One Formula Thinking

Speak­ing of Einstein–have you ever want­ed to explain the world on a nap­kin? The Edge, self-described as “an online col­lec­tive of deep thinkers,” has teamed up with the Ser­pen­tine Gallery in Lon­don to par­tic­i­pate in a month-long Exper­i­ment Marathon. The Ser­pen­tine has been ask­ing lead­ing sci­en­tists and thinkers “What Is Your For­mu­la?” and the Edge is now host­ing the fas­ci­nat­ing answers on their site. Rickard Dawkins, Bri­an Eno and Benoit Man­del­brot are just a few of the con­trib­u­tors.

Einstein and the Mind of God

Speak­ing at a con­fer­ence on sci­ence, reli­gion and phi­los­o­phy in 1941, Albert Ein­stein famous­ly said that “sci­ence with­out reli­gion is lame; reli­gion with­out sci­ence is blind.” Ein­stein, a Ger­man-born Jew, con­sid­ered him­self reli­gious. But what he meant by reli­gion was not straight­for­ward. The first episode of a two-part pod­cast called Ein­stein and the Mind of God (iTunesMP3Web Site) tries to sort out Ein­stein’s reli­gious sen­si­bil­i­ty and how it squares with his sci­en­tif­ic think­ing. For Ein­stein, reli­gion con­sist­ed of a belief, not in a per­son­al God, but a uni­ver­sal spir­it that man­i­fests itself in nature. And it was the task of physics to make sense of nature, of God’s uni­verse. Or, so that is how it’s explained by Free­man Dyson, a famed the­o­ret­i­cal physi­cist who appears on the show. In the sec­ond part, the pod­cast turns to look at Ein­stein’s ethics (iTunesMP3Web Site). Although not with­out per­son­al flaws (he often fell short in his personal/domestic life), Ein­stein had a strong moral sense informed by his Jew­ish upbring­ing. He saw sci­en­tists hav­ing a deep moral oblig­a­tion to soci­ety; he took strong posi­tions against war (except when Hitler came along); he opposed racial dis­crim­i­na­tion and lament­ed the plight of African-Amer­i­cans well before the civ­il rights move­ment; and he laud­ed reli­gious lead­ers’ efforts to use non-vio­lent action to oppose immoral con­di­tions. Each of these pod­casts runs around 53 min­utes in length, and they form part of a larg­er radio/podcast series called Speak­ing of Faith (iTunesFeedWeb Site), which is issued by Amer­i­can Pub­lic Media.

Relat­ed Con­tent:

Sub­scribe to Our Feed

by | Permalink | Make a Comment ( Comments Off on Einstein and the Mind of God ) |

Re-Organizing the Free Audiobook Podcast Collection

This is just a quick note to let you know that we “re-orged” the Audio­book Pod­cast Col­lec­tion. The list, which had become a bit unwieldy, is now bro­ken down by genre: Literature/Fiction, Non­fic­tion, and Poet­ry. And, with­in these cat­e­gories, the texts are orga­nized by the author’s name. Hope­ful­ly this all makes the col­lec­tion eas­i­er to use. Check it out.

Sub­scribe to Our Feed

by | Permalink | Make a Comment ( 1 ) |

Animated Woody Allen Stand-Up

Last week, we offered you Woody Allen’s stand-up rou­tine in black & white; this week we’re doing it in ani­mat­ed col­or. (You can get more ani­mat­ed bits here and here, and note that we cre­at­ed a Com­e­dy cat­e­go­ry here.)

 Sub­scribe in a read­er

by | Permalink | Make a Comment ( Comments Off on Animated Woody Allen Stand-Up ) |

Give Books Away; Get Books You Want

This is a great con­cept & ser­vice for our read­ers. Book­Mooch is an online book swap­ping web site that has 45,000 mem­bers and 750,000 books in its inven­to­ry. What goes on here is fair­ly straight­for­ward. Users can give away books they’ve read in exchange for books they want to read — all for no mon­ey, oth­er than the ship­ping costs. That makes it easy to sup­port your read­ing habit, and it saves a few trees. The inner-work­ings of the book swap­ping are explained here and here. Have a look.

Check out our col­lec­tion of free pod­casts of free audio­books

Sub­scribe to Our Feed

by | Permalink | Make a Comment ( Comments Off on Give Books Away; Get Books You Want ) |

A New Model for Investigative Journalism

As we’ve dis­cussed before on this blog, one of the major casu­al­ties in the shift­ing new media land­scape is the tra­di­tion­al inves­tiga­tive journalist–someone with the time and resources to research in-depth sto­ries. In response to this prob­lem a new group called Pro Pub­li­ca is propos­ing a nov­el eco­nom­ic mod­el: hire the jour­nal­ists into a foun­da­tion and give their work away to the pub­li­ca­tions where it will make the biggest impact.

The new ini­tia­tive, head­ed up by Paul Steiger, head edi­tor at the Wall Street Jour­nal for 16 years, will spend $10 mil­lion annu­al­ly to sup­port a news­room of 24 jour­nal­ists and 12 oth­er staff in New York City. The mon­ey comes from Her­bert and Mar­i­on San­dler, for­mer heads of Gold­en West Finan­cial Cor­po­ra­tion, a big play­er in mort­gages and sav­ings.

It seems like­ly to me that Pro Pub­li­ca will suc­ceed in attract­ing some high-lev­el tal­ent, both because of Steiger and because many jour­nal­ists have come to fear for their jobs in the shrink­ing news­rooms of tra­di­tion­al papers. The real ques­tion is how well this sys­tem will work in dig­ging up and deliv­er­ing qual­i­ty report­ing. What do you lose, and what do you gain, when your employ­er is no longer a “paper of record” but a pri­vate foun­da­tion fund­ed by peo­ple with their own polit­i­cal agen­das? On the oth­er hand, it’s easy to argue that every news­pa­per already has some kind of polit­i­cal posi­tion, so maybe Pro Pub­li­ca will be no dif­fer­ent.

Sub­scribe to Our Feed.

by | Permalink | Make a Comment ( Comments Off on A New Model for Investigative Journalism ) |

Religion: 5000 Years in 90 Seconds

How has the geog­ra­phy of reli­gion evolved over the cen­turies, and where has it sparked wars? This inter­ac­tive map sum­ma­rizes in a brief 90 sec­onds the his­to­ry of Chris­tian­i­ty, Islam, Hin­duism, Bud­dhism, and Judaism. It shows where & when each reli­gion orig­i­nat­ed, how the reli­gions some­times came into con­flict, and how they spread across the globe. This short his­to­ry les­son is pro­duced by a site called Maps of War, which fea­tures oth­er inter­ac­tive lessons, includ­ing The Impe­r­i­al His­to­ry of the Mid­dle East and Amer­i­can Lead­er­ship & War. Enjoy.

Via Boing Boing

by | Permalink | Make a Comment ( 2 ) |

Stephen Colbert For President

In yes­ter­day’s New York Times, Stephen Col­bert took over Mau­reen Dowd’s reg­u­lar opin­ion col­umn and made a fun­ny case for why he could be the next US pres­i­dent. Read it here. Also lis­ten to his inter­view last week on NPR’s Fresh Air (iTunesFeedWeb Site). These appear­ances all fig­ure into a media blitz designed to boost sales of Col­bert’s new­ly-released book I Am Amer­i­ca (And So Can You!), which is already #4 on Ama­zon’s best­seller list. Not bad.

by | Permalink | Make a Comment ( Comments Off on Stephen Colbert For President ) |

Al Gore’s “Earth in the Balance”: A Free, Environment Friendly Copy (Almost)

Since the release of An Incon­ve­nient Truth, Al Gore has had quite a run. He first won him­self an Emmy, then an Oscar, and now the Nobel Peace Prize. Although the film rep­re­sents Gore’s most well known work on the envi­ron­ment, it’s hard­ly where his envi­ron­men­tal efforts began. His cam­paign goes back to the late 1970s, when he held con­gres­sion­al hear­ings on cli­mate change and green­house gas­es. And it moves through the 1980s and then the 1990s, when he occu­pied the Vice Pres­i­den­cy. In 1992, while oth­er polit­i­cal lead­ers quib­bled over the pros and cons of NAFTA, Gore put the envi­ron­ment on the nation­al agen­da, real­ly for the first time, when he pub­lished Earth in the Bal­ance: Ecol­o­gy and the Human Spir­it. (The Bush admin­is­tra­tion then took it off the agen­da, regret­tably.) Gore’s book became a nation­al best­seller, and it has since gone through sev­er­al new edi­tions, the lat­est hav­ing been issued just last year. You could buy the book, but the good news is that Google serves up large por­tions of the book online for free. It’s at a price you can’t beat, and it goes easy on the pulp. Have a good look. And also see below Gore’s com­ments upon learn­ing about the Nobel Prize.

Sub­scribe to Our Feed

by | Permalink | Make a Comment ( 1 ) |

The Future of Collaborative Culture?

wales3.jpgI just heard Jim­my Wales, founder of Wikipedia, speak­ing at Stan­ford Law School today. Wales is work­ing on some new projects that he hopes will har­ness the com­mu­ni­ty-dri­ven col­lab­o­ra­tion of Wikipedia. He’s already had some suc­cess in branch­ing out from the ency­clo­pe­dia idea with Wikia, which is a “wiki farm” com­pil­ing infor­ma­tion on a vari­ety of dif­fer­ent sub­jects (some of the most suc­cess­ful so far relate to video games).

What Wales spoke about today, how­ev­er, is a new col­lab­o­ra­tive search project. The con­cept is still in its ear­ly stages, it seems, but the idea would be to har­ness the intel­li­gence and ded­i­ca­tion of human beings to pro­duce search results sig­nif­i­cant­ly bet­ter than Google’s. This rais­es a few ques­tions:

Is Google bro­ken? It’s amaz­ing what Google pulls up, but maybe we’ve all got­ten so good at work­ing with an imper­fect sys­tem that we just tune out the spam and mis­in­ter­pre­ta­tions that still crop up.

Is a col­lab­o­ra­tive social mod­el the appro­pri­ate solu­tion to this prob­lem? Peo­ple are good at com­pil­ing ency­clo­pe­dias, but they may not be good at emu­lat­ing search rank algo­rithms. Also, Google is pow­ered by mil­lions of servers in dozens of data cen­ters over the world man­ag­ing petabytes of infor­ma­tion. In oth­er words, this may be a technology+money busi­ness, not a people+transparency busi­ness.

These issues aside, Wikipedia is one of the most amaz­ing things to come out of the whole Inter­net exper­i­ment, so I’m excit­ed to see what Wales comes up with. Has search become a basic ser­vice? Would it work bet­ter as an open-source sys­tem?

Sub­scribe to Our Feed

by | Permalink | Make a Comment ( Comments Off on The Future of Collaborative Culture? ) |

Philosophers and Theorists on YouTube

When we announced last week that UC Berke­ley had launched a new chan­nel on YouTube, we were curt­ly informed by a Euro­pean read­er that Berke­ley was­n’t the first to get into this game. Appar­ent­ly, the Euro­pean Grad­u­ate School (or EGS) has been at it for a while. The school’s YouTube col­lec­tion fea­tures talks by impor­tant con­tem­po­rary the­o­rists and philoso­phers includ­ing Jacques Der­ri­da, Jean Bau­drillard, and Judith But­ler. (There are also some film­mak­ers mixed in — take for exam­ple, Peter Green­away and John Waters.) To be frank, much of the con­tent runs counter to what we’re look­ing to do here — to make think­ing less insu­lar and empha­size ideas that speak to a think­ing pub­lic. This is not to dis­miss the cal­iber of the think­ing pre­sent­ed here. It’s sim­ply to com­ment on where it fits (or does­n’t fit) into the kind of project that we’re under­tak­ing. How­ev­er, if the ESG YouTube chan­nel speaks to you, dig in. It’s yours to enjoy.

Sub­scribe to Our Feed

by | Permalink | Make a Comment ( Comments Off on Philosophers and Theorists on YouTube ) |


  • Great Lectures

  • Sign up for Newsletter

  • About Us

    Open Culture scours the web for the best educational media. We find the free courses and audio books you need, the language lessons & educational videos you want, and plenty of enlightenment in between.


    Advertise With Us

  • Archives

  • Search

  • Quantcast