
Image by Ironie, via WikiÂmeÂdia ComÂmons
The averÂage Open CulÂture readÂer may well be aware that there is such a thing as ArchaeÂolÂoÂgy YouTube. What could come as more of a surÂprise is how much back-and-forth there is withÂin that world. Below, we have a video from the chanÂnel ArtiÂfacÂtuÂalÂly SpeakÂing in which Brad HafÂford, a UniÂverÂsiÂty of PennÂsylÂvaÂnia archaeÂolÂoÂgist, gives his take on the so-called BaghÂdad BatÂtery, an ancient artiÂfact disÂcovÂered in modÂern-day Iraq. He does so in the form of a response to an earÂliÂer video on the BaghÂdad BatÂtery from anothÂer chanÂnel hostÂed by a young archaeÂolÂoÂgy eduÂcaÂtor called Milo Rossi. At some points HafÂford agrees, and at othÂers he has corÂrecÂtions to make, but sureÂly both YouTuÂbers can agree on the fasÂciÂnaÂtion of the object in quesÂtion. After all: an ancient batÂtery?
Even those of us withÂout any parÂticÂuÂlar investÂment in archaeÂolÂoÂgy may find our curiosÂiÂty piqued by the notion that some long-vanÂished civÂiÂlizaÂtion had manÂaged to harÂness elecÂtricÂiÂty. The name BaghÂdad BatÂtery was grantÂed in the first place by WilÂhelm König, who was the direcÂtor of the labÂoÂraÂtoÂry of the NationÂal MuseÂum of Iraq in the nineÂteen-thirÂties, when the object was origÂiÂnalÂly disÂcovÂered.
GivÂen that it conÂsistÂed of not just a ceramÂic pot but also a copÂper tube and an iron rod, all attached to one anothÂer with bituÂmen (a subÂstance present in crude oil used today in asphalt), the idea of its being used for powÂer storÂage was logÂiÂcal, in its way, if also fanÂtasÂtiÂcalÂly anachroÂnisÂtic. Not that König sugÂgestÂed the BaghÂdad BatÂtery was used to powÂer, say, a grid of streetÂlights; rather, he supÂposed that it could have been involved in some kind of elecÂtroÂplatÂing sysÂtem.
httppv://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aZBsNGPVK2s
UnforÂtuÂnateÂly for König’s hypothÂeÂsis, none of the othÂer gildÂed artiÂfacts recovÂered from ancient Iraq, no matÂter how fine their craft, were actuÂalÂly elecÂtroÂplatÂed. More pracÂtiÂcalÂly speakÂing, the BaghÂdad BatÂtery has no means of conÂnecÂtion to a cirÂcuit, a necesÂsiÂty to charge it up in the first place. As of now, the proÂfesÂsionÂal conÂsenÂsus holds that it must have been cerÂeÂmoÂniÂal: a default, as Rossi frames it, whenÂevÂer archaeÂolÂoÂgists throw up their hands at a lack of disÂposÂiÂtive eviÂdence about an artiÂfacÂt’s origÂiÂnal purÂpose. Though HafÂford acknowlÂedges that tenÂdenÂcy, he also lays out the reaÂsons he believes the mysÂterÂies don’t go quite as deep as popÂuÂlarÂizÂers tend to assume. Like any good YouTuÂber, archaeÂoÂlogÂiÂcal or othÂerÂwise, Rossi respondÂed with anothÂer video of his own, in which he addressÂes HafÂford’s critÂiÂcisms, and also keeps the BaghÂdad BatÂtery — as well as its newÂly creÂatÂed nameÂsake cockÂtail — firÂing up our imagÂiÂnaÂtions a litÂtle longer.
RelatÂed ConÂtent:
Behold the OldÂest WritÂten Text in the World: The Kish Tablet, CirÂca 3500 BC
20 New Lines from The Epic of GilÂgamesh DisÂcovÂered in Iraq, Adding New Details to the StoÂry
Based in Seoul, ColÂin Marshall writes and broadÂcasts on cities, lanÂguage, and culÂture. His projects include the SubÂstack newsletÂter Books on Cities and the book The StateÂless City: a Walk through 21st-CenÂtuÂry Los AngeÂles. FolÂlow him on the social netÂwork forÂmerÂly known as TwitÂter at @colinmarshall.
Leave a Reply