly, nobody ever will again. There we have both the upside and the down­side of arti­fi­cial intel­li­gence-pow­ered image gen­er­a­tion. A con­stant flow of visu­al, aur­al, or tex­tu­al nov­el­ty offers stim­u­la­tion, to put it mild­ly, but it inevitably comes to feel insub­stan­tial. How­ev­er com­plex­ly derived from the work of human­i­ty it may be, it lacks a direct con­nec­tion to that work. Not so the results deliv­ered by Arkivism, a new search engine that responds to descrip­tions by draw­ing on a col­lec­tion of more than four mil­lion pieces of real art and pho­tog­ra­phy.

You may need a “town at sun­set,” a “col­or­ful cake,” a “rock­et ship blast­ing off,” a “Japan­ese wood­block print of a cat,” or some­thing else besides. Arkivism will more than like­ly be able to come up with more than a few images to fit the bill, with sources at hand includ­ing the Library of Con­gress, the NASA Video and Image Library, the Rijksmu­se­um, and Japan’s Nation­al Diet Library. (I notice that its reach extends even to the Gongu Copy­right Com­mis­sion in Korea, where I live, which will make it my go-to site when next I need to evoke the Joseon Dynasty.) The chance of dis­cov­er­ing a work of art you’d nev­er heard of is always high, even if you search a big name like Rem­brandt, Leonar­do, Klimt, or Hoku­sai.

“Every work indexed here is CC0 or pub­lic domain,” says Arkivis­m’s about page. “Down­load it, adapt it, use it in client work — no per­mis­sion need­ed, no strings.” Like all the best online ser­vices, this one was designed to answer the actu­al needs of its cre­ator, “a design­er and video cre­ator who kept need­ing imagery that was gen­uine­ly safe to use — and kept los­ing after­noons to a dozen muse­um search box­es.” Even if your work has noth­ing to do with design or video cre­ation, you nev­er know when you’ll be look­ing for a pic­ture of a cas­tle, a paint­ing of a feast, or a map of the world. Sure, you could always ask AI to gen­er­ate one for you, and you’d get some­thing more or less usable. Some­times that’s what you need; oth­er times, you’re ready to be led down a his­tor­i­cal and cul­tur­al rab­bit hole. Enter Arkivism here.

via Kot­tke

Relat­ed con­tent:

A Free Online Archive Lets You Explore 5.8 Mil­lion Works of Art Span­ning 5,000 Years of His­to­ry

Down­load Great Works of Art from 40+ Muse­ums World­wide: Explore Artvee, the New Art Search Engine

A Search Engine for Find­ing Free, Pub­lic Domain Images from World-Class Muse­ums

Explore the New­ly-Launched Pub­lic Domain Image Archive with 10,000+ Free His­tor­i­cal Images

Cre­ative Com­mons Offi­cial­ly Launch­es a Search Engine That Index­es 300+ Mil­lion Pub­lic Domain Images

Based in Seoul, Col­in Marshall writes and broad­casts on cities, lan­guage, and cul­ture. He’s the author of the newslet­ter Books on Cities as well as the books 한국 요약 금지 (No Sum­ma­riz­ing Korea) and Kore­an Newtro. Fol­low him on the social net­work for­mer­ly known as Twit­ter at @colinmarshall.

The Vibrant Color Wheels Designed by Goethe, Newton & Other Theorists of Color (1665–1810)

Maybe it’s the clois­tered headi­ness of Rene Descartes, or the rig­or­ous aus­ter­i­ty of Isaac New­ton; maybe it’s all the leath­ern breech­es, gray waist­coats, sal­low faces, and pow­dered wigs… but we tend not to asso­ciate Enlight­en­ment Europe with an explo­sion of col­or the­o­ry. Yet philoso­phers of the late 17th and 18th cen­turies were obsessed with light and sight. Descartes wrote a trea­tise on optics, as did New­ton.

New­ton first described in his 1672 paper the “rev­o­lu­tion­ary new the­o­ry of light and colour,” the Uni­ver­si­ty of Cam­bridge Whip­ple Library writes, “in which he claimed that exper­i­ments with prisms proved that white light was com­prised of light of sev­en dis­tinct colours.” Sci­en­tists debat­ed Newton’s the­o­ry “well into the 19th cen­tu­ry.”

One ear­ly oppo­nent famous­ly illus­trat­ed his rebut­tal. Poet, writer, and sci­en­tist Johann Wolf­gang von Goethe pub­lished The­o­ry of Col­ors (see here), with its care­ful­ly hand-drawn and col­ored dia­grams and wheels, in 1810. From New­ton’s time onward, col­or the­o­rists elab­o­rat­ed pre­vail­ing con­cepts with col­or wheels, the first attrib­uted to New­ton in 1704 (and drawn in black and white, above).

Newton’s wheel “arranged red, orange, yel­low, green, blue, indi­go, and vio­let into a nat­ur­al pro­gres­sion on a rotat­ing disk.” A few years lat­er, two col­or circles—one with 7 col­ors and anoth­er with 12—appeared in a paint­ing man­u­al attrib­uted to Claude Boutet (top), based on Newton’s the­o­ries. Artists, chemists, map­mak­ers, poets, even ento­mol­o­gists… every­one seemed to have a pet the­o­ry of col­or, gen­er­al­ly accom­pa­nied by elab­o­rate col­ored charts and dia­grams.

The col­or wheel was one among many forms—which often pre­sent­ed con­trast­ing the­o­ries, like that of Jacques-Fabi­en Gau­ti­er, who argued that black and white were pri­ma­ry col­ors. But the wheel, and Newton’s basic ideas about it, have endured almost unchanged. The wheel fur­ther up (third one from top) by British ento­mol­o­gist Moses Har­ris from 1766 shows Newton’s 7‑color scheme sim­pli­fied to the 6 pri­ma­ry and sec­ondary col­ors we usu­al­ly see, arranged in the com­ple­men­tary and anal­o­gous scheme, with ter­tiary gra­da­tions between them. Anoth­er ento­mol­o­gist, Ignaz Schif­fer­müller, drew the 12-col­or wheel right above.

Col­or is always rep­re­sen­ta­tive. Newton’s orig­i­nal wheel includ­ed “musi­cal notes cor­re­lat­ed with col­or.” By the end of the 18th cen­tu­ry, col­or the­o­ry had become increas­ing­ly tied to psy­cho­log­i­cal the­o­ries and typolo­gies, as in the wheel above, the “rose of tem­pera­ments,” made by Goethe and Friedrich Schiller in 1799 to illus­trate “human occu­pa­tions and char­ac­ter traits,” the Pub­lic Domain Review notes, includ­ing “tyrants, heroes, adven­tur­ers, hedo­nists, lovers, poets, pub­lic speak­ers, his­to­ri­ans, teach­ers, philoso­phers, pedants, rulers,” grouped into the four tem­pera­ments of humoral the­o­ry.

It’s a fair­ly short leap from these psy­cholo­gies of col­or to those used by adver­tis­ers and com­mer­cial design­ers in the 20th century—or from the artists and sci­en­tists’ col­or the­o­ries to abstract expres­sion­ism, the Bauhaus school, and the chemists and pho­tog­ra­phers who recre­at­ed the col­ors of the world on film. (Goethe’s col­or wheel, below, from The­o­ry of Col­ors, illus­trates his chap­ter on “Alle­gor­i­cal, sym­bol­ic, and mys­ti­cal use of colour.”) See more ear­ly col­or wheels, like Philipp Otto Runge’s 1810 Far­benkugel, as well as oth­er con­cep­tu­al col­or schemes, at the Pub­lic Domain Review.

Note: An ear­li­er ver­sion of this post appeared on our site in 2017.

Relat­ed Con­tent:

The Woman Who The­o­rized Col­or: An Intro­duc­tion to Mary Gartside’s New The­o­ry of Colours (1808)

A 900-Page Pre-Pan­tone Guide to Col­or from 1692: A Com­plete High-Res­o­lu­tion Dig­i­tal Scan

Goethe’s The­o­ry of Col­ors: The 1810 Trea­tise That Inspired Kandin­sky & Ear­ly Abstract Paint­ing

How Tech­ni­col­or Rev­o­lu­tion­ized Cin­e­ma with Sur­re­al, Elec­tric Col­ors & Changed How We See Our World

Josh Jones is a writer and musi­cian based in Durham, NC. 

How Vincent van Gogh’s Sister-in-Law Worked Tirelessly to Make Him Famous

No artist, no mat­ter how soli­tary by nature, becomes a cul­tur­al phe­nom­e­non alone. That’s even true of such an iso­lat­ed fig­ure as Vin­cent van Gogh, whose death in obscu­ri­ty at the age of 37 left open the ques­tion of who, if any­one, would vouch­safe his paint­ings to pos­ter­i­ty. The sup­port of the artist’s younger broth­er Theo is often giv­en a good deal of cred­it for mak­ing his work pos­si­ble, and not with­out rea­son. What’s some­what less wide­ly known is that Theo, who’d long been in poor health, died less than a year after Vin­cen­t’s sui­cide. The work of ensur­ing the lat­ter’s lega­cy then fell to the for­mer’s wid­ow Johan­na Bonger — or per­haps she under­stood that if she did­n’t stew­ard it, nobody else would.

As Cindy Poh explains in the New­s­think video above, Bonger inher­it­ed a great many of van Gogh’s works and stored them away while devis­ing a plan to make them famous. Prac­ti­cal­ly going door-to-door — and some­times, it seems, lit­er­al­ly going door-to-door — she stayed engaged with the late Theo’s art-world con­tacts. She cut sweet­heart deals with muse­ums and even donat­ed art­works out­right, increas­ing their chance of pub­lic expo­sure. She orga­nized exhi­bi­tions every­where from Paris to Berlin to Lon­don to New York, the most piv­otal being one held at Ams­ter­dam’s Stedelijk Muse­um in 1905. The 484 works put on dis­play made it the largest van Gogh show in his­to­ry, a record it still holds today.

At that time, well before The Star­ry Night and Sun­flow­ers adorned cof­fee mugs in sub­ur­ban house­holds the world over, van Gogh’s art could still shock some crit­ics with its uncon­ven­tion­al­i­ty. Oth­ers, how­ev­er, showed signs of the enrap­ture­ment that Bonger must have sus­pect­ed would one day be pos­si­ble. Think­ing strate­gi­cal­ly, she pre­ferred to sell few­er pieces for high­er prices, pre­serv­ing the val­ue of his work and lim­it­ing its avail­abil­i­ty on the mar­ket. After her sec­ond hus­band’s death, she redou­bled her ded­i­ca­tion to the art that had become her life’s mis­sion, even trans­lat­ing and pub­lish­ing the hun­dreds of let­ters he’d left behind, most of which were sent to Theo. We’ve heard many artists described as mar­ried to their work, a cliché that applies well enough to Vin­cent van Gogh him­self. But to be mar­ried to one’s broth­er-in-law’s work is a rar­er thing indeed — and some­times a more impor­tant one.

Relat­ed con­tent:

1,000+ Art­works by Vin­cent Van Gogh Dig­i­tized & Put Online by Dutch Muse­ums

Vin­cent Van Gogh’s The Star­ry Night: Why It’s a Great Paint­ing in 15 Min­utes

A Com­plete Archive of Vin­cent van Gogh’s Let­ters: Beau­ti­ful­ly Illus­trat­ed and Ful­ly Anno­tat­ed

Behold the New­ly-Dis­cov­ered Sketch by Vin­cent van Gogh Sketch, “Study for Worn Out” (1882)

Dis­cov­er the Only Paint­ing Van Gogh Ever Sold Dur­ing His Life­time

Maria Anna Mozart Was a Musi­cal Prodi­gy Like Her Broth­er Wolf­gang, So Why Did She Get Erased from His­to­ry?

Based in Seoul, Col­in Marshall writes and broad­casts on cities, lan­guage, and cul­ture. He’s the author of the newslet­ter Books on Cities as well as the books 한국 요약 금지 (No Sum­ma­riz­ing Korea) and Kore­an Newtro. Fol­low him on the social net­work for­mer­ly known as Twit­ter at @colinmarshall.

 

 

Soviet-Era Illustrations of J. R. R. Tolkien’s The Hobbit (1976)

Hobbit1

Until I read J. R. R. Tolkien’s The Lord of the Rings, my favorite book grow­ing up was, by far, The Hob­bit. Grow­ing up in Rus­sia, how­ev­er, meant that instead of Tolkien’s Eng­lish ver­sion, my par­ents read me a Russ­ian trans­la­tion. To me, the trans­la­tion eas­i­ly matched the pace and won­der of Tolkien’s orig­i­nal. Look­ing back, The Hob­bit prob­a­bly made such an indeli­ble impres­sion on me because Tolkien’s tale was alto­geth­er dif­fer­ent than the Russ­ian fairy tales and children’s sto­ries that I had pre­vi­ous­ly been exposed to. There were no child­ish hijinks, no young pro­tag­o­nists, no par­ents to res­cue you when you got into trou­ble. I con­sid­ered it an epic in the truest lit­er­ary sense.

As with many Russ­ian trans­la­tions dur­ing the Cold War, the book came with a com­plete­ly dif­fer­ent set of illus­tra­tions. Mine, I remem­ber regret­ting slight­ly, lacked pic­tures alto­geth­er. A friend’s edi­tion, how­ev­er, was illus­trat­ed in the typ­i­cal Russ­ian style: much more tra­di­tion­al­ly styl­ized than Tolkien’s own draw­ings, they were more angu­lar, friend­lier, almost car­toon­ish. In this post, we include a num­ber of these images from the 1976 print­ing. The cov­er, above, depicts a grin­ning Bil­bo Bag­gins hold­ing a gem. Below, Gan­dalf, an osten­si­bly harm­less soul, pays Bil­bo a vis­it.

2

Next, we have the three trolls, argu­ing about their var­i­ous eat­ing arrange­ments, with Bil­bo hid­ing to the side.

3

Here, Gol­lum, né Sméagol, pad­dles his raft in the depths of the moun­tains.

4

Final­ly, here’s Bil­bo, ful­fill­ing his role as a bur­glar in Smaug’s lair.

5

Note: An ear­li­er ver­sion of this post appeared on our site in 2014.

Ilia Blin­d­er­man is a Mon­tre­al-based cul­ture and sci­ence writer. 

Relat­ed Con­tent:

110 Draw­ings and Paint­ings by J.R.R. Tolkien: Of Mid­dle-Earth and Beyond

The Only Draw­ing from Mau­rice Sendak’s Short-Lived Attempt to Illus­trate The Hob­bit

A Long-Lost Sovi­et Adap­ta­tion of The Lord of the Rings Resur­faces on YouTube–and Tolkien Fans Rejoice (1991)

J.R.R. Tolkien, Using a Tape Recorder for the First Time, Reads from The Hob­bit for 30 Min­utes (1952)

Dis­cov­er J.R.R. Tolkien’s Per­son­al Book Cov­er Designs for The Lord of the Rings Tril­o­gy

by | Permalink | Make a Comment ( 3 ) |

A 900-Page Pre-Pantone Guide to Color from 1692: A Complete High-Resolution Digital Scan

There’s ahead of its time, then there’s Traité des couleurs ser­vant à la pein­ture à l’eau — or, in its orig­i­nal Dutch title, Klaer Ligh­t­ende Spiegel der Ver­fkon­st, a 900-page book of paint col­ors made before any such things were com­mon tools of the artist’s, scientist’s, and indus­tri­al designer’s trade. Author and artist A. Boogert cre­at­ed one, and only one, copy of his extra­or­di­nary man­u­al on col­or mix­ing in 1692. Appear­ing on the thresh­old of mod­ern col­or the­o­ry, and fea­tur­ing over 700 pages of col­or swatch­es, the book draws on Aristotle’s sys­tem of col­or rather than the new under­stand­ing of the col­or spec­trum, ful­ly elab­o­rat­ed by New­ton in his Opticks over a decade lat­er.

It would be anoth­er hun­dred years before a flood tide of col­or books began to make the the­o­ry more prac­ti­cal: from Goethe’s 1810 The­o­ry of Col­ors and Werner’s 1814 Nomen­cla­ture of Colour to the dream of col­or stan­dard­iza­tion real­ized: the Pan­tone com­pa­ny, launched in 1963.

But if A. Boogert had much influ­ence on the the­o­ry or prac­ti­cal appli­ca­tion of col­or in his day, there doesn’t seem to be much evi­dence for it. Of course most of the Dutch mas­ters had died when the book was com­plet­ed, and it seems unlike­ly that those still work­ing in 1692 would have been famil­iar with its sin­gle copy.

Instead, the book was meant to edu­cate water­col­orists, hence its French title, which refers to “water-based paint.” (A lit­er­al trans­la­tion of the Dutch runs some­thing like “clear­ly light­ing mir­ror of the paint­ing art.”) Medieval his­to­ri­an Erik Kwakkel found the book in a French data­base, “and it turns out to be quite spe­cial,” he writes, “because it pro­vides an unusu­al peek into the work­shop of 17th-cen­tu­ry painters and illus­tra­tors.

In over 700 pages of hand­writ­ten Dutch, the author, who iden­ti­fies him­self as A. Boogert, describes how to make water­colour paints. He explains how to mix the colours and how to change their tone by adding ‘one, two or three por­tions of water.’… In the 17th Cen­tu­ry, an age known as the Gold­en Age of Dutch Paint­ing, this man­u­al would have hit the right spot.”

The book is cur­rent­ly housed at Bib­lio­thèque Méjanes in Aix-en-Provence, where you’ll find full-page, zoomable, hi-res­o­lu­tion scans. “Beyond being infor­ma­tion­al, the images from the book are stun­ning and addic­tive flip through,” notes Refinery29. “They resem­ble page after page of Pan­tone col­or chips, except with­out the house­hold name.” One won­ders if “A. Boogert” would have become a house­hold name had his book been print­ed and dis­trib­uted. But his col­or sys­tem was already pass­ing away in the New­ton­ian age of col­or spec­trums and wheels, until paint chips final­ly came back in style. Vis­it the col­or man­u­al online here.

Note: An ear­li­er ver­sion of this post appeared on our site in 2019.

Relat­ed Con­tent: 

Goethe’s Col­or­ful & Abstract Illus­tra­tions for His 1810 Trea­tise, The­o­ry of Col­ors: Scans of the First Edi­tion

Werner’s Nomen­cla­ture of Colour, the 19th-Cen­tu­ry “Col­or Dic­tio­nary” Used by Charles Dar­win (1814)

The Vibrant Col­or Wheels Designed by Goethe, New­ton & Oth­er The­o­rists of Col­or (1665–1810)

Josh Jones is a writer and musi­cian based in Durham, NC. 

David Byrne’s New Book Explores the Strange Afterlife of Good Ideas: From Vermeer’s Paintings to Roman Concrete & Dark Matter

David Byrne will always be most wide­ly known as the co-founder and front­man of Talk­ing Heads. That may count among the great­est pos­si­ble achieve­ments for any artist — to the minds of many an Open Cul­ture read­er, at least — but it must occa­sion­al­ly frus­trate the man him­self. Talk­ing Heads broke up 35 years ago, but Byrne has only grown more and more pro­duc­tive since, record­ing his own albums, cre­at­ing musi­cals, writ­ing books, putting on Pow­er­Point pre­sen­ta­tions, and even design­ing bike racks. By now, his ideas have stretched so far beyond music that he’s con­sid­er­ing the nature of ideas them­selves, how they suc­ceed or fail in catch­ing on, and why they go in and out of accep­tance over time. Hence his new book Sleep­ing Beau­ties: Why Good Ideas Go Dor­mant and How They Wake Up.

“I first saw the term ‘sleep­ing beau­ties’ (out­side of the folk­tale or the Dis­ney movie) when I went down a rab­bit hole and stum­bled on a paper from 2004 called “Sleep­ing Beau­ties in Sci­ence” by the sci­en­to­met­rics researcher Antho­ny van Raan at Lei­den Uni­ver­si­ty,” Byrne writes in an excerpt of the book pub­lished online. (Sci­en­to­met­rics being, he adds, “the study of the impact and com­mu­ni­ca­tion of sci­ence.”) He cites a favorite exam­ple of the astronomer Vera Rubin’s dis­cov­ery, in the nine­teen-sev­en­ties, of “evi­dence for dark mat­ter, which is esti­mat­ed to make up a large percent­age of the uni­verse.” Under­stand­ing her own obser­va­tions required her to “ques­tion even her most basic assump­tions — that mat­ter must emit light and radi­a­tion. She was a visu­al thinker, and she used her data to cre­ate plots and sketch­es that revealed pat­terns with­in the num­bers.”

Only decades lat­er was Rubin’s coun­ter­in­tu­itive vision of the uni­verse sup­port­ed by the­o­ret­i­cal physi­cists and radio astrono­mers using ever more tech­no­log­i­cal­ly advanced tools like “the pow­er­ful Hale Tele­scope, Kent Ford’s new spec­tro­graph, and the Uhu­ru satel­lite, which tracked cos­mic X‑rays.” In the Sci­ence Fri­day inter­view at the top of the post, Byrne brings up a much old­er, longer-sleep­ing beau­ty often fea­tured here on Open Cul­ture: ancient Roman con­crete, the source of whose extra­or­di­nary strength and endurance was only deter­mined a few years ago. Though espe­cial­ly vivid in tech­nol­o­gy and sci­ence, “this for­get­ting and then remem­ber­ing, I knew from my own expe­ri­ence, wasn’t lim­it­ed to acad­e­mia,” he writes. “It hap­pens in all kinds of fields and endeav­ors — music, art, lit­er­a­ture, every kind of cre­ative pro­fes­sion.”

As Adam Grant writes in the New York Times Book Review, the range of exam­ples cov­ered in Sleep­ing Beau­ties includes “how advo­cates reawak­ened Bach’s com­po­si­tions and Ver­meer’s paint­ings after one and two cen­turies of slum­ber; how tech­no­log­i­cal advances rekin­dled the­o­ries of con­ti­nen­tal drift and black holes; how acci­dents resus­ci­tat­ed hand-wash­ing and genet­ics; and how war renewed inter­est in the sub­ma­rine and The Great Gats­by.” Mak­ing an appear­ance on Late Night with Seth Mey­ers, Byrne was asked if any of his own work has under­gone a sim­i­lar process of dis­in­ter­est fol­lowed by redis­cov­ery. “It’s kind of the oppo­site,” he replies. “There’s things that I’ve done where I go, ‘That one does not hold up that well at all’ ” — which, if the irony of cul­tur­al his­to­ry con­tin­ues to oper­ate as usu­al, will be exact­ly the records the chil­dren of today’s Talk­ing Heads fans put on most enthu­si­as­ti­cal­ly a few years down the line.

Relat­ed Con­tent:

David Byrne Turns His Acclaimed Musi­cal Amer­i­can Utopia into a Pic­ture Book for Grown-Ups, with Vivid Illus­tra­tions by Maira Kalman

David Byrne’s New Illus­trat­ed Book Play­ful­ly Presents A His­to­ry of the World (in Ding­bats)

David Byrne: From Talk­ing Heads Front­man to Lead­ing Urban Cyclist

David Byrne’s Unusu­al Forms of Visu­al Art: Bike Racks, Cor­po­rate Signs & Pow­er­point Pre­sen­ta­tions

David Byrne: How Archi­tec­ture Helped Music Evolve

Bri­an Eno Explores What Art Does in a New Book Co-Writ­ten with Artist Bette A

Based in Seoul, Col­in Marshall writes and broad­casts on cities, lan­guage, and cul­ture. He’s the author of the newslet­ter Books on Cities as well as the books 한국 요약 금지 (No Sum­ma­riz­ing Korea) and Kore­an Newtro. Fol­low him on the social net­work for­mer­ly known as Twit­ter at @colinmarshall.

More in this category... »
Quantcast