1930s Fashion Designers Predict How People Would Dress in the Year 2000




From 1930 to 1941, Pathetone Weekly ran film clips that highlighted ‘the novel, the amusing and the strange.’ At some point during the 1930s (the exact date isn’t clear), Pathetone asked American designers to look roughly 70 years into the future and hazard a guess about how women might dress in Year 2000. Apparently, fashion designers don’t make great futurists, and the designs fell rather wide of the mark — unless you want to count Lady Gaga’s wardrobe, in which case they didn’t do a half bad job. Or, for that matter, the male connected 24/7 to his phone and sundry gadgets…

If you would like to get Open Culture post’s via email, please sign up for our free email newsletter here.

And if you would like to support the mission of Open Culture, consider making a donation to our site. It’s hard to rely 100% on ads, and your contributions will help us continue providing the best cultural and educational materials to learners everywhere. You can contribute through PayPal, Patreon, Venmo (@openculture) and Crypto. Thanks for your support!

Related Content:

How French Artists in 1899 Envisioned Life in the Year 2000: Drawing the Future

Isaac Asimov’s 1964 Predictions About What the World Will Look 50 Years Later — in 2014

Arthur C. Clarke Predicts the Future in 1964 … And Kind of Nails It

In 1900, Ladies’ Home Journal Publishes 28 Predictions for the Year 2000


by | Permalink | Comments (1) |

Support Open Culture

We’re hoping to rely on our loyal readers rather than erratic ads. To support Open Culture’s educational mission, please consider making a donation. We accept PayPal, Venmo (@openculture), Patreon and Crypto! Please find all options here. We thank you!

Comments (1)
You can skip to the end and leave a response. Pinging is currently not allowed.
  • Sasha says:

    If only reality had followed closer to their predictions.
    Instead, both men and women of our age dress – or rather, barely bother to dress – like slobs and walking billboard advertisements for brand logos or inane and vulgar slogans.

    It’s ironic that we demand elegant and beautiful aesthetic design from our devices and technology, and yet have the lowest possible aesthetic standards for themselves.

    The world has become uglier and uglier, since its inhabitants have become uglier and uglier. We are misfits in our own beautiful techno-utopias.

    Perhaps we are preparing for our eventual irrelevancy and extinction, once technology supersedes us completely.

Leave a Reply

Quantcast
Open Culture was founded by Dan Colman.