According to SRT rest mass and rest energy have equivalent meaning: E= Mc^2 or M= Ec^2. Why SRT and Quantum theory use word:’ rest mass /energy E= Mc^2 ‘ and don’t say: ‘ potential mass/energy E= Mc^2 ’ ?
When somebody says ‘ the particle in the rest . . .’, then we can image that particle was going maybe to sleep, maybe to have a cup of coffee . . . . etc. That a strange terminology the physicists use. ======== . My opinion.
In Classic physics there is ‘ potential energy’ and there is ‘ kinetic energy’. And „The Law of Conservation and Transformation of Energy/ Mass” connects them together.
In Quantum physics the ’rest mass/enegy’ looks as a static factor. I think that there is problem here. Because in QT there is ’rest mass/enegy E=Mc^2’ and there is active / kinetic energy E=hf. But how „The Law of Conservation and Transformation of Energy/ Mass” can unite them together nobody explains.
In other words: Dont know how to explain transforms the potenial mass/enegy E=Mc^2 into the active / kinetic energy E=hf the physicsts began to use new terminology and new words. ================== . . Socratus. http://www.worldnpa.org/php2/index.php?tab0=Sci... ===================== . .
According to SRT rest mass and rest energy have equivalent meaning: E= Mc^2 or M= Ec^2. Why SRT and Quantum theory use word:’ rest mass /energy E= Mc^2 ‘ and don’t say: ‘ potential mass/energy E= Mc^2 ’ ?
When somebody says ‘ the particle in the rest . . .’, then we can image that particle was going maybe to sleep, maybe to have a cup of coffee . . . . etc. That a strange terminology the physicists use. ======== . My opinion.
In Classic physics there is ‘ potential energy’ and there is ‘ kinetic energy’. And „The Law of Conservation and Transformation of Energy/ Mass” connects them together.
In Quantum physics the ’rest mass/enegy’ looks as a static factor. I think that there is problem here. Because in QT there is ’rest mass/enegy E=Mc^2’ and there is active / kinetic energy E=hf. But how „The Law of Conservation and Transformation of Energy/ Mass” can unite them together nobody explains.
In other words: Dont know how to explain transforms the potenial mass/enegy E=Mc^2 into the active / kinetic energy E=hf the physicsts began to use new terminology and new words. ================== . . Socratus. http://www.worldnpa.org/php2/index.php?tab0=Sci... ===================== . .
Get updates as soon as they go live, via RSS feed, email and now Twitter!
Follow on Twitter
Get the latest from our Twitter Stream.
Facebook
Why can't we be friends?
Suggest a Link
Got a link we should post? Send it our way!
About Us
Open Culture editor Dan Colman scours the web for the best educational media. He finds the free courses and audio books you need, the language lessons & movies you want, and plenty of enlightenment in between.
Why physicists don’t say: ‘ potential mass/energy E=Mc^2’ ?
According to SRT rest mass and rest energy have equivalent
meaning: E= Mc^2 or M= Ec^2.
Why SRT and Quantum theory use word:’ rest mass /energy E= Mc^2 ‘
and don’t say: ‘ potential mass/energy E= Mc^2 ’ ?
When somebody says ‘ the particle in the rest . . .’, then we
can image that particle was going maybe to sleep, maybe
to have a cup of coffee . . . . etc.
That a strange terminology the physicists use.
======== .
My opinion.
In Classic physics there is ‘ potential energy’ and
there is ‘ kinetic energy’.
And „The Law of Conservation and Transformation of
Energy/ Mass” connects them together.
In Quantum physics the ’rest mass/enegy’ looks as a static factor.
I think that there is problem here.
Because in QT there is ’rest mass/enegy E=Mc^2’ and
there is active / kinetic energy E=hf. But how „The Law of
Conservation and Transformation of Energy/ Mass”
can unite them together nobody explains.
In other words:
Dont know how to explain transforms the potenial
mass/enegy E=Mc^2 into the active / kinetic energy E=hf
the physicsts began to use new terminology and new words.
================== . .
Socratus.
http://www.worldnpa.org/php2/index.php?tab0=Sci...
===================== . .
Why physicists don’t say: ‘ potential mass/energy E=Mc^2’ ?
According to SRT rest mass and rest energy have equivalent
meaning: E= Mc^2 or M= Ec^2.
Why SRT and Quantum theory use word:’ rest mass /energy E= Mc^2 ‘
and don’t say: ‘ potential mass/energy E= Mc^2 ’ ?
When somebody says ‘ the particle in the rest . . .’, then we
can image that particle was going maybe to sleep, maybe
to have a cup of coffee . . . . etc.
That a strange terminology the physicists use.
======== .
My opinion.
In Classic physics there is ‘ potential energy’ and
there is ‘ kinetic energy’.
And „The Law of Conservation and Transformation of
Energy/ Mass” connects them together.
In Quantum physics the ’rest mass/enegy’ looks as a static factor.
I think that there is problem here.
Because in QT there is ’rest mass/enegy E=Mc^2’ and
there is active / kinetic energy E=hf. But how „The Law of
Conservation and Transformation of Energy/ Mass”
can unite them together nobody explains.
In other words:
Dont know how to explain transforms the potenial
mass/enegy E=Mc^2 into the active / kinetic energy E=hf
the physicsts began to use new terminology and new words.
================== . .
Socratus.
http://www.worldnpa.org/php2/index.php?tab0=Sci...
===================== . .