Watch Houdini Escape From a Strait Jacket, Then See How He Did It (Circa 1917)

Claus­tro­phobes, take cau­tion, and for pity’s sake, don’t try this at home!

Should such warn­ings leave you unde­terred, PBS has step-by-step instruc­tions for per­form­ing Hou­dini’s strait jack­et escape. Well, almost step-by-step. Derived from the mas­ter’s own 1909 Hand­cuff Secrets, the direc­tions are both vague and hor­ri­fy­ing in their speci­fici­ty, falling some­where between assem­bling an Ikea book­shelf and 127 Hours.

In need of more guid­ance? Have a look below at the how-to Hou­di­ni shared with Ladies Home Jour­nal in 1918. (He also gave advice to gen­teel, post-WWI female read­ers on how to escape rope bondage.)

houdini escape

For a more man­age­able trick, imag­ine your­self a face in the crowd, gaz­ing upward at the strug­gling magi­cian, with­out tex­ting, tweet­ing, or Insta­gram­ming. Sheer open-mouthed amaze­ment is a trick we see pre­cious lit­tle of these days.

Our best guess is that the video above was shot around 1917.

Relat­ed Con­tent:

Har­ry Houdini’s Great Rope Escape

Arthur Conan Doyle Dis­cuss­es Sher­lock Holmes and Psy­chics in a Rare Filmed Inter­view (1927)

Ayun Hal­l­i­day’s lat­est feat is direct­ing 16 home­schooled teens in Yeast Nation, the world’s first bio-his­tor­i­cal musi­cal. See it in New York City this week. Fol­low her @AyunHalliday

The 100 Best Novels: A Literary Critic Creates a List in 1898

old books 32Book lists, despite what younger read­ers born into Buzzfeed’s ruth­less list­si­cle monop­oly may think, have always been pop­u­lar. Some, like David Bowie’s Top 100 Books, give us a sense of the artist’s devel­op­ment. Oth­ers, like Joseph Brodsky’s List of 84 Books for Basic Con­ver­sa­tion, pro­vide a Nobel prize-win­ning bench­mark for knowl­edge. Even though the books are with­in the reach of most read­ers, sys­tem­at­i­cal­ly digest­ing such lists often tries one’s patience. Despite the lack of will or inter­est in work­ing through some­one else’s lit­er­ary edu­ca­tion, how­ev­er, glanc­ing through such per­son­al antholo­gies pro­vides us with a glimpse into the maker’s life—be it their pri­vate tastes, or their social mores.

In late Octo­ber, The Times Lit­er­ary Supplement’s Michael Caines unearthed anoth­er Top 100 list; this one, how­ev­er, has the dis­tinc­tion of hail­ing from 1898. At the turn of the 20th cen­tu­ry, a jour­nal­ist and author of numer­ous books on the Bron­të sis­ters named Clement K. Short­er tried his hand at com­pil­ing the 100 Best Nov­els for a jour­nal called The Book­man. The ground rules were sim­ple: the list could fea­ture only one nov­el per nov­el­ist, and liv­ing authors were exclud­ed.  Today, Shorter’s com­pendi­um looks some­what hit-or-miss. There are some indis­putable clas­sics (many of which can be found in our Free eBooks and Free Audio Books col­lec­tions) and some oth­er texts that have fad­ed into obliv­ion. Still—one can’t help but expe­ri­ence a cer­tain his­tor­i­cal fris­son at a 19th cen­tu­ry list­si­cle. Here it goes:

1. Don Quixote — 1604 — Miguel de Cer­vantes

2. The Holy War — 1682 — John Bun­yan

3. Gil Blas — 1715 — Alain René le Sage

4. Robin­son Cru­soe — 1719 — Daniel Defoe

5. Gul­liv­er’s Trav­els — 1726 — Jonathan Swift

6. Rod­er­ick Ran­dom — 1748 — Tobias Smol­lett

7. Claris­sa — 1749 — Samuel Richard­son

8. Tom Jones — 1749 — Hen­ry Field­ing

9. Can­dide — 1756 — Françoise de Voltaire

10. Ras­se­las — 1759 — Samuel John­son

11. The Cas­tle of Otran­to — 1764 — Horace Wal­pole

12. The Vic­ar of Wake­field — 1766 — Oliv­er Gold­smith

13. The Old Eng­lish Baron — 1777 — Clara Reeve

14. Eveli­na — 1778 — Fan­ny Bur­ney

15. Vathek — 1787 — William Beck­ford

16. The Mys­ter­ies of Udolpho — 1794 — Ann Rad­cliffe

17. Caleb Williams — 1794 — William God­win

18. The Wild Irish Girl — 1806 — Lady Mor­gan

19. Corinne — 1810 — Madame de Stael

20. The Scot­tish Chiefs — 1810 — Jane Porter

21. The Absen­tee — 1812 — Maria Edge­worth

22. Pride and Prej­u­dice — 1813 — Jane Austen

23. Head­long Hall — 1816 — Thomas Love Pea­cock

24. Franken­stein — 1818 — Mary Shel­ley

25. Mar­riage — 1818 — Susan Fer­ri­er

26. The Ayr­shire Lega­tees — 1820 — John Galt

27. Valerius — 1821 — John Gib­son Lock­hart

28. Wil­helm Meis­ter — 1821 — Johann Wolf­gang von Goethe

29. Kenil­worth — 1821 — Sir Wal­ter Scott

30. Brace­bridge Hall — 1822 — Wash­ing­ton Irv­ing

31. The Epi­cure­an — 1822 — Thomas Moore

32. The Adven­tures of Hajji Baba — 1824 — James Mori­er (“usu­al­ly reck­oned his best”)

33. The Betrothed — 1825 — Alessan­dro Man­zoni

34. Licht­en­stein — 1826 — Wil­helm Hauff

35. The Last of the Mohi­cans — 1826 — Fen­i­more Coop­er

36. The Col­le­gians — 1828 — Ger­ald Grif­fin

37. The Auto­bi­og­ra­phy of Man­sie Wauch — 1828 — David M. Moir

38. Riche­lieu — 1829 — G. P. R. James (the “first and best” nov­el by the “doyen of his­tor­i­cal nov­el­ists”)

39. Tom Cringle’s Log — 1833 — Michael Scott

40. Mr. Mid­ship­man Easy — 1834 — Fred­er­ick Mar­ry­at

41. Le Père Gori­ot — 1835 — Hon­oré de Balzac

42. Rory O’More — 1836 — Samuel Lover (anoth­er first nov­el, inspired by one of the author’s own bal­lads)

43. Jack Brag — 1837 — Theodore Hook

44. Far­dor­ougha the Miser — 1839 — William Car­leton (“a grim study of avarice and Catholic fam­i­ly life. Crit­ics con­sid­er it the author’s finest achieve­ment”)

45. Valen­tine Vox — 1840 — Hen­ry Cock­ton (yet anoth­er first nov­el)

46. Old St. Paul’s — 1841 — Har­ri­son Ainsworth

47. Ten Thou­sand a Year — 1841 — Samuel War­ren (“immense­ly suc­cess­ful”)

48. Susan Hop­ley — 1841 — Cather­ine Crowe (“the sto­ry of a resource­ful ser­vant who solves a mys­te­ri­ous crime”)

49. Charles O’Mal­ley — 1841 — Charles Lever

50. The Last of the Barons — 1843 — Bul­w­er Lyt­ton

51. Con­sue­lo — 1844 — George Sand

52. Amy Her­bert — 1844 — Eliz­a­beth Sewell

53. Adven­tures of Mr. Led­bury — 1844 — Eliz­a­beth Sewell

54. Sybil — 1845 — Lord Bea­cons­field (a. k. a. Ben­jamin Dis­raeli)

55. The Three Mus­ke­teers — 1845 — Alexan­dre Dumas

56. The Wan­der­ing Jew — 1845 — Eugène Sue

57. Emil­ia Wyn­d­ham — 1846 — Anne Marsh

58. The Romance of War — 1846 — James Grant (“the nar­ra­tive of the 92nd High­landers’ con­tri­bu­tion from the Penin­su­lar cam­paign to Water­loo”)

59. Van­i­ty Fair — 1847 — W. M. Thack­er­ay

60. Jane Eyre — 1847 — Char­lotte Bron­të

61. Wuther­ing Heights — 1847 — Emi­ly Bron­të

62. The Vale of Cedars — 1848 — Grace Aguilar

63. David Cop­per­field — 1849 — Charles Dick­ens

64. The Maid­en and Mar­ried Life of Mary Pow­ell — 1850 — Anne Man­ning (“writ­ten in a pas­tiche sev­en­teenth-cen­tu­ry style and print­ed with the old-fash­ioned typog­ra­phy and page lay­out for which there was a vogue at the peri­od …”)

65. The Scar­let Let­ter — 1850 — Nathaniel Hawthorne

66. Frank Fair­leigh — 1850 — Fran­cis Smed­ley (“Smed­ley spe­cialised in fic­tion that is hearty and active, with a strong line in bois­ter­ous col­lege escapades and adven­tur­ous esques­tri­an exploits”)

67. Uncle Tom’s Cab­in — 1851 — H. B. Stowe

68. The Wide Wide World — 1851 — Susan Warn­er (Eliz­a­beth Wetherell)

69. Nathalie — 1851 — Julia Kavanagh

70. Ruth — 1853 — Eliz­a­beth Gaskell

71. The Lamp­lighter — 1854 — Maria Susan­na Cum­mins

72. Dr. Anto­nio — 1855 — Gio­van­ni Ruffi­ni

73. West­ward Ho! — 1855 — Charles Kings­ley

74. Deb­it and Cred­it (Soll und Haben) — 1855 — Gus­tav Frey­tag

75. Tom Brown’s School-Days — 1856 — Thomas Hugh­es

76. Barch­ester Tow­ers — 1857 — Antho­ny Trol­lope

77. John Hal­i­fax, Gen­tle­man — 1857 — Dinah Mulock (a. k. a. Dinah Craik; “the best-known Vic­to­ri­an fable of Smile­sian self-improve­ment”)

78. Ekke­hard — 1857 — Vik­tor von Schef­fel

79. Elsie Ven­ner — 1859 — O. W. Holmes

80. The Woman in White — 1860 — Wilkie Collins

81. The Clois­ter and the Hearth — 1861 — Charles Reade

82. Raven­shoe — 1861 — Hen­ry Kings­ley (“There is much con­fu­sion in the plot to do with changelings and frus­trat­ed inher­i­tance” in this suc­cess­ful nov­el by Charles Kings­ley’s younger broth­er, the “black sheep” of a “high­ly respectable” fam­i­ly)

83. Fathers and Sons — 1861 — Ivan Tur­ge­ni­eff

84. Silas Marn­er — 1861 — George Eliot

85. Les Mis­érables — 1862 — Vic­tor Hugo

86. Salamm­bô — 1862 — Gus­tave Flaubert

87. Salem Chapel — 1862 — Mar­garet Oliphant

88. The Chan­nings — 1862 — Ellen Wood (a. k. a. Mrs Hen­ry Wood)

89. Lost and Saved — 1863 — The Hon. Mrs. Nor­ton

90. The Schön­berg-Cot­ta Fam­i­ly — 1863 — Eliz­a­beth Charles

91. Uncle Silas — 1864 — Joseph Sheri­dan Le Fanu

92. Bar­bara’s His­to­ry — 1864 — Amelia B. Edwards (“Con­fus­ing­ly for bib­li­og­ra­phers, she was relat­ed to Matil­da Betham-Edwards and pos­si­bly to Annie Edward(e)s …”)

93. Sweet Anne Page — 1868 — Mor­timer Collins

94. Crime and Pun­ish­ment — 1868 — Feodor Dos­toieff­sky

95. Fromont Junior — 1874 — Alphonse Daudet

96. Mar­morne — 1877 — P. G. Hamer­ton (“writ­ten under the pseu­do­nym Adol­phus Seg­rave”)

97. Black but Come­ly — 1879 — G. J. Whyte-Melville

98. The Mas­ter of Bal­lantrae — 1889 — R. L. Steven­son

99. Reuben Sachs — 1889 — Amy Levy

100. News from Nowhere — 1891 — William Mor­ris

In addi­tion to the canon, Shorter—unable to heed his own cau­tious coun­sel and throw­ing the door open to the winds of lit­er­ary passion—included 8 books by liv­ing nov­el­ists whom he called “writ­ers whose rep­u­ta­tions are too well estab­lished for their juniors to feel towards them any sen­ti­ments oth­er than those of rev­er­ence and regard:”

An Egypt­ian Princess — 1864 — Georg Ebers

Rho­da Flem­ing — 1865 — George Mered­ith

Lor­na Doone — 1869 — R. D. Black­more

Anna Karen­i­na — 1875 — Count Leo Tol­stoi

The Return of the Native — 1878 — Thomas Hardy

Daisy Miller — 1878 — Hen­ry James

Mark Ruther­ford — 1881 — W. Hale White

Le Rêve — 1889 — Emile Zola

via The Times Lit­er­ary Sup­ple­ment

Relat­ed Con­tent:

David Bowie’s List of Top 100 Books

Christo­pher Hitchens Cre­ates a Read­ing List for Eight-Year-Old Girl

See Nobel Lau­re­ate Joseph Brodsky’s Read­ing List For Hav­ing an Intel­li­gent Con­ver­sa­tion

Ilia Blin­d­er­man is a Mon­tre­al-based cul­ture and sci­ence writer. Fol­low him at @iliablinderman 

Everything You Wanted to Know About the L.A. Aqueduct That Made Roman Polanski’s Chinatown Famous: A New UCLA Archive

chinatown-nicholson

Next year marks the 40th anniver­sary of a mod­ern clas­sic, Roman Polanski’s Chi­na­town. And sure­ly no oth­er film has even come close to mak­ing the con­struc­tion of an aque­duct so thrilling.

For sure, the siz­able serv­ings of incest, cor­rup­tion, and greed help car­ry Robert Towne’s bril­liant screen­play. But under Towne’s script are the bones of anoth­er sto­ry, the sto­ry of an engi­neer­ing feat that eclipsed the Pana­ma Canal. Yes we’re talk­ing about the build­ing of the great Los Ange­les aque­duct start­ing in 1908.

In the pref­ace to the script Towne wrote this, “the great crimes in Cal­i­for­nia have been com­mit­ted against the land—and against the peo­ple who own it and future gen­er­a­tions. It was only nat­ur­al that the script should evolve into the sto­ry of a man who raped the land and his own daugh­ter.”

Towne didn’t wor­ry about stick­ing to the facts (he set the action of Chi­na­town in the 1930s—an inher­ent­ly more glam­orous peri­od, espe­cial­ly in Los Ange­les). Some even argue that the film cre­ates an entire­ly dif­fer­ent (and wrong) his­to­ry of the project that is remem­bered as fact.

UCLA has cre­at­ed the Los Ange­les Aque­duct Dig­i­tal Plat­form, a col­lec­tion of arti­cles, maps, images and gen­er­al his­to­ry of the project and time that sets the record straight. Among its great­est resources are those about the film that made South­ern Cal­i­for­ni­a’s water issues famous. In fact, there is an abun­dance of infor­ma­tion about the film itself, even if it wasn’t his­tor­i­cal­ly accu­rate.

There are links to, among oth­er resources, a con­ver­sa­tion with Robert Towne where he dis­cuss­es his inspi­ra­tion for the screen­play.

Kate Rix writes about dig­i­tal media and edu­ca­tion. Fol­low her on Twit­ter.

The Smithsonian Picks “101 Objects That Made America”

101-Objects-photo-collection-631

The Smith­so­ni­an’s 19 muse­ums, 9 research cen­ters, and 140-plus affil­i­ates boast the world’s largest collection—137 mil­lion items, in addi­tion to a stag­ger­ing array of pho­tos, doc­u­ments, films, and record­ings. Choos­ing which to include in The Smith­so­ni­an’s His­to­ry of Amer­i­ca in 101 Objects (pub­lished on Octo­ber 29) from such a wealth of options was no easy task. (On the oth­er hand, the Direc­tor of the British Muse­um Neil Mac­Gre­gor did man­age to encap­su­late two mil­lion years of world his­to­ry in one object less…)

Anthro­pol­o­gist Richard Kurin, the Smith­son­ian Insti­tu­tion’s Under Sec­re­tary for His­to­ry, Art, and Cul­ture, pri­or­i­tized objects with vivid biogra­phies. There may be no way for a muse­um to recre­ate the Civ­il War, as he notes, but a “hand-drawn bat­tle map of the time, a bul­let or gun­nery shelf, a uni­form bear­ing evi­dence of wounds, and bro­ken met­al shack­les are all objects that, hav­ing been present at the event depict­ed, can speak to the larg­er sto­ry. The parts stand for the whole.”

Celebri­ty may have fac­tored into the selec­tion process, too. Not every entry is bespan­gled with a famous name, but one can’t over­look the vic­ar­i­ous thrill inher­ent in Cesar Chavez’s union jack­et, Abra­ham Lin­col­n’s top hat, Helen Keller’s watch, or Mar­i­an Ander­son­’s mink coat.  Who can say whether these res­o­nances will lose their lus­ter in the future. In his intro­duc­tion, Kurin uses the steer­ing wheel of the U.S.S. Maine, once an object of keen nation­al inter­est due to its role in the Span­ish-Amer­i­can War, to exem­pli­fy the descent into obscu­ri­ty.

To cel­e­brate the pub­li­ca­tion of The Smith­so­ni­an’s His­to­ry of Amer­i­ca in 101 Objects, the Smith­son­ian Chan­nel will be pro­fil­ing some of the items in a four-part series, Seri­ous­ly Amaz­ing™ Objects (love the trade­mark, guys).

In the mean­time, have a browse through an online gallery fea­tur­ing 50 of Kur­in’s picks.

Or enjoy these three sam­ples, select­ed by yours tru­ly for their uni­fy­ing round­ness. (I could nev­er accom­plish any­thing on the order of Kur­in’s feat, but encour­age the Smith­son­ian to get in touch when­ev­er they’re in the mar­ket for some­one who could repack­age their col­lec­tion as board books for infants…)

Negro-Baseball-68-963

Negro League Base­ball

1937, Amer­i­can His­to­ry Muse­um

Sports­writer Frank Deford ful­fills Kur­in’s bio­graph­ic require­ments with an essay on the larg­er social impli­ca­tions behind this arti­fact, which scored a home run for Buck Leonard and the East line­up in the ’37 Comiskey All-Star game.

Oklahoma-stamp-963

USS Okla­homa Stamp

1941, Postal Muse­um

“To record when a piece of mail was processed aboard ship, the Navy used wood­en post­mark stamps. This one bears an omi­nous date: Dec 6, 1941 PM. It was recov­ered from the bat­tle­ship Okla­homa after it was hit by sev­er­al tor­pe­does, list­ed to a 45-degree angle, cap­sized and sank in the attack on Pearl Har­bor on Decem­ber 7, 1941. The Okla­homa lost 429 sailors and Marines, a third of its crew.”

Wow.

pill-100-963

The Pill

c. 1965 Amer­i­can His­to­ry Muse­um

As Natal­ie Ang­i­er, author of Woman: An Inti­mate Geog­ra­phy point­ed out in a recent arti­cle in Smith­son­ian mag­a­zine, “when peo­ple speak of the Pill, you know they don’t mean aspirin or Prozac but rather that moth­er of all block­buster drugs, the birth con­trol pill.”  A pin­na­cle of both med­ical and fem­i­nist his­to­ry, its sig­nif­i­cance extends well beyond the nation­al bor­ders.

How about you, read­ers? What item from a muse­um col­lec­tion would you include in a book on Amer­i­can His­to­ry?

Relat­ed Con­tent:

Ani­mat­ed Ver­sion of Howard Zinn’s His­to­ry of the Amer­i­can Empire

Pulitzer Prize Win­ner Picks Essen­tial US His­to­ry Books

Dis­cov­er Thomas Jefferson’s Cut-and-Paste Ver­sion of the Bible, and Read the Curi­ous Edi­tion Online

Ayun Hal­l­i­day remem­bers the amaze­ment she felt see­ing Archie and Edith’s chairs on an 8th grade field trip to Wash­ing­ton DC. Fol­low her @AyunHalliday

James Joyce’s Dublin Captured in Vintage Photos from 1897 to 1904

dublin 1902

The Google Cul­tur­al Insti­tute has drawn our atten­tion before, with its vir­tu­al exhi­bi­tions on the rise of the Eif­fel Tow­er, the fall of the Iron Cur­tain, and many oth­er notable chap­ters of human his­to­ry. Today, take a look at a Google Cul­tur­al Insti­tute gallery that has a foot in lit­er­a­ture as well as in his­to­ry, Dublin­ers: the Pho­tographs of J.J. Clarke from the Nation­al Library of Ire­land. Sub­ti­tled “a glimpse of James Joyce’s Dublin,” the online show presents pic­tures tak­en by this fel­low Clarke at the turn of the 20th cen­tu­ry, when he came to the Irish cap­i­tal to study med­i­cine. His “pho­to­jour­nal­is­tic approach to his sub­jects allowed him to cap­ture vivid scenes from the dai­ly lives of Dublin’s men, women and chil­dren.”

CLAR_071

This made Clarke a con­tem­po­rary of Joyce, and so his “images also show us how the city looked” to the writer “whose best known works — the short sto­ry col­lec­tion Dublin­ers, and the nov­els A Por­trait of the Artist as a Young Man and Ulysses — are all set around that time, when Joyce too was a young stu­dent fas­ci­nat­ed by the world around him.”

Both the pho­tog­ra­ph­er and the nov­el­ist, in their sep­a­rate forms, set about cap­tur­ing the city, the era, and the cul­ture around them, and the pic­tures of Clarke’s fea­tured at the Google Cul­tur­al Insti­tute could eas­i­ly illus­trate any of Joyce’s books.

CLAR_008

I’ve long enjoyed repeat­ing the obser­va­tion that, had the real Dublin crum­bled, we could rebuild it from the details giv­en in Ulysses — or at least we could rebuild the Dublin of 1904. But I now accept that hav­ing on hand Clarke’s pho­tographs, about which you can learn much more at the Nation­al Library of Ire­land’s site, they would great­ly speed the recon­struc­tion process as well. All of the Joycean texts men­tioned above can be found in our col­lec­tion of Free Audio Books and Free eBooks.

Relat­ed Con­tent:

Vladimir Nabokov Cre­ates a Hand-Drawn Map of James Joyce’s Ulysses

James Joyce, With His Eye­sight Fail­ing, Draws a Sketch of Leopold Bloom (1926)

James Joyce Reads ‘Anna Livia Plura­belle’ from Finnegans Wake

Col­in Mar­shall hosts and pro­duces Note­book on Cities and Cul­ture and writes essays on lit­er­a­ture, film, cities, Asia, and aes­thet­ics. He’s at work on a book about Los Ange­les, A Los Ange­les Primer. Fol­low him on Twit­ter at @colinmarshall.

The Nazi’s Philistine Grudge Against Abstract Art and The “Degenerate Art Exhibition” of 1937

entartetekunst

Has any polit­i­cal par­ty in West­ern his­to­ry had as vexed a rela­tion­ship with art as the Ger­man Nation­al Social­ists? We’ve long known, of course, that their uses of and opin­ions on art con­sti­tut­ed the least of the Nazi par­ty’s prob­lems. Still, the artis­tic pro­cliv­i­ties of Hitler and com­pa­ny com­pel us, per­haps because they seem to promise a win­dow into the mind­set that result­ed in such ulti­mate inhu­man­i­ty. We can learn about the Nazis from the art they liked, but we can learn just as much (or more) from the art they dis­liked — or even that which they sup­pressed out­right.

vassily-kandinsky

Cur­rent events have brought these sub­jects back to mind; this week, accord­ing to The New York Times, “Ger­man author­i­ties described how they dis­cov­ered 1,400 or so works dur­ing a rou­tine tax inves­ti­ga­tion, includ­ing ones by Matisse, Cha­gall, Renoir, Toulouse-Lautrec, Picas­so and a host of oth­er mas­ters,” most or all pre­vi­ous­ly unknown or pre­sumed lost amid all the flight from Nazi Ger­many. Hitler him­self, more a fan of racial­ly charged Utopi­an real­ism, would­n’t have approved of most of these new­ly redis­cov­ered paint­ings and draw­ings.

entartete-kunst-degenerate-art

In fact, he may well have thrown them into 1937’s Degen­er­ate Art Exhi­bi­tion. Four years after it came to pow­er,” writes the BBC’s Lucy Burns, “the Nazi par­ty put on two art exhi­bi­tions in Munich. The Great Ger­man Art Exhi­bi­tion [the Große Deutsche Kun­stausstel­lung] was designed to show works that Hitler approved of — depict­ing stat­uesque blonde nudes along with ide­alised sol­diers and land­scapes. The sec­ond exhi­bi­tion, just down the road, showed the oth­er side of Ger­man art — mod­ern, abstract, non-rep­re­sen­ta­tion­al — or as the Nazis saw it, ‘degen­er­ate.’ ” This Degen­er­ate Art Exhi­bi­tion (Die Ausstel­lung “Entartete Kun­st”), the much more pop­u­lar of the two, fea­tured Paul Klee, Oskar Kokosch­ka, Wass­i­ly Kandin­sky, Max Beck­mann, Emil Nolde and George Grosz. There the Nazis quar­an­tined these con­fis­cat­ed abstract, expres­sion­is­tic, and often Jew­ish works of art, those that, accord­ing to the Führer, “insult Ger­man feel­ing, or destroy or con­fuse nat­ur­al form or sim­ply reveal an absence of ade­quate man­u­al and artis­tic skill” and “can­not be under­stood in them­selves but need some pre­ten­tious instruc­tion book to jus­ti­fy their exis­tence.” And if that sounds rigid, you should see how that Nazis dealt with jazz.

Note: For more on this sub­ject, you can watch the 1993 doc­u­men­tary Degen­er­ate Art.

Relat­ed Con­tent:

How the CIA Secret­ly Fund­ed Abstract Expres­sion­ism Dur­ing the Cold War

The Nazis’ 10 Con­trol-Freak Rules for Jazz Per­form­ers: A Strange List from World War II

Joseph Stal­in, a Life­long Edi­tor, Wield­ed a Big, Blue, Dan­ger­ous Pen­cil

Col­in Mar­shall hosts and pro­duces Note­book on Cities and Cul­ture and writes essays on lit­er­a­ture, film, cities, Asia, and aes­thet­ics. He’s at work on a book about Los Ange­les, A Los Ange­les Primer. Fol­low him on Twit­ter at @colinmarshall.

Take a Virtual Tour of Shakespeare’s Globe Theatre

Hollar_Long_View_detail

Last week, we fea­tured a Prize-Win­ning Ani­ma­tion of 17th Cen­tu­ry Lon­don. In many ways, it could be paired with these short vir­tu­al tours of the Globe The­atre. Built in 1599 by Shake­speare’s play­ing com­pa­ny, the Lord Cham­ber­lain’s Men, the orig­i­nal the­atre host­ed some of the Bard’s great­est plays until it burned down 14 years lat­er. In 1613, dur­ing a per­for­mance of Hen­ry VIII, a stage can­non ignit­ed the thatched roof and the the­atre burned to the ground in less than two hours. Rebuilt with a tile roof, the the­atre re-opened in 1614, and remained active until England’s Puri­tan admin­is­tra­tion closed all the­atres in 1642. A mod­ern recon­struc­tion of the Globe, named “Shake­speare’s Globe,” was built in 1997, just a few feet away from the orig­i­nal struc­ture. If you want to get a feel for what Shake­speare’s the­atre looked like, then look no fur­ther than this vir­tu­al tour. All you need is this free Quick­time plu­g­in for your brows­er and you can take a 360 tour of the stage, the yard, the mid­dle gallery, and the upper gallery … all with­out leav­ing your seat.

via @matthiasrascher and @faraway67

Relat­ed Con­tent:

What Shake­speare Sound­ed Like to Shake­speare: Recon­struct­ing the Bard’s Orig­i­nal Pro­nun­ci­a­tion

Pink Floyd’s David Gilmour Sings Shakespeare’s Son­net 18

A Sur­vey of Shakespeare’s Plays (Free Course) 

Shakespeare’s Satir­i­cal Son­net 130, As Read By Stephen Fry

by | Permalink | Make a Comment ( 1 ) |

Cook Real Recipes from Ancient Rome: Ostrich Ragoût, Roast Wild Boar, Nut Tarts & More

Mar­cus Gav­ius Api­cius, who lived in the first cen­tu­ry AD, was as fine an embod­i­ment of Rome’s insa­tiable excess as any of his fel­low cit­i­zens. While some men gained infamy for wan­ton cru­el­ty or feats of courage, Api­cius came to be known as Rome’s most prodi­gious glut­ton, with Pliny call­ing him “the most riotous glut­ton and bel­lie-god of his time.” (An alter­na­tive, and equal­ly delec­table trans­la­tion, is the “most glut­to­nous gorg­er of all spend­thrifts.”)

Among Api­cius’ most impres­sive culi­nary exploits was sail­ing to Libya to pick up some craw­fish:

Hear­ing too that [the craw­fish] were very large in Africa, he sailed thith­er, with­out wait­ing a sin­gle day, and suf­fered exceed­ing­ly on his voy­age. But when he came near the place, before he dis­em­barked from the ship, (for his arrival made a great noise among the Africans,) the fish­er­men came along­side in their boats and brought him some very fine craw­fish; and he, when he saw them, asked if they had any fin­er; and when they said that there were none fin­er than those which they brought, he, rec­ol­lect­ing those at Minturnæ, ordered the mas­ter of the ship to sail back the same way into Italy, with­out going near the land.

Some would say that sail­ing all the way to Libya for fish and refus­ing to set foot ashore because you weren’t impressed with some fishermen’s wares might be called petu­lant. They would be wrong. It is gas­tro­nom­i­cal­ly dis­cern­ing. No less, how­ev­er, would be expect­ed of a man who end­ed his life when, as Mar­tial remarks, his purse could no longer sup­port his stom­ach:

Api­cius, you have spent 60 mil­lion [ses­ter­ces] on your stom­ach, and as yet a full 10 mil­lion remained to you. You refused to endure this, as also hunger and thirst, and took poi­son in your final drink. Noth­ing more glut­to­nous was ever done by you, Api­cius.

Only fit­ting, then, that one of Rome’s best known gour­mands became the attrib­uted author of the old­est sur­viv­ing cook­book. Api­cius’ De re coquinar­ia, which emerged between the 4th and 5th cen­turies AD, is a com­pi­la­tion of almost 500 Roman recipes arranged, much like con­tem­po­rary cook­books, by ingre­di­ents. This culi­nary gold­mine, which includes instruc­tions on prepar­ing brains and udders, was inac­ces­si­ble to Eng­lish speak­ers until the advent of Bar­bara Flower and Eliz­a­beth Rosenbaum’s The Roman cook­ery book: A crit­i­cal trans­la­tion of “The art of cook­ing” by Api­cius, for use in the study and kitchen (1958). Here’s a sam­ple from Book 9, From The Sea:

- Mus­sels: liqua­men, chopped leeks, pas­sum, savory, wine. Dilute the mix­ture with water, and boil the mus­sels in it.

- (Sauce) for oys­ters: pep­per, lovage, yolk of egg, vine­gar, liqua­men, oil and wine. If you wish, add hon­ey.

- (Sauce) for all kinds of shell­fish: pep­per, lovage, pars­ley, dried mint, lots of cumin, hon­ey, vine­gar, liqua­men. If you wish, add a bay leaf and foli­um indicum.

Unfor­tu­nate­ly for the aspir­ing Roman chef, nei­ther De re coquinar­ia nor Mmes. Flower and Rosen­baum includ­ed the nec­es­sary quan­ti­ties of the ingre­di­ents. While one may choose to parse the trans­la­tion inde­pen­dent­ly to arrive at the appro­pri­ate mean­ing of “lots of cumin,” there is help for those look­ing for a quick fix.

In 2003, a chef and food his­to­ri­an named Patrick Faas pub­lished Around the Roman Table: Food and Feast­ing in Ancient Rome. While some of the con­tent con­cerns Roman table man­ners, the heart of the book lies in the recipes. Faas pro­vides over 150 recipes, most of which he sources from Flower and Rosenbaum’s trans­la­tion (along­side a few dish­es men­tioned by Pliny and Cato). Eight are freely avail­able on the Uni­ver­si­ty of Chica­go Press web­site, and we’ve pro­vid­ed a few as an amuse-bouche:

Roast Wild Boar

Aper ita con­di­tur: spogiatur, et sic asper­gi­tur ei sal et cuminum fric­tum, et sic manet. Alia die mit­ti­tur in fur­num. Cum coc­tus fuer­it per­fun­du­tur piper tri­tum, condi­men­tum aprunum, mel, liqua­men, caroenum et pas­sum.

Boar is cooked like this: sponge it clean and sprin­kle with salt and roast cumin. Leave to stand. The fol­low­ing day, roast it in the oven. When it is done, scat­ter with ground pep­per and pour on the juice of the boar, hon­ey, liqua­men, caroenum, and pas­sum. (Api­cius, 330)

For this you would need a very large oven, or a very small boar, but the recipe is equal­ly suc­cess­ful with the boar joint­ed. Remove the bris­tles and skin, then scat­ter over it plen­ty of sea salt, crushed pep­per and coarse­ly ground roast­ed cumin. Leave it in the refrig­er­a­tor for 2–3 days, turn­ing it occa­sion­al­ly.

Wild boar can be dry, so wrap it in slices of bacon before you roast it. At the very least wrap it in pork caul. Then put it into the oven at its high­est set­ting and allow it to brown for 10 min­utes. Reduce the oven tem­per­a­ture to 180°C/350°F/Gas 4, and con­tin­ue to roast for 2 hours per kg, bast­ing reg­u­lar­ly.

Mean­while pre­pare the sauce. To make caroenum, reduce 500ml wine to 200ml. Add 2 table­spoons of hon­ey, 100ml pas­sum, or dessert wine, and salt or garum to taste. Take the meat out of the oven and leave it to rest while you fin­ish the sauce. Pour off the fat from the roast­ing tin, then deglaze it with the wine and the hon­ey mix­ture. Pour this into a saucepan, add the roast­ing juices, and fat to taste.

Carve the boar into thin slices at the table, and serve the sweet sauce sep­a­rate­ly.

Ostrich Ragoût

Until the 1980s the ostrich was con­sid­ered as exot­ic as an ele­phant, but since then it has become avail­able in super­mar­kets. Cook­ing a whole ostrich is an enor­mous task, but Api­cius pro­vides a recipe for ostrich:

In struthione elixo: piper, men­tam, cuminum assume, apii semen, dacty­los vel cary­otas, mel, ace­tum, pas­sum, liqua­men, et oleum modice et in cac­cabo facies ut bul­li­at. Amu­lo obligas, et sic partes struthio­n­is in lance per­fundis, ete desu­per piper aspar­gis. Si autem in con­di­tu­ram coquere volueris, ali­cam addis.

For boiled ostrich: pep­per, mint, roast cumin, cel­ery seed, dates or Jeri­cho dates, hon­ey, vine­gar, pas­sum, garum, a lit­tle oil. Put these in the pot and bring to the boil. Bind with amu­lum, pour over the pieces of ostrich in a serv­ing dish and sprin­kle with pep­per. If you wish to cook the ostrich in the sauce, add ali­ca. (Api­cius, 212)

You may pre­fer to roast or fry your ostrich, rather than boil it. Whichev­er method you choose, this sauce goes with it well. For 500g ostrich pieces, fried or boiled, you will need:

2 tea­spoon flour

2 table­spoons olive oil

300ml pas­sum (dessert wine)

1 table­spoon roast cumin seeds

1 tea­spoon cel­ery seeds

3 pit­ted can­died dates

3 table­spoons garum or a 50g tin of anchovies

1 tea­spoon pep­per­corns

2 table­spoons fresh chopped mint

1 tea­spoon hon­ey

3 table­spoons strong vine­gar

Make a roux with the flour and 1 table­spoon of the olive oil, add the pas­sum, and con­tin­ue to stir until the sauce is smooth. Pound togeth­er in the fol­low­ing order: the cumin, cel­ery seeds, dates, garum or anchovies, pep­per­corns, chopped mint, the remain­ing olive oil, the hon­ey, and vine­gar. Add this to the thick­ened wine sauce. Then stir in the ostrich pieces and let them heat through in the sauce.

Nut Tart

Pati­na ver­sa­tilis vice dul­cis: nucle­os pineos, nuces frac­tas et pur­gatas, attor­re­bis eas, teres cum melle, pipere, liquamine, lacte, ovis, mod­i­co mero et oleo, ver­sas in dis­cum.

Try pati­na as dessert: roast pine nuts, peeled and chopped nuts. Add hon­ey, pep­per, garum, milk, eggs, a lit­tle undi­lut­ed wine, and oil. Pour on to a plate. (Api­cius, 136)

400g crushed nuts—almonds, wal­nuts or pis­ta­chios

200g pine nuts

100g hon­ey

100ml dessert wine

4 eggs

100ml full-fat sheep­’s milk

1 tea­spoon salt or garum

pep­per

Pre­heat the oven to 240°C/475°F/Gas 9.

Place the chopped nuts and the whole pine nuts in an oven dish and roast until they have turned gold­en. Reduce the oven tem­per­a­ture to 200°C/400°F/Gas 6. Mix the hon­ey and the wine in a pan and bring to the boil, then cook until the wine has evap­o­rat­ed. Add the nuts and pine nuts to the hon­ey and leave it to cool. Beat the eggs with the milk, salt or garum and pep­per. Then stir the hon­ey and nut mix­ture into the eggs. Oil an oven dish and pour in the nut mix­ture. Seal the tin with sil­ver foil and place it in roast­ing tin filled about a third deep with water. Bake for about 25 min­utes until the pud­ding is firm. Take it out and when it is cold put it into the fridge to chill. To serve, tip the tart on to a plate and pour over some boiled hon­ey.

Col­umel­la Sal­ad

Col­umel­la’s writ­ings sug­gest that Roman sal­ads were a match for our own in rich­ness and imag­i­na­tion:

Addi­to in mor­tar­i­um sat­ureiam, men­tam, rutam, corian­drum, api­um, por­rum sec­tivum, aut si non erit viri­dem cepam, folia latu­cae, folia eru­cae, thy­mum viri­de, vel nepetam, tum eti­am viri­de puleium, et case­um recen­tem et sal­sum: ea omnia parti­er con­ter­i­to, ace­tique piperati exigu­um, per­mis­ce­to. Hanc mix­tu­ram cum in catil­lo com­po­sur­ris, oleum super­fun­di­to.

Put savory in the mor­tar with mint, rue, corian­der, pars­ley, sliced leek, or, if it is not avail­able, onion, let­tuce and rock­et leaves, green thyme, or cat­mint. Also pen­ny­roy­al and salt­ed fresh cheese. This is all crushed togeth­er. Stir in a lit­tle pep­pered vine­gar. Put this mix­ture on a plate and pour oil over it. (Col­umel­la, Re Rus­ti­ca, XII-lix)

A won­der­ful sal­ad, unusu­al for the lack of salt (per­haps the cheese was salty enough), and that Col­umel­la crush­es the ingre­di­ents in the mor­tar.

100g fresh mint (and/or pen­ny­roy­al)

50g fresh corian­der

50g fresh pars­ley

1 small leek

a sprig of fresh thyme

200g salt­ed fresh cheese

vine­gar

pep­per

olive oil

Fol­low Col­umel­la’s method for this sal­ad using the ingre­di­ents list­ed.

In oth­er sal­ad recipes Col­umel­la adds nuts, which might not be a bad idea with this one.

Apart from let­tuce and rock­et many plants were eat­en raw—watercress, mal­low, sor­rel, goose­foot, purslane, chico­ry, chervil, beet greens, cel­ery, basil and many oth­er herbs.

via Uni­ver­si­ty of Chica­go Press and De Coquinar­ia

Ilia Blin­d­er­man is a Mon­tre­al-based cul­ture writer. Fol­low him at @iliablinderman

Relat­ed Con­tent:

Archive of Hand­writ­ten Recipes (1600 – 1960) Will Teach You How to Stew a Calf’s Head and More

What Ancient Greek Music Sound­ed Like: Hear a Recon­struc­tion That is ‘100% Accu­rate’

How Many U.S. Marines Could Bring Down the Roman Empire?

« Go Back — More in this category... »
Quantcast