Roger Ebert’s Final List of His Top 10 Favorite Films

roger-ebert-list

Image by Sound Opinions, via Flickr Commons

Roger Ebert seems to have resented star ratings, which he had to dish out atop each and every one of his hundreds upon hundreds of regular newspaper movie reviews. He also emphasized, every once in a while, his disdain for the "thumbs up" and "thumbs down" system that became his and Gene Siskel's television trademark. And he could hardly ever abide that run-of-the-mill critic's standby, the top-ten list. Filmgoers who never paid attention to Ebert's career will likely, at this point, insist that the man never really liked anything, but those of us who read him for years, even decades, know the true depth and scope of his love for movies, a passion he even expressed, regularly, in list form. He did so for, as he put it, "the one single list of interest to me. Every 10 years, the ancient and venerable British film magazine, Sight & Sound, polls the world's directors, movie critics, and assorted producers, cinematheque operators and festival directors, etc., to determine the Greatest Films of All Time."




"Why do I value this poll more than others?" Ebert asks. "It has sentimental value. The first time I saw it in the magazine, I was much impressed by the names of the voters, and felt a thrill to think that I might someday be invited to join their numbers. I was teaching a film course in the University of Chicago's Fine Arts Program, and taught classes of the top ten films in 1972, 1982 and 1992." His dream came true, and when he wrote this reflection on sending in his list every decade, he did so a year nearly to the day before his death in 2013, making his entry in the 2012 Sight & Sound poll a kind of last top-ten testament:

Deciding that he must vote for "one new film" he hadn't included on his 2002 list, Ebert narrowed it down to two candidates: The Tree of Life and Charlie Kaufman's Synecdoche, New York. "Like the Herzog, the Kubrick and the Coppola, they are films of almost foolhardy ambition. Like many of the films on my list, they were directed by the artist who wrote them. Like several of them, they attempt no less than to tell the story of an entire life. [ ... ] I could have chosen either film — I chose The Tree of Life because it’s more affirmative and hopeful. I realise that isn’t a defensible reason for choosing one film over the other, but it is my reason, and making this list is essentially impossible, anyway."  That didn't stop his cinephilia from prevailing — not that much ever could.

Related Content:

Roger Ebert Talks Movingly About Losing and Re-Finding His Voice (TED 2011)

The Two Roger Eberts: Emphatic Critic on TV; Incisive Reviewer in Print

Roger Ebert Lists the 10 Essential Characteristics of Noir Films

1,150 Free Movies Online: Great Classics, Indies, Noir, Westerns, etc.

Colin Marshall hosts and produces Notebook on Cities and Culture and writes essays on cities, language, Asia, and men’s style. He’s at work on a book about Los Angeles, A Los Angeles Primer. Follow him on Twitter at @colinmarshall or on Facebook.


by | Permalink | Comments (15) |





Comments (15)
You can skip to the end and leave a response. Pinging is currently not allowed.
  • Roman Sateonetoo says:

    I can’t even imagine the amount of films Ebert must have watched in his lifetime…

  • Brian Berta says:

    Are these films in any order?

  • Bob says:

    They’re in alphabetical order

  • Marlon says:

    I’m 44 and I’ve only seen one of the movies on this list of his (Raging Bull, which I thought was pretty boring.)

  • Joe Feckle says:

    2001 and Citizen Kane are boring, too.

  • Carsten Cris says:

    And yet he has included an über corny and decidedly clumsy movie like Tree of Life in his top ten.

    Seriously makes me doubt everything that man has ever said about the art of film.

  • Carsten Cris says:

    And yet he has included an über corny and decidedly clumsy movie like Tree of Life in his top ten.

    Seriously makes me doubt everything that man has ever said about the art of film.

  • Amor Asad says:

    2001, Citizen Kane boring?

    Is that supposed to be a joke?

  • STVnRWC says:

    “Raging Bull”….boring?! ….Boring??!! … Wow!! ….To each his own I guess. Then just a few lines down “Citizen Kane” also described as boring?! … Strange how 2 people that have such a blatant disregard for what are widely considered 2 of the best films of all time!!!…Just strange how these 2 people even found there way to comment on this thread linked to one of the most famous film critics of all time … some one who absolutely adored film and even for a film that Roger Ebert loathed he at least had enough respect for films he hated to bestow upon them a liteny of adjectives to which they would be laid to shame in that they could at least be proud that they died a good death. But to just merely call a film “boring”……is the biggest injustice you can give a film. Even a film you dislike has to call rise to something inside you … that you would at least be man enough to look it in its eyes as you gut it from spleen to spine!!!….A lone pithy word … “boring” …. expounding no further…is to stab it in the back while it exposes all its vulnerabilities to the world. A film you dislike deserves all the same passion you bestow on the films you love otherwise just get up and leave the theater after the trailers have concluded because you have nothing deeper to offer medium.

  • Michael Hovey says:

    In my opinion these are the top 10 movies of all time:

    1. There Will Be Blood
    2. Pan’s Labyrinth
    3. Letters from Iwo Jima
    4. The 33
    5. 12 Angry Men
    6. The Ten Commandments
    7. Willy Wonka and the Chocolate Factory
    8. A Hard Day’s Night
    9. Snow White and the Seven Dwarfs
    10. Ratatouille

  • Michael Hovey says:

    In this 37 year old’s opinion there are the greatest films of all time:

    1. There Will Be Blood
    2. Pan’s Labyrinth
    3. Letters from Iwo Jima
    4. The 33
    5. The Ten Commandments
    6. A Hard Day’s Night
    7. 12 Angry Men
    8. Snow White and the Seven Dwarfs
    9. Ratatouille
    10. Willy Wonka and the Chocolate Factory

  • Paul Blake says:

    The movie stands on its own, leaving one question?

  • anthony barbuto says:

    I once listened to movie critics discuss the Academy Awards. They had all kinds of ideas as to why this movie was voted best, over another. The conversation got heated, then one person chimed in…”…Hey,…the reason this or that got the award,…it was VOTED in !”….Which is the truth. Movies are released, at given dates so they can be viewed and people can vote for the movie, in time for the Awards, that year. Full page ads are taken out in newspapers, like Variety and papers in certain demographic regions to bring the movies to the attention of viewers…and voters. Members of the Academy ( the only ones who can vote for a movie, by the way) get calls, and now I guess emails, and other prods to vote for this one or that.
    Who ever wins an academy award, be they actor or director has just moved in to the Million dollar a picture class…
    So, don’t get bent out of shape, if YOUR favorite movie is not rated highly. The entire award process is SUBJECTIVE and highly motivated by MONEY. It is interesting that many movies debut and are not highly regarded…but over time, critics study them and come to the conclusion that there is something great there.
    Movies have been around for 100+ years. Go back and discover movies you have not seen before…..re-see movies you saw in your youth. The definition of a classic is a movie you can watch over and over again and it never gets stale. I have my favorites…” 2001 Space Odyssey”. “Clock Work Orange” ” The Yearling” ” magnificent 7″ ( original with Yul Brynner, etc.) ” The Thing (from another world)” (original with Kenneth Tobey, etc)..” the best years of their lives”…” 30 seconds over tokyo”….” A guy named Joe”…”sunrise”..” the General”..” The Great Dictator” ( charlie Chaplin)…” things to come”..” the day the earth stood still” ( original with michael rennie, not the trash re make) ..” Carosel”…” the sound of music”…” the pawn broker”…” 12 angry men” ( original with Henry Fonda)…” failsafe”…” dr stranglove”…” lolita” ( original with Shelly Winters, etc)..” night of the hunter” (the only movie directed by Charles Laughton)..” the hunchback of notre dame” ( 1939 version starring charles laughton)..” moby Dick” ( gregory Peck)…” red dragon” ( ralph fiennes)..” silence of the lambs”..”them”…..etc…..ENJOY…

  • yqsb says:

    “Strange how 2 people that have such a blatant disregard for what are widely considered 2 of the best films of all time!!!…Just strange how these 2 people even found there way to comment on this thread linked to one of the most famous film critics of all time”

    “widely considered 2 of the best films of all time!!!”
    “widely considered 2 of the best films of all time!!!”
    “widely considered 2 of the best films of all time!!!”
    “one of the most famous film critics of all time”
    “one of the most famous film critics of all time”
    “one of the most famous film critics of all time”

    Strange how a single word like “boring” can be so triggering, can be viewed as “blatant disregard”. Just strange how people teach you which film is great by keeping mentioning that other people think which film is great.

    “A film you dislike deserves all the same passion you bestow on the films you love otherwise just get up and leave the theater after the trailers have concluded because you have nothing deeper to offer medium. ”

    Really? Do you show all the same passion to whatever you watch?
    Do you have something deep to offer other than some angry mumbo-jumbo?

  • pj says:

    Unlike a number of comments, Roger Ebert would elaborate his opinion to more than a few words. If people find these films boring then that’s unfortunate for them really. I understand why people might think Citizen Kane is boring as the pace is often slow but it may be worth watching it acknowledging that it was made almost 80 years ago and that a lot of films released and enjoyed since were inspired by it and imitated it.

    I’m obviously here looking for a list as well but I like Ebert’s comment about top 10s. What defines a top film anyway? Is it possible that the no.1 on Monday is the same as on Tuesday? I don’t really see any enjoyment at all in finding your no.1 film. It seems a childlike behaviour, looping the same film again and again.

Leave a Reply

Quantcast