Robert Dallek’s latÂest book recounts in plenÂtiÂful detail (752 pages) the odd workÂing relaÂtionÂship that existÂed between Richard Nixon and HenÂry Kissinger (Nixon’s nationÂal secuÂriÂty advisÂer and, latÂer, secÂreÂtary of state). They were partÂly allies, in many ways strongÂly depenÂdent upon one anothÂer, parÂticÂuÂlarÂly when it came to makÂing AmerÂiÂcan forÂeign polÂiÂcy. But they also disÂtrustÂed one anothÂer, someÂtimes deeply, and they’d occaÂsionÂalÂly maneuÂver behind each othÂers’ backs. Dallek’s book, Nixon and Kissinger: PartÂners in PowÂer, has just come out in paperÂback, which brings us to this NPR interÂview with the author (iTunes — Feed — Web Site). Dallek, who has preÂviÂousÂly writÂten extenÂsiveÂly on Kennedy and JohnÂson, gives a good interÂview that outÂlines “Nixinger’s” subÂstanÂtive accomÂplishÂments and the many behind-the-scenes intrigues. Give a lisÂten.
Nixon and Kissinger: Best of Allies and Rivals
A Short History of Man, God, and Political Philosophy
In case you missed it, The New York Times pubÂlished a lengthy artiÂcle — The PolÂiÂtics of God — last weekÂend which essenÂtialÂly traces how the thought of Thomas Hobbes, John Locke, and othÂer major politÂiÂcal philosoÂphers gave us secÂuÂlar polÂiÂtics, and parÂticÂuÂlarÂly the sepÂaÂraÂtion of Church and State. They’re innoÂvaÂtions with many upsides, but also the downÂside that they put us at an intelÂlecÂtuÂal disÂtance from entire regions where faith still govÂerns politÂiÂcal affairs. This includes large swathes of the MidÂdle East and othÂer areas withÂin the “MusÂlim orbit.” It’s a good piece to read if you’ve ever wonÂdered how phiÂlosÂoÂphy tanÂgiÂbly shapes our modÂern world. WritÂten by Mark LilÂla, a ColumÂbia UniÂverÂsiÂty proÂfesÂsor, the highÂly-readÂable artiÂcle is adaptÂed from his new book, The StillÂborn God: ReliÂgion, PolÂiÂtics, and the ModÂern West. Get the artiÂcle here, and don’t forÂget to subÂscribe to our feed.
RelatÂed ConÂtent for PhiÂlosÂoÂphy Buffs:
- PhiÂlosÂoÂphy Bites (PhilosoÂphers InterÂviews on PodÂcast)
- EnlightÂenÂment on iTunes: The PhiÂlosÂoÂphy of Immanuel Kant
- PhiÂlosÂoÂphy Talk and IntelÂliÂgent Design
- PlaÂto To Go (The RepubÂlic Now on iTunes)
Jon Stewart on 1994 and 2003 Dick Cheney
Strange culÂture we live in these days. It’s the comeÂdiÂans that ask the hard quesÂtions. See John StewÂart below and the refÂerÂenced Dick Cheney video below that.
America’s Philosopher President
What’s gone wrong with AmerÂiÂca’s democÂraÂcy? It’s a quesÂtion that Al Gore takes a hard look at in his recent (and well-reviewed) book, The Assault on ReaÂson. Below, Gore gives you the gist of his arguÂment in a half-hour video. It’s a bit heady. He’s invokÂing the Ancient Greeks, the EnlightÂenÂment, Edward GibÂbon, Adam Smith and John StuÂart Mill. What’s more, his thinkÂing is heavÂiÂly informed by JurÂgen HaberÂmas and his writÂings on ratioÂnal politÂiÂcal disÂcourse. And it all loops into an explaÂnaÂtion of how we’ve takÂen a wrong turn on the Iraq war, the enviÂronÂment, civÂil libÂerÂties and beyond. Yes, it’s heady stuff. But if Open CulÂture readÂers can’t hanÂdle it, who can?
The link to the origÂiÂnal video is here.
Filling the Idea Void in Iraq
We have hit botÂtom in Iraq. And you know it because the debates over Iraq (whether the war was just, whether we planned it adeÂquateÂly, whether we have a meanÂingÂful exist stratÂeÂgy, etc.) have ground to a halt. The big defendÂers of the war effort have mostÂly gone silent, or they’re no longer takÂen seriÂousÂly, and what we’re left with is a deficit of ideas all around. There are those who talk about stayÂing in Iraq, but can’t articÂuÂlate a credÂiÂble stratÂeÂgy for movÂing forÂward. And those who talk about leavÂing, but can’t outÂline how we’ll leave Iraq in a moralÂly defenÂsiÂble posiÂtion. We hear a lot in the way of platÂiÂtudes, litÂtle in the way of subÂstance.
This Fresh Air interÂview (stream it here) with Thomas Ricks, author of the bestÂseller FiasÂco: The AmerÂiÂcan MilÂiÂtary AdvenÂture in Iraq, helps fill the idea void a bit. (His book, by the way, comes out in paperÂback latÂer this week.) HavÂing recentÂly returned from Iraq, Ricks talks about the real options now availÂable to the US, and what steps the Bush adminÂisÂtraÂtion will likeÂly take durÂing its last 18 months. Also, he disÂcussÂes how the AmerÂiÂcan milÂiÂtary has changed its m.o. in Iraq. Gone are the days when polÂiÂtics dicÂtatÂed a sunÂny outÂlook and no real plans. Now, adults are runÂning the show, and they’re getÂting a good deal more realÂisÂtic and pragÂmatÂic. But even they recÂogÂnize that this newÂfound wisÂdom is comÂing perÂhaps too late.
RelatÂed Note: George PackÂer, the main jourÂnalÂist who covÂered the war effort for The New YorkÂer, has recentÂly rolled out a blog for the magÂaÂzine. It’s called “InterÂestÂing Times” and it’s sure to help fill the idea void as well. Give it a look here.
Want to downÂload free coursÂes from top uniÂverÂsiÂties? Check out this new podÂcast colÂlecÂtion.
A Whole Lotta Chomsky
We recentÂly stumÂbled upon a big trove of politÂiÂcal disÂsent. This colÂlecÂtion feaÂtures over 200 talks — some in audio, some in video — givÂen by MIT’s Noam ChomÂsky. The talks, which focus on polÂiÂtics (and not his work on linÂguisÂtics) range from the 1970s to today. For an archive of his politÂiÂcal writÂings, which includes many comÂplete online texts, click here.
Tell a Friend About Open CulÂture - 
SubÂscribe to Our Feed
Who Didn’t See This One Coming?
AmerÂiÂca’s 42nd presÂiÂdent spoke this weekÂend at HarÂvard’s Class Day, a traÂdiÂtionÂal event held for gradÂuÂatÂing seniors. While Class Day often feaÂtures pop icons and comeÂdiÂans — take this speech by Ali G from a few yeas ago — ClinÂton’s speech was a bit more seriÂous and ideÂalÂisÂtic, and it reminds us that there may be again a day when we can look to the White House for subÂstance and inspiÂraÂtion. This too shall pass. You can watch Part 1 of his preÂsenÂtaÂtion below. Here are links to Parts 2 and 3.
YouTube’s Impact on the 2008 Election: The Hype and the Fact
YouTube is a litÂtle more than two years old. It’s a mere todÂdler. But, it’s now owned by an overÂgrown, fulÂly-beardÂed nine year old. Yes, that would be Google, and that means that YouTube is ready to storm its way into the media mainÂstream, pamÂpers and all. You can be sure that GooTube has already cooked up sevÂerÂal strateÂgies that will lead the video unit to media domÂiÂnaÂtion. But, even to the untrained media observÂer, it’s fairÂly clear that Google’s video unit has choÂsen the 2008 elecÂtion as an areÂna in which it intends to comÂpete with othÂer major media outÂfits for eyeÂballs. In April, YouTube launched its politÂiÂcal chanÂnel CitÂiÂzenÂTube (get more info here) and, along with it, its first major line of video proÂgramÂming called You Choose ’08. The conÂcept here is simÂple and promisÂing: CitÂiÂzens ask quesÂtions to the ’08 canÂdiÂdates, and the canÂdiÂdates respond. The results, howÂevÂer, have been largeÂly disÂapÂpointÂing. When you strip everyÂthing away, what you get are politiÂcians speakÂing the same platÂiÂtudes that we’ve seen for decades on TV. (See a samÂple reply here.) The only difÂferÂence is that the video qualÂiÂty is worse, and they’re manÂagÂing to get their platÂiÂtudes in front of a young demoÂgraphÂic, which is no small feat. For betÂter or for worse, YouTube is to the ’08 elecÂtion what MTV (rememÂber Bill playÂing the sax?) was to the ’92 elecÂtion. While neiÂther CitÂiÂzenÂTube nor the politÂiÂcal camÂpaigns are using the video platÂform in revÂoÂluÂtionÂary ways, the milÂlions of averÂage users who make YouTube what it is are doing a betÂter job of it. Of parÂticÂuÂlar interÂest is the way in which videos are emergÂing on YouTube that counter images being careÂfulÂly proÂjectÂed by canÂdiÂdates and their camÂpaigns. Here are two quick examÂples. GOP canÂdiÂdate Mitt RomÂney has been preÂdictably workÂing to cast himÂself as a social conÂserÂvÂaÂtive. Twice in recent months, he has shown up at Pat RobertÂson’s Regent UniÂverÂsiÂty to delivÂer lines like this:
But then, howÂevÂer inconÂveÂnientÂly, videos from Mitt RomÂney’s past politÂiÂcal camÂpaigns show up on YouTube, ones which should make evanÂgelÂiÂcals think twice, and there is not much RomÂney can do about it. The past hurts, but it doesÂn’t lie: Then there is Hillary ClinÂton. She’s got the monÂey, the parÂty machine is backÂing her, tryÂing to wrap up the nomÂiÂnaÂtion with a bow. But then a damnÂing attack ad crops up on YouTube. This pitch for Barack ObaÂma remixÂes the “1984” TV ad that famousÂly introÂduced Apple comÂputÂers to AmerÂiÂca, and it casts Hillary as a politÂiÂcal automaÂton, an image that rings true for many. (The ObaÂma camÂpaign denies havÂing anyÂthing do with the video, and its creÂator remains unknown.) It is with videos like these that YouTube gets politÂiÂcalÂly interÂestÂing. Just as quickÂly as a politÂiÂcal camÂpaign projects an image for RomÂney or ClinÂton, your averÂage web user can scrounge up footage that calls that image into quesÂtion. A retort is always posÂsiÂble, which was nevÂer the case on TV. And the cost of delivering/countering a mesÂsage runs next to nothÂing. Again a first. YouTube equalÂizes, and it isn’t a terÂrain on which the rich can instantÂly claim vicÂtoÂry. Just ask RomÂney and his over $200 milÂlion in perÂsonÂal wealth. What good has it done him in YouTube land? |
Support Us
We're hoping to rely on loyal readers, rather than erratic ads. Please click the Donate button and support Open Culture. You can use Paypal, Venmo, Patreon, even Crypto! We thank you!
About Us
Open Culture scours the web for the best educational media. We find the free courses and audio books you need, the language lessons & educational videos you want, and plenty of enlightenment in between.
Advertise With Us
