VerÂtiÂgo is the greatÂest motion picÂture of all time. Or so say the results of the latÂest round of respectÂed film magÂaÂzine Sight & Sound’s long-runÂning critÂics poll, in which Alfred HitchÂcockÂ’s James StewÂart- and Kim Novak- (and San FranÂcisÂco-) starÂring psyÂchoÂlogÂiÂcal thriller unseatÂed CitÂiÂzen Kane from the top spot. For half a cenÂtuÂry, Orson Welles’ direcÂtoÂrÂiÂal debut seemed like it would forÂevÂer occuÂpy the head of the cinÂeÂmatÂic table, its staÂtus disÂputÂed only by the unimÂpressed modÂern viewÂers who, havÂing attendÂed a revival screenÂing or hapÂpened across it on teleÂviÂsion, comÂplain that they don’t underÂstand all the critÂiÂcal fuss. The new chamÂpiÂon has givÂen them a difÂferÂent quesÂtion to ask: what makes VerÂtiÂgo so great, anyÂway?
Like CitÂiÂzen Kane in 1941, VerÂtiÂgo flopped at the box office in 1958, but HitchÂcockÂ’s film drew more negÂaÂtive reviews, its critÂics soundÂing bafÂfled, disÂmisÂsive, or both. Even Welles reportÂedÂly disÂliked it, and HitchÂcock kept it out of cirÂcuÂlaÂtion himÂself between 1973 and his death in 1980, a periÂod when cinephiles — and cinephile-filmÂmakÂers, such as a cerÂtain well-known VerÂtiÂgo enthuÂsiÂast called MarÂtin ScorsÂese — regardÂed it as a sacred docÂuÂment. Only in 1984 did VerÂtiÂgo re-emerge, by which point it badÂly needÂed an extenÂsive audioÂviÂsuÂal restoraÂtion. It received just that in 1996, speedÂing up its ascent to acclaim, in progress at least since it first appeared on the Sight & Sound poll, in eighth place, in 1982.
“Why, after watchÂing VerÂtiÂgo more than, say, 30 times, are we conÂfiÂdent that there are things to disÂcovÂer in it — that some aspects remain ambiguÂous and uncerÂtain, unfathÂomably comÂplex, even if we scruÂtiÂnize every look, every cut, every moveÂment of the camÂera?” asks critÂic Miguel MarĂas in an essay on the film at Sight & Sound. He lists many reaÂsons, and many more exist than that. But nobody can appreÂciÂate a work with so many pureÂly cinÂeÂmatÂic strengths withÂout actuÂalÂly watchÂing it, which perÂhaps makes the video essay a betÂter form for examÂinÂing the powÂer of what we have come to recÂogÂnize as HitchÂcockÂ’s masÂterÂpiece.
“Only one film had been capaÂble of porÂtrayÂing imposÂsiÂble memÂoÂry — insane memÂoÂry,” says the narÂraÂtor of Chris MarkÂer’s essay film Sans Soleil: “Alfred HitchÂcockÂ’s VerÂtiÂgo.” B. Kite and AlexanÂder Points-ZolÂlo’s three-part “VerÂtiÂgo VariÂaÂtions” at the MuseÂum of the MovÂing Image uses MarkÂer’s interÂpreÂtaÂtion, as well as many othÂers, to see from as many angles as posÂsiÂble HitchÂcockÂ’s “imposÂsiÂble object: a gimÂcrack plot studÂded with strange gaps that nonetheÂless rides a pulse of pecuÂliar necesÂsiÂty, a field of assoÂciÂaÂtion that simulÂtaÂneÂousÂly expands and conÂtracts like its famous trick shot, a ghost stoÂry whose spirÂits linger even after havÂing been apparÂentÂly explained away, and a study of obsesÂsion that becomes an obsesÂsive object in its own right.”
The popÂuÂlar explainÂer known as the NerdÂwriter looks at how HitchÂcock blocks a scene by breakÂing down the visÂit by StewÂart’s trauÂmaÂtized, retired police detecÂtive proÂtagÂoÂnist to the office of a forÂmer colÂlege classÂmate turned shipÂbuildÂing magÂnate. The conÂverÂsaÂtion they have sets the stoÂry in motion, and HitchÂcock took the placeÂment of his actors and his camÂera in each and every shot as seriÂousÂly as he took every othÂer aspect of the film. ColÂor, for instance: anothÂer video essayÂist, workÂing under the banÂner of SociÂety of Geeks, idenÂtiÂfies HitchÂcockÂ’s use of rich TechÂniÂcolÂor as a mechÂaÂnism to heightÂen the emoÂtions, with, as critÂic Jim EmerÂson writes it, “red sugÂgestÂing ScotÂtie’s fear/caution/hesitancy when it comes to romance, and its oppoÂsite green, sugÂgestÂing the Edenic bliss (and/or watery oblivÂion) of his infatÂuÂaÂtion.” Ava Burke isoÂlates anothÂer of HitchÂcockÂ’s visuÂal devices in use: the mirÂrorÂing that fills the viewÂing expeÂriÂence with visuÂal echoes both faint and loud.
When he got to work on VerÂtiÂgo, HitchÂcock had already made more than forty films in just over three decades as a filmÂmakÂer. Though often labeled a “masÂter of susÂpense” durÂing his lifeÂtime, he instincÂtiveÂly learned and deeply interÂnalÂized a vast range of filmÂmakÂing techÂniques that film scholÂars, as well as his sucÂcesÂsors in filmÂmakÂing, conÂtinÂue to take apart, scruÂtiÂnize, and put back togethÂer again. This most re-watchÂable of his picÂtures (and one that, accordÂing to sevÂerÂal of the critÂics and video essayÂists here, transÂforms utterÂly upon the secÂond viewÂing) makes use of the full specÂtrum of HitchÂcockÂ’s masÂtery as well as the full specÂtrum of his fixÂaÂtions. Whether or not you conÂsidÂer it the greatÂest motion picÂture of all time, if you love the art of cinÂeÂma, you by defÂiÂnÂiÂtion love VerÂtiÂgo.
RelatÂed ConÂtent:
22 Free HitchÂcock Movies Online
Alfred Hitchcock’s SevÂen-Minute EditÂing MasÂter Class
The Eyes of HitchÂcock: A MesÂmerÂizÂing Video Essay on the ExpresÂsive PowÂer of Eyes in Hitchcock’s Films
5 Hours of Free Alfred HitchÂcock InterÂviews: DisÂcovÂer His TheÂoÂries of Film EditÂing, CreÂatÂing SusÂpense & More
AbanÂdoned AlterÂnate Titles for Two Great Films: Kubrick’s Dr. Strangelove and Hitchcock’s VerÂtiÂgo
Watch 25 Alfred HitchÂcock TrailÂers, ExcitÂing Films in Their Own Right
MarÂtin ScorsÂese Reveals His 12 Favorite Movies (and Writes a New Essay on Film PreserÂvaÂtion)
The 10 GreatÂest Films of All Time AccordÂing to 846 Film CritÂics
Based in Seoul, ColÂin MarÂshall writes and broadÂcasts on cities and culÂture. He’s at work on a book about Los AngeÂles, A Los AngeÂles Primer, the video series The City in CinÂeÂma, the crowdÂfundÂed jourÂnalÂism project Where Is the City of the Future?, and the Los AngeÂles Review of Books’ Korea Blog. FolÂlow him on TwitÂter at @colinmarshall or on FaceÂbook.