Mitch Mitchell, the last surÂvivÂing memÂber of the Jimi HenÂdrix ExpeÂriÂence, died late last week. Here we have him soloÂing in conÂcert in SweÂden, 1969. More on his passÂing here.
Mitch Mitchell, the last surÂvivÂing memÂber of the Jimi HenÂdrix ExpeÂriÂence, died late last week. Here we have him soloÂing in conÂcert in SweÂden, 1969. More on his passÂing here.
British hisÂtoÂriÂan Niall FerÂguÂson has achieved the acaÂdÂeÂmÂic holy trinÂiÂty, holdÂing posiÂtions at HarÂvard, Oxford, and Stanford’s Hoover InstiÂtuÂtion. Only 44 years old, he has 9 books to his credÂit (includÂing a new one: The Ascent of MonÂey: A FinanÂcial HisÂtoÂry of the World), and you’ll often find him writÂing in the pubÂlic press. In the latÂest ediÂtion of VanÂiÂty Fair, FerÂguÂson takes a good look at the demise of the globÂal finanÂcial sysÂtem and locates the criÂsis “in the long run of finanÂcial hisÂtoÂry.” The stoÂry he tells is how the 20th cenÂtuÂry — and parÂticÂuÂlarÂly AmerÂiÂca’s urge to become a “propÂerÂty-ownÂing democÂraÂcy” — brought us into “The Age of LeverÂage,” which carÂried with it a “delÂuge of paper monÂey, asset-price inflaÂtion, [an] exploÂsion of conÂsumer and bank debt, and the hyperÂtrophic growth of derivÂaÂtives.” The LeverÂage Age is now over. But will its colÂlapse have ecoÂnomÂic and social effects as disÂasÂtrous as the Great DepresÂsion? Or will govÂernÂment action pull us back from the brink? DefÂiÂniteÂly give this piece a read, and thanks to “Hanoch” for makÂing us aware of it. As always, it’s great to get readÂer sugÂgesÂtions.
As a relatÂed aside, I should direct your attenÂtion to a new artiÂcle by Michael Lewis, who first wrote about Wall Street’s excessÂes in Liar’s PokÂer. It’s called “The End,” and it offers an inside account of how Wall Street sowed the seeds of its own destrucÂtion. It’s also apparÂentÂly the basis for a new book.
FinalÂly, you may want to check out a fasÂciÂnatÂing piece in the Wall Street JourÂnal called “MemÂoÂries of the 1930s Still Sear.” It feaÂtures interÂviews with the oldÂer genÂerÂaÂtion who endured the DepresÂsion, how they coped, and what lessons they learned.
SevÂerÂal years ago, I had lunch with the forÂmer head of a large investÂment bank who talked about how Wall Street had a built-in bullÂish bias, and anyÂone who goes against the grain, does so at their own perÂil. Below you’ll find a good examÂple of that. Here we have Peter Schiff, head of Euro PacifÂic CapÂiÂtal, soundÂing the alarms repeatÂedÂly on Fox “News” in 2006-07, makÂing preÂdicÂtions that turned out to be remarkÂably right, and watch the scorn that gets heaped on him. ImagÂine if the grown ups had bothÂered to mind the store durÂing the past decade, to see some of the obviÂous probÂlems mountÂing. We might all be breathÂing a bit more easÂiÂly today.
via The DaiÂly Dish
We have reached the final week of the presÂiÂdenÂtial elecÂtions course. This week, MarÂtin Lewis slices and dices the elecÂtoral results of the ’08 elecÂtion and highÂlights the big and potenÂtialÂly far-reachÂing shifts in US votÂing patÂterns. No doubt, this is one of the more detailed analyÂses that you’ll find on the web. You can watch the last lecÂture in highÂer resÂoÂluÂtion on iTuneÂsU here, or watch it below on YouTube. The comÂplete course will be perÂmaÂnentÂly housed in our colÂlecÂtion of Free Online CoursÂes under GeogÂraÂphy and PolitÂiÂcal SciÂence.
Yet furÂther proof that ants are endÂlessÂly fasÂciÂnatÂing, and, on a relatÂed note, see our earÂliÂer piece: CenÂtral IntelÂliÂgence: From Ants to the Web.
In case you were wonÂderÂing what kind of media we would be most hunÂgry for in hard times (big budÂget action movies? escapist sit-coms), don’t forÂget that this is recesÂsion 3.0. IntroÂducÂing The pupÂpy cam, with 22,000 viewÂers and countÂing. The shibu pupÂpies are adorable, worÂry-free, and of course, non-union. Click here and tell us are you not enterÂtained? (Thanks SA for the tip.)
TakÂen from a French teleÂviÂsion proÂgram, this vinÂtage clip feaÂtures Vladimir Nabokov (1899–1977) readÂing from LoliÂta and revealÂing his list of the most imporÂtant novÂels of the 20th cenÂtuÂry, among othÂer things. Nabokov speaks in EngÂlish here. So don’t let the iniÂtial French throw you off. We’ve added this gem to our YouTube playlist.
LoliÂta, light of my life, fire of my loins. My sin, my soul. Lo-lee-ta: the tip of the tongue takÂing a trip of three steps down the palate to tap, at three, on the teeth. Lo. Lee. Ta.
Thomas FriedÂman has a new book out, Hot, Flat, and CrowdÂed. And it gets into the whole quesÂtion of what a “green revÂoÂluÂtion” is realÂly all about. New books mean book tours, and here we have an outÂtake from a spirÂitÂed talk he recentÂly gave in NorthÂern CalÂiÂforÂnia. You can watch the full talk on Fora.tv here.
By the way, FriedÂman starts talkÂing at the outÂset about “ET,” and it hapÂpens to stand for “EnerÂgy TechÂnolÂoÂgy.”
What are some of the most annoyÂing phrasÂes in the EngÂlish lanÂguage? In a new forthÂcomÂing book, A Damp Squid: The EngÂlish LanÂguage Laid Bare, Oxford researchers list the comÂmon phrasÂes that we use incorÂrectÂly or just all too excesÂsiveÂly. Here’s the list (and if you have your own disÂliked expresÂsions, list them below in the comÂments).
1 — At the end of the day
2 — FairÂly unique
3 — I perÂsonÂalÂly
4 — At this moment in time
5 — With all due respect
6 — AbsoluteÂly
7 — It’s a nightÂmare
8 — ShouldÂn’t of
9 — 24/7
10 — It’s not rockÂet sciÂence
via The TeleÂgraph
One of my friends from way back, SheerÂly Avni, has just postÂed an interÂview with Joss WheÂdon, who has now domÂiÂnatÂed in four media catÂeÂgories: film (SerenÂiÂty), teleÂviÂsion (Buffy the VamÂpire SlayÂer), comics (RunÂaways, The AstonÂishÂing X‑Men) and finalÂly the interÂnet. (Dr. HorÂriÂble’s SinÂgaÂlong Blog). The interÂview was conÂductÂed for MothÂer Jones, so there’s a lot about polÂiÂtics, genÂder, the writÂers’ strike, and, yes, TV and film. It runs about 38 minÂutes. Have a lisÂten.
Here we have the odd couÂple. The agnosÂtic filmÂmakÂer and one of AmerÂiÂca’s most influÂenÂtial reliÂgious figÂures engaged in a liveÂly conÂverÂsaÂtion. It’s actuÂalÂly a rather genÂtleÂmanÂly exchange from the late 1960s, and it’s added to our video colÂlecÂtion of CulÂturÂal Icons. Part 1 appears below, and you can get Part 2 here.
You can find this video perÂmaÂnentÂly hostÂed in our colÂlecÂtion of 235 CulÂturÂal Icons.