The Philosophy of The Matrix: From Plato and Descartes, to Eastern Philosophy

Do you take the red pill or the blue pill? The question, which at its heart has to do with either accepting or rejecting the illusions that constitute some or all of life as you know it, became part of the culture almost immediately after Morpheus, Lawrence Fishburne's character in The Matrix, put it to Keanu Reeves' protagonist Neo. That film, a career-making success for its directors the Wachowski sisters (then the Wachowski brothers), had its own elaborate vision of a false reality entrapping humanity as the actual one surrounds it, a vision made realizable by the finest late-1990s computer-generated special effects. But the ideas behind it, as this Film Radar video essay shows, go back a long way indeed.

The first and by far the most respected of the trilogy, The Matrix "largely interprets Plato's Allegory of the Cave. Imagine a cave. Inside are people who were born and have spent their entire lives there, chained into a fixed position, only able to see the wall in front of them. As far as they know, this is the entire world." The Wachowskis ask the same question Plato does: "How do we know what our reality really is?"




When they have Morpheus bring Neo out of his "cave" of everyday late-20th-century existence, they do it in a manner analogous to Plato's Analogy of the Sun, in which "the sun is a metaphor for the nature of reality and knowledge concerning it," and the eyes of the fearful few forced out of their cave need some time to adjust to it.

But when one "unplugs" from the illusion-generating Matrix of the title — a concept now in consideration again thanks to the popularity of the "simulation argument" — a longer journey toward that really-real reality still awaits. The second and third installments of the trilogy involve a dive into "religious philosophy from the East," especially the idea of escape from the eternal soul's reincarnation "into other physical forms in an infinite cycle where the soul is left to wander and suffer" by means of a spiritual quest for "enlightenment, by uniting body and mind with spirit." This leads, inevitably, to self-sacrifice: by finally "allowing himself to die," Neo "is reunited with spirit" and "becomes the true savior of humanity" — a narrative element not unknown in religious texts even outside the East.

These count as only "a few of the philosophical ideas the Wachowskis explore in the Matrix trilogy," the others including Robert Nozick's "Experience Machine," Descartes' "Great Deceiver," and other concepts from Kant and Hume "questioning reality, causality, and free will, not to mention the obvious commentary on technology or a submissive society." Of course, philosophical exploration in The Matrix involve countless flying — and gravity-defying — fists and bullets, much of it performed by characters clad in reflective sunglasses and black leather. Perhaps that datedness has prompted the recent announcement of a Matrix reboot: though the styles may change, if it happens, the ideas would no doubt remain recognizable to Plato himself.

Related Content:

Are We Living Inside a Computer Simulation?: An Introduction to the Mind-Boggling “Simulation Argument”

Philip K. Dick Theorizes The Matrix in 1977, Declares That We Live in “A Computer-Programmed Reality”

Daniel Dennett and Cornel West Decode the Philosophy of The Matrix

The Matrix: What Went Into The Mix

Free Online Philosophy Courses

Based in Seoul, Colin Marshall writes and broadcasts on cities and culture. He’s at work on a book about Los Angeles, A Los Angeles Primer, the video series The City in Cinema, the crowdfunded journalism project Where Is the City of the Future?, and the Los Angeles Review of Books’ Korea Blog. Follow him on Twitter at @colinmarshall or on Facebook.


by | Permalink | Comments (1) |

Support Open Culture

We're hoping to rely on our loyal readers rather than erratic ads. To support Open Culture's continued operation, please consider making a donation. We thank you!


Comments (1)
You can skip to the end and leave a response. Pinging is currently not allowed.
  • Clive says:

    The ‘Matrix’ film was of a population as ‘prisoner’s because they were all living within a reality and a ‘body’ both of which weren’t real. In other words, you are essentially a prisoner specifically because your body and your reality are FAKE. You are then in effect nothing more than a ‘shadow’ on the wall of a fake reality.

    As the entire basis of the ‘Matrix’ artificial reality type rests on the premise that your current body is fake then you’d imagine that a search for:

    ‘Plato’s cave two bodies interfaced together Matrix reality’

    . . . would return more than a handful of pages.

    I’ve also never seen mentioned in any Plato’s cave matrix artificial reality comparison discussions and particularly on philosophy orientated web sites that a fake reality would have both the MOTIVE as well as the opportunity to directly manipulate it’s residents and would perhaps particularly do this when the residents of a fake reality are discussing the possibility of whether they are living within a fake reality or not!!!

    Some reasoned/rational ‘Matrix’ reality speculation pages can be found on clivehetherington.com

Leave a Reply

Quantcast