J.K. Rowling Is Publishing Her New Children’s Novel Free Online, One Chapter Per Day

Image via Wiki­me­dia Com­mons

J.K. Rowl­ing may be the queen of chil­dren’s lit­er­a­ture, but how many of her fans have noticed she has­n’t pub­lished a book for chil­dren in near­ly thir­teen years? Today’s twen­tysome­things will recall fond­ly the sum­mer of 2007, when they descend­ed upon book­stores for their copy, or copies, of the con­clud­ing vol­ume of the Har­ry Pot­ter series. There­after Rowl­ing, no doubt eager to write for an audi­ence clos­er to her own age, put out the bleak social com­e­dy The Casu­al Vacan­cy and a series of crime thrillers under the pseu­do­nym Robert Gal­braith. Rowl­ing’s lat­est Gal­braith nov­el Trou­bled Blood is sched­uled for pub­li­ca­tion in the fall of this year, but the cur­rent gen­er­a­tion of young read­ers can enjoy her new fairy tale The Ick­abog online now as she seri­al­izes it for free over the next two months.

“The idea for The Ick­abog came to me while I was still writ­ing Har­ry Pot­ter,” says Rowl­ing in an intro­duc­to­ry post on her own web site. Hav­ing writ­ten “most of a first draft in fits and starts between Pot­ter books,” she end­ed up shelv­ing it for near­ly a decade. “Over time I came to think of it as a sto­ry that belonged to my two younger chil­dren, because I’d read it to them in the evenings when they were lit­tle, which has always been a hap­py fam­i­ly mem­o­ry.”

The unfin­ished man­u­script came back to mind more recent­ly as a pos­si­ble enter­tain­ment for chil­dren in coro­n­avirus lock­down all over the world. “As I worked to fin­ish the book, I start­ed read­ing chap­ters night­ly to the fam­i­ly again. This was one of the most extra­or­di­nary expe­ri­ences of my writ­ing life.”

With the work now com­plete, Rowl­ing will “be post­ing a chap­ter (or two, or three) every week­day between 26th May and 10th July on The Ick­abog web­site.” The first chap­ter, which is avail­able now, begins as fol­lows:

Once upon a time, there was a tiny coun­try called Cor­nu­copia, which had been ruled for cen­turies by a long line of fair-haired kings. The king at the time of which I write was called King Fred the Fear­less. He’d announced the ‘Fear­less’ bit him­self, on the morn­ing of his coro­na­tion, part­ly because it sound­ed nice with ‘Fred’, but also because he’d once man­aged to catch and kill a wasp all by him­self, if you didn’t count five foot­men and the boot boy.

This prose will feel famil­iar to par­ents who grew up read­ing Har­ry Pot­ter them­selves, and who will sure­ly be pleased to see Rowl­ing’s sig­na­ture sense of humo(u)r still in effect. These par­ents can read The Ick­abog’s week­ly install­ments to their own chil­dren, as well as encour­age those artis­ti­cal­ly inclined to con­tribute their own visu­als to the sto­ry by par­tic­i­pat­ing in the Ick­abog illus­tra­tion com­pe­ti­tion. “Cre­ativ­i­ty, inven­tive­ness and effort are the most impor­tant things,” Rowl­ing notes. “We aren’t nec­es­sar­i­ly look­ing for the most tech­ni­cal skill!” She also empha­sizes, as regards the sto­ry itself, that though its themes include “truth and the abuse of pow­er,” it “isn’t intend­ed to be read as a response to any­thing that’s hap­pen­ing in the world right now.” Many fac­tors have con­tributed to Rowl­ing’s great suc­cess, but her pref­er­ence for the time­less over the top­i­cal sure­ly isn’t a minor one. Read her sto­ry here.

Relat­ed Con­tent:

How J.K. Rowl­ing Plot­ted Har­ry Pot­ter with a Hand-Drawn Spread­sheet

J.K. Rowl­ing Pub­lish­es New Har­ry Pot­ter Sto­ry About the Malev­o­lent Dolores Umbridge

J.K. Rowl­ing Defends Don­ald Trump’s Right to Be “Offen­sive and Big­ot­ed”

J.K. Rowl­ing Tells Har­vard Grads Why Suc­cess Begins with Fail­ure

Clas­sic Children’s Books Now Dig­i­tized and Put Online: Revis­it Vin­tage Works from the 19th & 20th Cen­turies

Based in Seoul, Col­in Mar­shall writes and broad­casts on cities, lan­guage, and cul­ture. His projects include the book The State­less City: a Walk through 21st-Cen­tu­ry Los Ange­les and the video series The City in Cin­e­ma. Fol­low him on Twit­ter at @colinmarshall, on Face­book, or on Insta­gram.


by | Permalink | Comments (14) |

Sup­port Open Cul­ture

We’re hop­ing to rely on our loy­al read­ers rather than errat­ic ads. To sup­port Open Cul­ture’s edu­ca­tion­al mis­sion, please con­sid­er mak­ing a dona­tion. We accept Pay­Pal, Ven­mo (@openculture), Patre­on and Cryp­to! Please find all options here. We thank you!


Comments (14)
You can skip to the end and leave a response. Pinging is currently not allowed.
  • eduardo suarez says:

    This woman is a fuck­ing terf, this site should not be shar­ing her work

  • Kanénas Kaneís says:

    I won­der how many chap­ters she’ll devote to deny­ing the exis­tence of trans rights?

  • Deh! says:

    Many fac­tors have con­tributed to Rowl­ing’s great suc­cess in helm­ing one of the dullest fran­chise in the his­to­ry of movie fran­chis­es. Seri­ous­ly each episode fol­low­ing the boy wiz­ard and his pals from Hog­warts Acad­e­my as they fight assort­ed vil­lains has been indis­tin­guish­able from the oth­ers. Aside from the gloomy imagery, the series’ only con­sis­ten­cy has been its lack of excite­ment and inef­fec­tive use of spe­cial effects, all to make mag­ic unmag­i­cal, to make action seem inert.

    Per­haps the die was cast when Rowl­ing vetoed the idea of Spiel­berg direct­ing the series; she made sure the series would nev­er be mis­tak­en for a work of art that meant any­thing to anybody?just ridicu­lous­ly prof­itable cross-pro­mo­tion for her books. The Har­ry Pot­ter series might be anti-Chris­t­ian (or not), but it’s cer­tain­ly the anti-James Bond series in its refusal of won­der, beau­ty and excite­ment. No one wants to face that fact. Now, thank­ful­ly, they no longer have to.

    >a‑at least the books were good though

    “No!”

    The writ­ing is dread­ful; the book was ter­ri­ble. As I read, I noticed that every time a char­ac­ter went for a walk, the author wrote instead that the char­ac­ter “stretched his legs.”

    I began mark­ing on the back of an enve­lope every time that phrase was repeat­ed. I stopped only after I had marked the enve­lope sev­er­al dozen times. I was incred­u­lous. Rowl­ing’s mind is so gov­erned by clich­es and dead metaphors that she has no oth­er style of writ­ing. Lat­er I read a lav­ish, lov­ing review of Har­ry Pot­ter by the same Stephen King. He wrote some­thing to the effect of, “If these kids are read­ing Har­ry Pot­ter at 11 or 12, then when they get old­er they will go on to read Stephen King.” And he was quite right. He was not being iron­ic. When you read “Har­ry Pot­ter” you are, in fact, trained to read Stephen King.

  • The sorting hat's penis says:

    I won­der how many anti­se­mit­ic gob­lins will make an appear­ance in this one?

  • Karl Reitmann says:

    You seem to be on the evo­lu­tion­ary lev­el of a dung bee­tle and still crit­i­cise a writer who brought hap­pi­ness to count­less chil­dren. Inter­est­ing times…

  • Deebly goncerned says:

    A bloo hoo hoo some­one say mean things about the bil­lion­aire terf! Think of de chil­dren!

  • Karl Reitmann says:

    Dis­re­gard my pre­vi­ous com­ment, I’m a terf.

  • MS says:

    I love the Har­ry Pot­ter books and I believe J.K. Rowl­ing is a very tal­ent­ed writer indeed. I am curi­ous about her new book. To all the trolls and gob­lins: shoo!

  • MS says:

    I love the Har­ry Pot­ter books and I believe J.K. Rowl­ing is a very tal­ent­ed writer indeed.
    I am curi­ous about her new book and plan to read it. To all the trolls and gob­lins: shoo!

  • MS says:

    I love my own self impor­tance and I believe I need to state my opin­ions twice to demon­strate this. I’m curi­ous to learn about the defe­ca­tion habits of fairies. To all the peo­ple point­ing out her dis­gust­ing com­ments around trans peo­ple: stop mak­ing me feel uncom­fort­able for hav­ing a dif­fer­ent opin­ion than my supe­ri­or one!

  • MS says:

    I love my own self impor­tance and I believe I need to state my opin­ions twice to demon­strate this. I’m curi­ous to learn about the defe­ca­tion habits of fairies. To all the peo­ple point­ing out her dis­gust­ing com­ments around trans peo­ple: stop mak­ing me feel uncom­fort­able for hav­ing a dif­fer­ent opin­ion!

  • Senesh says:

    I’d love to read anoth­er jk Rowl­ing nov­el . Ik that some ppl hate on her because of her per­son­al opin­ions and the things she says about the har­ry pot­ter books these days but what’s impor­tant to us read­ers, per­son­al­ly, I think is how good her writ­ing and books are, if it is inter­est­ing or not. Her per­son­al views,life etc don’t con­cern us. All I know is we love jk Rowl­ing, the author for the awe­some books she has writ­ten all over the years that made our time worth it, so many hap­py har­ry pot­ter mem­o­ries. And the ick­abog rocks the clas­sic writ­ing style of hers, and I’m sure it will be an excel­lent read!

  • Senesh says:

    PS: What I’m basi­cal­ly say­ing is that as long as I, and oth­ers like me, per­son­al­ly derive enjoy­ment from some­thing then I don’t give a fuck about the eth­i­cal or moral stand­point of the per­son who cre­at­ed it.

    They can recre­ation­al­ly eat babies, bathe in the blood of endan­gered species, or deny basic rights to oth­er peo­ple and use their for­tunes that they’ve amassed to con­tin­ue to do so, as long as I get to con­sume that’s real­ly all that mat­ters.

  • lakey says:

    OMG she denied trans exis­tence?

Leave a Reply

Quantcast