How James Cameron Shot Titanic’s Hugely Complex Sinking Scene

in Film, History | April 1st, 2026

The dark arts of “Hol­ly­wood account­ing” make it dif­fi­cult to deter­mine film bud­gets with pre­ci­sion. But accord­ing to rea­son­able reck­on­ings, James Cameron may have direct­ed not just one but sev­er­al of the most expen­sive movies of all time. The under­wa­ter sci-fi spec­ta­cle that was The Abyss neces­si­tat­ed one of the biggest pro­duc­tion bud­gets of the eight­ies, but it looked straight off Pover­ty Row when com­pared to Cameron’s next project just two years lat­er. Ter­mi­na­tor 2: Judg­ment Day was the first film to cost more than $100 mil­lion; True Lies, his next Arnold Schwarzeneg­ger vehi­cle, could have cost as much as $120 mil­lion. What chal­lenge remained for Cameron at that point? Why, re-cre­at­ing the most famous ship­wreck in his­to­ry.

Such an improb­a­ble-sound­ing ambi­tion did­n’t come out of nowhere. Fas­ci­nat­ed with the Titan­ic since child­hood, Cameron even­tu­al­ly found him­self able to make mul­ti­ple expe­di­tions of his own to its final rest­ing place in deep-sea sub­mersibles. He was­n’t just well placed to gath­er the infor­ma­tion nec­es­sary to bring it back to life on screen, but also to imple­ment and indeed devel­op the tech­niques to film it believ­ably, pow­er­ful­ly, and with a high degree of his­tor­i­cal accu­ra­cy.

It per­haps does Cameron a dis­ser­vice to refer to him only as a film­mak­er, since through­out his career he’s dis­played just as much the mind of an engi­neer, char­ac­ter­ized by the will­ing­ness to make his own tech­no­log­i­cal advance­ments in the ser­vice of bring­ing his vision to the screen. You can get some insight into that mind at work in the Stu­dio Binder video above on how he direct­ed the Titan­ic’s sink­ing scene.

Titan­ic cost $200 mil­lion, more than the ship her­self. In 1997, that was an eye-water­ing sum, but giv­en the movie’s even­tu­al take of $2.264 bil­lion, it seems mon­ey well spent. A non-triv­ial amount of those prof­its came from view­ers who bought a tick­et — again and again, in some cas­es — express­ly to see their favorite heart­throb. But Cameron must have known full well that most movie­go­ers turned up to see the ship go down; every­thing thus rode on that one hour of the film’s 195-minute run­time. Its unprece­dent­ed­ly com­plex shoot involved, among oth­er things, hun­dreds of stunt per­form­ers and extras, the lat­est in CGI tools, and a 775-foot-long repli­ca of the Titan­ic installed in a cus­tom-built sea­side set in Mex­i­co. The scene, as well as the film that con­tains it, holds up near­ly thir­ty years lat­er in part due to this com­bi­na­tion of dig­i­tal and ana­log effects, a fusion of almost exper­i­men­tal­ly cut­ting-edge dig­i­tal tech­nol­o­gy and old-fash­ioned, thor­ough­ly ana­log movie mag­ic — some­thing Cameron under­stands just as well as he does under­sea explo­ration.

Relat­ed con­tent:

The Fas­ci­nat­ing Engi­neer­ing of the Titan­ic: How the Great Ocean Lin­er Was Built

Watch 80 Min­utes of Nev­er-Released Footage Show­ing the Wreck­age of the Titan­ic (1986)

The First Full 3D Scan of the Titan­ic, Made of More Than 700,000 Images Cap­tur­ing the Wreck’s Every Detail

Titan­ic Sur­vivor Inter­views: What It Was Like to Flee the Sink­ing Lux­u­ry Lin­er

Watch the Titan­ic Sink in Real-Time

How the Titan­ic Sank: James Cameron’s New CGI Ani­ma­tion

Based in Seoul, Col­in Marshall writes and broad­casts on cities, lan­guage, and cul­ture. He’s the author of the newslet­ter Books on Cities as well as the books 한국 요약 금지 (No Sum­ma­riz­ing Korea) and Kore­an Newtro. Fol­low him on the social net­work for­mer­ly known as Twit­ter at @colinmarshall.

by | Permalink | Make a Comment ( None ) |

Watch Errol Morris’s Tune Out the Noise Free Online: A Documentary About the Financial Revolution That Transformed Investing

in Film, Finance | March 30th, 2026

You can’t beat the mar­ket. That, at least, is the advice we all encounter ear­ly on when first we try our hand at invest­ing. Home­spun though it may sound, the idea has aca­d­e­m­ic roots: the Effi­cient Mar­ket Hypoth­e­sis, as the econ­o­mists call it, holds that the prices in any finan­cial mar­ket already reflect all avail­able infor­ma­tion rel­e­vant to what’s being trad­ed with­in them. In the case of the stock mar­ket, for exam­ple, every­thing known — or indeed, know­able — about the future prospects of a par­tic­u­lar com­pa­ny is already incor­po­rat­ed into its stock price, or might as well be. If the EMH is true, then it must also be true that nobody can beat the mar­ket, no mat­ter how deep their expe­ri­ence or devel­oped their instinct for pick­ing stocks.

Nobel Lau­re­ate econ­o­mist Eugene Fama, who’s done more than any­one alive to refine the EFM and keep it in cir­cu­la­tion, appears as one of the inter­vie­wees in Tune Out the Noise, the Errol Mor­ris-direct­ed doc­u­men­tary above. So do a range of oth­er fig­ures, most­ly sep­tu­a­ge­nar­i­an and octo­ge­nar­i­an, whose great suc­cess in their fields owes to their hav­ing trust­ed the wis­dom of the mar­ket. All have been involved with the invest­ment firm Dimen­sion­al Fund Advi­sors, which, since its found­ing in the ear­ly nine­teen-eight­ies, has been one of the engines of change in its indus­try. In the first half of the twen­ti­eth cen­tu­ry, invest­ing had an almost mys­ti­cal qual­i­ty about it — a qual­i­ty swept away by the “data rev­o­lu­tion” of the sec­ond half.

That rev­o­lu­tion was pow­ered, of course, by com­put­ers. Most of Mor­ris’ inter­vie­wees first found them­selves placed in front of one of those hulk­ing, inscrutable machines at some point in their ter­tiary edu­ca­tion, more than like­ly at the Uni­ver­si­ty of Chica­go. They learned to work those ear­ly com­put­ers’ punch cards and whirring reels of tape even as elec­tron­ic com­put­ing itself first found its uses in civ­i­liza­tion. Sud­den­ly, though it demand­ed painstak­ing col­lec­tion and pro­gram­ming work, it had become pos­si­ble to exam­ine stock mar­ket data and deter­mine what pat­terns, if any, it con­tained, and whether any investor had con­sis­tent­ly out­per­formed the aver­age. The answers revealed would become the premise of not just “pas­sive” invest­ment firms like DFA, but also of the orig­i­nal cre­ation of index funds like the S&P 500.

All this may not sound like the usu­al ter­rain of Errol Mor­ris, whose pre­vi­ous doc­u­men­taries have pro­filed every­one from pet ceme­tery oper­a­tors to for­mer U.S. sec­re­taries of defense to Stephen Hawk­ing. His films aren’t with­out their con­fronta­tion­al moments, though giv­en that Tune Out the Noise was com­mis­sioned by DFA itself, it should­n’t come as a sur­prise that Mor­ris nev­er shifts into inter­ro­ga­tion mode (despite using his sig­na­ture Inter­ro­tron rig to shoot the inter­views). Despite claim­ing not to know any­thing about invest­ing or finan­cial mar­kets going in, he finds plen­ty of over­lap with inter­ests that have long run through his work: epis­te­mol­o­gy, for exam­ple, and the nature of sci­en­tif­ic rev­o­lu­tion. After all, most any field has some con­nec­tion to the inex­haustible sub­ject of how we know, what we know, and what we can’t know. “Peo­ple shrink from uncer­tain­ty, but it’s uncer­tain­ty that real­ly cre­ates oppor­tu­ni­ty,” DFA co-founder David Booth says to Mor­ris. “What would the world be like if there were no uncer­tain­ty? I mean, pret­ty dull.”

Relat­ed Con­tent:

Nobel Prize-Win­ning Psy­chol­o­gist Daniel Kah­ne­man (RIP) Explains the Key Ques­tion Every Investor Must Ask, and Why It’s a Fool’s Errand to Pick Stocks

Errol Mor­ris Makes His Ground­break­ing Series First Per­son Free to Watch Online: Binge Watch His Inter­views with Genius­es, Eccentrics, Obses­sives & Oth­er Unusu­al Types

Take a Free Course on the Finan­cial Mar­kets with Robert Shiller, Win­ner of the Nobel Prize in Eco­nom­ics

“They Were There” — Errol Mor­ris Final­ly Directs a Film for IBM

Under­stand­ing Finan­cial Mar­kets

Watch A Brief His­to­ry of Time, Errol Mor­ris’ Film About the Life & Work of Stephen Hawk­ing

Based in Seoul, Col­in Marshall writes and broad­casts on cities, lan­guage, and cul­ture. He’s the author of the newslet­ter Books on Cities as well as the books 한국 요약 금지 (No Sum­ma­riz­ing Korea) and Kore­an Newtro. Fol­low him on the social net­work for­mer­ly known as Twit­ter at @colinmarshall.

by | Permalink | Make a Comment ( 1 ) |

When Soviet Youth Bootlegged Western Rock Music on Discarded X‑Rays: Hear Original Audio Samples

in Film, History, Music | March 27th, 2026

A catchy trib­ute to mid-cen­tu­ry Sovi­et hip­sters popped up a few years back in a song called “Stilya­gi” by lo-fi L.A. hip­sters Puro Instinct. The lyrics tell of a charis­mat­ic dude who impress­es “all the girls in the neigh­bor­hood” with his “mag­ni­tiz­dat” and gui­tar. Wait, his what? His mag­ni­tiz­dat, man! Like samiz­dat, or under­ground press, mag­ni­tiz­dat—from the words for “tape recorder” and “publishing”—kept Sovi­et youth in the know with sur­rep­ti­tious record­ings of pop music. Stilya­gi (a post-war sub­cul­ture that copied its style from Hol­ly­wood movies and Amer­i­can jazz and rock and roll) made and dis­trib­uted con­tra­band music in the Sovi­et Union. But, as an NPR piece informs us, “before the avail­abil­i­ty of the tape recorder and dur­ing the 1950s, when vinyl was scarce, inge­nious Rus­sians began record­ing banned boot­leg jazz, boo­gie woo­gie and rock ‘n’ roll on exposed X‑ray film sal­vaged from hos­pi­tal waste bins and archives.” See one such X‑ray “record” above, and see here the fas­ci­nat­ing process dra­ma­tized in the first scene of a 2008 Russ­ian musi­cal titled, of course, Stilya­gi (trans­lat­ed into Eng­lish as “Hipsters”—the word lit­er­al­ly means “obsessed with fash­ion”).

These records were called roent­g­e­niz­dat (X‑ray press) or, says Sergei Khrushchev (son of Niki­ta), “bone music.” Author Anya von Bremzen describes them as “for­bid­den West­ern music cap­tured on the inte­ri­ors of Sovi­et cit­i­zens”: “They would cut the X‑ray into a crude cir­cle with man­i­cure scis­sors and use a cig­a­rette to burn a hole. You’d have Elvis on the lungs, Duke Elling­ton on Aunt Masha’s brain scan….” The ghoul­ish makeshift discs sure look cool enough, but what did they sound like? Well, as you can hear below in the Bea­t­les sam­ples, a bit like old Vic­tro­la phono­graph records played through tiny tran­sis­tor radios on a squonky AM fre­quen­cy.

Dressed in fash­ions copied from jazz and rock­a­bil­ly albums, stilya­gi learned to dance at under­ground night­clubs to these tin­ny ghosts of West­ern pop songs, and fought off the Komsomol—super-square Lenin­ist youth brigades—who broke up roent­g­e­niz­dat rings and tried to sup­press the influ­ence of bour­geois West­ern pop cul­ture. Accord­ing to Arte­my Troit­sky, author of Back in the USSR: The True Sto­ry of Rock in Rus­sia, these records were also called “ribs”: “The qual­i­ty was awful, but the price was low—a rou­ble or rou­ble and a half. Often these records held sur­pris­es for the buy­er. Let’s say, a few sec­onds of Amer­i­can rock ’n’ roll, then a mock­ing voice in Russ­ian ask­ing: ‘So, thought you’d take a lis­ten to the lat­est sounds, eh?, fol­lowed by a few choice epi­thets addressed to fans of styl­ish rhythms, then silence.”

See more images of bone music records over at Laugh­ing Squid and Wired co-founder Kevin Kel­ly’s blog Street Use, and above dig some his­tor­i­cal footage of stilya­gi jit­ter­bug­ging through what appears to be a kind of Sovi­et train­ing film about West­ern influ­ence on Sovi­et youth cul­ture, pro­duced no doubt dur­ing the Khrushchev thaw when, as Russ­ian writer Vladimir Voinovich tells NPR, things got “a lit­tle more lib­er­al than before.”

bonemusic2

Note: An ear­li­er ver­sion of this post appeared on our site in 2014.

Relat­ed Con­tent:

How to Spot a Com­mu­nist by Using Lit­er­ary Crit­i­cism: A 1955 Man­u­al from the U.S. Mil­i­tary

Louis Arm­strong Plays His­toric Cold War Con­certs in East Berlin & Budapest (1965)

Read the CIA’s Sim­ple Sab­o­tage Field Man­u­al: A Time­less Guide to Sub­vert­ing Any Orga­ni­za­tion with “Pur­pose­ful Stu­pid­i­ty” (1944)

Bertolt Brecht Tes­ti­fies Before the House Un-Amer­i­can Activ­i­ties Com­mit­tee (1947)

How the CIA Secret­ly Fund­ed Abstract Expres­sion­ism Dur­ing the Cold War

Josh Jones is a writer and musi­cian based in Durham, NC. 

by | Permalink | Make a Comment ( None ) |

See the Climactic Ending of Steven Spielberg’s Breakout Duel Recreated Entirely with 3D-Printed Models

in Film | March 25th, 2026

With his last pic­ture The Fabel­mans, Steven Spiel­berg told a sto­ry of his own. Giv­en his long-held stature as more or less the per­son­i­fi­ca­tion of big-screen Hol­ly­wood enter­tain­ment, there’s only one such sto­ry he could have told: that of how he became a film­mak­er. The most mem­o­rable of The Fabel­mans depicts the young direc­to­r­i­al sur­ro­gate alone in the base­ment of his fam­i­ly home, re-cre­at­ing the train crash scene from The Great­est Show on Earth with an eight-mil­lime­ter cam­era and a Lionel set. Today, on the brink of his ninth decade with his famous pro­duc­tiv­i­ty hard­ly slow­ing, Spiel­berg remains, on some lev­el, the wide-eyed boy smash­ing his toys togeth­er at just the right angle. What bet­ter way to pay him trib­ute than to repli­cate his cin­e­mat­ic achieve­ments in minia­ture?

The Fabel­mans ends with its pro­tag­o­nist a col­lege stu­dent, eager to drop out and go straight to Hol­ly­wood. At the same point in life, the real Spiel­berg was about to receive an offer from Uni­ver­sal Pic­tures to write and direct the short film that became Amblin’, which itself led to a con­tract to direct tele­vi­sion pro­duc­tions.

He showed what he could do with episodes of Mar­cus Wel­by, M.D., The Name of the Game, and Colum­bo, among oth­er series. Then he stepped up to TV movies, a form regard­ed as infe­ri­or in all respects to the­atri­cal releas­es, but one he man­aged to tran­scend on the first try. When it first aired in 1971 as an ABC Movie of the Week, Duel pre­sent­ed its view­ers with a har­row­ing, near-mytho­log­i­cal con­fronta­tion between a mid­dle-aged trav­el­ing sales­man in a Ply­mouth Valiant and an unseen truck­er in a hulk­ing, smoke-belch­ing big rig who seems bent on destroy­ing him.

Giv­en that its direc­tor was just 24 years old at the time, Duel very much counts as ear­ly Spiel­berg. Yet it’s also dis­tilled Spiel­berg, a head-on treat­ment of mid­dle-class nor­mal­i­ty’s sud­den encounter with a force of incom­pre­hen­si­ble men­ace — a theme much revis­it­ed in his work since — with cin­e­mat­ic rhythms pre­cise­ly cal­cu­lat­ed for opti­mal ten­sion and release. An aspir­ing film­mak­er could learn much from re-cre­at­ing its sequences shot-for-shot. The YouTube chan­nel Movies Minia­tures Effects does just that in the video above, which doc­u­ments a remak­ing with 3D-print­ed maque­ttes of the final crash, after Den­nis Weaver’s des­per­ate every­man man­ages to out­wit his pur­suer. “Sheer skill need­ed more phi­los­o­phy for a fit­ting res­o­lu­tion,” wrote David Thom­son of this end­ing. Per­haps so, but the more than 18 mil­lion views so far racked up by its minia­ture ver­sion do sug­gest a film that more than retains its pow­er after 45 years.

Relat­ed Con­tent:

Watch Steven Spielberg’s Rarely Seen 1968 Film Amblin’

Watch Steven Spielberg’s Debut: Two Films He Direct­ed as a Teenag­er

Shot-By-Shot Break­downs of Spielberg’s Film­mak­ing in Jaws, Scorsese’s in Cape Fear, and De Palma’s in The Untouch­ables

How Movies Cre­at­ed Their Spe­cial Effects Before CGI: Metrop­o­lis, 2001: A Space Odyssey & More

How Wes Ander­son Uses Minia­tures to Cre­ate His Aes­thet­ic: A Primer from His Mod­el Mak­er & Prop Painter

How Car Chase Scenes Have Evolved Over 100 Years

Based in Seoul, Col­in Marshall writes and broad­casts on cities, lan­guage, and cul­ture. He’s the author of the newslet­ter Books on Cities as well as the books 한국 요약 금지 (No Sum­ma­riz­ing Korea) and Kore­an Newtro. Fol­low him on the social net­work for­mer­ly known as Twit­ter at @colinmarshall.

by | Permalink | Make a Comment ( None ) |

How Quentin Tarantino’s One-Night “Detest Fest” Changed His Life & Set Him on the Path to Pulp Fiction

in Film, Life | March 20th, 2026

Just days ago, a game came out whose unlike­ly premise has already drawn a good deal of atten­tion. “Man­age your very own video store in the ear­ly 90s!” exclaims the descrip­tion of Retro Rewind. “Rent, sell, dec­o­rate and expand your busi­ness from the ground up and relive the gold­en ages of video rentals!” Those of us old enough to have relied on such estab­lish­ments for our ear­ly cin­e­mat­ic edu­ca­tion can all too eas­i­ly remem­ber how frus­trat­ing they could be, what with their phys­i­cal­ly lim­it­ed selec­tions, sel­dom-rewound tapes, and puni­tive late fees. Even so, younger gen­er­a­tions aren’t wrong to imag­ine that some were spe­cial places where it felt like a cinephile’s dreams could come true. Just ask Quentin Taran­ti­no.

The clip above comes from Joe Rogan’s inter­view with Taran­ti­no and Roger Avary, who worked togeth­er at Man­hat­tan Beach’s Video Archives before they co-wrote Pulp Fic­tion. “Work­ing at that store, I just got caught up in the lit­tle life there,” Taran­ti­no says. Yet he also remem­bers him­self think­ing, “Well, this isn’t my dream. This isn’t what I want­ed to do work­ing at a video store for years. I want­ed to actu­al­ly make movies. It’s not my dream, what I’m doing — but it’s dream-adja­cent!” It turned out that get­ting paid to watch movies all day long (to say noth­ing of becom­ing local­ly famous for sheer cinephil­ia) with­out putting in any seri­ous man­u­al labor “put my ambi­tions to sleep a lit­tle bit.”

Taran­ti­no explains that his awak­en­ing from this retail rever­ie began with wit­ness­ing the sud­den embit­ter­ment of fel­low clerks who passed the age of thir­ty doing the same “cool” jobs they always had. This set him on the path to under­go­ing a series of dark nights of the soul he called “Quentin detest fests,” dur­ing which he would make a no-excus­es account­ing of all the mis­takes he was active­ly or pas­sive­ly mak­ing. “I would spend all night lay­ing out every­thing I’m doing that’s wrong, and then I would spend the last two hours fig­ur­ing out how I could change it. And as opposed to just doing it and then going to get some sleep, and then you for­get about it and fall back into your rou­tine, I decid­ed to change my life.”

Attach­ment to his job was a big part of the prob­lem. “I’ve got to just move to Hol­ly­wood, I’ve got to get involved there, I’ve got to meet oth­er peo­ple that are in the busi­ness,” he real­ized. “I should­n’t be mak­ing mon­ey until I’m mak­ing mon­ey doing what I want to do.” Not long after relo­cat­ing from the South Bay to Kore­atown — still well south of Hol­ly­wood, but close enough — he start­ed mak­ing con­nec­tions in the low-bud­get hor­ror world. “Well, if these guys can do it, I can do it,” he came to believe, and with­in a year and a half he was mak­ing a liv­ing as a screen­writer. The video rental indus­try has long since col­lapsed, but Quentin Taran­ti­no is still going strong as a film­mak­er. If he takes a break from work­ing on what may be his last pic­ture to play Retro Rewind, we’d sure­ly all be inter­est­ed in hear­ing what mem­o­ries it brings back. Maybe he and Avary can dis­cuss it on their Video Archives Pod­cast.

Relat­ed Con­tent:

The Sto­ry of How Quentin Taran­ti­no Became a Film­mak­er and Cre­at­ed Pulp Fic­tion, as Told by Quentin Taran­ti­no

My Best Friend’s Birth­day, Quentin Tarantino’s 1987 Debut Film

Quentin Taran­ti­no Explains How to Write & Direct Movies

Quentin Taran­ti­no Gives a Tour of Video Archives, the Store Where He Worked Before Becom­ing a Film­mak­er

Quentin Taran­ti­no & Roger Avary Rewatch Cult-Clas­sic Movies on Their New Video Archives Pod­cast

What Is a Life-Chang­ing Real­iza­tion You Wish You’d Had Soon­er in Life?

Based in Seoul, Col­in Marshall writes and broad­casts on cities, lan­guage, and cul­ture. He’s the author of the newslet­ter Books on Cities as well as the books 한국 요약 금지 (No Sum­ma­riz­ing Korea) and Kore­an Newtro. Fol­low him on the social net­work for­mer­ly known as Twit­ter at @colinmarshall.

by | Permalink | Make a Comment ( 1 ) |

Jim Jarmusch Picks His Favorite Films from the The Criterion Collection

in Film | March 19th, 2026

Jim Jarmusch—the direc­tor of Stranger Than Par­adise, Down by Law, and Dead Man—recent­ly stepped into The Cri­te­ri­on Col­lec­tion clos­et to share the films that shaped his aes­thet­ic sen­si­bil­i­ty. In the next three min­utes, Jar­musch pays trib­ute to a box set of Pier Pao­lo Pasolini’s 1960s films, along with Andrei Tarkovsky’s Mir­ror, plac­ing it even above Stalk­er and Andrei Rublev. Along the way, he name checks a num­ber of oth­er clas­sics. And then, with a bag full of DVDs in hand, he con­cludes: “I love Cri­te­ri­on. I always say the Cri­te­ri­on Chan­nel is my drug of choice.” For any­one inter­est­ed, you can start watch­ing films on the Cri­te­ri­on Chan­nel’s stream­ing ser­vice by sign­ing up for a free tri­al here.

If you would like to sup­port the mis­sion of Open Cul­ture, con­sid­er mak­ing a dona­tion to our site. It’s hard to rely 100% on ads, and your con­tri­bu­tions will help us con­tin­ue pro­vid­ing the best free cul­tur­al and edu­ca­tion­al mate­ri­als to learn­ers every­where. You can con­tribute through Pay­Pal, Patre­on, and Ven­mo (@openculture). Thanks!

Relat­ed Con­tent 

Jim Jarmusch’s 10 Favorite Films: Ozu’s Tokyo Sto­ry, Kurosawa’s Sev­en Samu­rai and Oth­er Black & White Clas­sics

Watch Stalk­er, Andrei Tarkovsky’s Mind-Bend­ing Mas­ter­piece Free Online

How Jim Jar­musch Gets Cre­ative Ideas from William S. Bur­roughs’ Cut-Up Method and Bri­an Eno’s Oblique Strate­gies

Jim Jar­musch: The Art of the Music in His Films

Jim Jarmusch’s Anti-MTV Music Videos for Talk­ing Heads, Neil Young, Tom Waits & Big Audio Dyna­mite

by | Permalink | Make a Comment ( None ) |

Hear Paul McCartney’s Forgotten 1967 Movie Soundtrack, Arranged by George Martin

in Film, Music | March 17th, 2026

In 1967, a young Roger Ebert drew up a top-ten-films-of-the-year list includ­ing Bon­nie and Clyde, Blow-Up, The Grad­u­ate, A Man for All Sea­sons, and Cool Hand Luke. Lat­er, he added a few more pic­tures from this cin­e­mat­ic bumper crop that he remem­bered fond­ly, the first of which was The Fam­i­ly Way. Though sel­dom ref­er­enced today, it was a big hit in Britain — one of sev­er­al, in fact, for the twin-broth­er film­mak­ers John and Roy Boult­ing. Respon­si­ble for such nine­teen-fifties come­dies as Lucky Jim and I’m All Right Jack, the two attained in their home­land not only auteur sta­tus, but also the curi­ous posi­tion of estab­lish­ment satirists, val­i­dat­ing the insti­tu­tions of mid-cen­tu­ry Eng­lish life even as they ridiculed them.

Adapt­ed from a stage play by Alfie author Bill Naughton, The Fam­i­ly Way finds its mate­r­i­al in the tri­als of a pair of north­ern new­ly­weds who, hav­ing been fleeced by a crooked trav­el agent, end up hav­ing to spend their hon­ey­moon at home. What’s worse, giv­en their impe­cu­nious­ness, “home” meant a room in the house of the groom’s par­ents.

That 1967 was a dif­fer­ent time is also sig­naled by a scene in which the father-in-law bel­lows for his cham­ber pot, which his wife had hoped to keep hid­den from her new daugh­ter-in-law’s sen­si­tive eyes. In that role is the acclaimed per­former of Eng­lish every­man John Mills, appear­ing onscreen for the first time with his daugh­ter Hay­ley, who plays the bride. It marked her first real adult part, a kind of grad­u­a­tion from her child-actress career in pic­tures like The Par­ent Trap and That Darn Cat!

The pic­ture also boast­ed a score by Paul McCart­ney, or at any rate by Bea­t­les pro­duc­er George Mar­tin, who built upon what themes he could suc­cess­ful­ly impor­tune the seem­ing­ly writer’s-blocked Bea­t­le to bang out. Tak­ing into account that this was hap­pen­ing between Revolver and Sgt. Pep­per, it’s per­haps under­stand­able that McCart­ney would feel his cre­ative ener­gies drained by oth­er projects, but the Boult­ing broth­ers had offered a first, irre­sistible oppor­tu­ni­ty to com­pose offi­cial­ly out­side the Lennon-McCart­ney dyad. Though not with­out the charms of Mar­t­in’s orches­tral work (more of which would be heard in Yel­low Sub­ma­rine in 1969), The Fam­i­ly Way’s brief sound­track bears few obvi­ous marks of the McCart­ney musi­cal sen­si­bil­i­ty. Present on the Bea­t­les’ albums, of course, that sen­si­bil­i­ty has con­tin­ued to devel­op through­out a solo career that has out­lived the band by 56 years — and count­ing.

via Boing­Bo­ing

Relat­ed Con­tent:

How George Mar­tin Defined the Sound of the Bea­t­les: From String Quar­tets to Back­wards Gui­tar Solos

The Genius of Paul McCartney’s Bass Play­ing in 7 Iso­lat­ed Tracks

Paul McCart­ney Breaks Down His Most Famous Songs and Answers Most-Asked Fan Ques­tions in Two New Videos

Paul McCart­ney Explains How Bach Influ­enced “Black­bird”

Hear The Bea­t­les’ Abbey Road with Only Paul McCartney’s Bass: You Won’t Believe How Good It Sounds

A 17-Hour Chrono­log­i­cal Playlist of Bea­t­les Songs: 338 Tracks Let You Hear the Musi­cal Evo­lu­tion of the Icon­ic Band

Based in Seoul, Col­in Marshall writes and broad­casts on cities, lan­guage, and cul­ture. He’s the author of the newslet­ter Books on Cities as well as the books 한국 요약 금지 (No Sum­ma­riz­ing Korea) and Kore­an Newtro. Fol­low him on the social net­work for­mer­ly known as Twit­ter at @colinmarshall.

by | Permalink | Make a Comment ( None ) |

The First Robot Movie: Watch a Newly Discovered Georges Méliès Film from 1897

in Film, History | March 4th, 2026

Metrop­o­lis, For­bid­den Plan­et, 2001: A Space Odyssey, Star Wars, Blade Run­ner, The Ter­mi­na­tor, Short Cir­cuit, Robo­Cop, Ghost in the Shell, The Iron Giant, WALL‑E, Ex Machi­na: there is a par­al­lel his­to­ry of cin­e­ma to be told entire­ly through its robots. That such a his­to­ry must begin with the work of Georges Méliès may not come as a sur­prise, giv­en that he invent­ed so many of the tech­niques of sci­ence-fic­tion film­mak­ing. But until recent­ly, we did­n’t actu­al­ly know that the cin­e­ma pio­neer who “invent­ed every­thing” ever put a robot onscreen. The evi­dence turned up among a col­lec­tion of “old and bat­tered” reels of film that were “from before World War I and had been shut­tled around from base­ments to barns to garages and had just been dropped off at the Library.”

So writes the Library of Con­gress’ Neely Tuck­er, who goes on to describe the action of one of the films involv­ing “a magi­cian and a robot bat­tling it out in slap­stick fash­ion. It took a bit, but then the gasp of real­iza­tion: They were look­ing at ‘Gugusse and the Automa­ton,’ a long-lost film by the icon­ic French film­mak­er Georges Méliès at his Star Film com­pa­ny.”

Méliès him­self plays the magi­cian, who “winds up an automa­ton dressed like the famous clown Pier­rot, which is stand­ing on a pedestal. Once wound up, the clown begins to beat the magi­cian with his walk­ing stick. The magi­cian retal­i­ates by get­ting a huge sledge­ham­mer and bash­ing the automa­ton over the head, with each blow seem­ing to shrink it in half, until it is just a small doll.”

In just 45 sec­onds, this sim­ple film would have aston­ished audi­ences back in 1897 — and indeed retains the pow­er to impress, pro­vid­ed you con­sid­er that none of the tech­niques to real­ize its effects were wide­ly known before Méliès attempt­ed them. He did so five years before ‘A Trip to the Moon,’ a huge­ly ambi­tious cin­e­mat­ic endeav­or by com­par­i­son, and by far the sin­gle film that best rep­re­sents his lega­cy.’ Yet it and Gugusse and the Automa­ton are clear­ly the work of the same artist-inven­tor, one who pos­sessed that rare com­bi­na­tion of tech­ni­cal know-how and artis­tic dar­ing, and who under­stood the need for an organ­ic rela­tion­ship between spec­ta­cle and nar­ra­tive. Not that either the spec­ta­cle or the nar­ra­tive are high­ly evolved at this stage, but, as Méliès may have sus­pect­ed, the cin­e­ma of robots has as long an evo­lu­tion ahead of it as automa­ta them­selves.

Relat­ed con­tent:

Watch 194 Films by Georges Méliès, the Film­mak­er Who “Invent­ed Every­thing” (All in Chrono­log­i­cal Order)

How Georges Méliès A Trip to the Moon Became the First Sci-Fi Film & Changed Cin­e­ma For­ev­er (1902)

The Word “Robot” Orig­i­nat­ed in a Czech Play in 1921: Dis­cov­er Karel Čapek’s Sci-Fi Play R.U.R. (a.k.a. Rossum’s Uni­ver­sal Robots)

Fritz Lang First Depict­ed Arti­fi­cial Intel­li­gence on Film in Metrop­o­lis (1927), and It Fright­ened Peo­ple Even Then

Watch “The Birth of the Robot,” Len Lye’s Sur­re­al 1935 Stop-Motion Ani­ma­tion

Watch the Sci-Fi Short Film “I’m Not a Robot”: Win­ner of a 2025 Acad­e­my Award

Based in Seoul, Col­in Marshall writes and broad­casts on cities, lan­guage, and cul­ture. He’s the author of the newslet­ter Books on Cities as well as the books 한국 요약 금지 (No Sum­ma­riz­ing Korea) and Kore­an Newtro. Fol­low him on the social net­work for­mer­ly known as Twit­ter at @colinmarshall.

by | Permalink | Make a Comment ( 3 ) |

« Go Back — More in this category... »
Quantcast