Every year, a thouÂsand “thought-leadÂers, movers and shakÂers” get togethÂer at a four-day conÂferÂence
called TED (which is short for TechÂnolÂoÂgy, EnterÂtainÂment and Design). In past years, the list of speakÂers has ranged from Sergey Brin and LarÂry Page to Bill Gates, to HerÂbie HanÂcock and Peter Gabriel, to Frank Gehry and BilÂly GraÂham. This year Bill ClinÂton, Paul Simon, and LarÂry Lessig are set to speak. It almost goes withÂout sayÂing that not just anyÂone can attend such an event. You’ll need an inviÂtaÂtion for starters, plus $4400 to covÂer admisÂsion fees. If you can look past the counÂtry clubÂbishÂness of the event, then you may find it worth spendÂing time with the audio (iTunes — Feed) and video (iTunes — Feed) podÂcasts of talks from recent conÂferÂences. Some “vodÂcasts” you’ll want to check out include: Bono, Peter Gabriel, Richard Dawkins, MalÂcolm GladÂwell, and Al Gore. (We’re not sure what to say about Tony RobÂbins.)
Read More...
Back in 1971, Philip ZimÂbarÂdo, a StanÂford psyÂcholÂoÂgy proÂfesÂsor, set up an experÂiÂment that quickÂly and now famousÂly went awry. Here, ZimÂbarÂdo had underÂgradÂuÂates play the role of prisÂonÂers and prison guards in a mock prison enviÂronÂment. Meant to last two weeks, the experÂiÂment was cut short after only six days when the guards, as The StanÂford Prison ExperÂiÂment web site puts it, “became sadisÂtic and [the] prisÂonÂers became depressed and showed signs of extreme stress.” For ZimÂbarÂdo, the way things played out says a lot about what hapÂpens when good peoÂple are put in bad sitÂuÂaÂtions. And it speaks to how torÂture sceÂnarÂios, like those at Abu Ghraib, become posÂsiÂble. (For more on the parÂalÂlels between the prison experÂiÂment and the torÂture in Iraq, you may want to check out ZimÂbarÂdo’s talk at a recent conÂferÂence called “ThinkÂing HumanÂiÂty After Abu Ghraib.”
If you would like to supÂport the misÂsion of Open CulÂture, conÂsidÂer makÂing a donaÂtion to our site. It’s hard to rely 100% on ads, and your conÂtriÂbuÂtions will help us conÂtinÂue proÂvidÂing the best free culÂturÂal and eduÂcaÂtionÂal mateÂriÂals to learnÂers everyÂwhere. You can conÂtribute through PayÂPal, PatreÂon, and VenÂmo (@openculture). Thanks!
Read More...|
|
The list of susÂpenseÂful novÂels availÂable as free podÂcasts starts with the “monÂster novÂels” of 19th cenÂtuÂry Britain. These novÂels, which freÂquentÂly offered a roundÂabout comÂmenÂtary on the anxÂiÂeties proÂduced by a sociÂety in the midst of rapid indusÂtriÂalÂizaÂtion and wideÂspread coloÂnial involveÂment, include Mary ShelÂley’s FrankenÂstein (1818), Robert Louis StevenÂson’s The Strange Case of Dr Jekyll & Mr. Hyde (1886), and Bram StokÂer’s DracÂuÂla (1897). MeanÂwhile, across the pond, AmerÂiÂca was proÂducÂing its own disÂtincÂtive thrillers. In the trove of free audio books, you get WashÂingÂton IrvÂing’s clasÂsic 1820 short stoÂry, The LegÂend of Sleepy HolÂlow (lisÂten here or here) as well as Edgar Allan Poe’s great short tales: The Tell Tale Heart (1843), The Raven from 1845 (lisÂten here or here), and The Cask of AmonÂtilÂlaÂdo (1846). (AmazÂing that he wrote all of these before he died at 40.) LastÂly, we’d also point you to the famous ghost stoÂry, The Turn of the Screw (lisÂten here and here), writÂten by one of AmerÂiÂca’s greats, HenÂry James. You’ll note that some of these podÂcasts come from LibÂrivox, and that’s because LibÂrivox, with the help of volÂunÂteers, has quickÂly put togethÂer a strong colÂlecÂtion of audio texts from the pubÂlic domain. If you like audio verÂsions of the clasÂsics, then you’ll want to spend some time reviewÂing their catÂaÂlogue, and, in the meanÂtime, enjoy these susÂpenseÂful tales. P.S. If you haven’t seen it before, check out our recent favorite: The War of the Worlds on PodÂcast: How H.G. Wells and Orson Welles RivÂetÂed A Nation See Open CulÂture’s PodÂcast ColÂlecÂtions: Arts & CulÂture — Audio Books — ForÂeign LanÂguage Lessons — News & InforÂmaÂtion — SciÂence — TechÂnolÂoÂgy — UniÂverÂsiÂty (GenÂerÂal) — UniÂverÂsiÂty (B‑School) |
|
|
This AmerÂiÂcan Life, a slightÂly quirky but always comÂpelling radio show, has develÂoped a large and fierceÂly dedÂiÂcatÂed audiÂence since it first aired in 1995. And nowaÂdays, the proÂgram, hostÂed by Ira Glass, is one of the most popÂuÂlar podÂcasts on iTunes. (It curÂrentÂly ranks #2 on the most popÂuÂlar podÂcast list: iTunes Feed Web Site.) On March 22, This AmerÂiÂcan Life will take the next step in its evoÂluÂtion when ShowÂtime airs a teleÂvised verÂsion of the proÂgram. If you’re a fan who is wonÂderÂing what the show might look like on TV — how they might transÂlate the feel of the show to a visuÂal mediÂum — below you can find a couÂple of trailÂers that will give you a quick taste: |
See Open CulÂture’s PodÂcast ColÂlecÂtions:
Arts & CulÂture — Audio Books — ForÂeign LanÂguage Lessons — News & InforÂmaÂtion — SciÂence — TechÂnolÂoÂgy — UniÂverÂsiÂty (GenÂerÂal) — UniÂverÂsiÂty (B‑School)
Read More...
100s of culÂturÂal and eduÂcaÂtionÂal podÂcasts. Email a friend about Open
CulÂture.
E = mc2. It’s hands-down the most well known equaÂtion out there. But how many have the faintest idea what the equaÂtion realÂly means? Not too long ago, PBS’ NOVA put togethÂer a “docuÂdÂraÂma,” called EinÂstein’s Big Idea, which took a close look at how EinÂstein arrived at the equaÂtion and what it means. Along with the proÂgram, NOVA proÂduced some relatÂed media resources, among which you’ll find a series of podÂcasts (iTunes — Feed — mp3) feaÂturÂing 10 top physiÂcists (includÂing two Nobel Prize winÂners) who briefly explain the meanÂing and imporÂtance of E = mc2. In addiÂtion, and perÂhaps even betÂter, they’ve postÂed an audio clip of EinÂstein himÂself explainÂing what the equaÂtion is all about. You’ll find many good resources here, so have a good look around.
If physics intrigues you, you should also check out a new StanÂford course that’s being disÂtribÂuted for free via video podÂcast. The course, ModÂern TheÂoÂretÂiÂcal Physics: QuanÂtum EntanÂgleÂment, is preÂsentÂed by Leonard Susskind, whom many conÂsidÂer the father of string theÂoÂry, a conÂtroÂverÂsial innoÂvaÂtion in physics that squares quanÂtum theÂoÂry with relÂaÂtivÂiÂty and explains the nature of all matÂter and forces. Now, when Susskind disÂcussÂes quanÂtum entanÂgleÂment, he is sureÂly getÂting into some heady, cutÂting-edge stuff. But the good thing is that the very popÂuÂlar course was preÂsentÂed through StanÂford’s ConÂtinÂuÂing StudÂies ProÂgram (where I work, just to put my cards on the table), and was geared toward the genÂerÂal pubÂlic. The course is expectÂed to last a full year, and it should result in 30 free two-hour lecÂtures, which will all be gradÂuÂalÂly postÂed online. You can find a more detailed course descripÂtion here.
Read More...
A HisÂtoÂry DepartÂment Bans CitÂing Wikipedia as a Research Source
“…the MidÂdleÂbury hisÂtoÂry departÂment notiÂfied its stuÂdents this month that Wikipedia could not be citÂed in papers or exams, and that stuÂdents could not “point to Wikipedia or any simÂiÂlar source that may appear in the future to escape the conÂseÂquences of errors.
With the move, MidÂdleÂbury, in VerÂmont, jumped into a growÂing debate withÂin jourÂnalÂism, the law and acadÂeÂmia over what respect, if any, to give Wikipedia artiÂcles, writÂten by hunÂdreds of volÂunÂteers and subÂject to misÂtakes and someÂtimes delibÂerÂate falseÂhoods.“
See full artiÂcle from The New York Times
See Open CulÂture’s podÂcast colÂlecÂtions:
Arts & CulÂture — Audio Books — ForÂeign LanÂguage Lessons — News & InforÂmaÂtion — TechÂnolÂoÂgy — UniÂverÂsiÂty (GenÂerÂal) — UniÂverÂsiÂty (B‑School)
Even if you don’t agree with its Euro conÂserÂvÂaÂtive posÂture, The
EconÂoÂmist always comes off as
emiÂnentÂly ratioÂnal and senÂsiÂble when
grapÂpling with politÂiÂcal issues, and cerÂtainÂly unwillÂing to put spin
ahead of good reportÂing, which sepÂaÂrates it from many of its AmerÂiÂcan
counÂterÂparts. This judiÂciousÂness comes across in a talk givÂen last week
by John MickÂlethÂwait, the magÂaÂzine’s newÂly appointÂed EdiÂtor-in-Chief. (Access audio verÂsions here.) InterÂviewed by Orville Schell, Dean of the GradÂuÂate School of JourÂnalÂism at
UC-BerkeÂley,
MickÂlethÂwait covÂers a lot of ground, but spends a good deal of time
conÂtemÂplatÂing AmerÂiÂca’s role in the world, and parÂticÂuÂlarÂly whether
AmerÂiÂca’s interÂnaÂtionÂal leadÂerÂship is now irreÂtrievÂably broÂken. His comÂmon sense answers proÂvide no red
meat for anyÂone on the left or right. But they’re thoughtÂful, and worth your time. (Just as an fyi, his talk doesÂn’t get startÂed until about 10 minÂutes in, and he doesÂn’t get to interÂnaÂtionÂal affairs until about the 29th minute.) FinalÂly, on a relatÂed note, you may want to explore The EconÂoÂmist’s relÂaÂtiveÂly new series of podÂcasts: iTunes Feed
For more podÂcasts like it, see Open CulÂture’s colÂlecÂtion of News & InforÂmaÂtion PodÂcasts and our UniÂverÂsiÂty PodÂcast ColÂlecÂtion.
|
|
SpeakÂing recentÂly on StanÂford’s camÂpus, Reza Aslan, an IranÂian-AmerÂiÂcan scholÂar who has writÂten for The New York Times, The Nation, and Slate, sketched out an interÂestÂing frameÂwork for makÂing sense of recent trends withÂin the MidÂdle East, and more parÂticÂuÂlarÂly withÂin Islam itself (iTunes — feed N/A). His arguÂment is essenÂtialÂly this: Islam is underÂgoÂing a refÂorÂmaÂtion that’s not terÂriÂbly unlike the one ChrisÂtianÂiÂty underÂwent in the 16th cenÂtuÂry. WithÂin Islam, we see indiÂvidÂuÂals arroÂgatÂing powÂer from the clerÂiÂcal estabÂlishÂment, interÂpretÂing Islam for themÂselves, and attemptÂing to return it to a more pure and origÂiÂnal form. And what’s driÂving all of this are three social and techÂnoÂlogÂiÂcal innoÂvaÂtions. First, the transÂlaÂtion of the Koran into many new lanÂguages, which has made it accesÂsiÂble to wideÂspread popÂuÂlaÂtions, includÂing non-AraÂbic-speakÂing peoÂple, for the first time. SecÂond, the parÂticÂiÂpaÂtion in reformist moveÂments by MusÂlims from the West, who bring their own indiÂvidÂuÂalÂisÂtic perÂspecÂtives to the reliÂgion. Third and most imporÂtantÂly, the invenÂtion of the InterÂnet, which, much like the printÂing press durÂing the 16th cenÂtuÂry, has empowÂered new arbiters of IslamÂic law. Through the interÂnet, new thinkers can get their ideas out there in unpreceÂdentÂed ways, mobiÂlize supÂport behind a new body of reliÂgious ideas, and comÂpete effecÂtiveÂly with the old reliÂgious order. It is withÂin this genÂerÂal conÂtext of refÂorÂmaÂtion that Aslan places Usama bin Laden. Although the IslamÂic refÂorÂmaÂtion has been shaped by many modÂerÂate and proÂgresÂsive figÂures, there are, as with all reforÂmaÂtions, more radÂiÂcal figÂures who chalÂlenge the traÂdiÂtionÂal reliÂgious instiÂtuÂtions and will resort to a pathoÂlogÂiÂcal kind of vioÂlence if necÂesÂsary. In this instance, Aslan sees simÂiÂlarÂiÂties between bin Laden and more radÂiÂcal figÂures of the ProtesÂtant RefÂorÂmaÂtion. Give the talk a lisÂten. And let yourÂself get past the first 10 minÂutes because it starts a litÂtle slowÂly. See our UniÂverÂsiÂty PodÂcast colÂlecÂtion.
|