
When we watch Fritz Lang’s MetropÂoÂlis now, we see an aesÂthetÂiÂcalÂly darÂing landÂmark work of sciÂence-ficÂtion cinÂeÂma. When H.G. Wells watched MetropÂoÂlis back in 1927, the year of its release, he saw someÂthing very difÂferÂent indeed. “I have recentÂly seen the silÂliÂest film,” wrote the author of The War of the Worlds and The Time Machine as an openÂer for his New York Times review. “I do not believe it would be posÂsiÂble to make one silÂliÂer.”
Despite its giant budÂget, MetropÂoÂlis gives “in one eddyÂing conÂcenÂtraÂtion almost every posÂsiÂble foolÂishÂness, clichĂ©, platÂiÂtude, and mudÂdleÂment about mechanÂiÂcal progress and progress in genÂerÂal, served up with a sauce of senÂtiÂmenÂtalÂiÂty that is all its own.” HisÂtoÂry rememÂbers Lang and Wells both as visionÂarÂies who looked, often with litÂtle optiÂmism, to the future, but clearÂly they had a difÂferÂence of opinÂion as to how that future would actuÂalÂly play out.
The sciÂenÂtifÂiÂcalÂly-mindÂed Wells took the impresÂsionÂisÂtic MetropÂoÂlis litÂerÂalÂly, takÂing issue with — among othÂer things — how its airÂplanes “show no advance on conÂtemÂpoÂrary types”; its “motor cars are 1926 modÂels or earÂliÂer”; its vision of a verÂtiÂcalÂly stratÂiÂfied city look, “to put it mildÂly, highÂly improbÂaÂble”; the apparÂent conÂdiÂtion that the city’s “machines are engaged quite furiÂousÂly in the mass proÂducÂtion of nothÂing that is ever used”; and the senÂtiÂmenÂtalÂiÂty of its makÂers, “who are all on the side of soul and love and such like.”
MetropÂoÂlis opened to mixed reviews at first (some of which you can read here), but no conÂtemÂpoÂrary critÂic could match Wells for sheer disÂdain. “NevÂer for a moment does one believe any of this foolÂish stoÂry; nevÂer for a moment is there anyÂthing amusÂing or conÂvincÂing in its dreaÂry series of strained events,” he wrote, steerÂing his point-by-point takeÂdown to its conÂcluÂsion. “It is immenseÂly and strangeÂly dull. It is not even to be laughed at.”
Strong stuff, but the highÂest form of film critÂiÂcism, as the French New Wave would latÂer articÂuÂlate, is filmÂmakÂing. And so, in 1936, came Things to Come, anothÂer cinÂeÂmatÂic specÂtaÂcle of the future, this one built to the ostenÂsiÂbly more plauÂsiÂble specÂiÂfiÂcaÂtions Wells laid out as its screenÂwriter — that film itself just one more preÂdeÂcesÂsor to the unendÂing series of dystopias, utopias, and every kind of future in-between to appear on the screen over the next eight decades.
RelatÂed ConÂtent:
Read the OrigÂiÂnal 32-Page ProÂgram for Fritz Lang’s MetropÂoÂlis (1927)
Fritz Lang Invents the Video Phone in MetropÂoÂlis (1927)
Based in Seoul, ColÂin MarÂshall writes and broadÂcasts on cities and culÂture. He’s at work on a book about Los AngeÂles, A Los AngeÂles Primer, the video series The City in CinÂeÂma, the crowdÂfundÂed jourÂnalÂism project Where Is the City of the Future?, and the Los AngeÂles Review of Books’ Korea Blog. FolÂlow him on TwitÂter at @colinmarshall or on FaceÂbook.
