Speaking of Einstein–have you ever wanted to explain the world on a napkin? The Edge, self-described as “an online collective of deep thinkers,” has teamed up with the Serpentine Gallery in London to participate in a month-long Experiment Marathon. The Serpentine has been asking leading scientists and thinkers “What Is Your Formula?” and the Edge is now hosting the fascinating answers on their site. Rickard Dawkins, Brian Eno and Benoit Mandelbrot are just a few of the contributors.
Speaking at a conference on science, religion and philosophy in 1941, Albert Einstein famously said that “science without religion is lame; religion without science is blind.” Einstein, a German-born Jew, considered himself religious. But what he meant by religion was not straightforward. The first episode of a two-part podcast called Einstein and the Mind of God (iTunes — MP3 — Web Site) tries to sort out Einstein’s religious sensibility and how it squares with his scientific thinking. For Einstein, religion consisted of a belief, not in a personal God, but a universal spirit that manifests itself in nature. And it was the task of physics to make sense of nature, of God’s universe. Or, so that is how it’s explained by Freeman Dyson, a famed theoretical physicist who appears on the show. In the second part, the podcast turns to look at Einstein’s ethics (iTunes — MP3 — Web Site). Although not without personal flaws (he often fell short in his personal/domestic life), Einstein had a strong moral sense informed by his Jewish upbringing. He saw scientists having a deep moral obligation to society; he took strong positions against war (except when Hitler came along); he opposed racial discrimination and lamented the plight of African-Americans well before the civil rights movement; and he lauded religious leaders’ efforts to use non-violent action to oppose immoral conditions. Each of these podcasts runs around 53 minutes in length, and they form part of a larger radio/podcast series called Speaking of Faith (iTunes — Feed — Web Site), which is issued by American Public Media.
This is just a quick note to let you know that we “re-orged” the Audiobook Podcast Collection. The list, which had become a bit unwieldy, is now broken down by genre: Literature/Fiction, Nonfiction, and Poetry. And, within these categories, the texts are organized by the author’s name. Hopefully this all makes the collection easier to use. Check it out.
This is a great concept & service for our readers. BookMooch is an online book swapping web site that has 45,000 members and 750,000 books in its inventory. What goes on here is fairly straightforward. Users can give away books they’ve read in exchange for books they want to read — all for no money, other than the shipping costs. That makes it easy to support your reading habit, and it saves a few trees. The inner-workings of the book swapping are explained here and here. Have a look.
As we’ve discussed before on this blog, one of the major casualties in the shifting new media landscape is the traditional investigative journalist–someone with the time and resources to research in-depth stories. In response to this problem a new group called Pro Publica is proposing a novel economic model: hire the journalists into a foundation and give their work away to the publications where it will make the biggest impact.
The new initiative, headed up by Paul Steiger, head editor at the Wall Street Journal for 16 years, will spend $10 million annually to support a newsroom of 24 journalists and 12 other staff in New York City. The money comes from Herbert and Marion Sandler, former heads of Golden West Financial Corporation, a big player in mortgages and savings.
It seems likely to me that Pro Publica will succeed in attracting some high-level talent, both because of Steiger and because many journalists have come to fear for their jobs in the shrinking newsrooms of traditional papers. The real question is how well this system will work in digging up and delivering quality reporting. What do you lose, and what do you gain, when your employer is no longer a “paper of record” but a private foundation funded by people with their own political agendas? On the other hand, it’s easy to argue that every newspaper already has some kind of political position, so maybe Pro Publica will be no different.
How has the geography of religion evolved over the centuries, and where has it sparked wars? This interactive map summarizes in a brief 90 seconds the history of Christianity, Islam, Hinduism, Buddhism, and Judaism. It shows where & when each religion originated, how the religions sometimes came into conflict, and how they spread across the globe. This short history lesson is produced by a site called Maps of War, which features other interactive lessons, including The Imperial History of the Middle East and American Leadership & War. Enjoy.
In yesterday’s New York Times, Stephen Colbert took over Maureen Dowd’s regular opinion column and made a funny case for why he could be the next US president. Read it here. Also listen to his interview last week on NPR’s Fresh Air (iTunes — Feed — Web Site). These appearances all figure into a media blitz designed to boost sales of Colbert’s newly-released book I Am America (And So Can You!), which is already #4 on Amazon’s bestseller list. Not bad.
Since the release of An Inconvenient Truth, Al Gore has had quite a run. He first won himself an Emmy, then an Oscar, and now the Nobel Peace Prize. Although the film represents Gore’s most well known work on the environment, it’s hardly where his environmental efforts began. His campaign goes back to the late 1970s, when he held congressional hearings on climate change and greenhouse gases. And it moves through the 1980s and then the 1990s, when he occupied the Vice Presidency. In 1992, while other political leaders quibbled over the pros and cons of NAFTA, Gore put the environment on the national agenda, really for the first time, when he published Earth in the Balance: Ecology and the Human Spirit. (The Bush administration then took it off the agenda, regrettably.) Gore’s book became a national bestseller, and it has since gone through several new editions, the latest having been issued just last year. You could buy the book, but the good news is that Google serves up large portions of the book online for free. It’s at a price you can’t beat, and it goes easy on the pulp. Have a good look. And also see below Gore’s comments upon learning about the Nobel Prize.
I just heard Jimmy Wales, founder of Wikipedia, speaking at Stanford Law School today. Wales is working on some new projects that he hopes will harness the community-driven collaboration of Wikipedia. He’s already had some success in branching out from the encyclopedia idea with Wikia, which is a “wiki farm” compiling information on a variety of different subjects (some of the most successful so far relate to video games).
What Wales spoke about today, however, is a new collaborative search project. The concept is still in its early stages, it seems, but the idea would be to harness the intelligence and dedication of human beings to produce search results significantly better than Google’s. This raises a few questions:
Is Google broken? It’s amazing what Google pulls up, but maybe we’ve all gotten so good at working with an imperfect system that we just tune out the spam and misinterpretations that still crop up.
Is a collaborative social model the appropriate solution to this problem? People are good at compiling encyclopedias, but they may not be good at emulating search rank algorithms. Also, Google is powered by millions of servers in dozens of data centers over the world managing petabytes of information. In other words, this may be a technology+money business, not a people+transparency business.
These issues aside, Wikipedia is one of the most amazing things to come out of the whole Internet experiment, so I’m excited to see what Wales comes up with. Has search become a basic service? Would it work better as an open-source system?
When we announced last week that UC Berkeley had launched a new channel on YouTube, we were curtly informed by a European reader that Berkeley wasn’t the first to get into this game. Apparently, the European Graduate School (or EGS) has been at it for a while. The school’s YouTube collection features talks by important contemporary theorists and philosophers including Jacques Derrida, Jean Baudrillard, and Judith Butler. (There are also some filmmakers mixed in — take for example, Peter Greenaway and John Waters.) To be frank, much of the content runs counter to what we’re looking to do here — to make thinking less insular and emphasize ideas that speak to a thinking public. This is not to dismiss the caliber of the thinking presented here. It’s simply to comment on where it fits (or doesn’t fit) into the kind of project that we’re undertaking. However, if the ESG YouTube channel speaks to you, dig in. It’s yours to enjoy.
We're hoping to rely on loyal readers, rather than erratic ads. Please click the Donate button and support Open Culture. You can use Paypal, Venmo, Patreon, even Crypto! We thank you!
Open Culture scours the web for the best educational media. We find the free courses and audio books you need, the language lessons & educational videos you want, and plenty of enlightenment in between.