The Tiny Transforming Apartment: 8 Rooms in 420 Square Feet

Welcome to the New York city apartment of Graham Hill, a Canadian-born architect committed to bringing sustainability into the mainstream. His apartment does more with less. It has a footprint of only 420 square feet. Yet it’s elegantly-designed and completely functional. What initially looks like a simple studio unfolds into much more, a Soho apartment that features no less than eight rooms – a bedroom, guest room, kitchen, office and the rest. We’ll let Graham, the founder of treehugger.com, take you on the grand tour, and we’ll leave you to wonder what a designer could do with this Parisian apartment measuring only 17 square feet….

H/T Jason G. via Gizmodo

Follow us on FacebookTwitter and Google Plus and share intelligent media with your friends! They’ll thank you for it.


Share on FacebookShare on TwitterShare via emailShare on LinkedInShare on TumblrSubmit to StumbleUponSubmit to reddit

by | Permalink | Comments (7) |

Comments (7)
You can skip to the end and leave a response. Pinging is currently not allowed.
  1. Ruud Klerks says . . . | February 3, 2013 / 10:28 am

    Hi, I really would like to suggest to add a foldable table in the toilet for a laptop or to do some writing when you have a private phonecall.
    Well done!

  2. Nicholas Kronos says . . . | February 3, 2013 / 11:30 am

    The text on the video says 350 square feet, whereas the story says 420 square feet.

  3. Cathleen Palmer says . . . | February 3, 2013 / 12:39 pm

    Well done, indeed! I also wonder about a change in “feel” by going from ultra modern to a bit more traditional using a different medium for walls and floors throughout such as a hard wood – a light burnished elm for instance (supposing feng shui was a bigger object than $$). Can you see any reasons why that wouldn’t work? Looking at retirement in the face, we’ll be downsizing in a big way soon. Wonderful to see what’s possible. Thanks!

  4. Mari says . . . | February 3, 2013 / 7:39 pm

    The Goliath table was amazing.

  5. Dan Colman says . . . | February 3, 2013 / 10:51 pm

    Yup, he also mentions in the video that it was 420 square feet. So we went with that. Whoever gave the video a title seems to have made an error.

    Cheers,
    Dan

  6. jack says . . . | February 4, 2013 / 7:59 am

    regarding retirement and downsizing — many
    art objects, wall-art, and personality related ‘things’ will necessarily need to be eliminated. Also, for an older person, good knees, good back, and flexibility would be required. Think of the comfort-zone of an airplane bathroom. I am a hedonist. For an even loving couple, this arrangement is perhaps too much togetherness — one must consider. Utility, space, and creativity are all spectacular! For a young, affluent individual — what a beauty — in the long term, one would be looking for other solutions.

  7. Dr.Prof. says . . . | February 5, 2013 / 9:02 pm

    Wonderful! Reminds me of a renovated walk-up I lived in on the Upper East Side of NYC in the late 1990′s. I think I measured the living space as 10×12′ excluding kitchenette and bathroom. This space has volume (which my studio was lacking) and of course the sliding unit which makes the space look downright huge. Well done.

Add a comment

  • Subscribe

    Get updates as soon as they go live, via RSS feed, email and now Twitter!

    Follow on Twitter

    Get the latest from our Twitter Stream.

    Why can't we be friends?

    Suggest a Link

    Got a link we should post? Send it our way!

  • About Us

    Open Culture editor Dan Colman scours the web for the best educational media. He finds the free courses and audio books you need, the language lessons & movies you want, and plenty of enlightenment in between.

  • Advertise on Open Culture

    Open Culture receives about 2.8 million visits per month and has over 300,000 social media and rss followers. Get your message in front of our smart, savvy audience today.

Quantcast