Discover J.R.R. Tolkien’s Personal Book Cover Designs for The Lord of the Rings Trilogy

In some rare cas­es, adap­ta­tions and inter­pre­ta­tions of a lit­er­ary work can sur­pass the source. Despite hun­dreds of valiant efforts on the part of fans, film­mak­ers, game/toy design­ers, and radio pro­duc­ers, this has nev­er been true of the ful­ly-real­ized fan­ta­sy world in J.R.R. Tolkien’s The Hob­bit and The Lord of the Rings tril­o­gy (not that it’s ever been anyone’s intent). As we not­ed in a pre­vi­ous post, Tolkien’s fic­tion­al world is so intri­cate, its sources so vast and var­ied, that Corey Olsen, “The Tolkien Pro­fes­sor,” has made it his entire life’s work to open that world up to stu­dents and curi­ous read­ers, such as with his eight-part lec­ture series on The Hob­bit.

One might also add illus­tra­tors to the list of Tolkien inter­preters above who have—in the almost nine­ty years since The Hobbit’s pub­li­ca­tion and more than sev­en­ty years since the first appear­ance of The Lord of the Rings trilogy—done their best to visu­al­ize Tolkien’s world. But per­haps no one did so bet­ter than the mas­ter him­self. Long known as a visu­al artist as well as a lit­er­ary one, Tolkien left behind over 100 illus­tra­tions for The Hob­bit, one of which adorns 2011’s Harper­Collins 75th anniver­sary edi­tion of the book. He also cre­at­ed these orig­i­nal cov­er designs for each book in The Lord of the Rings tril­o­gy.

In the long and com­plex pub­li­ca­tion his­to­ry of Tolkien’s most famous of works, it’s unclear if these designs ever made it onto books pub­lished dur­ing his life­time, but the sig­il in the cen­ter of The Fel­low­ship of the Ring design (above), with its omi­nous eye of Sauron sur­round­ed by elvish runes and topped by the one ring, did grace the ele­gant, min­i­mal­ist cov­ers of the first edi­tion of the tril­o­gy. Tolkien’s art­work received a thor­ough treat­ment in a 1995 mono­graph J.R.R. Tolkien Artist & Illus­tra­tor, which cov­ers over 60 years of Tolkien’s life as an artist, and the mag­ic of flickr brings us this com­pendi­um of Tolkien illus­tra­tions.

Note: An ear­li­er ver­sion of this post appeared on our site in 2013.

Relat­ed Con­tent: 

Lis­ten to J.R.R. Tolkien Read Poems from The Fel­low­ship of the Ring, in Elvish and Eng­lish (1952)

The Art of the Book Cov­er Explained at TED

Vladimir Nabokov Mar­vels Over Dif­fer­ent “Loli­ta” Book Cov­ers

Jack Kerouac’s Hand-Drawn Cov­er for On the Road

Josh Jones is a writer and musi­cian based in Durham, NC.

Why AI Companies Are Buying—And Then Destroying—Old Books

We’ve long joked about delay­ing bed­time in order to read the entire inter­net, but the prospect of actu­al­ly doing so does­n’t sound as appeal­ing as it used to. An ever-grow­ing pro­por­tion of text online, we may sense, has­n’t been writ­ten by humans, but gen­er­at­ed by arti­fi­cial intel­li­gence. One solu­tion is to return to read­ing on paper, and beyond that, spend­ing our time only with books pub­lished before the advent — and thus uncor­rupt­ed by the out­put — of large lan­guage mod­els. Iron­i­cal­ly, that’s what large lan­guage mod­els them­selves have had to do, and in order to ensure them a steady diet of man­made text, their own­ers are resort­ing to con­tro­ver­sial­ly destruc­tive meth­ods.

Sus­pi­cions first arose when book deal­ers noticed a spike in their income due to large orders from mys­te­ri­ous buy­ers for titles they assumed they’d nev­er unload. Books on home oxy­gen treat­ment in Italy, mar­riage lit­i­ga­tion in medieval Eng­land, Texas civ­il pro­ce­dure in the twen­ty-tens, Swedish com­e­dy in the six­ties: these enti­ties bought them all, and for what­ev­er price the sell­er hap­pened to be ask­ing.

404 Media reporter Emanuel Maiberg tracked the path of one such book, which even­tu­al­ly wound up at a Las Vegas scan­ning facil­i­ty run by Ama­zon. Though under­gird­ed by advanced tech­nol­o­gy, the work done there is sim­ple: dig­i­tize as many books as pos­si­ble, then destroy them.

“In order to scan them real­ly fast, they cut the spines off the books and fed the pages to the scan­ner,” Maiberg explained to NPR. Many are tech­ni­cal­ly rare, albeit eso­teric obscu­ri­ties like van­i­ty pub­li­ca­tions and old instruc­tion man­u­als rather than first-edi­tion clas­sics. Humans may not val­ue them, but LLMs do: their con­sump­tion fore­stalls “a prob­lem called mod­el col­lapse, where if an AI trains on AI train­ing data, it gets worse.” Ama­zon and Anthrop­ic have both been found to use the book-sac­ri­fic­ing method to har­vest text, but every com­pa­ny with mod­els to train needs a solu­tion. All this makes for “an unusu­al­ly on-the-nose exam­ple of dig­i­tal tech­nol­o­gy devour­ing lit­er­ary cul­ture,” as the Wall Street Jour­nal’s Melis­sa Korn puts it. But when you real­ly have read the entire inter­net, per­haps extreme mea­sures are inevitable.

Relat­ed Con­tent:

How the Inter­net Archive Dig­i­tizes 3,500 Books a Day–the Hard Way, One Page at a Time

Libraries & Archivists Are Dig­i­tiz­ing 480,000 Books Pub­lished in 20th Cen­tu­ry That Are Secret­ly in the Pub­lic Domain

How Will AI Change the World?: A Cap­ti­vat­ing Ani­ma­tion Explores the Promise & Per­ils of Arti­fi­cial Intel­li­gence

How to Read Many More Books in a Year: Watch a Short Doc­u­men­tary Fea­tur­ing Some of the World’s Most Beau­ti­ful Book­stores

How 99% of Ancient Lit­er­a­ture Was Lost

Based in Seoul, Col­in Marshall writes and broad­casts on cities, lan­guage, and cul­ture. He’s the author of the newslet­ter Books on Cities as well as the books 한국 요약 금지 (No Sum­ma­riz­ing Korea) and Kore­an Newtro. Fol­low him on the social net­work for­mer­ly known as Twit­ter at @colinmarshall.

The Art of Splendor Solis, the Most Glorious Illuminated Alchemical Manuscript of Them All

When it was pub­lished in the Unit­ed States in 1998, Har­ry Pot­ter and the Philoso­pher’s Stone was reti­tled Har­ry Pot­ter and the Sor­cer­er’s Stone. The jokes about the Amer­i­can read­ing pub­lic’s appar­ent aller­gy to the very word philoso­pher write them­selves, but the change was also unfor­tu­nate for more sub­stan­tial rea­sons. A “sor­cer­er’s stone” had no cul­tur­al res­o­nance at all, where­as the philoso­pher’s stone had been sought after since, at the very lat­est, the dawn of the fourth cen­tu­ry. Some sources claim that human knowl­edge of it goes all the way back to Adam, who got the word direct­ly from God. In any case, it’s no mys­tery why the philoso­pher’s stone has long cap­tured the col­lec­tive imag­i­na­tion of human­i­ty, giv­en that it’s reput­ed to turn lead into gold.

Among the rumored pos­ses­sors of the philoso­pher’s stone through­out his­to­ry is Salomon Tris­mosin, a six­teenth-cen­tu­ry Renais­sance alchemist who taught the influ­en­tial physi­cian Paracel­sus. He’s also cred­it­ed, at least in leg­ends, with writ­ing Splen­dor Solis, a book once no less desir­able than the next Har­ry Pot­ter vol­ume in that series’ hey­day.

Noth­ing so mun­dane as “a list of instruc­tions for whip­ping up a lit­tle alchem­i­cal soup in the hope of find­ing a nugget of arti­fi­cial gold in the pot at the end,” writes Jörg Völl­nagel at Medievalists.net, it rather “sets forth the phi­los­o­phy of alche­my, a world view accord­ing to which the human being (the alchemist) exists and acts in har­mo­ny with nature, respect­ing divine cre­ation and at the same time inter­ven­ing in the process­es under­ly­ing that cre­ation, all the while sup­port­ing its growth with the help of alche­my.”

As “a — or rather the – prime exam­ple of an illu­mi­nat­ed alchem­i­cal man­u­script,” Splen­dor Solis has drawn the fas­ci­na­tion of even such mod­ern fig­ures as William But­ler Yeats, James Joyce, and Umber­to Eco. It also became an impor­tant work in the sym­bol­ic-cul­tur­al uni­verse of Carl Jung, who, accord­ing to the Asso­ci­a­tion of Jun­gian Ana­lysts, “rec­og­nized the alchem­i­cal motifs and sym­bols as expres­sions of the indi­vid­u­a­tion process, the trans­for­ma­tion and inte­gra­tion of the psy­che. Splen­dor Solis, with its rich sym­bol­ism and pro­found alle­gories, res­onat­ed with Jung’s under­stand­ing of the arche­typ­al imagery and the trans­for­ma­tive nature of the human psy­che, con­tribut­ing to his the­o­ries on ana­lyt­i­cal psy­chol­o­gy.”

None of this is to say that Jung, or many oth­er esteemed intel­lec­tu­als of the past cou­ple of cen­turies, believed that base met­als real­ly could be trans­mut­ed to gold and sil­ver. But they did under­stand that the phe­nom­e­non of alche­my has much to reveal about the irre­solv­able exis­ten­tial nego­ti­a­tion between man and the world he inhab­its. It res­onates so deeply that it’s even worked in chil­dren’s lit­er­a­ture, and to great com­mer­cial suc­cess at that. You can even feel some of it just by gaz­ing upon Splen­dor Solis’ 22 gold-high­light­ed, book-of-hours-style illus­tra­tions at the web site of M. Moleiro, pub­lish­er of one fac­sim­i­le edi­tion. And who knows? If, as in the world of Har­ry Pot­ter, the philoso­pher’s stone also grants immor­tal­i­ty, per­haps Salomon Tris­mosin still walks some­where among us.

You can view pages of Splen­dor Solis on Wikipedia. Enter the image gallery here.

Relat­ed Con­tent:

A Gallery of Fan­tas­ti­cal Alchem­i­cal Draw­ings

Isaac Newton’s Recipe for the Myth­i­cal ‘Philosopher’s Stone’ Is Being Dig­i­tized & Put Online (Along with His Oth­er Alche­my Man­u­scripts)

How the Bril­liant Col­ors of Medieval Illu­mi­nat­ed Man­u­scripts Were Made with Alche­my

Videos Recre­ate Isaac Newton’s Neat Alche­my Exper­i­ments: Watch Sil­ver Get Turned Into Gold

Hun­dreds of Medieval Med­ical Man­u­scripts with Strange Cures Get Dig­i­tized & Put Online: From Leech­es to Crushed Weasel Tes­ti­cles

The Vision­ary Mys­ti­cal Art of Carl Jung: See Illus­trat­ed Pages from the Red Book

Based in Seoul, Col­in Marshall writes and broad­casts on cities, lan­guage, and cul­ture. He’s the author of the newslet­ter Books on Cities as well as the books 한국 요약 금지 (No Sum­ma­riz­ing Korea) and Kore­an Newtro. Fol­low him on the social net­work for­mer­ly known as Twit­ter at @colinmarshall.

Isaac Asimov Explains His Three Laws of Robots: Do No Harm, Follow Orders, Survive, in That Order

A num­ber of futur­ists, philoso­phers, and technophiles believe we are approach­ing what they call the “sin­gu­lar­i­ty”: a point in time when smart machines become much smarter, stronger, and faster than their cre­ators, and then become self-con­scious. What­ev­er the chance of this occur­ring, it’s worth­while to pon­der the con­se­quences. But we do already, all the time—in exis­ten­tial­ly bleak sce­nar­ios like Blade Run­ner, the Ter­mi­na­tor series, the reboot­ed Bat­tlestar Galac­ti­ca (and its failed pre­quel Capri­ca).

The prospects are nev­er pleas­ant. Robot­ic engi­neers in these worlds hard­ly seem to both­er teach­ing their machines the kind of moral code that would keep them from turn­ing and destroy­ing us (that is, when they aren’t explic­it­ly designed to do so).

I won­der about this con­cep­tu­al gap—convenient as it may be in nar­ra­tive terms—given that Isaac Asi­mov, one of the fore­fa­thers of robot fic­tion invent­ed just such a moral code. In the video above, he out­lines it (with his odd pro­nun­ci­a­tion of “robot”). The code con­sists of three laws; in his fic­tion these are hard­wired into each robot’s “positron­ic brain,” a fic­tion­al com­put­er that gives robots some­thing of a human-like con­scious­ness.

First Law: A robot may not injure a human being, or, through inac­tion, allow a human being to come to harm.

Sec­ond Law: A robot must obey the orders giv­en it by human beings except where such orders would con­flict with the First Law.

Third Law: A robot must pro­tect its own exis­tence as long as such pro­tec­tion does not con­flict with the First or Sec­ond Law.

Isaac Asi­mov devot­ed a good deal of his writ­ing career to the sub­ject of robots, so it’s safe to say, he’d done quite a bit of think­ing about how they would fit into the worlds he invent­ed. In doing so, Asi­mov had to solve the prob­lem of how robots would inter­act with humans once they had some degree of free will. But are his three laws suf­fi­cient? Many of Asimov’s sto­ries—I, Robot, for example—turn on some fail­ure or con­fu­sion between them. And even for their chase scenes, explo­sions, and melo­dra­ma, the three screen explo­rations of arti­fi­cial life men­tioned above thought­ful­ly exploit philo­soph­i­cal ambi­gu­i­ties and insuf­fi­cien­cies in Asimov’s sim­ple sys­tem.

For one thing, while Asimov’s robots were hunks of met­al, tak­ing only vague­ly humanoid form, the robots of our cur­rent imag­in­ings emerge from an uncan­ny val­ley with real­is­tic skin and hair or even a genet­ic code and cir­cu­la­to­ry sys­tem. They are pos­si­ble sex­u­al part­ners, friends and lovers, co-work­ers and supe­ri­ors. They can deceive us as to their nature (a fourth law by Bul­gar­i­an nov­el­ist Lyuben Dilov states that a robot “must estab­lish its iden­ti­ty as a robot in all cas­es”); they can con­ceive chil­dren or desires their cre­ators nev­er intend­ed. These dif­fer­ences beg impor­tant ques­tions: how eth­i­cal are these laws? How fea­si­ble? When the sin­gu­lar­i­ty occurs, will Skynet become aware of itself and destroy us?

Unlike Asi­mov, we now live in a time where the ques­tions have direct applic­a­bil­i­ty to robots liv­ing among us, out­side the pages of sci-fi. As Japan­ese and South Kore­an roboti­cists have found, the three laws can­not address what they call “open tex­ture risk”— unpre­dictable inter­ac­tions in unstruc­tured envi­ron­ments. Humans rely on nuanced and often pre­con­scious read­ings of com­plex social codes and the fine shades of mean­ing embed­ded in nat­ur­al lan­guage; despite many advances, machines are still catch­ing up. Whether or not they can suc­cess­ful­ly devel­op it is an open ques­tion, mak­ing humanoid robots with arti­fi­cial intel­li­gence an “open tex­ture risk.” But as you can see from the video below, we’re per­haps much clos­er to Blade Run­ner or, of course, arti­fi­cial intel­li­gence than to the clunky, inter­stel­lar min­ing machines in Asi­mov’s fic­tion.

Josh Jones is a writer and musi­cian based in Durham, NC.

Note: An ear­li­er ver­sion of this post appeared on our site in 2012.

Relat­ed Con­tent

Isaac Asi­mov Laments the Cult of Igno­rance

200-Year-Old Robots That Play Music, Shoot Arrows & Even Write Poems: Watch Automa­tons in Action

Isaac Asi­mov Reviews George Orwell’s Nine­teen Eighty-Four and Calls It “Not Sci­ence Fic­tion, But a Dis­tort­ed Nos­tal­gia for a Past that Nev­er Was”

by | Permalink | Make a Comment ( 1 ) |

Why Americans Stopped Reading Books

The kids can’t read. Such has been the impli­ca­tion, even the dec­la­ra­tion, made by a wave of arti­cles in recent years. But the state­ment needs some qual­i­fi­ca­tion: the kids in ques­tion are Amer­i­can; what they can’t read is entire books, espe­cial­ly lit­er­ary fic­tion; and it isn’t just the kids in the first place. It would be the rare read­er, espe­cial­ly of a site like Open Cul­ture, who could resist feel­ing any despair when con­front­ed with, say, a study find­ing that only five per­cent of col­lege Eng­lish majors test­ed could under­stand the open­ing of Bleak House. But the real prob­lem is broad­er, as reflect­ed by the fram­ing of the Jared Hen­der­son video above, “Why Every­one Stopped Read­ing.”

Hen­der­son points to sev­er­al explana­to­ry fac­tors. The first is the way many Amer­i­can schools teach read­ing: for a time, they aban­doned the method of phon­ics, which starts with basic indi­vid­ual sounds and builds from there, and went all in on some­thing called “whole lan­guage learn­ing,” which was based on teach­ing stu­dents to “infer the mean­ings of words from con­text.” The idea was that, rather than rely­ing on rote drilling, the new sys­tem could cul­ti­vate a nat­ur­al love for read­ing in young stu­dents. “The only prob­lem is that whole lan­guage learn­ing did­n’t work,” and the result­ing drop in lit­er­a­cy rates sure­ly has some­thing to do with the dra­mat­ic falloff of read­ing in gen­er­al.

Oth­er U.S. edu­ca­tion­al reforms, such as the nation­wide push toward short infor­ma­tion­al texts and stan­dard­ized test­ing, which pri­or­i­tized infor­ma­tion extrac­tion over tex­tu­al engage­ment, must also share the blame. This has pro­duced an abun­dance of, to bor­row the head­line of Rose Horow­itch’s much-cir­cu­lat­ed Atlantic piece from 2024, “Elite Col­lege Stu­dents Who Can’t Read Books.” Those same stu­dents, of course, have all come of age in the time of the smart­phone, which does pro­vide us with an “end­less stream of text,” albeit of low-to-nonex­is­tent lit­er­ary mer­it — to say noth­ing of the infi­nite scroll of hyper-stim­u­lat­ing short-form videos absorb­ing ever-greater pro­por­tions of dai­ly life, and not just that of the young.

“Amer­i­cans, once mem­bers of a proud­ly lit­er­ate soci­ety, read much less than they used to,” writes Horow­itch in a new, in-depth piece on the coun­try’s “post-lit­er­a­cy.” “Few­er than half of all adults report­ed hav­ing read a book of any kind in 2022. Only 38 per­cent read a nov­el or short sto­ry.” At the same time, “gam­bling has become a more com­mon leisure activ­i­ty than read­ing a book: Last year, 57 per­cent of Amer­i­cans placed a bet.” The now-main­stream notion that Amer­i­ca (and, in time, the world) is revert­ing from a tex­tu­al to an oral cul­ture was first fore­seen by the likes of Mar­shall McLuhan, Neil Post­man, and Wal­ter J. Ong. But many here in the twen­ty-first cen­tu­ry might hear their con­di­tion described in a more relat­able fash­ion by David Bowie, in his Tin Machine peri­od, near­ly forty years ago.

Relat­ed con­tent:

How Read­ing Increas­es Your Emo­tion­al Intel­li­gence & Brain Func­tion: The Find­ings of Recent Sci­en­tif­ic Stud­ies

How to Read Books That Chal­lenge Your Mind: Advice from Robert Greene, Author of The 48 Laws of Pow­er

How to Read Many More Books in a Year: Watch a Short Doc­u­men­tary Fea­tur­ing Some of the World’s Most Beau­ti­ful Book­stores

How to Read Five Books Per Month & Become a Seri­ous Read­er: Tips from Deep Work Author Cal New­port

The Virtue of Own­ing Books You Haven’t Read: Why Umber­to Eco Kept an “Antili­brary”

W. H. Auden’s 1941 Syl­labus Asked Stu­dents to Read 32 Great Lit­er­ary Works, Total­ing 6,000 Pages

Based in Seoul, Col­in Marshall writes and broad­casts on cities, lan­guage, and cul­ture. He’s the author of the newslet­ter Books on Cities as well as the books 한국 요약 금지 (No Sum­ma­riz­ing Korea) and Kore­an Newtro. Fol­low him on the social net­work for­mer­ly known as Twit­ter at @colinmarshall.

Umberto Eco’s Personal Library Opens to the Public: More Than 32,000 Books, Exactly as He Left Them

Umber­to Eco’s The Name of the Rose sold so well that its Eng­lish trans­la­tor William Weaver could add an exten­sion onto his Tus­can vil­la, which he called the “Eco Cham­ber.” The Bib­liote­ca Eco, or Eco Library, whose rib­bon-cut­ting ear­li­er this month you can see in the Ital­ian news clip just above, may not be as wit­ti­ly named, but it’s a much more ambi­tious project. It was opened this year, the tenth anniver­sary of the famed philoso­pher, semi­oti­cian, nov­el­ist, and crit­ic’s death, at the Uni­ver­si­ty of Bologna, where he was a pro­fes­sor from 1971 to 2007. Hous­ing more than 32,000 books from his per­son­al library in Milan (pre­vi­ous­ly fea­tured here on Open Cul­ture, and the sub­ject of its own fea­ture-length doc­u­men­tary), it stands as an explorable con­crete rep­re­sen­ta­tion of his capa­cious mind.

So capa­cious was that mind, in fact, that the Eco Library actu­al­ly com­pris­es sev­er­al libraries, chiefly the Rare Book Library and the much-sub­di­vid­ed Work­ing Library. In them, one encoun­ters sec­tions “ded­i­cat­ed to lit­er­ary gen­res, comics and pop­u­lar cul­ture, works by and about Umber­to Eco” — includ­ing more than 2,000 edi­tions and trans­la­tions of his own books — “ancient and medieval phi­los­o­phy, the his­to­ry of ideas, semi­otics, trans­la­tion and the­o­ries of lan­guage,” says the Uni­ver­si­ty of Bolog­na’s mag­a­zine Uni­bo.

There are “Ital­ian, French, Eng­lish-lan­guage, Ger­man, Cen­tral Euro­pean, Slav­ic, Latin Amer­i­can and many oth­er lit­er­a­tures,” includ­ing works of “detec­tive fic­tion and sci­ence fic­tion, pop­u­lar lit­er­a­ture and the feuil­leton.” As any­one who’s read Eco’s essay on Peanuts might imag­ine, “his com­ic book col­lec­tion is also of great impor­tance.”

Indeed, as any fan would expect, Eco’s name­sake library reflects not just the vast sweep of his human­is­tic inter­ests and knowl­edge, but also his play­ful sense of eccen­tric­i­ty, and even grotes­querie. Accord­ing to the Fon­dazione Umber­to Eco, most of the vol­umes it con­tains “are marked by a dis­tinc­tive ex lib­ris,” an adap­ta­tion of a six­teenth-cen­tu­ry wood­cut that depicts a don­key on a cor­nu­copia-topped latrine. “The ani­mal plays a small pipe, set­ting in motion a mer­ry dance of a dozen cavort­ing mon­keys.” The books them­selves have been painstak­ing­ly arranged just as Eco shelved them, in accor­dance with the “good neigh­bor” prin­ci­ple of plac­ing seem­ing­ly unre­lat­ed titles in close prox­im­i­ty in order to reveal unex­pect­ed intel­lec­tu­al con­nec­tions between them. The vol­umes from Eco’s coun­try house in Monte Cerignone will also be incor­po­rat­ed into the col­lec­tion, but as the man him­self knew, the best libraries, like the best minds, are nev­er tru­ly com­plete.

Relat­ed con­tent:

Watch Umber­to Eco Walk Through His Immense Pri­vate Library: It Goes On, and On, and On!

Umber­to Eco Explains Why We Make Lists

The Virtue of Own­ing Books You Haven’t Read: Why Umber­to Eco Kept an “Antili­brary”

Dis­cov­er the 1126 Books in John Cage’s Per­son­al Library: Fou­cault, Joyce, Wittgen­stein, Vir­ginia Woolf, Buck­min­ster Fuller & More

Darwin’s Per­son­al Library Goes Dig­i­tal: 330 Books Online

The Largest Book­shelf Tour Ever Filmed: Inside a Classicist’s 20,000-Volume Library

Based in Seoul, Col­in Marshall writes and broad­casts on cities, lan­guage, and cul­ture. He’s the author of the newslet­ter Books on Cities as well as the books 한국 요약 금지 (No Sum­ma­riz­ing Korea) and Kore­an Newtro. Fol­low him on the social net­work for­mer­ly known as Twit­ter at @colinmarshall.

The Radical, Unclassifiable Art of William Blake

William Blake is a house­hold name, or not far from it, but things get more com­pli­cat­ed when it comes to pro­fes­sion­al descrip­tion. He was a poet, a painter, and a print­mak­er, at least inso­far as he wrote poet­ry, paint­ed paint­ings, and made prints. But we can’t hope to attain even a basic under­stand­ing of his lega­cy if we regard him as one man who hap­pened to have the ener­gy to do three dif­fer­ent things. In fact, the osten­si­bly sep­a­rate artis­tic pur­suits in which he engaged were but three aspects of a uni­fied act of cre­ation, result­ing in the likes of Songs of Inno­cence and of Expe­ri­ence and his illu­mi­nat­ed “prophet­ic books”: unclas­si­fi­able works by “the patron saint of unclas­si­fi­able artists.”

So Evan Puschak, bet­ter known as the Nerd­writer, labels him in his new video above. Blake made books, “which he designed, wrote, etched, col­ored, and print­ed him­self, using a tech­nique that he invent­ed.” They “mix and syn­the­size cat­e­gories, and as a result, the art­work of the late sev­en­teen- and ear­ly eigh­teen-hun­dreds did­n’t real­ly know what to make of them.”

It did­n’t help that the Roy­al Acad­e­my of Arts, found­ed when Blake was in ado­les­cence, had laid down its own strict aes­thet­ic, gener­ic, and for­mal stan­dards. Offi­cial­ly an engraver and accord­ed the low­ly sta­tus there­of, Blake devot­ed his labors to real­iz­ing his elab­o­rate­ly idio­syn­crat­ic visions using images and words togeth­er in ways that no artist had done before.

This choice “to work as mak­er of words, mak­er of images, and cross­breed­er of both, amount­ed to a deci­sion to live in incom­men­su­rable neigh­bor­hoods of mean­ing,” writes The Cam­bridge Com­pan­ion to William Blake author Mor­ris Eaves as quot­ed by Puschak. Blake swam against the cur­rent “of mod­ern human under­stand­ing, whose bedrock is the prin­ci­ple of spe­cial­iza­tion.” Today, near­ly two cen­turies after his death, that prin­ci­ple still obtains, and in some ways more rigid­ly than ever. But his work remains, from the Songs and the prophet­ic books to his illus­tra­tions of clas­sics like the Divine Com­e­dyPar­adise Lost, and even the Bib­li­cal Book of Job, which he read as “the sto­ry of a man who believes, mis­tak­en­ly, that sal­va­tion requires a slav­ish obe­di­ence to words writ­ten in a book.” With his rules, divi­sions, and cat­e­gories, man has cut real­i­ty apart; through his art, Blake sought to make it whole again.

Relat­ed con­tent:

The Rad­i­cal Artis­tic & Philo­soph­i­cal World of William Blake: A Short Intro­duc­tion

William Blake’s Hal­lu­ci­na­to­ry Illus­tra­tions of John Milton’s Par­adise Lost

The Oth­er­world­ly Art of William Blake: An Intro­duc­tion to the Vision­ary Poet and Painter

William Blake: The Remark­able Print­ing Process of the Eng­lish Poet, Artist & Vision­ary

Enter an Archive of William Blake’s Fan­tas­ti­cal “Illu­mi­nat­ed Books”: The Images Are Sub­lime, and in High Res­o­lu­tion

William Blake’s 102 Illus­tra­tions of the Divine Com­e­dy Col­lect­ed in a Beau­ti­ful Book from Taschen

Based in Seoul, Col­in Marshall writes and broad­casts on cities, lan­guage, and cul­ture. He’s the author of the newslet­ter Books on Cities as well as the books 한국 요약 금지 (No Sum­ma­riz­ing Korea) and Kore­an Newtro. Fol­low him on the social net­work for­mer­ly known as Twit­ter at @colinmarshall.

Explore 1,300+ Beautiful Wildlife Illustrations from the 19th Century, Now Restored and Available Online

Today, if you want to know about any of the flo­ra or fau­na that sur­round us, you have only to look it up online. After you get your fill of knowl­edge, you can decide whether or not you want to ven­ture out into the world and see your object of inter­est in its nat­ur­al envi­ron­ment (or a con­trolled sim­u­la­tion there­of). In the Vic­to­ri­an era, things worked a bit dif­fer­ent­ly. Ide­al­ly, you’d have grown up in a house­hold, or at least had access to an insti­tu­tion, with the com­plete set of The Nat­u­ral­ist’s Library, a series of more than 40 vol­umes on every­thing from the birds and the bees to the quadrupeds and the mar­su­pi­alia. Print­ed in a rel­a­tive­ly small for­mat and priced at six shillings each, they brought the intel­lec­tu­al fruits of the nat­u­ral­ist’s enter­prise clos­er to the reach of the every­man than ever before.

While these books offered a good deal of infor­ma­tive text, includ­ing mem­oirs from var­i­ous famous nat­u­ral­ists of the time, their imme­di­ate attrac­tion had more to do with their glo­ri­ous illus­tra­tions, in which col­ored exam­ples of each species popped right out of its black-and-white habi­tat. These more than 1,300 col­or plates, some of the finest that could be seen in any pub­li­ca­tion of sim­i­lar scale in the mid-nine­teenth cen­tu­ry, pre­sent­ed an attrac­tive project to the design­er Nicholas Rougeux, whose work we’ve pre­vi­ous­ly fea­tured here on Open Cul­ture.

Hav­ing already restored and cre­at­ed dig­i­tal ver­sions of Euclid­’s Ele­ments, Pierre-Joseph Red­outé’s Les Ros­es and Les Lil­i­acées, Eliz­a­beth Twin­ing’s Illus­tra­tions of the Nat­ur­al Orders of Plants, and Daniel Berke­ley Updike’s Print­ing Types, among oth­er books, he’s now put online a com­plete repro­duc­tion of the Nat­u­ral­ist’s Library — with, as usu­al, a blog post about the painstak­ing restora­tion and dig­i­tal re-cre­ation process.

This time, Rougeux has includ­ed a sec­tion about his use of arti­fi­cial intel­li­gence, which actu­al­ly did its part to bring The Nat­u­ral­ist’s Library to his atten­tion in the first place. Not only did AI tools then help him unearth need­ed sources and fill in visu­al gaps, they also came in handy when he was brain­storm­ing cov­er con­cepts for a print­ed ver­sion. Though Rougeux’s restora­tion is pri­mar­i­ly a web site, free to all to explore, you can also buy your own hand­some, large-for­mat phys­i­cal copy of Plates of the Nat­u­ral­ist’s Library for $295.11 USD.

Eas­i­er on the wal­let is the series of posters he’s made with the same illus­tra­tions, each of which presents one of these cat­e­gories of crea­tures great or small at a glance. The orig­i­nal Nat­u­ral­ist’s Library inspired gen­er­a­tions to ded­i­cate them­selves to under­stand­ing the nat­ur­al world; these new ver­sions, whether in print, online, or on the wall, will no doubt encour­age the enthu­si­asm of more than a few bud­ding nat­u­ral­ists in the gen­er­a­tions to come. Vis­it the repro­duc­tion of the Nat­u­ral­ist’s Library here.

Relat­ed Con­tent:

A Lav­ish­ly Illus­trat­ed Cat­a­log of All Hum­ming­bird Species Known in the 19th Cen­tu­ry Gets Restored & Put Online

Behold an Inter­ac­tive Online Edi­tion of Eliz­a­beth Twining’s Illus­tra­tions of the Nat­ur­al Orders of Plants (1868)

Ernst Haeckel’s Sub­lime Draw­ings of Flo­ra & Fau­na: The Beau­ti­ful Sci­en­tif­ic Draw­ings That Influ­enced Europe’s Art Nou­veau Move­ment (1889)

300,000 Won­drous Nature Illus­tra­tions Put Online by The Bio­di­ver­si­ty Her­itage Library

Explore a New Archive of 2,200 His­tor­i­cal Wildlife Illus­tra­tions (1916–1965): Cour­tesy of The Wildlife Con­ser­va­tion Soci­ety

Explore an Inter­ac­tive, Online Ver­sion of the Beau­ti­ful­ly Illus­trat­ed, 200-Year-Old British & Exot­ic Min­er­al­o­gy

Based in Seoul, Col­in Marshall writes and broad­casts on cities, lan­guage, and cul­ture. He’s the author of the newslet­ter Books on Cities as well as the books 한국 요약 금지 (No Sum­ma­riz­ing Korea) and Kore­an Newtro. Fol­low him on the social net­work for­mer­ly known as Twit­ter at @colinmarshall.

More in this category... »
Quantcast