The National Gallery Makes 25,000 Images of Artwork Freely Available Online

A14623.jpg

No surprise that in “Masterworks for One and All,” an article about how museums have begun to offer free, high-quality downloadable images of works from their collections, the New York Times’ Nina Siegal brings up Walter Benjamin. The preoccupations of the philosopher behind “The Work of Art in the Age of Mechanical Reproduction” may seem more relevant than ever in these days of not just mechanical reproduction, but universal, developed-world ownership of the means of mechanical reproduction — and nearly instantaneous, effortless mechanical reproduction at that. Many rights-holders, including certain museums, have effectively decided that if you can’t beat the mechanical reproducers, join ‘em. “With the Internet, it’s so difficult to control your copyright or use of images,” Siegal quotes the Rijksmuseum’s director of collections as saying. “We decided we’d rather people use a very good high-resolution image of [Vermeer's] ‘Milkmaid’ from the Rijksmuseum rather than using a very bad reproduction.” (See our previous post: The Rijksmuseum Puts 125,000 Dutch Masterpieces Online, and Lets You Remix Its Art.)

A17014.jpg

Siegal goes on to mention the efforts of Washington’s National Gallery of Art, which has so far made super high-resolution images of 25,000 works freely available on NGA Images, a site that describes itself as “designed to facilitate learning, enrichment, enjoyment, and exploration.” You can browse the images by collectionFrench galleries, self-portraits, music — view the most recent additions, or pull up the works of art most frequently requested by others. Leonardo’s portrait of the Florentine aristocrat Ginevra de’ Benci, seen up top, has proven particularly popular, as has Claude Monet’s The Japanese Footbridge just above. But does all this bear out Benjamin’s concerns about mechanical reproduction cheapening the original aura of a work? “I don’t think anyone thinks we’ve cheapened the image of the ‘Mona Lisa,’” an NGA spokeswoman said to Siegal. “People have gotten past that, and they still want to go to the Louvre to see the real thing. It’s a new, 21st-century way of respecting images.”

Related Content:

Google Launches a New “Art Talks” Series: Tune in Tonight

Download Hundreds of Free Art Catalogs from The Metropolitan Museum of Art

Free: The Guggenheim Puts 65 Modern Art Books Online

Colin Marshall hosts and produces Notebook on Cities and Culture and writes essays on literature, film, cities, Asia, and aesthetics. He’s at work on a book about Los AngelesA Los Angeles Primer. Follow him on Twitter at @colinmarshall.



Make knowledge free & open. Share our posts with friends on Facebook, Twitter and other social media platforms:

by | Permalink | Comments (4) |

Choose a comment platform

Comments (4)
You can skip to the end and leave a response. Pinging is currently not allowed.
  1. Felicia Hannah Fish says . . . | June 11, 2013 / 8:28 pm

    The high-quality images give me a responsibility to be a better artist.

  2. R. Hartzell says . . . | June 12, 2013 / 9:09 am

    I was impressed by this story and the apparent museum movement to make “very good high-resolution” images available to everyone.

    However, after visiting the National Gallery image site I have to say I’m a little disappointed by the available resolution. I downloaded 3 images and found that the maximum resolution in any one direction is 1200. So I found a Henri Fantin-Latour self-portrait with a resolution of 1000 x 1200, a Vincent Van Gogh self-portrait with a resolution of 921 x 1200, and an uncredited American primitive seascape of a schooner with a resolution of 1200 x 831.

    These are fine for displaying on a PC screen or printing out on 5 x 7 ink-jet photo paper but would look pretty dreadful if you opted to try printing them out much larger — say, in poster size or actual size.

    So: better than nothing but, as a giveaway, not exactly impressive.

  3. Peter says . . . | June 12, 2013 / 9:47 am

    R. Hartzell – there are two download options. You can download images up to 3,000 pixels using the high resolution download option (arrow with two bars underneath). These are not “super” high resolution as the article states but suitable for many uses, including publication. If you need a poster sized image you can order a higher resolution file for a nominal fee to cover processing.

  4. Samuel Francazio says . . . | June 22, 2013 / 5:59 pm

    Thanks

Add a comment

Loading Facebook Comments ...
Quantcast