
Some of the most rigÂorÂous moral thinkers of the past cenÂtuÂry have spent time on the wrong side of quesÂtions they deemed of vital imporÂtance. MohanÂdas GandÂhi, for examÂple, at first remained loyÂal to the British, manÂiÂfestÂing many of the vicious prejÂuÂdices of the Empire against Black South Africans and lobÂbyÂing for IndiÂans to serve in the war against the Zulu. Maya Jasanoff in New RepubÂlic describes GandÂhi durÂing this periÂod of his life as a “crank.” At the same time, he develÂoped his phiÂlosÂoÂphy of non-vioÂlent resisÂtance, or satyaÂgraÂha, in South Africa as an IndiÂan sufÂferÂing the injusÂtices inflictÂed upon his counÂtryÂmen by both the Boers and the British.
Gandhi’s someÂtime conÂtraÂdicÂtoÂry stances may be in part underÂstood by his rather arisÂtoÂcratÂic herÂitage and by the warm welÂcome he first received in LonÂdon when he left his famÂiÂly, his caste, and his wife and child in India to attend law school in 1888. And yet it is in LonÂdon that he first began to change his views, becomÂing a staunch vegÂeÂtarÂiÂan and encounÂterÂing theosÂoÂphy, ChrisÂtianÂiÂty, and many of the conÂtemÂpoÂrary writÂers who would shift his perÂspecÂtive over time. GandÂhi received a very difÂferÂent recepÂtion in EngÂland when he returned in 1931, the de facÂto leader of a burÂgeonÂing revÂoÂluÂtionÂary moveÂment in India whose examÂple was so imporÂtant to both the South African and U.S. civÂil rights moveÂments of sucÂceedÂing decades.
One of the writÂers who most deeply guidÂed Gandhi’s politÂiÂcal, spirÂiÂtuÂal, and philoÂsophÂiÂcal evoÂluÂtion, Leo TolÂstoy, expeÂriÂenced his own draÂmatÂic transÂforÂmaÂtion, from landÂed arisÂtoÂcrat to social radÂiÂcal, and also renounced propÂerÂty and posiÂtion to advoÂcate strenÂuÂousÂly for social equalÂiÂty. GandÂhi eagerÂly read Tolstoy’s The KingÂdom of God is WithÂin You, the novelist’s stateÂment of ChrisÂtÂian anarÂchism. The book, GandÂhi wrote in his autoÂbiÂogÂraÂphy, “left an abidÂing impresÂsion on me.” After furÂther study of Tolstoy’s reliÂgious writÂing, he “began to realÂize more and more the infiÂnite posÂsiÂbilÂiÂties of uniÂverÂsal love.”
It was in EngÂland, not India, where GandÂhi first read “A LetÂter to a HinÂdu,” Tolstoy’s 1908 reply to a note from IndiÂan revÂoÂluÂtionÂary TarakÂnath Das on the quesÂtion of IndiÂan indeÂpenÂdence. TolÂstoy divides his lengthy, thoughtÂful “LetÂter” into short chapÂters, each of which begins with a quoÂtaÂtion from the Vedas. “Indeed,” writes Maria PopoÂva, the misÂsive “puts in glarÂing perÂspecÂtive the nuanceÂless and hasty op-eds of our time.” It so affectÂed GandÂhi that, in 1909, he wrote to TolÂstoy, thus beginÂning a corÂreÂsponÂdence between the two that lastÂed through the folÂlowÂing year. “I take the libÂerÂty of invitÂing your attenÂtion to what has been going on in the TransÂvaal for nearÂly three years,” begins Gandhi’s first letÂter, someÂwhat abruptÂly, “There is in that Colony a British IndiÂan popÂuÂlaÂtion of nearÂly 13,000. These IndiÂans have, for sevÂerÂal years, labored under varÂiÂous legal disÂabilÂiÂties.”
The prejÂuÂdice against colÂor and in some respects against Asians is intense in that Colony….The cliÂmax was reached three years ago, with a law that many othÂers and I conÂsidÂered to be degradÂing and calÂcuÂlatÂed to unman those to whom it was applicÂaÂble. I felt that subÂmisÂsion to a law of this nature was inconÂsisÂtent with the spirÂit of true reliÂgion. Some of my friends and I were and still are firm believÂers in the docÂtrine of nonÂreÂsisÂtance to evil. I had the privÂiÂlege of studyÂing your writÂings also, which left a deep impresÂsion on my mind.
GandÂhi refers to a law forcÂing the IndiÂan popÂuÂlaÂtion in South Africa to regÂisÂter with the authorÂiÂties. He goes on to inquire about the authenÂticÂiÂty of the “LetÂter” and asks perÂmisÂsion to transÂlate it, with payÂment, and to omit a negÂaÂtive refÂerÂence to reinÂcarÂnaÂtion that offendÂed him. TolÂstoy respondÂed a few months latÂer, in 1910, allowÂing the transÂlaÂtion free of charge, and allowÂing the omisÂsion, with the qualÂiÂfiÂcaÂtion that he believed “faith in re-birth will nevÂer restrain mankind as much as faith in the immorÂtalÂiÂty of the soul and in divine truth in love.” OverÂall, howÂevÂer, he expressÂes solÂiÂdarÂiÂty, greetÂing GandÂhi “fraÂterÂnalÂly” and writÂing,
God help our dear brothÂers and co-workÂers in the TransÂvaal! Among us, too, this fight between genÂtleÂness and bruÂtalÂiÂty, between humilÂiÂty and love and pride and vioÂlence, makes itself ever more strongÂly felt, espeÂcialÂly in a sharp colÂliÂsion between reliÂgious duty and the State laws, expressed by refusals to perÂform milÂiÂtary serÂvice.
The two conÂtinÂued to write to each othÂer, GandÂhi sendÂing TolÂstoy a copy of his IndiÂan Home Rule and the transÂlatÂed “LetÂter,” and TolÂstoy expoundÂing at length on the errors—and what he saw as the supeÂriÂor characteristics—of ChrisÂtÂian docÂtrine. You can read their full corÂreÂsponÂdence here, along with Tolstoy’s “LetÂter to a HinÂdu” and Gandhi’s introÂducÂtion to his ediÂtion. Despite their reliÂgious difÂferÂences, the exchange furÂther galÂvaÂnized GandÂhi’s pasÂsive resisÂtance moveÂment, and in 1910, he foundÂed a comÂmuÂniÂty called “TolÂstoy Farm” near JohanÂnesÂburg.
GandÂhi’s views on African indeÂpenÂdence would change, and NelÂson ManÂdela latÂer adoptÂed GandÂhi and the IndiÂan indeÂpenÂdence moveÂment as a stanÂdard for the anti-apartheid moveÂment. We’re well aware, of course, of GandÂhi’s influÂence on MarÂtin Luther King, Jr. For his part, GandÂhi wrote glowÂingÂly of TolÂstoy, and the modÂel the novÂelÂist proÂvidÂed for his own anti-coloÂnial camÂpaign. In a speech 18 years latÂer, he said, “When I went to EngÂland, I was a votary of vioÂlence, I had faith in it and none in nonÂviÂoÂlence.” After readÂing TolÂstoy, “that lack of faith in nonÂviÂoÂlence vanished…Tolstoy was the very embodÂiÂment of truth in this age. He strove uncomÂproÂmisÂingÂly to folÂlow truth as he saw it, makÂing no attempt to conÂceal or dilute what he believed to be the truth. He statÂed what he felt to be the truth withÂout carÂing whether it would hurt or please the peoÂple or whether it would be welÂcome to the mighty emperÂor. TolÂstoy was a great advoÂcate of nonÂviÂoÂlence in his age.”
RelatÂed ConÂtent:
Hear Gandhi’s Famous Speech on the ExisÂtence of God (1931)
Albert EinÂstein ExpressÂes His AdmiÂraÂtion for MahatÂma GandÂhi, in LetÂter and Audio
Josh Jones is a writer and musiÂcian based in Durham, NC. FolÂlow him at @jdmagness

