Walter Benjamin’s 13 Oracular Writing Tips

benjamin writing tips

Image by Wal­ter Ben­jamin Archiv, via Wiki­me­dia Com­mons

The prob­a­bil­i­ty of Wal­ter Ben­jamin’s name com­ing up in your aver­age MFA work­shop, or fic­tion writ­ers’ group of any kind, like­ly approach­es zero. But head over to a name-your-crit­i­cal-polit­i­cal-lit­er­ary-the­o­ry class and I’d be sur­prised not to hear it dropped at least once, if not half a dozen times. Ben­jamin, after all, men­tored or befriend­ed the first gen­er­a­tion Frank­furt School, Han­nah Arendt, Bertolt Brecht, Leo Strauss, and near­ly every oth­er twen­ti­eth-cen­tu­ry Ger­man intel­lec­tu­al who escaped the Nazis. Trag­i­cal­ly, Ben­jamin him­self did not fare so well. It has long been believed that he killed him­self rather than face Nazi cap­ture. Anoth­er the­o­ry spec­u­lates that Stal­in had him mur­dered.

Since his death, the leg­end of Ben­jamin as a kind of het­ero­dox Marx­ist prophet—an image he fos­tered with his embrace of Jew­ish mysticism—has grown and grown. And yet, despite his rar­i­fied aca­d­e­m­ic pedi­gree, I main­tain that writ­ers of all kinds, from the most pedan­tic to the most vis­cer­al, can learn much from him.

Ben­jamin did not strict­ly con­fine him­self to the arcane tex­tu­al analy­sis and lit­er­ary-the­o­log­i­cal hermeneu­tics for which he’s best known; he spent most of his career work­ing as a free­lance crit­ic and jour­nal­ist, writ­ing almost casu­al trav­el­ogues, per­son­al rem­i­nis­cences of Weimar Berlin, and approach­able essays on a vari­ety of sub­jects. For a few years, he even wrote and pre­sent­ed pop­u­lar radio broad­casts for young adults—acting as a kind of “Ger­man Ira Glass for teens.”

And, like so many writ­ers before and since, Ben­jamin once issued a list of “writer’s tips”—or, as he called it, “The Writer’s Tech­nique in Thir­teen The­ses,” part of his 1928 trea­tise One-Way Street, one of only two books pub­lished in his life­time. In Ben­jam­in’s hands, that well-worn, well mean­ing, but often less than help­ful genre becomes a series of orac­u­lar pro­nounce­ments that can seem, at first read, com­i­cal, super­sti­tious, or puz­zling­ly idio­syn­crat­ic. But read them over a few times. Then read them again. Like all of his writ­ing, Ben­jam­in’s sug­ges­tions, some of which read like com­mand­ments, oth­ers like Niet­zschean apho­risms, reveal their mean­ings slow­ly, illu­mi­nat­ing the pos­tures, atti­tudes, and phys­i­cal and spir­i­tu­al dis­ci­plines of writ­ing in sur­pris­ing­ly humane and astute ways.

The Writer’s Tech­nique in Thir­teen The­ses:

  1. Any­one intend­ing to embark on a major work should be lenient with him­self and, hav­ing com­plet­ed a stint, deny him­self noth­ing that will not prej­u­dice the next.
  2. Talk about what you have writ­ten, by all means, but do not read from it while the work is in progress. Every grat­i­fi­ca­tion pro­cured in this way will slack­en your tem­po. If this regime is fol­lowed, the grow­ing desire to com­mu­ni­cate will become in the end a motor for com­ple­tion.
  3. In your work­ing con­di­tions avoid every­day medi­oc­rity. Semi-relax­ation, to a back­ground of insipid sounds, is degrad­ing. On the oth­er hand, accom­pa­ni­ment by an etude or a cacoph­o­ny of voic­es can become as sig­nif­i­cant for work as the per­cep­ti­ble silence of the night. If the lat­ter sharp­ens the inner ear, the for­mer acts as a touch­stone for a dic­tion ample enough to bury even the most way­ward sounds.
  4. Avoid hap­haz­ard writ­ing mate­ri­als. A pedan­tic adher­ence to cer­tain papers, pens, inks is ben­e­fi­cial. No lux­u­ry, but an abun­dance of these uten­sils is indis­pens­able.
  5. Let no thought pass incog­ni­to, and keep your note­book as strict­ly as the author­i­ties keep their reg­is­ter of aliens.
  6. Keep your pen aloof from inspi­ra­tion, which it will then attract with mag­net­ic pow­er. The more cir­cum­spect­ly you delay writ­ing down an idea, the more mature­ly devel­oped it will be on sur­ren­der­ing itself. Speech con­quers thought, but writ­ing com­mands it.
  7. Nev­er stop writ­ing because you have run out of ideas. Lit­er­ary hon­our requires that one break off only at an appoint­ed moment (a meal­time, a meet­ing) or at the end of the work.
  8. Fill the lacu­nae of inspi­ra­tion by tidi­ly copy­ing out what is already writ­ten. Intu­ition will awak­en in the process.
  9. Nul­la dies sine lin­ea [‘No day with­out a line’] — but there may well be weeks.
  10. Con­sid­er no work per­fect over which you have not once sat from evening to broad day­light.
  11. Do not write the con­clu­sion of a work in your famil­iar study. You would not find the nec­es­sary courage there.
  12. Stages of com­po­si­tion: idea — style — writ­ing. The val­ue of the fair copy is that in pro­duc­ing it you con­fine atten­tion to cal­lig­ra­phy. The idea kills inspi­ra­tion, style fet­ters the idea, writ­ing pays off style.
  13. The work is the death mask of its con­cep­tion.

via Clar­i­on 18/Brain­Pick­ings

Relat­ed Con­tent:

Wal­ter Benjamin’s Radio Plays for Kids (1929–1932)

Umber­to Eco Dies at 84; Leaves Behind Advice to Aspir­ing Writ­ers

David Ogilvy’s 1982 Memo “How to Write” Offers 10 Pieces of Time­less Advice

Josh Jones is a writer and musi­cian based in Durham, NC. Fol­low him at @jdmagness

Watch Star Trek: New Voyages: The Original Fan-Made Sequel to the 1960s TV Series

Sev­er­al weeks back, we fea­tured for you Star Trek Con­tin­ues, the crit­i­cal­ly-acclaimed, fan-made sequel to the orig­i­nal TV series, which tries to answer the ques­tions: What if Star Trek had con­tin­ued? How would the sto­ry have played out?

Oth­ers have tried to offer up answers to those ques­tions too. And we’d be remiss, a read­er remind­ed us, if we did­n’t give a lit­tle air­time to Star Trek: New Voy­ages, “the longest-run­ning, Star Trek orig­i­nal series fan pro­duc­tion in the world.” Here’s a lit­tle more infor­ma­tion about the pro­duc­tion from the show’s web site:

Cre­at­ed in 2003 by James Caw­ley, along with pro­duc­er Jack Mar­shall, the show strives to com­plete the “five-year mis­sion” of the Star­ship Enter­prise, “to bold­ly go where no man has gone before.” It’s cel­e­bra­tion of Gene Roddenberry’s lega­cy has won crit­i­cal acclaim and numer­ous acco­lades, as well as attract­ing the atten­tion and par­tic­i­pa­tion of Star Trek alum­ni such as George Takei and Wal­ter Koenig, who have returned to reprise their roles on NEW VOYAGES. We have even pro­vid­ed prop items for the actu­al STAR TREK fran­chise series “Enter­prise”!

All 10 episodes can viewed online or down­loaded from the show’s web­site. And you can also find them on YouTube too. Start with Episode 1 above.

If you would like to sign up for Open Culture’s free email newslet­ter, please find it here. It’s a great way to see our new posts, all bun­dled in one email, each day.

If you would like to sup­port the mis­sion of Open Cul­ture, con­sid­er mak­ing a dona­tion to our site. It’s hard to rely 100% on ads, and your con­tri­bu­tions will help us con­tin­ue pro­vid­ing the best free cul­tur­al and edu­ca­tion­al mate­ri­als to learn­ers every­where. You can con­tribute through Pay­Pal, Patre­on, and Ven­mo (@openculture). Thanks!

Relat­ed Con­tent:

Watch Star Trek Con­tin­ues: The Crit­i­cal­ly-Acclaimed, Fan-Made Sequel to the Orig­i­nal TV Series

City of Scars: The Impres­sive Bat­man Fan Film Made for $27,000 in 21 Days

How Isaac Asi­mov Went from Star Trek Crit­ic to Star Trek­Fan & Advi­sor

Nichelle Nichols Explains How Mar­tin Luther King Con­vinced Her to Stay on Star Trek

David Bowie’s Music Video “Jump They Say” Pays Tribute to Marker’s La Jetée, Godard’s Alphaville, Welles’ The Trial & Kubrick’s 2001

Last week we fea­tured William Gib­son’s mem­o­ry of the first time he saw La Jetée, Chris Mark­er’s influ­en­tial 1962 sci­ence-fic­tion short film con­struct­ed almost entire­ly out of still pho­tographs. In the Guardian arti­cle on the film’s lega­cy that quotes Gib­son, we also hear from direc­tor Mark Romanek, who speaks of being “exposed to Chris Mark­er’s work at a par­tic­u­lar­ly impres­sion­able age.” Romanek, known for the fea­ture films One Hour Pho­to and Nev­er Let Me Go, has worked pri­mar­i­ly as a music video direc­tor, and in 1993 he got the chance to do a trib­ute to Mark­er in the video for David Bowie’s “Jump They Say.”

“Bowie and I shared an admi­ra­tion for La Jetée, so we con­trived to pay homage to it,” says Romanek. “The idea of mak­ing those icon­ic still images move seemed both excit­ing and some­how a lit­tle sac­ri­le­gious.” The obser­vant Mark­er fan will notice strong echoes of the film in the char­ac­ters and the events of the music video, espe­cial­ly when Bowie’s char­ac­ter gets dragged off by a pack of post-apoc­a­lyp­ti­cal­ly Gal­lic-look­ing tech­no-thugs and strapped into what looks like the very same wired-up ham­mock and mask used to send the pro­tag­o­nist of La Jetée back through time.

But much more went into this influ­ence-rich project than an appre­ci­a­tion for Chris Mark­er. Bowie described the song itself to the New Musi­cal Express as “semi-based on my impres­sion of my step­broth­er” Ter­ry Burns, who had tak­en his own life eight years ear­li­er. In the video, the singer’s char­ac­ter winds up tak­ing a fly­ing leap from the 29th floor of an office build­ing, thus escap­ing the oppres­sion and para­noia of his slick­ly sin­is­ter near-future cor­po­rate set­ting, which owes much to the ver­sion of Paris that Jean-Luc Godard offered up in his 1965 sci-fi noir Alphav­ille.

We might say that the sharp-suit­ed, sharp­er-haired incar­na­tion of Bowie here jumps as a way out of a world with which he can­not rea­son, and artists who want to depict such a world have often looked to the work of Franz Kaf­ka as an exam­ple. In this case, Bowie and Romanek draw from Orson Welles’ film adap­ta­tion of Kafka’s The Tri­al (espe­cial­ly its use of cor­ri­dors), which came out the very same year as La Jetée did. Enthu­si­asts of 1960s film will also notice that 2001: A Space Odyssey also had its impact on the pro­duc­tion design (espe­cial­ly as regards female cos­tum­ing). But what did the man behind the main inspi­ra­tion think? “I was deeply relieved,” says Romanek, “to hear that Mr. Mark­er was pleased and not offend­ed by the ges­ture.”

Relat­ed Con­tent:

David Bowie Releas­es 36 Music Videos of His Clas­sic Songs from the 1970s and 1980s

How “Space Odd­i­ty” Launched David Bowie to Star­dom: Watch the Orig­i­nal Music Video From 1969

The Sto­ry of Zig­gy Star­dust: How David Bowie Cre­at­ed the Char­ac­ter that Made Him Famous

How Chris Marker’s Rad­i­cal Sci­Fi Film, La Jetée, Changed the Life of Cyber­punk Prophet, William Gib­son

Based in Seoul, Col­in Mar­shall writes and broad­casts on cities, lan­guage, and style. He’s at work on a book about Los Ange­les, A Los Ange­les Primer, the video series The City in Cin­e­ma, the crowd­fund­ed jour­nal­ism project Where Is the City of the Future?, and the Los Ange­les Review of Books’ Korea Blog. Fol­low him on Twit­ter at @colinmarshall or on Face­book.

Langston Hughes Reads Langston Hughes

James Mer­cer Langston Hugh­es’ poetry—joyful, cel­e­bra­to­ry, cut­ting, filled with deep long­ing, play­ful jabs, bit­ter­sweet images, and earnest affirmations—is pre-emi­nent­ly African Amer­i­can poet­ry. But in say­ing that I mean also to say that it is pre-emi­nent­ly Amer­i­can poet­ry, as the jazz and blues Hugh­es drew so much from is pre-emi­nent­ly Amer­i­can music. Hugh­es was com­mit­ted to the promis­es of the Amer­i­can experiment—despite and in full recog­ni­tion of its vicious con­tra­dic­tions—and he was also in live­ly con­ver­sa­tion with the poets who cap­tured and trans­mut­ed the country’s unique voic­es.

His “major ear­ly influ­ences,” writes crit­ic Arnold Ram­per­sad, “were Walt Whit­man, Carl Sand­burg, as well as the black poets Paul Lawrence Dun­bar, a mas­ter of both dialect and stan­dard verse, and Claude McK­ay, a rad­i­cal social­ist who also wrote accom­plished lyric poet­ry.” All of these influ­ences are read­i­ly appar­ent in his ear­ly work, and it was Sand­burg who led him “toward free verse and a rad­i­cal­ly demo­c­ra­t­ic mod­ernist aes­thet­ic.”

Hugh­es also descend­ed from a rad­i­cal polit­i­cal tra­di­tion, his cho­sen first name, Langston, the sur­name of an abo­li­tion­ist grand­fa­ther who died fight­ing with John Brown; when his grand­moth­er remar­ried, it was to a promi­nent Recon­struc­tion politi­cian. It’s a lega­cy that seems to have inspired in the poet a fierce hope for the country’s future that he express­es in that famous response to Whit­man, “I, Too.”

Tomor­row,
I’ll be at the table
When com­pa­ny comes.
Nobody’ll dare
Say to me,
“Eat in the kitchen,”
Then.

Besides,
They’ll see how beau­ti­ful I am
And be ashamed—

The lines of his col­lect­ed works have been read aloud in count­less class­rooms and from count­less stages as rep­re­sent­ing the best of the Harlem Renais­sance’s buoy­ant cri­tique and cel­e­bra­tion of every­thing con­tained in the des­ig­na­tion “African-Amer­i­can.” That’s not to say that Hugh­es’ poet­ry or his vision res­onat­ed with all of his con­tem­po­raries.

Two years after his death in 1967, author Lind­say Pat­ter­son in the New York Times called Hugh­es “the most abused poet in Amer­i­ca…. Seri­ous white crit­ics ignored him, less seri­ous ones com­pared his poet­ry to Cas­sius Clay dog­ger­el, and most black crit­ics only grudg­ing­ly admired him. Some like James Bald­win, were down­right mali­cious about his poet­ic achieve­ment.” Bald­win, writes Ani­ta Pat­ter­son (no rela­tion to Lind­say), “fault­ed Hugh­es for fail­ing to fol­low through con­sis­tent­ly on the artis­tic premis­es laid out in his ear­ly verse.” The lat­er poems, wrote Bald­win in 1959, “take refuge, final­ly, in a fake sim­plic­i­ty.”

And yet, Lind­say Pat­ter­son point­ed out, crit­ics like Bald­win and oth­ers mis­took “the sim­ple form and lan­guage of Hugh­es’ poet­ry for pauci­ty of mean­ing. His real mean­ings are nev­er that appar­ent,” and his poet­ry “must be heard, rather than read silent­ly, for one to real­ize its emo­tion­al scope.” In 1962 and 63, Hugh­es sat down with the BBC for a series of read­ings and inter­views, and lat­er, Caed­mon Records, who have for many decades record­ed and pre­served the voic­es of 20th poet­ry, released por­tions of those ses­sions as part of their “Essen­tial” series. That record­ing has now been ful­ly released on Spo­ti­fy (stream the 47 minute record­ing right below), and appar­ent­ly YouTube too.

You can hear Hugh­es read the famil­iar favorite “The Negro Speaks of Rivers” (top) and below it, an auto­bi­o­graph­i­cal intro­duc­tion to the poem. Fur­ther down, hear the less well-known, and much more tren­chant, poem, “The South,” which begins with grotesque, almost Faulkner­ian images in its open­ing lines:

The lazy, laugh­ing South
With blood on its mouth.
The sun­ny-faced South,
Beast-strong,
Idiot-brained.
The child-mind­ed South

Of anoth­er less­er-known poem, “Mer­ry-go-Round,” above, Hugh­es says in com­men­tary titled “In My Poet­ry”: “I’ve nev­er been at a loss for mov­ing sub­ject mat­ter because I myself have faced many of these racial prob­lems all over the Unit­ed States, hav­ing lived from one end of the coun­try to the oth­er, in my now more than 50 years of life. One of the dra­mat­ic ways of express­ing the race prob­lem, I’ve found, is to express it through the eyes of a child, and I have done this through sto­ries and poet­ry.”

In the short, vio­lent “Ku Klux Klan,” above (some­times pub­lished as just “Ku Klux”) —a poem still trag­i­cal­ly all too relevant—Hughes dra­ma­tizes the bru­tal­i­ty a racist ide­ol­o­gy requires to force oth­ers to acknowl­edge it. The inter­nal rhymes and brevi­ty of the poem present us with an almost com­ic con­trast to the sub­ject. It is, writes crit­ic John Moore, “a strange­ly humor­ous poem,” sug­gest­ing “the pos­si­bil­i­ty that the man being lynched might be laugh­ing” at “the rit­u­al­ized bom­b­a­sity of the Klans­man,” fur­ther incit­ing his rage.

The ear­ly lyric poems in this record­ing show us Hugh­es engag­ing direct­ly with the lega­cies of slav­ery and Jim Crow and their last­ing effects; in these poems, he names “the bit­ter truth” Bald­win accused him, unfair­ly, of hid­ing behind the “hiero­glyph­ics” of jazz idioms in lat­er works like Mon­tage of Dream Deferred. The bits of expla­na­tion and auto­bi­og­ra­phy between the record­ed read­ings make the whole album a very reward­ing lis­ten. Whether you already know Hugh­es’ poet­ry well or have only encoun­tered famous poems like “Harlem,” The Essen­tial Langston Hugh­es will like­ly show you a side of the poet you may not have known before.

Relat­ed Con­tent:

Watch Langston Hugh­es Read Poet­ry from His First Col­lec­tion, The Weary Blues (1958)

Langston Hugh­es Presents the His­to­ry of Jazz in an Illus­trat­ed Children’s Book (1955)

Hear Hem­ing­way Read Hem­ing­way, and Faulkn­er Read Faulkn­er (90 Min­utes of Clas­sic Audio)

Hear Ten­nessee Williams Read Hart Crane’s “The Bro­ken Tow­er” and “The Hur­ri­cane” (1960)

Josh Jones is a writer and musi­cian based in Durham, NC. Fol­low him at @jdmagness

« Go Back
Quantcast