EarÂly in his life, William FaulknÂer had an epiphany: “I disÂcovÂered that my own litÂtle postage stamp of native soil was worth writÂing about, and that I would nevÂer live long enough to exhaust it.” And so, as he told The Paris Review in 1956, “by subÂliÂmatÂing the actuÂal into the apocÂryphal” FaulknÂer was able to take his homeÂtown of Oxford, MisÂsisÂsipÂpi, and the surÂroundÂing counÂtryÂside and use it to creÂate his own imagÂiÂnary cosÂmos. He called it YokÂnaÂpÂatawÂpha CounÂty.
In NovemÂber of 1952, the norÂmalÂly recluÂsive FaulknÂer allowed a film crew into his secludÂed world at Oxford to make a short docÂuÂmenÂtary about his life. The film, shown here in five pieces, was fundÂed by the Ford FounÂdaÂtion and broadÂcast on DecemÂber 28, 1952 on the CBS teleÂviÂsion proÂgram Omnibus. The scriptÂed film re-enacts events from NovemÂber 1950, when FaulknÂer received the Nobel Prize in LitÂerÂaÂture, through the spring of 1951, when he spoke at his daughÂter JilÂl’s high school gradÂuÂaÂtion.
There are scenes of FaulknÂer at Rowan Oak, his anteÂbelÂlum house on the edge of Oxford, and at GreenÂfield Farm, 17 miles away, where he is shown driÂving a tracÂtor and talkÂing with workÂers. FaulknÂer is also shown briefly with his wife, Estelle, and with sevÂerÂal promiÂnent Oxford resÂiÂdents, includÂing drugÂgist Mac Reed, Oxford Eagle ediÂtor Phil Mullen, who colÂlabÂoÂratÂed with the filmÂmakÂers on the script, and lawyer Phil Stone, who was an earÂly litÂerÂary menÂtor and chamÂpiÂon of FaulknÂer. AccordÂing to Joseph BlotÂner in his biogÂraÂphy FaulknÂer, the famous writer put aside his usuÂal canÂtanÂkerÂousÂness when the filmÂmakÂers arrived in Oxford:
To the pleaÂsure of direcÂtor Howard T. MagÂwood and his ten-man crew, FaulknÂer showed himÂself to be a conÂsidÂerÂate host and an interÂestÂed actor. He even offered Mullen some advice on readÂing his lines. He was at ease when he appeared with Mac Reed, but in a scene with Phil Stone he seemed stiff and disÂtant.
The uneasiÂness between FaulknÂer and Stone may have had someÂthing to do with Stone’s feelÂing (as Mullen reportÂedÂly said latÂer) that FaulknÂer had come down with a bad case of “Nobelitis in the Head.” ActuÂalÂly the entire film is stiff and unreÂalÂisÂtic. It’s a bit of a shock to see FaulknÂer, a masÂter of the narÂraÂtive form, going through the motions as a bad actor in a horÂriÂbly writÂten stoÂry about his own life. But any litÂerÂary fan should be fasÂciÂnatÂed by this rare glimpse of the masÂter at home on his own litÂtle postage stamp of native soil.
via BibÂliokÂlept
RelatÂed conÂtent:
DrinkÂing with William FaulknÂer
SevÂen Tips From William FaulknÂer on How to Write FicÂtion
William FaulknÂer Explains Why WritÂing is Best Left to Scoundrels
