Watch the Coen Brothers’ TV Commercials: Swiss Cigarettes, Gap Jeans, Taxes & Clean Coal

Rais­ing Ari­zona; The Big Lebows­ki; O Broth­er, Where Art Thou? — Joel and Ethan Coen have made more than a few movies not just wide­ly beloved, but also wide­ly thought of as eccen­tric. One thus would­n’t imag­ine their sen­si­bil­i­ty trans­lat­ing well to adver­tis­ing, that means of occa­sion­al sup­port for many an uncom­pro­mis­ing auteur. But just as the Coen broth­ers have brought Hol­ly­wood at least par­tial­ly over to their way of cre­at­ing, they’ve also, on sev­er­al occa­sions, bent the form of the com­mer­cial to their advan­tage.

Take the Coen broth­ers’ Parisi­enne cig­a­rette com­mer­cial at the top, pre­vi­ous­ly fea­tured here on Open Cul­ture (along­side David LynchEmir Kus­turi­caRoman Polan­s­ki and, Jean-Luc Godard’s work for the same appar­ent­ly auteur-lov­ing brand). But if they felt guilty about thus encour­ag­ing the befoul­ing of the air, they sure­ly cleared their own con­sciences with the satir­i­cal spot about “clean coal” just above. And in the slight­ly more straight­for­ward Gap ad below, they used the main­stream-yet-alter­na­tive icons Christi­na Ric­ci and Den­nis Hop­per:

And even if you keep up with the Coen broth­ers’ short film work, you may nev­er have seen the spot below, which orig­i­nal­ly aired dur­ing the 2002 Super Bowl. Work­ing for H&R Block, they use per­haps the least promis­ing set­ting imag­in­able, a slow-mov­ing tax law lec­ture, to cre­ate a dystopi­an vision not a mil­lion miles from the one Rid­ley Scott used to intro­duce the Apple Mac­in­tosh eigh­teen Super Bowls before.

Relat­ed Con­tent:

Cig­a­rette Com­mer­cials from David Lynch, the Coen Broth­ers and Jean Luc Godard

Tui­leries: A Short, Slight­ly Twist­ed Film by Joel and Ethan Coen

World Cin­e­ma: Joel and Ethan Coen’s Play­ful Homage to Cin­e­ma His­to­ry

Col­in Mar­shall hosts and pro­duces Note­book on Cities and Cul­ture as well as the video series The City in Cin­e­ma and writes essays on cities, lan­guage, Asia, and men’s style. He’s at work on a book about Los Ange­les, A Los Ange­les Primer. Fol­low him on Twit­ter at @colinmarshall or on Face­book.

An Ambitious List of 1400 Films Made by Female Filmmakers

It’s a tru­ism to say that Hol­ly­wood is a boy’s club but Dr. Sta­cy L. Smith of the Uni­ver­si­ty of South­ern Cal­i­for­nia put this say­ing into stark, empir­i­cal terms: a mere 4.4% of the top 100 box-office releas­es in the USA were direct­ed by women. That’s it. It’s a per­cent­age that should be used to describe the amount of cream in whole milk, not half the human race.

The truth is that the film indus­try in gen­er­al, not just Hol­ly­wood, is dom­i­nat­ed by men. In books on cin­e­ma and class­es on film his­to­ry, female direc­tors fre­quent­ly get over­looked.

Over at MUBI, some­one apt­ly named Ally the List­mak­er has tak­en great pains to counter that. She has com­piled an exhaus­tive col­lec­tion of movies by women. The list runs the gamut from pop­corn fare like Amy Heckerling’s Clue­less (1995), to for­eign art house films like Chan­tal Akerman’s The Cap­tive (2000), to chal­leng­ing exper­i­men­tal movies (any­thing by Peg­gy Ahwesh).

Ally’s list con­tains over 1400 movie titles, most­ly films made with­in the past 20 years. Yet with­in this list are oth­ers lists – “Films Direct­ed by Dan­ish Women,” “Actress­es Who Have Tried Their Hand at Direct­ing” – reveal­ing a mind-bog­gling range and diver­si­ty of movies. Here are a few favorites:

  • The Glean­ers & I (2000) – Agnes Var­da
    A fas­ci­nat­ing med­i­ta­tion on art, aging and for­ag­ing off left­overs of oth­ers. Var­da turns the act of hunt­ing for pota­toes into a polit­i­cal act. You can watch the first four min­utes of the film above.
  • The Apple (1998) – Sami­ra Makhmal­baf
    The daugh­ter of Mohsen Makhmal­baf, one of the true trail­blaz­ers of the Iran­ian new wave, Sami­ra proved to be a cin­e­mat­ic tal­ent in her own right with this movie that blurs the line between doc­u­men­tary and nar­ra­tive.
  • Wendy and Lucy (2008) – Kel­ly Reichardt
    A woman at the mar­gins of soci­ety whose life utter­ly comes apart after her car breaks down. Riechardt’s direc­tion is slow, qui­et and ulti­mate­ly dev­as­tat­ing.
  • The Pervert’s Guide to Cin­e­ma (2006) – Sophie Fiennes
    Slavoj Zizek, the reign­ing rock star/comedian of the cul­tur­al the­o­ry world, riffs on some of the great­est films ever made.
  • Amer­i­can Psy­cho (2000) – Mary Har­ron
    Per­haps the best por­trait out there on the mind­set of the 1%. You’ll nev­er lis­ten to Huey Lewis and the News in the same way.

Check out the full list here. And if you’re inter­est­ed in more, take a look at this sub­list – Female Direc­tors Present on the Jonathan Rosen­baum 1000 Essen­tials List.

Relat­ed Con­tent:

Watch The Hitch-Hik­er by Ida Lupino (the Only Female Direc­tor of a 1950s Noir Film)

Alice Guy-Blaché: The First Female Direc­tor & the Cin­e­mat­ic Trail­blaz­er You Like­ly Nev­er Heard Of

4,000+ Free Movies Online: Great Clas­sics, Indies, Noir, West­erns, Doc­u­men­taries & More

Jonathan Crow is a Los Ange­les-based writer and film­mak­er whose work has appeared in Yahoo!, The Hol­ly­wood Reporter, and oth­er pub­li­ca­tions. You can fol­low him at @jonccrow. And check out his blog Veep­to­pus, fea­tur­ing lots of pic­tures of bad­gers and even more pic­tures of vice pres­i­dents with octo­pus­es on their heads.  The Veep­to­pus store is here.

What Films Should Get Into The Criterion Collection? Video Series “Three Reasons” Makes the Case

Most film fans I know have played this game: which movie, if you called the shots over there, would you bring into the Cri­te­ri­on Col­lec­tion? While the fun con­ver­sa­tions that result nec­es­sar­i­ly elide all the dif­fi­cul­ties — acquir­ing the rights, find­ing restor­able mate­ri­als, design, dis­tri­b­u­tion — of actu­al­ly get­ting a film onto Cri­te­ri­on’s ros­ter of high-qual­i­ty, fea­ture-inten­sive home video releas­es, they do illu­mi­nate one’s own cin­e­mat­ic val­ues, even if only with idle talk.

Japan-based film­mak­er, artist, design­er, and gal­lerist Robert Nishimu­ra plays the game too, but he does­n’t do it idly. On his blog, he fea­tures the high­ly con­vinc­ing DVD cas­es he’s designed for such dream Cri­te­ri­on releas­es as Kim Ki-young’s The House­maid, Akio Jissoji’s Life of a Court Lady, and Wern­er Her­zog’s Fitz­car­ral­do. He also has a Vimeo chan­nel called For Cri­te­ri­on Con­sid­er­a­tion, where he goes so far as to craft new “trail­ers” of the films he’d like to see in the Col­lec­tion, each offer­ing three rea­sons why they qual­i­fy. His pitch for Bar­ry Son­nen­feld’s 1997 Men in Black cites its sta­tus as a “galac­ti­cal­ly fun­ny block­buster,” visu­als enhanced by “Rick Bak­er’s spe­cial FX,” and a script even more enhanced with “Ed Solomon’s one-lin­ers.”

Evi­dent­ly a lover of less­er-seen Japan­ese pic­tures and the idio­syn­crat­ic qua­si-Hol­ly­wood releas­es of the 1970s (but then again, aren’t all cinephiles?), he’s also made videos argu­ing for films like Hiroshi Teshi­ga­hara’s Kobo Abe nov­el adap­ta­tion The Man With­out a Map (the log­i­cal fol­low-up to Cri­te­ri­on­s’s real box set of Teshi­ga­hara-Abe col­lab­o­ra­tions) and Michael Cimi­no’s faint­ly homo­erot­ic heist pic­ture Thun­der­bolt and Light­foot. And all the way on the oth­er end of the spec­trum from Men in Black, he advo­cates for the likes of Per­fumed Night­mare, Kid­lat Tahimik’s “play­ful cri­tique of Amer­i­can cul­tur­al dom­i­nance,” “exer­cise in mag­i­cal real­ism,” “semi-auto­bi­o­graph­i­cal explo­ration of inno­cence,” and cor­ner­stone of inde­pen­dent Philip­pine cin­e­ma.

Nishimu­ra’s out­put of videos and cov­er designs seems to have slowed in recent years, and I hope for one expla­na­tion and one expla­na­tion only: that he’s spent the time nego­ti­at­ing a healthy salary from peo­ple at Cri­te­ri­on eager to hire him.

Relat­ed Con­tent:

Slavoj Žižek Names His Favorite Films from The Cri­te­ri­on Col­lec­tion

Steve Buscemi’s Top 10 Film Picks (from The Cri­te­ri­on Col­lec­tion)

120 Artists Pick Their Top 10 Films in the Cri­te­ri­on Col­lec­tion

The Art of Restor­ing Clas­sic Films: Cri­te­ri­on Shows You How It Refreshed Two Hitch­cock Movies

Col­in Mar­shall hosts and pro­duces Note­book on Cities and Cul­ture as well as the video series The City in Cin­e­ma and writes essays on cities, lan­guage, Asia, and men’s style. He’s at work on a book about Los Ange­les, A Los Ange­les Primer. Fol­low him on Twit­ter at @colinmarshall or on Face­book.

Rare Interview: Tim Curry Discusses The Rocky Horror Picture Show, During the Week of Its Release (1975)

A defin­ing role can be both bless­ing and curse. In August of 1975, the week the The Rocky Hor­ror Pic­ture Show opened, its 29-year-old star, Tim Cur­ry gave an inter­view to STOIC, the Stu­dent Tele­vi­sion Of Impe­r­i­al Col­lege.

In between clips of Curry’s Frank-n-Furter sashay­ing through such des­tined-to-become cult favorites as “Sweet Trans­ves­tite” and “The Time Warp,” in fish­nets, mer­ry wid­ow, and maquil­lage designed by David Bowie’s per­son­al make­up artist, the actor enter­tained questions…in lus­cious black and white!

Kudos to the young inter­view­er, Mark Cald­well, for nev­er inter­rupt­ing or try­ing to elbow his way into the spot­light with jokey asides or dou­ble enten­dres. The reward is a seri­ous con­sid­er­a­tion of the film­mak­ing process and the actor’s craft.

(Bear in mind that it would be at least a year until mid­night audi­ences at New York’s Waver­ly The­ater start­ed throw­ing toast, rice, and toi­let paper at the screen, thus ini­ti­at­ing an entire script’s worth of audi­ence par­tic­i­pa­tion.)

Hav­ing orig­i­nat­ed the role on the Lon­don stage (he audi­tioned with Lit­tle Richard’s “Tut­ti Frut­ti”) and reprised it in L.A., Cur­ry was clear­ly ready to put some space between him­self and his icon­ic cre­ation, announcing—correctly, as it turns out—that any sequels would have to pro­ceed with­out him.

Then he clammed up for three decades, refus­ing to dis­cuss his most icon­ic role until 2005, when he broke the silence dur­ing an inter­view on NPR’s Fresh Air .

It’s clear that Cur­ry saw the mak­ing of the film as a seri­ous busi­ness, but Rocky Hor­ror fans will find plen­ty of juicy morsels to feed their obses­sion. Even vir­gins will enjoy the sto­ry of Frank’s evolv­ing accent —from mid­dle Euro­pean to “Bel­gravia Host­ess with the Mostest.”

Ayun Hal­l­i­day is an author, illus­tra­tor, and Chief Pri­ma­tol­o­gist of the East Vil­lage Inky zine. Fol­low her @AyunHalliday

The Shining and Other Complex Stanley Kubrick Films Recut as Simple Hollywood Movies

Nev­er has the work of so pop­u­lar a film­mak­er felt so dis­tant from the main­stream than in the case of Stan­ley Kubrick. Just think­ing of the man who direct­ed movies like 2001: A Space OdysseyThe Shin­ing, Full Met­al Jack­et, and Eyes Wide Shut in the same cul­tur­al con­text as a rom-coms and explo­sion-inten­sive block­busters gets one chuck­ling. But Robert Ryang took it to the next lev­el when he cut togeth­er the trail­er above, which con­verts The Shin­ing, one of the most haunt­ing psy­cho­log­i­cal hor­ror pic­tures ever made, into Shin­ing, a gar­den-vari­ety feel-good dram­e­dy.

Ryang, then a young edi­tor, pulled off this aston­ish­ing con­ver­sion as his win­ning sub­mis­sion for an Asso­ci­a­tion of Inde­pen­dent Cre­ative Edi­tors con­test, which asked for new trail­ers for exist­ing films that put them into dif­fer­ent gen­res. The Shin­ing trail­er’s suc­cess has spawned many imi­ta­tors, includ­ing quite a few based on Kubrick­’s work alone. Just above, we have 2001 turned into an entire­ly dif­fer­ent kind of sci­ence-fic­tion movie — the kind that try to over­whelm us with their sheer inten­si­ty sum­mer after tir­ing sum­mer.

This trail­er pro­duces anoth­er light­heart­ed Kubrick, this time out of per­haps Kubrick­’s most dark-heart­ed piece, the unre­lent­ing Viet­nam pic­ture Full Met­al Jack­et. Here it plays a lot more like Stripes with­out the satir­i­cal edge. Below, Kubrick­’s fam­i­ly-unfriend­ly Christ­mas film Eyes Wide Shut becomes a fam­i­ly-friend­ly Christ­mas film. Ulti­mate­ly, though, it speaks to the qual­i­ty of the orig­i­nal movies that, try as they might to con­vert them into the bland­est of stan­dard Hol­ly­wood fare, these trail­ers still can’t ful­ly con­ceal the pres­ence of some­thing cin­e­mat­i­cal­ly intrigu­ing indeed. I know I’d still buy a tick­et.

Relat­ed Con­tent:

Lost Kubrick: A Short Doc­u­men­tary on Stan­ley Kubrick’s Unfin­ished Films

Napoleon: The Great­est Movie Stan­ley Kubrick Nev­er Made

Explore the Mas­sive Stan­ley Kubrick Exhib­it at the Los Ange­les Coun­ty Muse­um of Art

The Mak­ing of Stan­ley Kubrick’s A Clock­work Orange

Ter­ry Gilliam: The Dif­fer­ence Between Kubrick (Great Film­mak­er) and Spiel­berg (Less So)

Col­in Mar­shall hosts and pro­duces Note­book on Cities and Cul­ture as well as the video series The City in Cin­e­ma and writes essays on cities, lan­guage, Asia, and men’s style. He’s at work on a book about Los Ange­les, A Los Ange­les Primer. Fol­low him on Twit­ter at @colinmarshall or on Face­book.

Start Your Day with Werner Herzog Inspirational Posters

herzog inspiration 2

Wern­er Her­zog is the wild man of cin­e­ma. His movies are stark and ele­men­tal and ecsta­t­ic and are usu­al­ly about a crazed dream­er who strug­gles to achieve an impos­si­ble task in the face of a chaot­ic, indif­fer­ent uni­verse. Think Aguirre, Wrath of God, about a con­quis­ta­dor who goes crazy while adrift along an Ama­zon­ian riv­er. Think Stroszek, about a Ger­man grifter who goes men­tal in the for­bid­ding land­scape of Wis­con­sin while strug­gling to find the Amer­i­can dream. That film famous­ly, inex­plic­a­bly, ends with shots of a danc­ing chick­en.

herzog inspiration 1

The ecsta­t­ic truths seen in his movies are reflect­ed in the man him­self. At the age of 14, Her­zog struck out from his native Ger­many for Alba­nia and then Sudan. In 1972, he once walked from Munich to Paris to vis­it an ail­ing friend. In 1977, he shot footage at the lip of a vol­cano at the brink of erup­tion. He’s a film­mak­er who seems to go out of his way to choose loca­tions that are remote and dif­fi­cult — Antarc­ti­ca, the Sahara and the Ama­zon­ian rain for­est — and his shoots always seem to be bedev­iled by intrigue and cat­a­stro­phe. His first fea­ture was near­ly derailed because of a coup d’état. While shoot­ing Fata Mor­gana in Cameroon, he was mis­tak­en for a want­ed crim­i­nal and thrown in jail. Once dur­ing a TV inter­view in the hills of Los Ange­les, he was shot by a ran­dom crazy per­son. Watch it here.

“A BBC tele­vi­sion crew came to see me in Lau­rel Canyon,” as he recount­ed for The New York­er. “They want­ed to inter­view me for the British pre­mière of ‘Griz­zly Man.’ I didn’t want them to film right out­side my house, so we went up to Sky­line Dri­ve. In the mid­dle of the inter­view, I was shot with a rifle by some­one stand­ing on his bal­cony. I seem to attract the clin­i­cal­ly insane.”

herzog inspiration 3

Instead of stop­ping the inter­view, run­ning for pro­tec­tion and per­haps going to the hos­pi­tal, Her­zog just con­tin­ued with the inter­view say­ing sim­ply, “It was not a sig­nif­i­cant bul­let. I am not afraid.”

Herzog’s improb­a­ble pen­chant for dis­as­ter, his col­lab­o­ra­tion with the bril­liant, but bat­shit crazy, Klaus Kin­s­ki, and of course, his sin­gu­lar, uncom­pro­mis­ing work have turned him into almost a myth­ic fig­ure in some cir­cles. But it’s these mad, macho dec­la­ra­tions like those above that have real­ly fed the cult of Her­zog.

herzog inspiration 4

Recent­ly, some unknown genius turned some of Herzog’s more extreme quo­ta­tions into inspi­ra­tional posters. Lines like “Civ­i­liza­tion is like a thin lay­er of ice upon a deep ocean of chaos and dark­ness” are placed along side a shot of a glass of white wine and a sun­set.

So gaze upon them. Absorb the pearls of wis­dom. Find cold com­fort in their bleak, nihilist pro­nounce­ments. They make fine addi­tions to any cubi­cle.

See the full gallery here.

via Coudal

Relat­ed Con­tent:

Wern­er Her­zog Picks His 5 Top Films

Wern­er Her­zog Offers 24 Pieces of Film­mak­ing & Life Advice

Wern­er Her­zog Los­es a Bet to Errol Mor­ris, and Eats His Shoe (Lit­er­al­ly)

Jonathan Crow is a Los Ange­les-based writer and film­mak­er whose work has appeared in Yahoo!, The Hol­ly­wood Reporter, and oth­er pub­li­ca­tions. You can fol­low him at @jonccrow. And check out his blog Veep­to­pus, fea­tur­ing lots of pic­tures of bad­gers and even more pic­tures of vice pres­i­dents with octo­pus­es on their heads.  The Veep­to­pus store is here.

Cinematic Experiment: What Happens When The Bicycle Thief’s Director and Gone With the Wind’s Producer Edit the Same Film

When we get deep enough into our enthu­si­asm for film, cinephiles start spec­u­lat­ing in ways that might strike non-cinephiles as, well, unusu­al. The video essay­ist kogana­da, for exam­ple, states in the video above his desire to “build a time machine and trav­el to Italy cir­ca 1952” and “ask Vit­to­rio de Sica to make a film using Hol­ly­wood actors like Mont­gomery Clift and Jen­nifer Jones, and then team de Sica up with a Hol­ly­wood pro­duc­er, the kind that likes to impose his will and sen­si­bil­i­ty onto a film — some­one like David O. Selznick. In bring­ing these two worlds of cin­e­ma togeth­er, I’d hope for a clash in cin­e­ma so great that it would result in two cuts of the same film, one by de Sica and the oth­er by Selznick.”

This may sound like the spec­u­la­tion of a fan­boy, albeit a high­brow fan­boy, but you can hard­ly call it idle spec­u­la­tion. This video essay, as you can see, actu­al­ly man­ages to screen, side-by-side, scenes from what real­ly do look like two dif­fer­ent ver­sions of the same ear­ly-1950s film, one cut in the clas­sic Hol­ly­wood style, and one cut in the Ital­ian neo­re­al­ist style. This “exper­i­ment” in cin­e­ma illu­mi­nates the rhythms, emphases, and val­ues of both kinds of film­mak­ing, adding nuance to the con­cep­tion of one as clear-eyed, method­i­cal, and uncom­pro­mis­ing, and the oth­er as ide­al­ized, flam­boy­ant, and crowd-pleas­ing.

So has kog­o­na­da actu­al­ly built this time machine and com­mis­sioned two cuts of the same pic­ture from the direc­tor of Bicy­cle Thieves and the pro­duc­er of Gone with the Wind? Not quite, but film his­to­ry has pro­vid­ed him with the next best thing: 1954’s Ter­mi­nal Sta­tion and The Indis­cre­tion of an Amer­i­can Wife. De Sica “was one of the world’s most cel­e­brat­ed film­mak­ers when David O. Selznick com­mis­sioned Ter­mi­nal Sta­tion from him and his screen­writ­ing part­ner, Cesare Zavat­ti­ni,” writes crit­ic Dave Kehr in a Cri­te­ri­on Col­lec­tion essay. But the pro­duc­tion soon hit some seri­ous snags. Cri­te­ri­on goes on to add:

The trou­bled col­lab­o­ra­tion between direc­tor Vit­to­rio De Sica and pro­duc­er David O. Selznick result­ed in two cuts of the same film. De Sica’s ver­sion, Ter­mi­nal Sta­tion, was screened at a length of one-and-a-half hours, but after dis­ap­point­ing pre­views, Selznick severe­ly re-edit­ed it and changed the title to Indis­cre­tion of an Amer­i­can Wife with­out De Sica’s per­mis­sion.

Though Kehr finds de Sica’s take on the mate­r­i­al “immea­sur­ably supe­ri­or” to Selznick­’s, he adds that “both have quite dis­tinct emo­tion­al and dra­mat­ic qual­i­ties, and it is fas­ci­nat­ing to see how iden­ti­cal mate­r­i­al can be pushed and pulled, whol­ly through the post­pro­duc­tion process, in two rad­i­cal­ly dif­fer­ent direc­tions.” Even casu­al cinephiles stand to learn a lot from a back-to-back view­ing of Ter­mi­nal Sta­tion and The Indis­cre­tion of an Amer­i­can Wife, but only in this video essay’s five min­utes can we see them so care­ful­ly com­pared and con­trast­ed side-by-side. Briefly but dense­ly, it reveals to us the nature of both clas­sic Hol­ly­wood and Ital­ian neo­re­al­ism — no time trav­el required.

Relat­ed Con­tent:

The Eyes of Hitch­cock: A Mes­mer­iz­ing Video Essay on the Expres­sive Pow­er of Eyes in Hitchcock’s Films

The Per­fect Sym­me­try of Wes Anderson’s Movies

Crit­ics Pick the Top 100 Movies of All Time in the Pages of Cahiers du Ciné­ma

Sig­na­ture Shots from the Films of Stan­ley Kubrick: One-Point Per­spec­tive

Col­in Mar­shall hosts and pro­duces Note­book on Cities and Cul­ture as well as the video series The City in Cin­e­ma and writes essays on cities, lan­guage, Asia, and men’s style. He’s at work on a book about Los Ange­les, A Los Ange­les Primer. Fol­low him on Twit­ter at @colinmarshall or on Face­book.

Marlene Dietrich Plays the Musical Saw (aka the Singing Saw) to Entertain the Troops During WWII

It’s not my favorite Mar­lene Diet­rich gem on the inter­net. No, that would be her tem­pera­men­tal screen test for The Blue Angel  (1930). But it’s still a pre­cious find. Above, we have an audio clip fea­tur­ing Diet­rich, one of the tow­er­ing movie stars of ear­ly cin­e­ma, play­ing the musi­cal saw. Andrea James writes over at Boing­Bo­ing: “Diet­rich always want­ed to be a clas­si­cal musi­cian. Since her cabaret act and film career left lit­tle time for her to do the required prac­tice, she played the musi­cal saw instead. Through­out World War II she wowed USO audi­ences with the nov­el­ty.” And that’s what we get a taste of here. In oth­er clips avail­able on Youtube, you can find Diet­rich play­ing her “singing saw,” and again play­ing the musi­cal saw on the radio, cir­ca 1945.

via

Fol­low us on Face­book, Twit­ter and Google Plus and share intel­li­gent media with your friends. Or bet­ter yet, sign up for our dai­ly email and get a dai­ly dose of Open Cul­ture in your inbox.

Relat­ed Con­tent:

Ernest Hemingway’s “Love Let­ter” to His “Dear­est Kraut,” Mar­lene Diet­rich (1955)

Mar­lene Dietrich’s Tem­pera­men­tal Screen Test for The Blue Angel

101 Free Silent Films: The Great Clas­sics

by | Permalink | Make a Comment ( 2 ) |

« Go BackMore in this category... »
Quantcast