Angels & Demons: The Science Revealed

God and Dev­il.
=============

In 1906, Ruther­ford stud­ied inter­nal struc­ture of atoms,
bom­bard­ing them with high ener­gy a- par­ti­cles.
This idea helped him to under­stand the struc­ture of atom.
But the clever Dev­il inter­fered and gave advice to physi­cists:
’ Bomb them stronger’.
And physi­cists cre­at­ed huge can­non-accel­er­a­tors of par­ti­cles.
And they began to bomb micro par­ti­cles in the vac­u­um,
in hop­ing to under­stand their inner struc­ture.
And they were sur­prised with the results of this bomb­ing.
Sev­er­al hun­dreds of com­plete­ly new strange par­ti­cles appeared.
They lived for a very lit­tle time and do not relate to our world.
Our Earth needs anoth­er con­stants of nature.
But physi­cists are proud of their work. They say:
we study the inner struc­ture of the par­ti­cles.
The clever and art­ful Dev­il is glad. He again has deceived man.
Physi­cists think, that an accel­er­a­tor is first of all
the pres­ence of huge ener­gy. And the Dev­il laughs.
He knows that an accel­er­a­tor is first of all the Vac­u­um.
But this, he has with­held from man.
He has not explained that the Vac­u­um is infi­nite and inex­haustible.
And in infin­i­ty an infi­nite vari­ety of par­ti­cles is con­tained .
And by bomb­ing the vac­u­um, one can find cen­taurs and sphin­x­es.
But my God, save us from their pres­ence on Earth.
============== . .
E. Ruther­ford was right.
His fol­low­ers are mis­tak­en.
Why?
Imag­ine, that I want to plant a small apple- tree.
For this pur­pose I will dig out a hole of 1 meter width
and 1,20 m depth. It is nor­mal.
But if to plant a small apple- tree, I will begin to dig
a base for a huge build­ing (sky­scraper),
or if to begin to drill ground with 10 km. depth,
will you call me a nor­mal man?
=================================== , .
Imag­ine a man who breaks watch­es on a wall.
And then he tries to under­stand their mech­a­nisms by
col­lect­ing the cog­wheels, springs and small screws,
that have been scat­tered every­where.
What are his chances of a suc­cess­ful recon­struc­tion?
As many chances as there are sci­en­tists who aspire to under­stand
the inner struc­ture of elec­trons by smash­ing them in accel­er­a­tors?
If, by not tak­ing into account the ini­tial con­di­tions of Gen­e­sis,
the fan­tasies of the sci­en­tists may well be unlim­it­ed.
========== . ======== .
The Nature works very eco­nom­i­cal.
For exam­ple, biol­o­gists know 100 ( hun­dred ) kinds of
amino acids. But only 20 ( twen­ty) kinds of amino acids
are suit­able to pro­duce mol­e­cules of pro­tein, from which all
dif­fer­ent cells cre­at­ed on our plan­et. What are about anoth­er
80 % of amino acids? They are dead end of evo­lu­tion.
The physi­cists found many ( 1000 ) new ele­men­tary par­ti­cles in
accel­er­a­tors. But we need only one ( 1) elec­tron and one (1 )
pro­ton to cre­ate first atom, to begin to cre­ate the Nature.
All anoth­er ele­men­tary par­ti­cles (mesons, muons , bosons, taus,
all their girl­friends — antipar­ti­cles, all quarks and antiquarks…etc)
are dead end of evo­lu­tion.
============.
What was before — “ the big bang” or the vac­u­um ?
The physi­cists cre­at­ed “ Europe’s Large Hadron Col­id­er “
Please, look at how our physi­cists made this accel­er­a­tor.
They made the vac­u­um and after they gen­er­at­ed a big reac­tion
between two col­lid­ing par­ti­cles in some small imi­ta­tion of the
“big bang”. They didn’t make this process in the reverse.
So, what was pri­or in the Uni­verse: “ big bang” or vac­u­um?
============ . .
Best wish­es.
Israel Sadovnik. / Socra­tus.

http://www.worldnpa.org/php2/index.php?tab0=Scientists&tab1=Display&id=1372
===================== . .