To our way of thinkÂing, the quesÂtion is not whether MarÂcel Duchamp conÂceived of FounÂtain, history’s most famous uriÂnal, as art or prank.
Nor is it the ongoÂing conÂtroÂverÂsy as to whether the piece should be attribÂuted to Duchamp or his friend, avant-garde poet and artist Baroness Elsa von FreyÂtag-LorÂingÂhoven.
The quesÂtion is why more civilÂians don’t head for the men’s room armed with black paint pens (or alterÂnaÂtiveÂly, die-cut stickÂers) to enhance every uriÂnal they encounter with the sigÂnaÂture of the non-exisÂtent “R. Mutt.”
The art world bias that was being testÂed in 1917, when the signed uriÂnal was unsucÂcessÂfulÂly subÂmitÂted to an unjuried exhiÂbiÂtion at the SociÂety of IndeÂpenÂdent Artists, has not vanÂished entireÂly, but as curaÂtor Sarah Urist Green explains in the above episode of The Art AssignÂment, the past hunÂdred years has witÂnessed a lot of conÂcepÂtuÂal art affordÂed space in even the most staid instiÂtuÂtions.
FounÂtain was a preÂmedÂiÂtatÂed piece, but someÂtimes, these artÂworks, or pranks, if you preÂfer — Green favors letÂting each viewÂer reach their own conÂcluÂsions — are more sponÂtaÂneous in nature.
She refÂerÂences the case of two teenaged boys who, underÂwhelmed by a Mike KelÂley stuffed aniÂmal instalÂlaÂtion at the San FranÂcisÂco MuseÂum of ModÂern Art, posiÂtioned a pair of eyeÂglassÂes in such a way that othÂer visÂiÂtors assumed they, too, were part of an exhibÂit.
One of the boys told The New York Times that “when art is more abstract, it is more difÂfiÂcult to interÂpret,” causÂing him to lose interÂest.
“We had a good laugh about it,” the othÂer added.
And that, for us, gets to the heart of FounÂtain’s endurÂing powÂer.
PlenÂty of art world stunts, whether their intenÂtion was to shock, criÂtique, or screw with the gateÂkeepÂers have been lost to the ages.
FounÂtain, at heart, is a parÂticÂuÂlarÂly memÂoÂrable kind of funÂny…
FunÂny in the same way poet RusÂsell Edson’s “With SinÂcerÂest Regrets” is funÂny:
WITH SINCEREST REGRETS
for Charles SimÂic
Like a white snail the toiÂlet slides into the livÂing room, demandÂing to be loved. It is imposÂsiÂble, and we tenÂder our sinÂcerÂest regrets.In the book of the heart there is no menÂtion made of plumbÂing.
And though we have spent our intiÂmaÂcy many times with you, you belong to a rather unforÂtuÂnate refÂerÂence, which we would rather not embrace…
The toiÂlet slides out of the livÂing room like a white snail, flushÂing with grief…
More recent art world conÂtroÂverÂsies — Chris Ofili’s “The Holy VirÂgin Mary” and Andres Serrano’s Piss Christ — arose from the juxÂtaÂpoÂsiÂtion of seriÂous reliÂgious subÂject matÂter with bodÂiÂly fluÂids.
By conÂtrast, FounÂtain took the piss out of a secÂuÂlar high church — the estabÂlished art world.
And it did so with a facÂtoÂry-fresh uriÂnal, no more gross than a porceÂlain dinÂner plate.
No wonÂder peoÂple couldÂn’t stop talkÂing about it!
We still are.
Green recounts how perÂforÂmance artists Cai Yuan and Jian Jun Xi attemptÂed to “celÂeÂbrate the spirÂit of modÂern art” by uriÂnatÂing on the Tate Modern’s FounÂtain repliÂca in 2000.
That perÂforÂmance, titled “Two artists piss on DuchamÂp’s UriÂnal” was “intendÂed to make peoÂple re-evalÂuÂate what conÂstiÂtutÂed art itself and how an act could be art.”
Their action might have made a more eleÂgant — and funÂnier — stateÂment had the FounÂtain repliÂca not been disÂplayed inside a vitÂrine.
Still, drawÂing attenÂtion to their inabilÂiÂty to hit the tarÂget might, as Green sugÂgests, highÂlight how museÂum culÂture “fetishizes and proÂtects the objects” it, or hisÂtoÂry, deems worÂthy.
RelatÂed ConÂtent:
When BriÂan Eno & OthÂer Artists Peed in MarÂcel Duchamp’s Famous UriÂnal
Ayun HalÂlÂiÂday is an author, illusÂtraÂtor, theÂater makÂer and Chief PriÂmaÂtolÂoÂgist of the East VilÂlage Inky zine. FolÂlow her @AyunHalliday.