The Odds on America’s Collapse

jdiamond1Jared Dia­mond became a house­hold name with his Pulitzer Prize-win­ning book Guns, Germs & Steel (2003). Lat­er, the UCLA geo­g­ra­ph­er climbed the charts again with Col­lapse: How Soci­eties Choose to Fail or Suc­ceed (2005). Now, based on this last book, he’s putting odds on whether the Unit­ed States will sur­vive this cri­sis, and he’s putting them only at 51–49. Not too great. And he goes on to say that our best chance of sur­viv­ing is if Amer­i­ca’s wealthy elite suf­fers far more than it already has. For more, lis­ten here.

via Big Think’s Twit­ter Feed. Get our Twit­ter Feed here.

by | Permalink | Make a Comment ( 2 ) |

Our Rapidly Changing Digital World

In case you need­ed a reminder, we’re no longer liv­ing in your grand­fa­ther’s world. This video makes that plain­ly clear. Every­thing is chang­ing in a blink, and edu­ca­tion offers you and your kids the best way to nav­i­gate it all. Don’t take it for grant­ed.

via The Dig­i­tal­Blur. Thanks Jil­lian for the tip on this one.

Remem­ber to catch us on Twit­ter.

by | Permalink | Make a Comment ( 1 ) |

Milton Friedman on Greed

The new Trea­sury Sec­re­tary unveiled his plan this morn­ing, and appar­ent­ly the mar­kets hate it, which pret­ty much guar­an­tees that we’ll be liv­ing with our finan­cial mess for a good while longer. As we know, this cri­sis could have been avoid­ed. But greed got the bet­ter of us. So, I won­der what read­ers think when they see Mil­ton Fried­man’s 1979 defense of cap­i­tal­ism and greed. Is it a mod­el, a line of argu­ment, that’s now dis­cred­it­ed? Or do we grudg­ing­ly con­cede his points and say that cap­i­tal­ism is the worst eco­nom­ic mod­el except for all the oth­ers that have been tried (a cheap play here on Churchill), and then fig­ure out how to mop it up?

via Andrew Sul­li­van’s Dai­ly Dish

by | Permalink | Make a Comment ( 3 ) |

The Obama “Hope” Poster & The New Copyright Controversy

obamaposter-198x300By now, every­one knows the famous Oba­ma “Hope” poster pro­duced by Shep­ard Fairey. Recent­ly, Fairey has acknowl­edged that the poster was orig­i­nal­ly inspired by a pho­to­graph belong­ing to the AP Press, and now the AP is claim­ing that Fairey has infringed on its copy­right and wants “pay­ment for the use of the pho­to and a por­tion of any mon­ey he makes from it.” (see arti­cle in the New York Times). In response, Fairey has filed a pre­emp­tive law­suit, claim­ing that he used the AP pho­to as a mere start­ing point and then trans­formed it into a “stun­ning, abstract­ed and ide­al­ized visu­al image that cre­at­ed pow­er­ful new mean­ing and con­veys a rad­i­cal­ly dif­fer­ent mes­sage.” If you put the two images side by side (see here), it’s pret­ty instant­ly clear that Fairey took an admit­ted­ly well done news pho­to and did some­thing quite trans­for­ma­tive with it, which makes things fair game. That’s obvi­ous to almost any­one (includ­ing hope­ful­ly judges), and it’s a shame to see the AP, which lives by its First Amend­ment rights, look­ing to use the copy­right clause to lim­it free­dom of expres­sion. Bad move guys.

As a quick side note, Fairey is being rep­re­sent­ed in court by The Fair Use Project at Stan­ford Law School’s Cen­ter for Inter­net and Soci­ety (to which I have zero con­nec­tion.)

Relat­ed Con­tent:

The Sto­ry Behind the Icon­ic Oba­ma Cam­paign Poster

by | Permalink | Make a Comment ( 4 ) |

Bill Gates on Changing the World

The 2009 TED con­fer­ence, which fea­tured a long list of well-known speak­ers, wrapped up on Fri­day. And now you can watch two of the key pre­sen­ta­tions online. First, and fea­tured above, you’ll get Bill Gates, Microsoft founder and now major phil­an­thropist, talk­ing about how to change the world through edu­ca­tion and dis­ease pre­ven­tion. It’s a good 20 min­utes, and it will par­tic­u­lar­ly inter­est any edu­ca­tors who read this blog. Next, Bill Gross, founder of Ide­al­ab, gives you 20 min­utes on the ground­break­ing work being done in solar ener­gy.

We’ve added the Gates talk to our list of YouTube Favorites. Also, you’ll find videos from TED on our list: YouTube Edu­ca­tion: 80 Intel­li­gent Video Col­lec­tions.

by | Permalink | Make a Comment ( 1 ) |

Japan’s Lost Decade and What It Means for the US

NPR’s Plan­et Mon­ey pod­cast has done an excel­lent job of track­ing the ongo­ing glob­al finan­cial cri­sis. In its lat­est install­ment (Stream — iTunes — Rss Feed), they get down to an impor­tant ques­tion: Does his­to­ry offer solu­tions to the cur­rent cri­sis? And if so, does it make sense to look back at the Depres­sion of the 1930s? Or does 1990s Japan offer a bet­ter exam­ple?

One of Plan­et Mon­ey’s guests, econ­o­mist Adam Posen, argues that we should keep our eyes on Japan. Dur­ing the 1980s, Japan­ese banks and investors exploit­ed loose mort­gage lend­ing and gen­er­at­ed a sub­stan­tial real estate bub­ble, which popped in the ear­ly 90s once Japan’s gov­ern­ment start­ed tight­en­ing cred­it. From there, all oth­er assets and mar­kets fell apart, and a long reces­sion began. Sound famil­iar?

For Posen, the actions of the Japan­ese gov­ern­ment help illus­trate which anti-reces­sion poli­cies worked, and which did­n’t. The upshot is that Japan’s cri­sis could have been lim­it­ed to three years. But it went on for a decade instead. And that’s because Japan nev­er passed a major stim­u­lus pack­age until the very end, and because the gov­ern­ment nev­er forced the banks to change their prac­tices. This all sug­gests that Amer­i­can pol­i­cy can make a dif­fer­ence. The Oba­ma admin­is­tra­tion has a big stim­u­lus pack­age com­ing. But will it get the banks under con­trol? I’m less than san­guine about that, and it could make the dif­fer­ence between a short, sharp reces­sion and anoth­er lost decade.

PS The con­ver­sa­tion men­tioned above starts about 3 and 1/2 min­utes into the pod­cast.

by | Permalink | Make a Comment ( 1 ) |

Jon Stewart on the Bizarro World of Wall Street

As usu­al, Stew­art cuts to the chase and says what has to be said. And gets a good laugh along the way…

by | Permalink | Make a Comment ( 3 ) |

The Story Behind the Iconic Obama Campaign Poster

obamaposter The sto­ry behind the art­work that defined the Oba­ma cam­paign is a fas­ci­nat­ing one. Shep­ard Fairey’s posters achieved promi­nence much in the same way that Oba­ma did. They rose from the ground up. Every­day peo­ple sup­port­ed and pro­mot­ed his imag­i­na­tive posters on the web, until they became some­thing of a pub­lic phe­nom­e­non. And they turned the sta­tus quo — in this case, the tra­di­tion polit­i­cal poster — into some­thing fresh and new. In this inter­view (iTunes — Feed — Stream), Fairey, once a self-pro­claimed “out­law street artist,” talks about how got start­ed with his Oba­ma pieces, and how his most cel­e­brat­ed work end­ed up in the per­ma­nent col­lec­tion at the U.S. Nation­al Por­trait Gallery.

P.S. As you’ll see, we’re in the midst of launch­ing a new design. Things are going rather smooth­ly. But if you encounter any prob­lems, please be patient and please let us know. We’ll be mak­ing small tweaks here and there. Thanks!

by | Permalink | Make a Comment ( 7 ) |

« Go BackMore in this category... »
Quantcast