Poor moon-landÂing conÂspirÂaÂcy theÂoÂrists. LackÂing the hisÂtorÂiÂcal and culÂturÂal gravÂiÂtas of JFK assasÂsiÂnaÂtion conÂspirÂaÂcy theÂoÂrists or the brazen pseuÂdo-relÂeÂvance of 9/11 conÂspirÂaÂcy theÂoÂrists, those who believe the ApolÂlo 11 misÂsion came out of a HolÂlyÂwood backÂlot must toil in deepÂest obscuÂriÂty. ImagÂine sufÂferÂing from the aching conÂvicÂtion that the UnitÂed States govÂernÂment, in league with a respectÂed auteur or two, hoodÂwinked the entire world with a few minÂutes of blurÂry, amaÂteurÂish video and garÂbled walkie-talkie speech — hoodÂwinked the entire world except you, that is. Now imagÂine a Truther and a secÂond-gunÂman obsesÂsive sharÂing a laugh about all your imporÂtant revÂeÂlaÂtions. If indeed you do hold that mankind has nevÂer visÂitÂed the moon, make sure you don’t watch usuÂalÂly seriÂous docÂuÂmenÂtarÂiÂan William Karel’s Dark Side of the Moon. In it, you’ll see your ideas furÂther ridiculed, which would be unpleasÂant — or, even worse, you’ll see them vinÂdiÂcatÂed.
These moon-landÂing conÂspirÂaÂcy theÂoÂrists offer many alterÂnaÂtive hisÂtorÂiÂcal narÂraÂtives, and Karel picks a rich one. He proÂceeds from the quesÂtion of how, exactÂly, filmÂmakÂer StanÂley Kubrick came into posÂsesÂsion of the advanced camÂera lensÂes he used to shoot 1975’s canÂdle-lit BarÂry LynÂdon. PerÂhaps NASA, who had the lensÂes in the first place, owed Kubrick for cerÂtain serÂvices renÂdered six years earÂliÂer? CutÂting deconÂtexÂtuÂalÂized file footage togethÂer with scriptÂed lines delivÂered by actors, NASA staffers, and KubrickÂ’s actuÂal widÂow, Karel tells an omiÂnousÂly earnest stoÂry of how the CIA recruitÂed Kubrick and his 2001-testÂed cinÂeÂmatÂic craftsÂmanÂship to “win” the space race, at least on teleÂviÂsion. Though libÂerÂalÂly pepÂpered with small falseÂhoods and inside jokes for film buffs, Dark Side of the Moon has nonetheÂless inadÂverÂtentÂly won its share of sinÂcere adherÂents, includÂing self-styled “SpeakÂer of Truth” Wayne Green. It’s been said many times, many ways: humanÂiÂty isn’t quite smart enough to effecÂtiveÂly conÂspire, but we’re just smart enough to invent an infiniÂtude of conÂspirÂaÂcy theÂoÂries.
RelatÂed conÂtent:
StanÂley Kubrick’s Very First Films: Three Short DocÂuÂmenÂtaries
TerÂry Gilliam: The DifÂferÂence Between Kubrick (Great FilmÂmakÂer) and SpielÂberg (Less So)
The Best of NASA Space ShutÂtle Videos (1981–2010)
ColÂin MarÂshall hosts and proÂduces NoteÂbook on Cities and CulÂture. FolÂlow him on TwitÂter at @colinmarshall.