ReadÂing the press lateÂly, you’d think the AmerÂiÂcan uniÂverÂsiÂty sysÂtem is the next mortÂgage marÂket. And the humanÂiÂties? They’re toxÂic debt. Here’s a quick recap of the grim parade of stoÂries:
- Last week, The New York Times set the stage with this: an artiÂcle detailÂing how stuÂdents are drownÂing in debt, which raisÂes the quesÂtions: Can stuÂdents still afford AmerÂiÂca’s expenÂsive uniÂverÂsiÂties? And will banks keep makÂing these loans? The WashÂingÂton ExamÂinÂer goes furÂther and bluntÂly asks: Is a HighÂer EduÂcaÂtion BubÂble about to Burst?
- Next, in The New YorkÂer, a wideÂly-read artiÂcle offers this facÂtoid: DurÂing the comÂing decade, most of the secÂtors adding jobs in the US won’t require a colÂlege degree. So some acaÂdÂeÂmics (yes, acaÂdÂeÂmics) are left wonÂderÂing, “why not save the monÂey and put it towards a house?” Or, put difÂferÂentÂly, is a colÂlege eduÂcaÂtion realÂly worth the monÂey?
- The meme conÂtinÂues yesÂterÂday with David Brooks musÂing in an opinÂion piece: “When the going gets tough, the tough take accountÂing. When the job marÂket worsÂens, many stuÂdents figÂure they can’t indulge in an EngÂlish or a hisÂtoÂry major. They have to study someÂthing that will lead directÂly to a job.” “There already has been a nearÂly 50 perÂcent drop in the porÂtion of libÂerÂal arts majors over the past genÂerÂaÂtion, and that trend is bound to accelÂerÂate.” So why bothÂer with a humanÂiÂties eduÂcaÂtion? Brooks tries to make his best case, and it’s not a bad one. But I’m not sure that a younger genÂerÂaÂtion is lisÂtenÂing. And if you lisÂten to this 2008 interÂview with Harold Bloom, they maybe shouldÂn’t be.
- And just to top things off: StanÂley Fish launchÂes his own defense of a “clasÂsiÂcal eduÂcaÂtion,” even if it “sounds downÂright anteÂdiluÂvian, outÂmodÂed, narÂrow and elitÂist.” You get the drift. AnothÂer sign that the humanÂiÂties is in a bear marÂket.