ImagÂine your favorite works for the piano—the delÂiÂcate and hauntÂing, the thunÂderÂing and powÂerÂful. The minÂiÂmalÂism of Erik Satie, the RomanÂtiÂcism of Claude Debussy or ModÂest MusÂsorgsky, the rapÂturÂous swoonÂing of Beethoven’s conÂcerÂtos. Maybe it’s JerÂry Lee Lewis or LitÂtle Richard; TheloÂnious Monk or Duke EllingÂton. Tom Waits, Tori Amos, Rufus WainÂwright, Prince… you get the idea.
Now imagÂine all of it nevÂer existÂing. A giant hole opens up in world culÂture. CatÂaÂstrophÂic! Or maybe, I supÂpose, we’d nevÂer know the difÂferÂence. But I’m cerÂtain we’d be worse off for it, someÂhow. The piano seems inevitable when we look back into music hisÂtoÂry. Its immeÂdiÂate preÂdeÂcesÂsors, the claviÂchord and harpÂsiÂchord, so resemÂble the modÂern piano that they must have evolved in just such a way, we think. But it needn’t have been so.
The harpÂsiÂchord, writes GeorÂgia State University’s HyperÂphysics, “has a shape simÂiÂlar to a grand piano,” but its operÂaÂtion preÂvents one critÂiÂcal musiÂcal propÂerÂty: dynamics—“the playÂer has no conÂtrol over the loudÂness and qualÂiÂty of the tone.” On the whole, every innoÂvaÂtion of the harpsichord’s design aimed to solve this probÂlem. Over the instrument’s 400-year hisÂtoÂry, none of them did so as eleÂgantÂly as the piano, inventÂed around 1700 by BarÂtolomeo CristoÂfori. In the video above, you can hear a slightÂly latÂer verÂsion of his instruÂment from 1720 played by pianist DongÂsok Shin—an excerpt from one of the first pieces of music ever writÂten for the instruÂment.
CristoÂfori called his design the graveÂcemÂbaÂlo col piano et forte, “keyÂboard instruÂment with soft and loud” sounds. This soon shortÂened to simÂply pianoforte. It’s interÂestÂing that the word for “soft” evenÂtuÂalÂly became its sole name. For all its grandeur and thunÂderÂous capaÂbilÂiÂty, it’s the piano’s softÂness that so often capÂtures our attention—the abilÂiÂty of this lumÂberÂing beast of an instruÂment to pull its punchÂes and move with quiÂet grace. As you’ll probÂaÂbly note in Shin’s demonÂstraÂtion, the earÂliÂest pianos still retained a bit of the harpsichord’s twang, but we can also clearÂly disÂcern the woody thumps, rumÂbles, and tinÂkling highs of modÂern pianos. (ComÂpare it to this, for examÂple.)
True to its name, the “quiÂet nature of the piano’s birth around 1700,” writes the MetÂroÂpolÂiÂtan MuseÂum of Art, “comes as someÂthing of a surÂprise.” It was inventÂed “almost entireÂly by one man,” CristoÂfori, whose experÂtise had made him stewÂard of FloÂrenÂtine Prince FerÂdiÂnanÂdo d’Medici’s entire colÂlecÂtion of harpÂsiÂchords and othÂer musiÂcal instruÂments. The first menÂtion comes from a 1700 Medici invenÂtoÂry describÂing a harpÂsiÂchord-like instruÂment “newÂly inventÂed by BarÂtolomeo CristoÂfori with hamÂmers and dampers, two keyÂboards, and a range of four octaves, C‑c.” The first pianos had 54 keys rather than 88, and used “small woodÂen hamÂmers covÂered with deerÂskin.”
OthÂer makÂers tried difÂferÂent mechÂaÂnisms, but “CristoÂfori was an artÂful invenÂtor,” the Met remarks, “creÂatÂing such a sophisÂtiÂcatÂed action for his pianos that, at the instrument’s incepÂtion, he solved many of the techÂniÂcal probÂlems that conÂtinÂued to puzÂzle othÂer piano designÂers for the next sevÂenÂty-five years of its evoÂluÂtion.” These designÂers made shortÂcuts, since Cristofori’s “action was highÂly comÂplex and thus expenÂsive.” But nothÂing matched his design, and those feaÂtures were “gradÂuÂalÂly reinÂventÂed and reinÂcorÂpoÂratÂed in latÂer decades.”
Cristofori’s ingeÂnious innoÂvaÂtions includÂed an “escapeÂment” mechÂaÂnism that enabled the hamÂmer to fall away from the string instantÂly after strikÂing it, so as not to dampÂen the string, and allowÂing the string to be struck hardÂer than on a claviÂchord; a “check” that kept the fast-movÂing hamÂmer from bouncÂing back to re-hit the string; a dampÂenÂing mechÂaÂnism on a jack to silence the string when not in use; isoÂlatÂing the soundÂboard from the tenÂsion-bearÂing parts of the case, so that it could vibrate more freely; and employÂing thickÂer strings at highÂer tenÂsions than on a harpÂsiÂchord.
The piano Shin plays above is the oldÂest surÂvivÂing instruÂment of Cristofori’s design, and it resides at the MetÂroÂpolÂiÂtan MuseÂum of Art. Only “two othÂer CristoÂfori pianos surÂvive today,” notes CMuse, “in Rome and anothÂer at Leipzi UniÂverÂsiÂty.” This instruÂment might have repÂreÂsentÂed an eleÂgant dead end in musiÂcal evoÂluÂtion. Though Baroque comÂposers at the time, includÂing Johann SebasÂtÂian Bach, “were aware of it,” most, like Bach, harÂbored doubts. “It was only with the comÂpoÂsiÂtions of Haydn and Mozart” decades latÂer “that the piano found a firm place in music.” A place so firm, it’s nearÂly imposÂsiÂble to imagÂine the last 250 years of music withÂout it.
RelatÂed ConÂtent:
MusiÂcian Plays the Last StradiÂvarÂius GuiÂtar in the World, the “Sabionari” Made in 1679
Why VioÂlins Have F‑Holes: The SciÂence & HisÂtoÂry of a RemarkÂable RenaisÂsance Design
MusiÂcians Play Bach on the OctoÂbass, the GarÂganÂtuÂan String InstruÂment InventÂed in 1850
Josh Jones is a writer and musiÂcian based in Durham, NC. FolÂlow him at @jdmagness

