# The Shortest-Known Paper Published in a Serious Math Journal: 2 Succinct Sentences

Euler’s conjecture, a theory proposed by Leonhard Euler in 1769, hung in there for 200 years. Then L.J. Lander and T.R. Parkin came along in 1966, and debunked the conjecture in two swift sentences. Their article — which is now open access and can be downloaded here — appeared in the Bulletin of the American Mathematical Society. If you’re wondering what the conjecture and its refutation are all about, you might want to ask Cliff Pickover, the author of 45 books on math and science. He brought this curious document to the web a couple of years back…

If you would like to get Open Culture post’s via email, please sign up for our free email newsletter here.

And if you would like to support the mission of Open Culture, consider making a donation to our site. It’s hard to rely 100% on ads, and your contributions will help us continue providing the best cultural and educational materials to learners everywhere. You can contribute through PayPal, Patreon, Venmo (@openculture) and Crypto. Thanks for your support!

Note: An earlier version of this post appeared on our site in April, 2015.

Related Content:

Free Math Textbooks

When a Cat Co-Authored a Paper in a Leading Physics Journal (1975)

Read John Nash’s Super Short PhD Thesis with 26 Pages & 2 Citations: The Beauty of Inventing a Field

The World Record for the Shortest Math Article: 2 Words

Does Math Objectively Exist, or Is It a Human Creation? A New PBS Video Explores a Timeless Question

Support Open Culture

We’re hoping to rely on our loyal readers rather than erratic ads. To support Open Culture’s educational mission, please consider making a donation. We accept PayPal, Venmo (@openculture), Patreon and Crypto! Please find all options here. We thank you!

You can skip to the end and leave a response. Pinging is currently not allowed.
• Antonio says:

A small note, in the spirit of constructive criticism:

>Euler’s conjecture, a theory proposed by (…)

A conjecture is not a theory, it is a conjecture; leave it at that. It’s something that you guess is true but don’t know how to prove.

>and debunked the conjecture

“debunk” is harsh. You “debunk” a hoax, maybe. You *disprove* a conjecture, or, more causally, you “show it to be false”.

> If you’re wondering what the conjecture and its refutation are all about, you might want to ask

What the conjecture is, is written right there, on the last line of those “two swift sentences”. But ok, I suppose many of your readers may appreciate a bit of hand-holding – although it’s pretty readable, as long as you remember what an “nth power” is.

Anyway, I don’t mean to be harsh, hope you take this in the way I meant it.

• Albert S. Franzen says:

I would like to show thanks to you just for bailing me out of this this particular trouble. As a result of checking through the net and meeting techniques that was not productive, I released my life was done.

• ## Support Us

We're hoping to rely on loyal readers, rather than erratic ads. Please click the Donate button and support Open Culture. You can use Paypal, Venmo, Patreon, even Crypto! We thank you!

• ## K-12 Resources

• ### FREE UPDATES!

#### GET OUR DAILY EMAIL

Get the best cultural and educational resources on the web curated for you in a daily email. We never spam. Unsubscribe at any time.

FOLLOW ON SOCIAL MEDIA

• ## About Us

Open Culture scours the web for the best educational media. We find the free courses and audio books you need, the language lessons & educational videos you want, and plenty of enlightenment in between.

• ## Search

Open Culture was founded by Dan Colman.