40,000-Year-Old Symbols Found in Caves Worldwide May Be the Earliest Written Language

We may take it for grant­ed that the ear­li­est writ­ing sys­tems devel­oped with the Sume­ri­ans around 3400 B.C.E. The archae­o­log­i­cal evi­dence so far sup­ports the the­o­ry. But it may also be pos­si­ble that the ear­li­est writ­ing sys­tems pre­date 5000-year-old cuneiform tablets by sev­er­al thou­sand years. And what’s more, it may be pos­si­ble, sug­gests pale­oan­thro­pol­o­gist Genevieve von Pet­zinger, that those pre­his­toric forms of writ­ing, which include the ear­li­est known hash­tag marks, con­sist­ed of sym­bols near­ly as uni­ver­sal as emo­ji.

The study of sym­bols carved into cave walls all over the world—including pen­ni­forms (feath­er shapes), clav­i­forms (key shapes), and hand stencils—could even­tu­al­ly push us to “aban­don the pow­er­ful nar­ra­tive,” writes Frank Jacobs at Big Think, “of his­to­ry as total dark­ness until the Sume­ri­ans flip the switch.” Though the sym­bols may nev­er be tru­ly deci­pher­able, their pur­pos­es obscured by thou­sands of years of sep­a­ra­tion in time, they clear­ly show humans “undim­ming the light many mil­len­nia ear­li­er.”

While bur­row­ing deep under­ground to make cave paint­ings of ani­mals, ear­ly humans as far back as 40,000 years ago also devel­oped a sys­tem of signs that is remark­ably con­sis­tent across and between con­ti­nents. Von Pet­zinger spent years cat­a­logu­ing these sym­bols in Europe, vis­it­ing “52 caves,” reports New Scientist’s Ali­son George, “in France, Spain, Italy and Por­tu­gal. The sym­bols she found ranged from dots, lines, tri­an­gles, squares and zigza­gs to more com­plex forms like lad­der shapes, hand sten­cils, some­thing called a tec­ti­form that looks a bit like a post with a roof, and feath­er shapes called pen­ni­forms.”

She dis­cov­ered 32 signs found all over the con­ti­nent, carved and paint­ed over a very long peri­od of time. “For tens of thou­sands of years,” Jacobs points out, “our ances­tors seem to have been curi­ous­ly con­sis­tent with the sym­bols they used.” Von Pet­zinger sees this sys­tem as a car­ry­over from mod­ern humans’ migra­tion into Europe from Africa. “This does not look like the start-up phase of a brand-new inven­tion,” she writes in her book The First Signs: Unlock­ing the mys­ter­ies of the world’s old­est sym­bols.

In her TED Talk at the top, von Pet­zinger describes this ear­ly sys­tem of com­mu­ni­ca­tion through abstract signs as a pre­cur­sor to the “glob­al net­work of infor­ma­tion exchange” in the mod­ern world. “We’ve been build­ing on the men­tal achieve­ments of those who came before us for so long,” she says, “that it’s easy to for­get that cer­tain abil­i­ties haven’t already exist­ed,” long before the for­mal writ­ten records we rec­og­nize. These sym­bols trav­eled: they aren’t only found in caves, but also etched into deer teeth strung togeth­er in an ancient neck­lace.

Von Pet­zinger believes, writes George, that “the sim­ple shapes rep­re­sent a fun­da­men­tal shift in our ances­tors’ men­tal skills,” toward using abstract sym­bols to com­mu­ni­cate. Not every­one agrees with her. As the Brad­shaw Foun­da­tion notes, when it comes to the Euro­pean sym­bols, emi­nent pre­his­to­ri­an Jean Clottes argues “the signs in the caves are always (or near­ly always) asso­ci­at­ed with ani­mal fig­ures and thus can­not be said to be the first steps toward sym­bol­ism.”

Of course, it’s also pos­si­ble that both the signs and the ani­mals were meant to con­vey ideas just as a writ­ten lan­guage does. So argues MIT lin­guist Cora Lesure and her co-authors in a paper pub­lished in Fron­tiers in Psy­chol­o­gy last year. Cave art might show ear­ly humans “con­vert­ing acoustic sounds into draw­ings,” notes Sarah Gibbens at Nation­al Geo­graph­ic. Lesure says her research “sug­gests that the cog­ni­tive mech­a­nisms nec­es­sary for the devel­op­ment of cave and rock art are like­ly to be anal­o­gous to those employed in the expres­sion of the sym­bol­ic think­ing required for lan­guage.”

In oth­er words, under her the­o­ry, “cave and rock [art] would rep­re­sent a modal­i­ty of lin­guis­tic expres­sion.” And the sym­bols sur­round­ing that art might rep­re­sent an elab­o­ra­tion on the theme. The very first sys­tem of writ­ing, shared by ear­ly humans all over the world for tens of thou­sands of years.

Note: An ear­li­er ver­sion of this post appeared on our site in 2019.

Relat­ed Con­tent:

Trac­ing Eng­lish Back to Its Old­est Known Ances­tor: An Intro­duc­tion to Pro­to-Indo-Euro­pean

Was a 32,000-Year-Old Cave Paint­ing the Ear­li­est Form of Cin­e­ma?

How to Write in Cuneiform, the Old­est Writ­ing Sys­tem in the World: A Short, Charm­ing Intro­duc­tion

Dic­tio­nary of the Old­est Writ­ten Language–It Took 90 Years to Com­plete, and It’s Now Free Online

Josh Jones is a writer and musi­cian based in Durham, NC. 


by | Permalink | Comments (53) |

Sup­port Open Cul­ture

We’re hop­ing to rely on our loy­al read­ers rather than errat­ic ads. To sup­port Open Cul­ture’s edu­ca­tion­al mis­sion, please con­sid­er mak­ing a dona­tion. We accept Pay­Pal, Ven­mo (@openculture), Patre­on and Cryp­to! Please find all options here. We thank you!


Comments (53)
You can skip to the end and leave a response. Pinging is currently not allowed.
  • Ben says:

    Hmm, regard­less if some of these sym­bols look sim­i­lar, there is no evi­dence that they mean the same thing in dif­fer­ent parts of the world as the author seems to sug­gest. This looks like pret­ty slop­py research.

  • andrew says:

    35000 years before we start­ed mak­ing up reli­gions

  • Manju says:

    Air­plane nose div­ing sym­bol is inter­est­ing 😀

  • Philo says:

    Sim­i­lar­i­ty does­n’t mean there was a com­mon shared lan­guage: prob­a­bly they paint­ed the idea of a thing and that thing was com­mon. Eg., I paint a cow to indi­cate the cow: since, an an ear­ly human, I’m not Michelan­ge­lo, it is pos­si­ble I paint the cow like any oth­er human would do at the time.

  • The King is here says:

    Ah but they did­n’t paint a cow did they… ? We know these cave dwellers knew how to paint ani­mals cuz there’s count­less paint­ings of ani­mals in those times and not only in caves but on rocks and boul­ders etc. But they did­n’t paint ani­mals, they specif­i­cal­ly drew the “signs” if you will.
    At the end of the day nei­ther you or myself were there and so we can­not say for cer­tain.

  • Asim says:

    I called that one ‘branch’

  • Nicole Morton says:

    I don’t mean to sound rude, but hon­est­ly, HOW LONG have we been study­ing, and mak­ing dis­cov­er­ies of ear­ly civ­i­liza­tion, and id have to think, by now, we have come to the con­clu­sion, that, HUMANS, regard­less of the geog­ra­phy, were, intel­li­gent, and that their DISCOVERY or cre­ation Of a sym­bol, to rep­re­sent an object or word, is and was BRILLIANT, every time. And the astound­ing real­iza­tion of how remark­ably sim­i­lar, or if not, in fact, the same, Giv­en the dif­fer­ence in regent and ori­gin, only makes me ques­tion OUR INTELLIGENCE, NOT THEIRS. Like first time par­ents see­ing their baby make the con­nec­tion between sound and object, ” they are GENIUS!’ LOL Don’t get me wrong, I am fas­ci­nat­ed with every and any dis­cov­ery of our past, but, after a while, I’m start­ing to think, WE,are insult­ing THEIR intelligence,of that time.

  • Joe Wheeler says:

    What is missed by most opin­ions regard­ing pet­ro­glyphs is their rela­tion to the time and place that the author is memo­ri­al­iz­ing or com­mu­ni­cat­ing. Take for instance the desert south­west where these sym­bols are scribed in line or pic­ture on rock and boul­der. They are mean­ing­ful only by the sun or lunar light cast upon them that reflects a sig­nif­i­cant event. Hunt­ing, farm­ing, trav­el, water, loca­tion, buried jars intern­ment etc… All of the real life events wor­thy of intel­li­gent human beings liv­ing in sim­pler and mean­er con­di­tions. I have a thou­sand exam­ples just from hik­ing desert wash­es for years. No degree need­ed for a cor­rect obser­va­tion.

  • Ben says:

    Did you actu­al­ly read the research paper before you made your com­ments?

  • Nancy B Lewis says:

    Thank you…all of you.

  • Rachel Phelps says:

    Would this sug­gest that there was one com­mon lan­guage to mankind and then at some point it changed and scat­tered? I ask because I like to read about bib­li­cal his­to­ry and it kin­da cor­re­lates with the sto­ry of the Tow­er of Babel. Thoughts?

  • C says:

    Great reply!

  • Jonathan Engwall says:

    At face val­ue, the mean­ing of each sym­bol is com­pre­hen­si­ble even today. Snakes, fire, dan­ger, wheat, you can enter won’t come back-that sort of thing.

  • Richard Lars says:

    It would be inter­est­ing to com­pare this to mDNA and Y DNA hap­lo­type dis­tri­b­u­tions of peo­ples

  • James Kelly says:

    From a Bib­li­cal stand­point I always find it fun­ny that ear­li­est writ­ings dis­count the Biblle. As many,many scholars,some Chris­t­ian and some not read­i­ly admit that the first Hebrew writ­ings exist­ed 3,400 years ago and pos­si­bly a bit ear­li­er. They also admit that Hebrew was the first writ­ten lan­guage and all oth­ers fol­low that.

  • Dj says:

    I bet the hand with the cir­cle and the hand with­out the cir­cle means day and the oth­er means night

  • OC says:

    Hi there,

    This is the edi­tor of Open Cul­ture, and we’re just won­der­ing if any­one can tell us how they found this arti­cle since it is get­ting a lot of vis­its right now.

    Thanks very much,
    Open Cul­ture

  • Mattjew says:

    One is a trac­ing of a hand. One is a mouth­ful of pig­ment spat at a hand on a wall. They are more like­ly the hunter/gatherer ver­sion of “I was here”.

  • Dan Gilmore says:

    I have a the­o­ry that the first use of lan­guage was not vocal, but rather akin to sign lan­guage by ges­tures (as devel­oped by Native Amer­i­cans to com­mu­ni­cate across lan­guage bar­ri­ers). Such ges­tures would have arisen from the inate “wiring” of the human brain and innate­ly under­stood to rep­re­sent con­crete ideas (like point­ing towards some­thing) and even­tu­al­ly more abstract ideas. Some­thing along this scheme would have devel­oped com­plex­i­ty in a rapid way sim­i­lar to learn­ing anoth­er lan­guage — once you find a com­mon­ly under­stood sym­bol or word, it gets built upon and devel­ops into more abstract sym­bols, ges­tures and words. Even­tu­al­ly, sym­bols become and abstract com­plex ideas become “syn­crat­ic.”

  • Elizabeth says:

    Dis­cuss signs with indige­nous Aus­tralians. An exhib­it of signs and sto­ries showed that signs had very dif­fer­ent mean­ings for the same signs. They seemed to be used as mem­o­ry cues for sto­ry­tellers, and not expect­ed to only have only one mean­ing. There was an exhib­it of these at Asia Soci­ety NY around the 1980s, and many dif­fer­ent sto­ries. It’s worth find­ing that infor­ma­tion.

  • James Knolton says:

    I found it upon my google feed when open­ing a new google search win­dow.

  • Amy gorin says:

    The arti­cle link and teas­er showed up on my google start/home page. Top row.

  • Pango says:

    The arti­cle was fea­tured on one of the aggre­gate news sites for me. Can’t remem­ber if it was Google or anoth­er one.

  • Jonathan says:

    The argu­ment of sim­i­lar mean­ing is the fact that the signs are invari­ant. If we look at cuneiform or the Phoenin­ian alpha­bet, we see that the reused sym­bols change as the val­ue changes.

    With the cave paint­ings, invari­ance over such a large region over a 30,000 year time­frame is sim­ply not con­sis­tent with what we know about sym­bol­ic rep­re­sen­ta­tion of vary­ing val­ues.

  • Greg sparksman says:

    About 40000 years ago the mag­net­ic poles half flipped to be at equa­tor. This allowed suns radi­a­tion to blast earth mak­ing humans retreat to caves & only hunt & gath­er dawn, dust & moon­light. Auro­ras vis­i­ble dur­ing day & night

  • Sarah says:

    It was a fea­tured arti­cle on my Google home­page

  • JoeDHendricks says:

    This is eas­i­ly explained,but of 8billion humans,only a hand­ful actu­al­ly know how human is put togeth­er and func­tions. When the uni­verse began from sin­gu­lar­i­ty every­thing is in potential,everything is there already,a dis­cov­ery is just recog­ni­tion of what is already there. 8 bil­lion are con­nect­ed by the unconscious,the uncon­scious is dark ener­gy. We are from sin­gu­lar­i­ty.

  • MMichael Tr says:

    Phoeni­cian, not Hebrew, is rec­og­nized by schol­ars as the first alpha­bet. Then also, it would be pro­to-Sinaitic. Look it up

  • Biruk says:

    I am impressed & cin­vinced with this find­ing in that it depictes a soc­cer field, no where except around Britain, Spain, Ger­many, rep­re­sent­ing Pre­mier League, La-Liga, Bun­desli­ga, and so on.

  • Biruk says:

    I am impressed & con­vinced with this find­ing in that it depictes a soc­cer field, no where except around Britain, Spain, Ger­many, rep­re­sent­ing Pre­mier League, La-Liga, Bun­desli­ga, and so on.

  • Erica says:

    I read this after it popped up on my Google feed. I’ve been try­ing to click on more sci­ence, cul­ture, and his­to­ry stuff, to improve the men­tal nutri­tion val­ue of my doom scrolling. Can’t say if that was a con­se­quence, or the cause, of it get­ting more pop­u­lar.

  • Maja says:

    Chrome app rec­om­mend­ed arti­cles

  • Vince says:

    Sym­bols with mean­ing are the def­i­n­i­tion of a writ­ten lan­guage and it is shown here that they used these sym­bols across the world. It’s a world­wide writ­ten lan­guage and every­one knew what it meant at that time. Only after the flood did humans for­get the orig­i­nal mean­ing and invent­ed new lan­guages.

  • franck says:

    “I am an enthu­si­ast in com­mu­ni­ca­tion and lan­guage. Most peo­ple do not dis­tin­guish between lan­guage and speech, but your work is very enlight­en­ing for researchers of the ori­gins of com­mu­ni­ca­tion. Thank you.”

  • Samantha says:

    Open Cul­ture — Thank you for this most inter­est­ing pub­li­ca­tion. It showed up on my Fire­fox home­page in the sec­tion for Edu­ca­tion.

  • Samantha says:

    I’m guess­ing one of the reoc­cur­ring sym­bols is for an are­na or the­ater, or the like. It feels mean­ing­ful that we real­ly are deeply ingrained to con­nect with oth­ers.

  • Samantha says:

    And why would­n’t have sym­bols evolved as a uni­ver­sal lan­guage? As has con­tem­po­rary math­e­mat­ics and sci­en­tif­ic sym­bols.

  • Gopalakrishn says:

    Very good Thank you

  • Clint says:

    The arti­cle remind­ed me of the scene about the world’s first artist and first art crit­ic in the movie, “The His­to­ry of the World part I”

  • Nintendo 40k BC says:

    Looks like the Euro­peans were alone in draw­ing the sym­bols for Game­Boy and hit-mark­er. Time trav­el­ers?

  • Sweet Green Ink says:

    What was updat­ed in this arti­cle from the 2019 ver­sion?

  • Ben says:

    Google News sug­gest­ed it to me

  • Jan says:

    Right on!

  • Rex says:

    That’s real­ly inter­est­ing.

  • LenNeal says:

    I ordered her book, looks inter­est­ing even if it’s ‘wrong’ or what­ev­er. My posi­tion about these things, is that they are not lan­guage or speech or nec­es­sar­i­ly rep­re­sen­ta­tive of phys­i­cal things, but images used as metaphors for some­thing else. Images like these com­mu­ni­cate mean­ings that are dif­fi­cult to put into words, and are, in my opin­ion, clos­er to math­e­mat­i­cal sym­bols than writ­ten language/letters. The ‘swasti­ka’ is the best-known: point, radius, rota­tion: a dynam­ic sym­bol rep­re­sent­ing the movement/Force of the known Cos­mos. It’s more a scientific/mathematical sym­bol than a writ­ten let­ter. Like a STOP sign: the word: ‘STOP’ ver­bal­ly tells you to stop, but the octag­o­nal sym­bol means: ‘STOP’. Two dif­fer­ent things, that work in dif­fer­ent ways, on, in my opin­ion, dif­fer­ent parts of the brain. Look­ing for a record of a spo­ken lan­guage with these symbols/images is, in my opin­ion, a waste of time as that’s not how these things work.
    Anoth­er exam­ple is sym­bols on a map: they are some­what rep­re­sen­ta­tive but more abstract, and are not ‘words’ as such.
    Eh, my opin­ion.
    I ordered her book any­way, if for no oth­er rea­son than to see a col­lec­tion of the sym­bols in one place instead of hav­ing to peruse mul­ti­ple books and web­sites.

  • Old Shatterhand says:

    :) Here come the “bible” Mani­acs with their unfound­ed, unfac­tu­al invent­ed the­o­ries.

  • Ty says:

    I found the arti­cle on my Google feed.

  • Deliberately Obtuse says:

    Let’s get to the most impor­tant ques­tion, indeed the only ques­tion about this ear­li­est lan­guage? How Black were the inven­tors of lan­guage?

  • Thinking Hat says:

    Love those com­ments about “bib­li­cal his­to­ry” ‑if you’re look­ing at a BOOK OF FABLES AND METAPHORS for your his­tor­i­cal facts, well keep look­ing as you’re not like­ly to find any.
    The com­ment about Hebrew being the first writ­ten lan­guage when they know full well that we have numer­ous exam­ples of writ­ing that pre­date it. Or maybe they don’t con­sid­er­ing where their his­tor­i­cal “facts” came from. SMH

  • Katastroowl says:

    Put your­self into the sit­u­a­tion and abstract your per­cep­tion to this envi­ron­ment. I would begin, with inves­ti­gat­ing food. That is and was the major need and top­ic of the time for ani­mals and less ele­vat­ed humans. So most sym­bols like­ly mean a kind of food source. And yes, the mean­ing might be dif­fer­ent, like a bird sym­bol, at one place that is a dif­fer­ent kind of bird, but still a bird. I am sure that all sym­bols rep­re­sent a rough view, like a class or gen­er­al type of some­thing, and not some­thing spe­cif­ic.
    Good luck.

  • Ian says:

    I humbly sug­gest all of this is cov­ered in elec­tric uni­verse the­o­ry. A 20@5 book Thun­der­bolts of the Gods will show you ear­li­er research cor­re­lat­ing uni­ver­sal sym­bols. Some go so far to say slight dif­fer­ences in form cor­re­late to where on earth they viewed the enor­mous­ly pow­er­ful upper atmos­phere or space locat­ed plas­ma streams we in the 21st cen­tu­ry have no life con­cep­tion of.
    While “rejected”.by main­stream sci­ence since the 1950s and Immanuel Velikovsky (Worlds in Col­li­sion„ etc), aspects of EU the­o­ry are per­co­lat­ing into space sci­ence as we learn the real­i­ty of unimag­in­ably large cables of entwined elec­tric­i­ty stretch­ing many many light years through (sup­pos­ed­ly) emp­ty space.
    It’s “pseu­do sci­ence” if out­side of the acad­e­my but real sci­ence if some­one in offi­cial­dom says the same thing.
    A bit of cross cul­tur­al or cross dis­ci­pli­nary read­ing can do won­ders for your out­look.

  • Lewis says:

    I was won­der­ing if some­one would men­tion the bible. Thank you for your response. It fits very nice­ly. But I don’t think they are about to admit it. Then they would have to read it and get answers to so many oth­er ques­tions.

  • Lewis says:

    Hard to imag­ine but, at one time, every­one on earth spoke the same lan­guage, but how do you explain all the dif­fer­ent lan­guages with­out look­ing in The Book.

Leave a Reply

Quantcast