What Character Traits Do Geniuses Share in Common?: From Isaac Newton to Richard Feynman




Back in 1993, James Gleick wrote Genius: The Life and Science of Richard Feynman. A decade later came his biography on Isaac Newton. As Gleick mentions above, the two scientists–who lived, of course, centuries apart–shared very little in common. Newton (1643-1727) was “solitary, antisocial, unpleasant, bitter.” Richard Feynman (1918-1988) could be best described as “gregarious, funny, a great dancer.” Watch him joyously play the bongos to see what Gleick means.

So the question remains: What did they have in common? And particularly what character traits contributed to their “scientific genius”? Gleick goes on to explain:

They were both, as I tried to get in their heads, understand their minds, the nature of their genius, I sort of felt I was seeing things that they had in common, and they were things that had to do with aloneness. Newton was much more obviously alone than Feynman, but Feynman didn’t particularly work well with others. He was known as a great teacher, but he wasn’t a great teacher, I don’t think, one on one. I think he was a great lecturer. I think he was a great communicator. But when it came time to make the great discoveries of science, he was alone in his head. Now, when I say he, I mean both Feynman and Newton, and this applies, also, I think, to the geniuses that I write about in The Information, Charles Babbage, Alan Turing, Ada Byron. They all had the ability to concentrate with a sort of intensity that is hard for mortals like me to grasp, a kind of passion for abstraction that doesn’t lend itself to easy communication, I don’t think.

Solitude. Concentration. Abstraction. In a nutshell, that’s what goes into the making of a genius.

If you would like to get Open Culture post’s via email, please sign up for our free email newsletter here.

And if you would like to support the mission of Open Culture, consider making a donation to our site. It’s hard to rely 100% on ads, and your contributions will help us continue providing the best cultural and educational materials to learners everywhere. You can contribute through PayPal, Patreon, Venmo (@openculture) and Crypto. Thanks for your support!

Related Content:

Neil deGrasse Tyson on the Staggering Genius of Isaac Newton

Sir Isaac Newton’s Papers & Annotated Principia Go Digital

Free Physics Courses (From Our Collection of 1200 Free Online Courses)

Richard Feynman Creates a Simple Method for Telling Science From Pseudoscience (1966)

‘The Character of Physical Law’: Richard Feynman’s Legendary Course Presented at Cornell, 1964

The Feynman Lectures on Physics, The Most Popular Physics Book Ever Written, Now Completely Online


by | Permalink | Comments (2) |

Support Open Culture

We’re hoping to rely on our loyal readers rather than erratic ads. To support Open Culture’s educational mission, please consider making a donation. We accept PayPal, Venmo (@openculture), Patreon and Crypto! Please find all options here. We thank you!

Comments (2)
You can skip to the end and leave a response. Pinging is currently not allowed.
  • Ros says:

    Another thing geniuses have in common is they ask childish questions as adults… Newton asked ‘What made the apple fall?’ Einstein asked ‘What wold happen if I could ride the particle of light that came from the clock? Would it always be that time?’

  • Time alone, time to think, concentrate and observe would help so many of us.. not necessarily become geniuses; however, think more clearly and live, perhaps become smarter and happier lives. Thanks for the reminder to slow down!

Leave a Reply

Quantcast
Open Culture was founded by Dan Colman.