A team of stuÂdent engiÂneers at the UniÂverÂsiÂty of MaryÂland are closÂing in on the AmerÂiÂcan HeliÂcopter SociÂety’s $250,000 SikoÂrsky Prize, which has remained unclaimed for over thirÂty years. The requireÂments of the prize sound simÂple enough. The winÂner must build and demonÂstrate a human-powÂered heliÂcopter that can lift off the ground verÂtiÂcalÂly and hovÂer for one minute, reachÂing a height of three meters (about 10 feet) withÂout driftÂing from a 10-square-meter area. But as this video from the NPR “Radio PicÂtures” series explains, those paraÂmeÂters test the limÂits of light-weight airÂcraft design. After four years of triÂal and error, the MaryÂland team has satÂisÂfied two of the three requireÂments. In one recent flight they kept their heliÂcopter, the GamÂera II, in the air for a world-record 65 secÂonds while stayÂing withÂin the required 10-meter area–but only reachÂing a height of two feet. In shortÂer flights they’ve approached the 10 foot goal. To learn more about the project you can read and lisÂten to Adam Cole’s stoÂry at NPR, “Human-PowÂered HeliÂcopter: Straight Up DifÂfiÂcult.”
Note to those cave dwellers who’ve yet to sucÂcumb to Mad Men mania, it’s not that same route so travÂeled by the dodo. For a while it looked like the world’s supÂply of UnderÂwoods and OlivetÂtis was being reqÂuiÂsiÂtioned for hipÂster jewÂelÂry, but their recent comeÂback is rootÂed in their intendÂed purÂpose. These days, they’re near fetish objects for romanÂtic young writÂers conÂceived in the shadÂow of the Mac ClasÂsic.
MeanÂwhile, the likes of CorÂmac McCarthy and David McCulÂlough, author of 1776, have yet to turn their backs on their beloved, quite likeÂly lucky anaÂlog impleÂments.
All due respect to the young Turks seekÂing to digÂiÂtize the dinosaur, but the real hero of the typeÂwriter’s post milÂlenÂniÂal surÂvival is Paul Schweitzer, the ink finÂgered medÂiÂcine man at the helm of GramerÂcy TypeÂwriter. His once-robust comÂpeÂtiÂtion conÂsigned to the ash heap, Schweitzer has both the stubÂbornÂness and experÂtise to tough it out, in an anaÂlog lair that’s the antitheÂsis of sleek.
No one will fault you if your heart lies with your varÂiÂous screens. But let’s not forÂget where you came from.
So much of what we expeÂriÂence as digÂiÂtal is intanÂgiÂble. The colÂor and texÂture of the InterÂnet exists only for the time we have that parÂticÂuÂlar site loaded. With just a click of the mouse, the lushÂness disÂapÂpears.
Except that it doesn’t, realÂly.
BackÂstage, every email, phoÂto, YouTube video and docÂuÂment we share lives in a very real place, which is weird when you think about it. These masÂsive data cenÂters are like vaults of ones and zeros, some of which could wreak havÂoc in the wrong hands but, honÂestÂly, most of which will nevÂer mean anyÂthing again to anyÂbody.
Every time anyÂone uses a Google prodÂuct, for examÂple, like conÂductÂing a search or lookÂing up direcÂtions, their comÂputÂer talks to one of the world’s most powÂerÂful servÂer netÂworks, which are housed in huge data cenÂters. Very few peoÂple actuÂalÂly get to see where Google’s servers live. These data cenÂters are high secuÂriÂty, for good reaÂson.
The comÂpaÂny recentÂly launched Where the InterÂnet Lives, part of a mini camÂpaign to pull back the curÂtain on how the web works. They hired a phoÂtogÂraÂphÂer to capÂture eight of their data cenÂters on, well, not realÂly film, but you get the picÂture. Oh, and the data cenÂters aren’t brick and morÂtar either. More like glass and dryÂwall and pipes. Lots and lots of pipes.
And like Willie WonÂka and his famous facÂtoÂry, Google invitÂed Wired magÂaÂzine reporter Stephen Levy to visÂit and write a stoÂry about the preÂviÂousÂly off-limÂits facilÂiÂties.
Take a street view tour of the North CarÂoliÂna data cenÂter (and see their “secuÂriÂty team” at work). PhoÂtogÂraÂphÂer ConÂnie Zhou’s images are loveÂly and the facilÂiÂties are beauÂtiÂful in an eerie, futurÂisÂtic way. See how water is used to keep the procesÂsors cool, where data is backed up, failed driÂves destroyed to keep data safe and how workÂers get around.
It’s a peek behind the scenes, but it’s also marÂketÂing. And what’s interÂestÂing is that it’s a lot like the autoÂmoÂbile industry’s marÂketÂing (think of Saturn’s ads in praise of the assemÂbly-line workÂer) and camÂpaigns by the Big Three to attract auto workÂers in the 1940s. Some of the phoÂto capÂtions recall the nosÂtalÂgic, UtopiÂan mesÂsagÂing of the post-War era, when effiÂcient, modÂern subÂurÂban comÂmuÂniÂties were sproutÂing up around indusÂtriÂal cenÂters. This lunch room looks pretÂty nice, and the sauna is right outÂside.
Kate Rix writes about digÂiÂtal culÂture and eduÂcaÂtion. VisÂit her work online at katerÂixwriter
It has been said that “the true voice of [Hunter S.] ThompÂson is revealed to be that of AmerÂiÂcan moralÂist … one who often makes himÂself ugly to expose the ugliÂness he sees around him.” That ugliÂness served its litÂerÂary and jourÂnalÂisÂtic purÂpose, no doubt. As for the purÂpose it served in his priÂvate life, in the realm of getÂting nitÂty-gritÂty, munÂdane things done, that’s a whole othÂer quesÂtion. Not much is known about this clip othÂer than it feaÂtures a NSFW voiceÂmail that the gonzo jourÂnalÂist left for his local AV guy in Woody Creek, ColÂorado. The poor man.…
There are good and bad online instrucÂtionÂal platÂforms for everyÂthing: some lanÂguage coursÂes work betÂter than othÂers and some approachÂes to teachÂing music are more effecÂtive than othÂers.
This is just as true for comÂputÂer proÂgramÂming, where, like everyÂthing else, an abunÂdance of free coursÂes and tutoÂriÂals from MIT, UC BerkeÂley, HarÂvard and StanÂford offer interÂacÂtive tools for learnÂing web develÂopÂment and comÂputÂer proÂgramÂming. You can find a long list of free comp sci coursÂes from these great uniÂverÂsiÂties here.
One new site that is getÂting parÂticÂuÂlarÂly good reviews is CodecadÂeÂmy, a free online learnÂing sysÂtem for learnÂing everyÂthing from HTML Basics to Python in a “user active” style—meaning that users can use tutoÂriÂals to design projects of their own choosÂing. It’s also easy to track your progress.
What sets CodecadÂeÂmy apart from othÂer proÂgramÂming tutoÂriÂals is that all stuÂdent work can be comÂpletÂed withÂin a web browsÂer. No softÂware downÂloadÂing or installing is required. RespondÂing to critÂiÂcism that the site didÂn’t iniÂtialÂly offer enough coursÂes, CodecadÂeÂmy has added numerÂous coursÂes in 2012 and launched a Course CreÂator proÂgram. This is a boon for users interÂestÂed in learnÂing how to teach. CodecadÂeÂmy does not put user-creÂatÂed coursÂes through an approval process and gives course creÂators a link that they can disÂtribÂute as they wish. CodecadÂeÂmy does, howÂevÂer, screen the coursÂes and selects which to feaÂture on its own site.
Enrollees in its Code Year proÂgram receive a proÂgramÂming lesÂson in their email inbox every MonÂday, startÂing with the funÂdaÂmenÂtals of JavaScript and then movÂing on to HTML and CSS. HunÂdreds of thouÂsands of peoÂple signed up at the beginÂning of the year (includÂing the White House and New York MayÂor Michael Bloomberg). If you were one the enrollees, it’s still not too late to keep that New Year’s resÂoÂluÂtion.
The “PolitehniÂca” UniÂverÂsiÂty of Timisoara, RomaÂnia, an engiÂneerÂing school estabÂlished in 1920, takes its motÂto from FerÂdiÂnand I: “It’s not the walls that make a school, but the spirÂit livÂing inside.” While the walls of “PolitehniÂca” are as stateÂly as anyÂone could ask for, what’s inside, accordÂing to the short docÂuÂmenÂtary above, is also pretÂty spiffy—the spirÂit of comÂputÂing hisÂtoÂry, RomanÂian style. With a score that sounds a litÂtle like an outÂtake from Logan’s Run, this video gives us a tour of the university’s MuseÂum of InforÂmaÂtion TechÂnolÂoÂgy and ComÂmuÂniÂcaÂtions, opened NovemÂber 16, 2001.
We meet a numÂber of ancient machines, many of which were responÂsiÂble for designÂing buildÂings and hydroÂelecÂtric dams and some of which still funcÂtion. There’s the Mecipt 1, a masÂsive 1961 mainÂframe sysÂtem covÂered in dials, switchÂes, and routÂing sysÂtems and lookÂing someÂwhat more indusÂtriÂal than the machines built by Fairchild and IBM at the same time. Next comes Mecipt 2 in 1963, which was in operÂaÂtion for sixÂteen years and did much of the buildÂing design. The microÂcomÂputÂers TIMS and MS-100 resemÂble the origÂiÂnal busiÂness machines made in the sixÂties by comÂpaÂnies like Hewlett-Packard and Data GenÂerÂal Corp. OverÂall, the short doc takes us through the experÂiÂmenÂtal course of RomanÂian comÂputÂing from 1961 to 1989. The readÂer who brought this to our attenÂtion points out that there’s litÂtle mateÂrÂiÂal out there on RomanÂian comÂputÂer engiÂneerÂing. This short doc offers a rare look at a very litÂtle-known and fasÂciÂnatÂing hisÂtoÂry.
Josh Jones is a docÂtorÂal canÂdiÂdate in EngÂlish at FordÂham UniÂverÂsiÂty and a co-founder and forÂmer manÂagÂing ediÂtor of GuerÂniÂca / A MagÂaÂzine of Arts and PolÂiÂtics.
YesÂterÂday saw the launch of what you’ll sureÂly find the most intriguÂing use of SyrÂiÂa’s domain name extenÂsion yet, espeÂcialÂly if you folÂlow the visuÂal arts. It serves the punÂning site Art.sy, to which you’ll soon point your browsÂer whenÂevÂer you want to disÂcovÂer new imagery that appeals to your aesÂthetÂic senÂsiÂbilÂiÂty. Thus holds the theÂoÂry, in any case, behind this serÂvice creÂatÂed by the Art Genome Project. It aims to become to visuÂal art what PanÂdoÂra has become to music: a virÂtuÂal mind that can take your tastes, turn right back around to recÂomÂmend works that please those tastes, and — in the best of all posÂsiÂble outÂcomes, litÂtle by litÂtle — broadÂen those tastes as well. Tell Art.sy what has recentÂly capÂtiÂvatÂed you in the museÂums, and it will dig through pieces from WashÂingÂton’s NationÂal Gallery, the Los AngeÂles MuseÂum of ConÂtemÂpoÂrary Art, the CoopÂer-Hewitt NationÂal Design MuseÂum, the British MuseÂum, and elseÂwhere, tryÂing its best to find someÂthing else that will do the same. In total, Art.sy hosts “17,000+ artÂworks by 3,000+ artists” from “300+ of the world’s leadÂing galÂleries, museÂums, priÂvate colÂlecÂtions, founÂdaÂtions, and artist estates from New York to LonÂdon, Paris to ShangÂhai, JohanÂnesÂburg to SĂŁo Paulo.”
MeleÂna Ryzik in TheNew York Times describes Art.sy’s elabÂoÂrate sysÂtem of code-based aesÂthetÂic clasÂsiÂfiÂcaÂtion as develÂoped by “a dozen art hisÂtoÂriÂans who decide what those codes are and how they should be applied,” in which “some labels (Art.sy calls them “genes” …) denote fairÂly objecÂtive qualÂiÂties, like the hisÂtorÂiÂcal periÂod and region the work comes from and whether it is figÂuÂraÂtive or abstract, or belongs in an estabÂlished catÂeÂgoÂry like Cubism, FlemÂish porÂtraiÂture or phoÂtogÂraÂphy,” while othÂers “are highÂly subÂjecÂtive, even quirky.” Ryzik lists the posÂsiÂble codes for a PicasÂso as includÂing “Cubism,” “abstract paintÂing,” “Spain,” “France” and “love,” and those for a JackÂson PolÂlock as “abstract art,” “New York School,” “splattered/dripped,” “repÂeÂtiÂtion” and “process-oriÂentÂed.” Here we have yet anothÂer reaÂson to mainÂtain a high artisÂtic awareÂness in our high-tech time. Still, I can’t help but recall the wise counÂsel Stephen Fry offered in an interÂview we feaÂtured back in August: a truÂly life-enrichÂing recÂomÂmenÂdaÂtion engine wouldÂn’t give you the same art you’ve always enjoyed; it would give you the exact oppoÂsite.
You can learn more about the ins-and-outs of Art.sy here.
It took five years and five modÂels, but AmaÂzon has finalÂly released a new genÂerÂaÂtion of the KinÂdle — the KinÂdle PaperÂwhite — that delivÂers the goods. The probÂlem with the preÂviÂous modÂels boiled down to this. The screens were fairÂly mudÂdy. The conÂtrast, poor. The words didÂn’t pop off of the page. If you ever tried readÂing a KinÂdle indoors, espeÂcialÂly in lowÂer light conÂdiÂtions, you know what I mean.
With the KinÂdle PaperÂwhite, AmaÂzon has made a pretÂty big leap ahead. They’ve made improveÂments to the font conÂtrast and screen resÂoÂluÂtion, which defÂiÂniteÂly enhance the readÂing expeÂriÂence. They’ve also added a touchÂscreen to the e‑ink modÂel. But the big stride forÂward is the built-in light that illuÂmiÂnates the screen. The screen is sidelit, not backÂlit (Ă la the iPad). The point of the light isn’t to make the screen glow like a comÂputÂer screen. It’s to make the screen stay white, like the page of a book, under varyÂing light conÂdiÂtions. If you move from brighter to dimÂmer lightÂing conÂdiÂtions, you nudge up the brightÂness so that the page conÂtinÂues to look white. And then you stop there.
It all works quite well, until you start readÂing with the PaperÂwhite in pretÂty dim light conÂdiÂtions. Then you’ll need to dial up the light until the screen actuÂalÂly glows, and that’s when you’ll start to see some imperÂfecÂtions in the design. As David Pogue menÂtioned in his New York Times review, the PaperÂwhite has some hotspots (areas of uneven lightÂing) along the botÂtom of the screen, which detract minorÂly from the readÂing expeÂriÂence.
The last thing AmaÂzon got right is the price. The entry modÂel starts at $119, which means that AmaÂzon is basiÂcalÂly sellÂing the e‑reader at cost, and then makÂing monÂey on book sales. But that doesÂn’t mean that you need to spend very much. You can always downÂload texts from our colÂlecÂtion of 375 Free eBooks. Or, if you’re an AmaÂzon Prime MemÂber, you can borÂrow up to 180,000 books for free.
We're hoping to rely on loyal readers, rather than erratic ads. Please click the Donate button and support Open Culture. You can use Paypal, Venmo, Patreon, even Crypto! We thank you!
Open Culture scours the web for the best educational media. We find the free courses and audio books you need, the language lessons & educational videos you want, and plenty of enlightenment in between.