The Dearth of Conservative Professors Explained

Liberals outnumber conservatives in the academy. That's a known fact. What explains this divergence? Some have attributed it to liberals creating a hostile environment for conservatives. But new research calls that view into question and offers an intriguing alternative explanation.

As described in The Chronicle of Higher Education, Matthew Woessner (a conservative academic) and April Kelly-Woessner (a liberal academic) looked at surveys completed by 15,569 college seniors, and what an analysis of the data suggests is that "the personal priorities of those on the left are more compatible with pursuing a Ph.D." "Liberalism is more closely associated with a desire for excitement, an interest in creative outlets, and an aversion to a structured work environment. Conservatives express greater interest in financial success and stronger desires to raise families. From this perspective, the ideological imbalance that permeates much of academia may be somewhat intractable." Or, put differently, this imbalance may not be going away any time soon.

To delve further into their research, you can read their report online here.

Subscribe to Our Feed

A Nation of Dunces?

There is a lot of publicity this week around Susan Jacoby's new book, The Age of American Unreason. The new work fits into the tradition of Richard Hofstadter's 1963 classic, Anti-Intellectualism in American Life. And it seemingly moves in the same orbit as Al Gore's The Assault on Reason (2007). The upshot of Jacoby's argument is that "Americans are in serious intellectual trouble -- in danger of losing our hard-won cultural capital to a virulent mixture of anti-intellectualism, anti-rationalism and low expectations." As she goes on to say in this op-ed appearing in The Washington Post, we're now living in a moment when Americans are reading fewer books than ever, and they know staggeringly little about the world: Only 23 percent of Americans with some college education can identify Iraq, Iran, Saudi Arabia and Israel on a map, even though the US has a tremendous amount at stake there. (Source: NY Times book review.) And one fifth of American adults think that the sun revolves around the Earth. This is all pretty bad. But what makes matters worse is the "alarming number of Americans who have smugly concluded that they do not need to know such things in the first place." Ignorance has somehow strangely gone from vice to virtue.

What are the solutions? I guess you'll have to get the book, or get millions of your friends to read Open Culture (wink).

UPDATE: You can catch Bill Moyers' interview with Susan Jacoby here: video - mp3 - iTunes - feed. This will let you take a closer look at Jacoby's argument. Thanks Muriel for the tip!

Related Piece:

America's Philosopher President

Ideas & Culture Podcast Collection

Subscribe to Our Feed

The Christian Darwin You Don’t Know

darwin2.jpgAt least in America, Charles Darwin has become the favorite whipping boy for many fundamentalists on the right. In one neat package, you get in Darwin all things deplorable. A godless "secular humanist" who denied the sanctity of humanity, God's providence, and the integrity of the Bible. What more could you love to hate?

Somewhere lost in today's culture wars is the real Charles Darwin. Aired first in October, this program, produced by American Public Media's Speaking of Faith (MP3 - iTunes - Feed - Web Site), revisits Darwin's life & thought with James Moore, a Cambridge University scholar who has written Darwin: The Life of a Tormented Evolutionist. And here's the picture that we get. Like many important scientists who came before him — Galileo, Copernicus and Newton — Darwin believed that science could help explain the laws of nature created by God. Further, he saw his Origin of Species as describing the forms of life that owed their existence to God's law -- a law that expressed itself in natural selection. Readers will find that Darwin's text is littered with references to creation. And Darwin, himself, was noted for saying that when he wrote the book, his faith in God was as strong as that of a bishop, although his faith did wane latter in life. Simply put, Darwin was hardly the enemy of religion that many consider him today.

Again, you can access this program with the following links: (MP3 - iTunes - Feed - Web Site). Additionally, you can access a free e-text of On the Origin of Species here, along with a free audiobook version here.

You may also want to check out a related program by Speaking of Faith: Einstein and the Mind of God

Subscribe to Our Feed

Who is Your Unconscious Mind Voting For in ’08?

You've figured it out. You know exactly which presidential candidate you like the best. Or do you?

Psychologists at Harvard have posted an online quiz that lets you know whether your unconscious mind favors the same candidate as your conscious mind. Spend a few minutes with it and see whether you're in sync with yourself. And if you want, report your findings in the comments below.

Note: The link to get started on the quiz appears at the bottom of this page. (Source: The Utne Reader.)

Check out our podcasts from leading universities.  See our University Podcast Collection and our collection of Free Online Courses.

Subscribe to Our Feed

What Does 47 Billion Light Years (in Radius) Look Like?

That's one estimate of the size of our universe, and this video (added to our YouTube Playlist), using pictures from the Hubble Space Telescope, tries to put it in perspective. For more amazing photos from the Hubble, see this collection.

Harvard Opens Scholarship, Freeing Up Knowledge and Budgets

Yesterday, Harvard University passed a motion (see proposal here) that will require its faculty members to publish their scholarly articles online. On the face of things, this marks a big victory for the open access movement, which is all about making information free and accessible to all. In reality, however, the real winner may eventually be Harvard's library budget (and the future of scholarship itself).

One of the figures behind the opening of Harvard's scholarship is Robert Darnton, an eminent historian who now oversees Harvard's libraries. And, in a piece called The Case for Open Access, Darnton underscores how digital publishing can relieve some important financial pressures on the academy. Under the current publishing model, academics write articles for scholarly journals and then the journals get sold back to the university libraries at exorbitant prices, with some costing more than $20,000 per year. And here the real problem begins: "in order to purchase the journals, libraries have had to reduce their acquisitions of monographs; the reduced demand among libraries for monographs has forced university presses to cut back on the publication of them; and the near impossibility of publishing their dissertations has jeopardized the careers of a whole generation of scholars in many fields." Digital publishing solves this spiraling problem in a straightforward way. The cost of publishing directly to the web is negligible. There's no pulp to buy, no publisher's overhead to pay; no corporation (e.g., Reed Elsevier, the owner of many scholarly journals) looking to pad its profits and get thanked by Wall Street. The cost savings are everywhere.

The traditional publishers will be quick to point out a flaw in the digital publishing model - namely, that it generally means working outside of a peer-review system that ensures the overall integrity of research. But my sense is that there's no reason that digital publishing and peer review can't go together. It's not hard to imagine ways in which conventional forms of peer review could be preserved. But digital publishing also makes possible new forms of peer review that didn't exist before. Publishing to the web will almost necessarily increase the overall readership of articles, which will encourage more fact checking and critical commentary in turn. And, because we're publishing on the web, these scholarly articles can become living documents that get better over time. It's a new way of doing things. It may take a generation to get all the kinks worked out and habits changed. But we will get there.

As a final aside, if you're interested in the Open Educational Resources (OER) movement, then you'll want to check this new site sponsored by the Hewlett Foundation. It aggregates blogs that regularly focus on all things OER, offering you a great starting point for reading in this area.

Subscribe to Our Feed

Paris at Night

They don't call it the city of light for nothing.

« Go BackMore in this category... »
Quantcast