This coming fall, Mark Peterson, a physics professor at Mount Holyoke College, will publish a new book where he makes a rather curious argument: Back in 1588, a young Galileo presented two lectures before the Florentine Academy. And there he laid the groundwork for his theoretical physics when he called into question the accepted measurements of Dante’s hell (as depicted in the Inferno, the great epic poem from 1314). Did debates over a poem figure into the unfolding of The Scientific Revolution? The Boston Globe digs deeper into the question with the video above and a longer article here.
If you would like to sign up for Open Culture’s free email newsletter, please find it here. Or follow our posts on Threads, Facebook, BlueSky or Mastodon. If you would like to support the mission of Open Culture, consider making a donation to our site. It’s hard to rely 100% on ads, and your contributions will help us continue providing the best free cultural and educational materials to learners everywhere. You can contribute through PayPal, Patreon, and Venmo (@openculture). Thanks!Related Content:
The Story of Physics Animated in 4 Minutes: From Galileo and Newton, to Einstein
Open Yale Courses has videos lectures for “Dante in Translation”. Course home page: http://oyc.yale.edu/italian-language-and-literature/dante-in-translation/
Absolutely fascinating. Did Dante intuit some kernel of truth that Galileo was able to build upon or did Galileo merely use Dante’s poem as jumping off place for his journey to find truth? I’m looking forward to reading this one.
Dantes concept is philosophical. The dismissal via Galileo in the video is about as ‘real’ as the clain Galileo was the equivalent of ‘just a med- school drop-out’ when he made a startling, I suppose, discovery about, ‘reality’.
Dante was, himself, very engaged with the scientific thoughts of his time, so Galileo response was quite appropriate. As for how literal that version of the III Worlds was supposed to be, Dante made it clear that his poem was allegorical.