In the eighteenth century, the readers of Europe went mad for epistolary novels. France had, to name the most sensational examples, Montesquieu’s Lettres persanes, Rousseau’s Julie, and Laclos’ Les Liaisons dangereuses; Germany, Goethe’s Die Leiden des jungen Werther and Hölderlin’s Hyperion. The English proved especially insatiable when it came to long-form stories composed entirely out of letters: soon after its publication in 1740, Samuel Richardson’s Pamela — by some reckonings, the first real English novel — grew into an all-encompassing cultural phenomenon, which Richardson himself outdid eight years later with Clarissa. Alas, when the BBC surveyed the public two and three-quarter centuries later to determine the most beloved novel in the U.K., neither of those books even made the top 100.
With the possible exceptions of Bram Stoker’s Dracula (#104) and Mary Shelley’s Frankenstein (#171) — two works of nineteenth-century horror that make use of a variety of textual forms, letters included — the rankings produced by “The Big Read” included practically no epistolary novels. (Nor did eighteenth-century works of any other kind make the cut.) What happened to the literary genre that had once caused such a national craze? For one thing, Jane Austen happened: novels like Pride and Prejudice, Emma, and Persuasion revealed just how rich a story could become when its narration breaks away from the pen of any character in particular, gaining the ability to know more about them than they know about themselves. Not for nothing did all three of those books perform well on The Big Read the better part of 200 years after they came out; Pride and Prejudice even came in at number two.
The top spot was taken by J. R. R. Tolkien’s Lord of the Rings trilogy: an understandable outcome, given not just its ambition but also its massive and enduring popularity and influence. Still, one does wonder if Peter Jackson’s blockbuster film adaptations, released in the years leading up to the poll, might have had something to do with it. Similar suspicions adhere to the likes of Captain Corelli’s Mandolin (#19), American Psycho (#185), The Beach (#103), and Bridget Jones’s Diary (#75), all of which provided the basis for major motion pictures around the turn of the millennium. Umberto Eco’s The Name of the Rose, one of a scattering of translated novels to make the list, also got the Hollywood treatment, but it’s worth remembering that the book itself sold so well that its English translator could use his royalties to build an addition to his Tuscan villa called the “Eco Chamber.”
Apart from Austen, the other novelists with multiple books on The Big Read’s top 100 include Stephen King, who also has three; Thomas Hardy, with four; and Charles Dickens, with seven. Those are, in any case, some of the novelists for adults. The abiding British appreciation for children’s literature shows in the high rankings of Roald Dahl, who secured a great many votes with even lesser works like The Twits and Danny, the Champion of the World; J. K. Rowling, who would have benefited from the height of Harry Potter mania in any case; and the prolific Dame Jacqueline Wilson, whose fourteen novels on the list place her second only to Sir Terry Pratchett’s fifteen. It could be that his comic-fantasy sensibility, saturated with both the outlandish and the mundane, resonated uniquely with the British psyche. Or, as Pratchett himself says in the BBC’s Big Read television broadcast, “it could just be that I’m quite popular.”
In total, more than 750,000 readers participated in the Big Read poll. Find readers’ top 100 books below:
Related content:
800 Free eBooks for iPad, Kindle & Other Devices
The 10 Greatest Books Ever, According to 125 Top Authors (Download Them for Free)
The 100 Best Novels: A Literary Critic Creates a List in 1898
Based in Seoul, Colin Marshall writes and broadcasts on cities, language, and culture. His projects include the Substack newsletter Books on Cities and the book The Stateless City: a Walk through 21st-Century Los Angeles. Follow him on the social network formerly known as Twitter at @colinmarshall.
Any list of “the best books” that doesn’t include Hemingway’s ” The Old Man and The Sea” is incomplete in my opinion!
The readers sure are contemporary; that’s the only thing that can explain inclusion of so many Lord of the Rings & Harry Potter books!
Any list of “the best books” is incomplete without the mention of Hemingway’s “The Old Man and the Sea” IMHO!
The readers sure are contemporary that’s the only thing that can explain the inclusion of so many Lord of the Rings & Harry Potter books in such a prestigious list!
Other notable absentees are The Little Prince, The Astonishing Colour of After, The Fault in Our Stars, and Sinclair Lewis’s It cant happen here.
Hard to take seriously a list that includes all of the Harry Potter novels but leaves out any Mark Twain. That’s just one complaint among several. Not much good to say about these readers’ taste!
No love for Tom Jones in the UK? Seriously?
A list that does not include James Clavell’s Shogun cannot be taken seriously as well. Then again, I guess we are not talking about serious books that required extensive and detailed research to let us into the early 17th century world of medieval Japan, but rather “beloved” books such as Winnie the Pooh.
Any comment on a ‘Top 100’ article that whinges about their favorite book being left off the list can’t be taken seriously.
Relax. This is unofficial, and your favorite book is still available to be read.
Wow, the Harry Potter book is in 5th place, seriously? It’s before To Kill a Mocking Bird? Plus zero Wheel of Time books by the late Robert Jordan? He wrote rings around J.K. Rowling. Terry Pratchett wishes he could write as well as Jorden could. This is one strange list.
I was sorry, but not surprised, that Sigrid Undsett’s Kristin Lavransdatter trilogy (winner of 1928 Nobel Prize for Lit. but hardly anyone seems to have heard of it) didn’t make the list–but it remains at the top of mine.
Glad to see Jane Austen get her due. So sad that it didn’t happen in her lifetime.