Acclaimed Japanese Jazz Pianist Yōsuke Yamashita Plays a Burning Piano on the Beach

Unlikely as it might seem, the Japanese jazz scene has for decades and decades produced some of the finest players in the world, from traditionalists to experimentalists and everything in-between. One might say the same about other jazz-inclined countries (those of northern Europe, for instance, having developed particularly robust scenes), but those countries have to do without enlivenment by “only in Japan” moments like the one we have above: jazz pianist Yōsuke Yamashita, acclaimed on both sides of the Pacific, playing piano on the beach — a piano on fire on the beach, to be precise.

This wasn’t even the first time he’d done it. In 1973, famed graphic designer Kiyoshi Awazu asked Yamashita to appear in his short film burning piano, playing the titular instrument. Watching it again 35 years later, Yamashita wrote, “Seeing myself engaged in that extraordinary performance, I felt this wave of emotion that was like, ‘What was that?’




In one sense, I had performed as an ‘object’ in a Kiyoshi Awazu artwork. In another, however, I had perhaps experienced a form of artistic expression that no one before me had ever experienced before, as the result of a situation that could only have happened at that time. ‘What was that?’ There was only one way I could reconfirm this for myself—by doing it one more time.”

The opportunity arose at the behest of Kanazawa’s 21st Century Museum of Contemporary Art, who staged Burning Piano 2008. You can read the event’s program as a PDF, which contains Yamashita’s reflections leading up to the event. It also contains remarks from an Awazu Design Room representative who witnessed the original burning piano shoot, a local piano dealer (who assures us that long after the piano “began to appear in Japanese homes in the era of high-level economic growth,” some “must be destroyed amid reluctant feelings”), and the mayor of Shika Town, on whose Masuhogaura Beach Yamashita donned his silver protective suit and played a funeral requiem on the flaming instrument until it could produce not a sound more.

“I did not think I was risking my life,” Yamashita later said, “but I was almost suffocating from the smoke that was continuously getting into my eyes and nose. I had decided to keep on playing until the piano stopped making sounds, so though I did not mean it, but it ended up having a life-or-death battle between the piano and myself.” Dedicated jazz players know what it means to suffer for their art, as do all the participants in the age-old intensive Japanese conception of mastery, but who would have guessed that those cultures would intersect so… combustibly?

via Dangerous Minds

Related Content:

CERN’s Cosmic Piano and Jazz Pianist Jam Together at The Montreux Jazz Festival

Hear the Experimental Piano Jazz Album by Comedian H. Jon Benjamin — Who Can’t Play Piano

Parking Garage Door Does Impression of Miles Davis’ Jazz Album, Bitches Brew

Hunter S. Thompson Sets His Christmas Tree on Fire, Nearly Burns His House Down (1990)

Based in Seoul, Colin Marshall writes and broadcasts on cities and culture. He’s at work on a book about Los Angeles, A Los Angeles Primer, the video series The City in Cinema, the crowdfunded journalism project Where Is the City of the Future?, and the Los Angeles Review of Books’ Korea Blog. Follow him on Twitter at @colinmarshall or on Facebook.


by | Permalink | Comments (6) |

Support Open Culture

We’re hoping to rely on our loyal readers rather than erratic ads. To support Open Culture’s continued operation, please consider making a donation. We thank you!






Comments (6)
You can skip to the end and leave a response. Pinging is currently not allowed.
  • Liza says:

    I hate this. I don not respect any musician who does not respect their instrument. Destroy a piano for a publicity stunt? Horowitz would never. It’s disgusting.

  • Josh says:

    Hmm, someone should have stuck their wet finger in the breeze to decide which way to set the piano so that the artist doesn’t’ need to be treated for smoke inhalation.

  • Josh says:

    An instrument, ultimately, is a tool of expression. He had a statement he wanted to make, in this case it required sacrificing the tool, as we sacrifice the earth for the things we deem ourselves to need. Do you disrespect Hendrix? If so, I pity you. I think the art is more important that the object used to make it. This performance certainly makes me contemplate a lot of important ideas about our world and I think that is what he wanted to achieve.

  • giovanni says:

    If you have to burn a piano in order to “contemplate a lot of important ideas about our world”, you have probably a serious problem.

  • Huby says:

    Tis is a rare piece of Art!

    Maybe he’s uses his instrument to make a statement … to the world? By burning an instrument, his instrument, as a musician, how much stronger can this act be?
    It is easy to make a judgement about someone making a statement thru art by his own means. I think this is a very personal way of expression. Only he did this piece .. once?
    But now, 2020, 12 years later, this peace of art has nothing lost of intensity or actuality..

    If we look attentive to the video, one can imagine the Fukushima electric plant in the far distant..
    Should I condemn this video, because the instrument used by the videographer used the electricity’s coming from an installation witch burned and destroyed the land and the life of so manny for many generations to come?

    I think there is all the respect in the world to be found for this strong and timeless statement. I think it is a timeless and a great work of Art.
    Mozart could have done it but didn’t, Monk could have but hd didn’t, Leo Cuypers should have, but only Yosuku did it. And in 2 or more centuries, this video will still continue to surprise and touch people.

    Huby

    Huby

  • Jonny says:

    First of all, why does it seem unlikely that good Jazz musicians would come out of Japan?

    Second of all. It’s just a piano, and he is an artist.

    He clearly wasn’t making a statement with music alone. This piece was not solely about sound or composition. It was a visual metaphor and a legit piece of art. If you can’t see past the physical destruction of an instrument to the metaphors represented by the destruction of an instrument than this piece (and likely many others) are beyond you.

Leave a Reply

Quantcast