Arthur C. Clarke Predicts the Future in 1964 … And Kind of Nails It

in Sci Fi | September 4th, 2011 21 Comments

In 1964, Sir Arthur C. Clarke, the futur­ist and sci-fi writer best known for his nov­el 2001: A Space Odyssey, peered into the future, to the year 2000, and described what he saw. And a pret­ty good guess it was. Ours would be a world in which…

We could be in instant con­tact with each oth­er, wher­ev­er we may be, where we can con­tact our friends any­where on earth, even if we don’t know their actu­al phys­i­cal loca­tion. It will be pos­si­ble in that age, per­haps only 50 years from now, for a man to con­duct his busi­ness from Tahi­ti or Bali just as well as he could from Lon­don.… Almost any exec­u­tive skill, any admin­is­tra­tive skill, even any phys­i­cal skill, could be made inde­pen­dent of dis­tance. I am per­fect­ly seri­ous when I sug­gest that one day we may have brain sur­geons in Edin­burgh oper­at­ing on patients in New Zealand.

By 2001, Cal­i­for­nia doc­tors were already con­duct­ing vir­tu­al surgery on patients in Rome. And, by 2005, Thomas Fried­man pub­lished his best­seller, The World is Flat, which pret­ty much told us that us that Clarke’s imag­ined world had arrived — with, of course, one big excep­tion. Cities? They’re still stand­ing…

If you would like to sign up for Open Culture’s free email newslet­ter, please find it here. It’s a great way to see our new posts, all bun­dled in one email, each day.

If you would like to sup­port the mis­sion of Open Cul­ture, con­sid­er mak­ing a dona­tion to our site. It’s hard to rely 100% on ads, and your con­tri­bu­tions will help us con­tin­ue pro­vid­ing the best free cul­tur­al and edu­ca­tion­al mate­ri­als to learn­ers every­where. You can con­tribute through Pay­Pal, Patre­on, and Ven­mo (@openculture). Thanks!

Relat­ed Con­tent:

Mar­shall McLuhan: The World is a Glob­al Vil­lage

Arthur C. Clarke Presents the Col­ors of Infin­i­ty


by | Permalink | Comments (21) |

Sup­port Open Cul­ture

We’re hop­ing to rely on our loy­al read­ers rather than errat­ic ads. To sup­port Open Cul­ture’s edu­ca­tion­al mis­sion, please con­sid­er mak­ing a dona­tion. We accept Pay­Pal, Ven­mo (@openculture), Patre­on and Cryp­to! Please find all options here. We thank you!


Comments (21)
You can skip to the end and leave a response. Pinging is currently not allowed.
  • criolle johnny says:
    September 2, 2011 at 7:39 am

    If you think cities are still stand­ing, take a good look at Detri­ot, spelling intend­ed.
    Clarke would not rec­og­nize cities as they exist today. Nor would he rec­og­nize sub­urbs exurbs or malls.

    Reply
  • Will Fitzgerald says:
    September 2, 2011 at 8:43 am

    And this is why we are all telecom­mut­ing today!

    Reply
  • John says:
    September 2, 2011 at 12:17 pm

    » with, of course, one big excep­tion. Cities? They’re still stand­ing…

    Tell that to Detroit.

    Reply
  • Cap says:
    September 2, 2011 at 12:33 pm

    …and just a reminder, this is the man that has been cred­it­ed for the con­cept of the com­mu­ni­ca­tions satel­lite. He most cer­tain­ly based his prophe­cies on the premise that there would be com­mu­ni­ca­tions satel­lite net­work in place by then.

    Reply
  • Felix says:
    September 2, 2011 at 2:44 pm

    “Cities? They’re still stand­ing…”

    Yes, they do, but
    “the tra­di­tion­al role of a city as a meet­ing place for men would have seized to make any sense”
    is true for inter­net mon­keys like myself and maybe you too…

    55 years ago — Clarke was way ahead of his time. Great mind…

    Reply
  • RalfLippold says:
    September 3, 2011 at 3:49 am

    “Comm-” — a behav­ior of the present and the future

    Present — com­mute

    Future — COMMUNICATE

    … BTW the future already is tak­ing place while I am writ­ing this or you are read­ing this!

    PS.: I talked to India, Italy, Aus­tria, Cal­i­for­nia, Ugan­da, Ger­many, Eng­land the last two days — and did not have to move my but a mile out of the vicin­i­ty of Dres­den, one of the most beau­ti­ful places I can imag­ine.

    Reply
  • Ronan L says:
    September 3, 2011 at 4:09 am

    Clarke was right about the end of cities as cen­tres of pro­duc­tion for their pop­u­la­tions. What is sur­pris­ing many though is how robust they are as cen­tres as con­sump­tion. Not that sur­pris­ing, though, when we remem­ber our evo­lu­tion as a social ani­mal…

    Reply
  • Carol A says:
    September 4, 2011 at 11:33 pm

    In “Impe­r­i­al Earth” he even pre­dicts the tablet com­put­er! Every­one has a gad­get the size of an IPad which allows inter­net access and com­mu­ni­ca­tions.

    Reply
  • Jimbob says:
    September 10, 2011 at 5:43 am

    Now that’s what I call fore­sight. Eat your heart out Nos­tradamus!

    Reply
  • James says:
    February 11, 2012 at 11:15 pm

    This was not real­ly a pre­dic­tion see­ing as how he was cer­tain this would hap­pen.

    In Novem­ber of 1965 the first civil­ian use of a com­mu­ni­ca­tion satel­lite took place to inform my grand­fa­ther, who was in Africa with Mar­garet Meade, that my moth­er was born (in Flori­da). So, he was speak­ing per­haps a year before…

    Reply
  • Bruce Long says:
    March 27, 2012 at 2:21 am

    Per­haps time trav­ellers have turned up and are with us! Who was Clarke’s grand­fa­ther?

    Reply
  • Bruce Long says:
    March 27, 2012 at 2:28 am

    Seri­ous­ly, though. Claude E. Shan­non devel­oped the Math­e­mat­i­cal The­o­ry of Com­mu­ni­ca­tions in 1948 while work­ing for Ma Bell. The ARPANET was devel­oped in the late 60s.

    Reply
  • Bruce Long says:
    March 27, 2012 at 2:40 am

    The last guess about the remote surgery is, how­ev­er, a bit scary. It would have be hard to guess that. He think that the sur­geons would be doing remote work. That would be very hard to see that ear­ly in the his­to­ry of robot­ics and net­works.

    Reply
  • Thorn daCosta says:
    March 27, 2012 at 8:08 am

    The cities of today are Forced
    Con­structs. Kept by social and eco­nom­ic neces­si­ty rather than being vibrant and pos­i­tive con­tri­bu­tions to our world as they once were. If that’s a jux­ta­po­si­tion it’s a sad­ly poing­nient one of our times. Just my opin­ion.

    Reply
  • autocad kursu says:
    December 30, 2012 at 1:42 pm

    I’ve found that the best data sub­ject, thank you http://www.autocadkursu.co/ http://www.autocadkursu.co/autocad-ozel-ders.html

    Reply
  • David says:
    January 1, 2014 at 12:07 pm

    “The cities of today are Forced Con­structs. Kept by social and eco­nom­ic neces­si­ty rather than being vibrant and pos­i­tive con­tri­bu­tions to our world as they once were.” How are the social and eco­nom­ic ben­e­fits of city life any­thing but pos­i­tive ben­e­fits? I’m liv­ing in a city by choice. How is that “Forced”?

    Reply
  • Peter Vollan says:
    January 1, 2014 at 1:40 pm

    There are a lot of jobs that can be done from any­where, but employ­ers still have the “indus­tri­al rev­o­lu­tion” men­tal­i­ty that you have to show up and punch a time clock. We’ve got a ways to go yet before we can stop com­mut­ing

    Reply
  • Jd says:
    September 27, 2015 at 8:05 am

    Pret­ty sure Detroit is actu­al­ly doing great now. Come check it out

    Reply
  • WRStark says:
    October 16, 2015 at 5:25 am

    The dis­agree­ment seen in these com­ments can be tak­en as a mea­sure of the understanding/misunderstanding of ACC’s com­ments.

    Reply
  • Yancat says:
    February 6, 2022 at 3:15 pm

    Asi­mov did a nice job Of see­ing where we are head­ed in 1954 his nov­el Caves of Steel. The aliens and colonists out­side of Earth cities are dis­ease free and must san­i­tize every­thing an Earth­er liv­ing in a megac­i­ty touch­es. Also nailed beyond meat..refers to it as yeast sub­sti­tute for real food, a real chick­en leg is a lux­u­ry. Sci­fi has always been about irra­tional human behav­iors in hypo­thet­i­cal sit­u­a­tions. …glad I was raised by sci­fi fans and do not lump mag­ic and vam­pires in the genre

    Reply
  • Cathy says:
    February 9, 2022 at 1:46 pm

    Seems to be quite a bit of “nail on the head” pre­dic­tions. Of course they had plen­ty of time and imag­i­na­tion to think those things. Which are two things we seem to be short on these days. Every­thing is becom­ing more instant grat­i­fi­ca­tion. So that being said I’d pre­dict our future as much less patient, less real human con­tact and last but not least… mon­ey, pol­i­tics and mis­un­der­stand­ings rule our part of the world. Wait.…..nevermind that’s the present. I feel like the gen­er­a­tion before us. Guess I’ll just say “Good Luck” and “Hold On To Each oth­er” to my kids when my turn to be a spec­ta­tor is over. What a wild ride so far. 1960- we’ll see.:)

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Quantcast