Free: A Professionally-Read Version of the Ukraine Whistleblower Complaint, Released by Penguin Random House Audio

Lis­ten to the Whistle­blow­er Com­plaint released by the House Intel­li­gence Com­mit­tee, as read by Sask­ia Maar­leveld. Stream or down­load it above. Find more of Maar­leveld’s nar­rat­ed books on Audi­ble.

This record­ing will be added to our col­lec­tion, 1,000 Free Audio Books: Down­load Great Books for Free.

by | Permalink | Comments (20) |

Sup­port Open Cul­ture

We’re hop­ing to rely on our loy­al read­ers rather than errat­ic ads. To sup­port Open Cul­ture’s edu­ca­tion­al mis­sion, please con­sid­er mak­ing a dona­tion. We accept Pay­Pal, Ven­mo (@openculture), Patre­on and Cryp­to! Please find all options here. We thank you!

Comments (20)
You can skip to the end and leave a response. Pinging is currently not allowed.
  • Lonnie says:

    I notice you chose to post the whistle­blow­ers ver­sion, which has been proven incon­sis­tent, instead of the real tran­scripts. How inter­est­ing.

  • JNagarya says:

    Cite ONE “incon­sis­ten­cy”.

    And in Eng­lish, please; I don’t read Russ­ian.


    Thank you Rachel and thank you Sask­ia. You have a fan.


    Thank you Rachel and thank you Sask­ia. You have a fan.I will donate when I can, fixed income and bud­get.

  • Dan J Cooke says:

    Still wait­ing for your retort Lon­sky…

  • Pat Conboy says:

    You seem to like the fairy tale ver­sion tran­scripts not real thing.

  • Chris says:

    Actu­al­ly the real, com­plete tran­script is still being hid­den by the White House. How­ev­er, the par­tial tran­script can be seen on line. It is per­fect­ly con­sis­tent with the com­plaint. You crit­i­cism is base­less.

  • Chris says:

    Note: the par­tial tran­script I men­tioned above is “real;” it was released by the White House. It clear­ly shows the Pres­i­dent ask­ing “for a favor,” inves­ti­gat­ing Biden AND help­ing “clear” Rus­sia of 2016 elec­tion inter­fer­ence in exchange for the defense aid that was cleared by Con­gress and cleared by the Pen­ta­gon.

  • Manuel Marques says:

    Great Job Sask­ia, Thanks Rachel

  • Dennis says:

    Very inter­est­ing read. Now the fun begins. It will be inter­est­ing to watch the Repub­li­cans turn their backs on Trump in hopes he does in fact get impeached so they can get some­one else to run for Pres­i­dent in 2020.

    Let the games begin!

  • Freyda Chemes says:

    There is only one ver­sion and that is the Whistle­blow­ers.

    As for the tele­phone tape, that is in the secret serv­er where it was put for a coverup. We will see that very soon and maybe oth­er dam­ag­ing phone call tapes.

  • Lonnie says:

    Yes, just like Kavanaugh was “proven” guilty and it was “proven” Trump con­spired with Rus­sia! Lmao!. This is sim­ply Trump Derange­ment Syn­drome at its best.

    Bill Clin­ton lies under oath and then admit­ted it, but the Democ­rats turned a blind eye and said that was not impeach­able. The chick­ens are com­ing home to roost. This will back­fire bad­ly on the Democ­rats and Trump will get elect­ed again. Sor­ry to tell you.

  • Joseph -Sandralee Randazzo says:

    The pres­i­dent lies under oath every day..lets see now I think its up to some­thing like 5700 lies as counted.A big nexus from a stain on a dress to con­spir­ing with a for­eign enti­ty to fix an Amer­i­can elec­tion.

  • Lonnie says:

    Clin­ton didn’t get impeached because he shot a wad on an intern’s dress. He was impeached because he lied under oath. But nice try though.

  • Jerry says:

    So you choose the whistle­blow­ers account when it’s 2nd,3rd,4th hand­ed info…Instead of the White house actu­al transcript…nice try

  • Jerry says:

    So this whistle­blow­er is wor­ried about nation­al secu­ri­ty yet the whistle­blow­er and oth­ers are leak­ing info to the media for all the world to see…now who is hurt­ing the secu­ri­ty of the Unit­ed States.…btw,Biden says he was cleared of wrong­do­ing yet I dont recall an inves­ti­ga­tion

  • lori says:

    Lon­nie, bill clin­ton lied about get­ting a blow job in his office…i hard­ly think that com­pares to the many many lies Trump had told. And we are talk­ing about ille­gal action in this. A Fel­low Repub­li­can

  • Lonnie says:

    Bill Clin­ton lied “under oath” peri­od. There is nev­er a good rea­son for that. Once we start using opin­ions to jus­ti­fy wrong­ful actions, that is a slip­pery slope.

    Plus, Bill knew that there was damn­ing evi­dence against him yet he still lied under oath because he also knew his approval rat­ing was above 70% and the Amer­i­can pub­lic wouldn’t stand for him get­ting kicked out of office.

    As for Trump telling so many lies; none that I am aware of have been under oath. Now if you want to get into politi­cians telling lies then, well … we will be here all day won’t we. Lol

  • Ky says:

    Clin­ton? Over Twen­ty years ago? What does that have to do with today’s Pres­i­dent who has clear­ly com­mit­ted trea­so­nous acts against our Coun­try? Read the “entire” Mueller report includ­ing the foot­notes and the Whistleblower’s com­plaint, includ­ing those foot­notes, with an open mind, then make seri­ous sub­stan­tive com­ments. Oth­er­wise, your emo­tion­al­ly charged words have no stand­ing.

  • Lonnie says:


    Because it sets a legal prece­dence. I sug­gest you watch more Mat­lock!

Leave a Reply

Open Culture was founded by Dan Colman.